Sukamal Saha

Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) accurately identifies nodal metastasis of early breast cancer, but it is not clear whether further nodal dissection affects survival. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on survival of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis of breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial, a phase 3 noninferiority trial conducted at 115 sites and enrolling patients from May 1999 to December 2004. Patients were women with clinical T1-T2 invasive breast cancer, no palpable adenopathy, and 1 to 2 SLNs containing metastases identified by frozen section, touch preparation, or hematoxylin-eosin staining on permanent section. Targeted enrollment was 1900 women with final analysis after 500 deaths, but the trial closed early because mortality rate was lower than expected. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent lumpectomy and tangential whole-breast irradiation. Those with SLN metastases identified by SLND were randomized to undergo ALND or no further axillary treatment. Those randomized to ALND underwent dissection of 10 or more nodes. Systemic therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall survival was the primary end point, with a noninferiority margin of a 1-sided hazard ratio of less than 1.3 indicating that SLND alone is noninferior to ALND. Disease-free survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS Clinical and tumor characteristics were similar between 445 patients randomized to ALND and 446 randomized to SLND alone. However, the median number of nodes removed was 17 with ALND and 2 with SLND alone. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years (last follow-up, March 4, 2010), 5-year overall survival was 91.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1%-94.5%) with ALND and 92.5% (95% CI, 90.0%-95.1%) with SLND alone; 5-year disease-free survival was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.3%-86.3%) with ALND and 83.9% (95% CI, 80.2%-87.9%) with SLND alone. The hazard ratio for treatment-related overall survival was 0.79 (90% CI, 0.56-1.11) without adjustment and 0.87 (90% CI, 0.62-1.23) after adjusting for age and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION Among patients with limited SLN metastatic breast cancer treated with breast conservation and systemic therapy, the use of SLND alone compared with ALND did not result in inferior survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003855.

Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial.

Background and Objective:Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has eliminated the need for axillary dissection (ALND) in patients whose sentinel node (SN) is tumor-free. However, completion ALND for patients with tumor-involved SNs remains the standard to achieve locoregional control. Few studies have examined the outcome of patients who do not undergo ALND for positive SNs. We now report local and regional recurrence information from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial. Methods:American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 was a prospective trial examining survival of patients with SN metastases detected by standard H and E, who were randomized to undergo ALND after SLND versus SLND alone without specific axillary treatment. Locoregional recurrence was evaluated. Results:There were 446 patients randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND + ALND. Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, estrogen receptor status, use of adjuvant systemic therapy, tumor type, T stage, and tumor size. Patients randomized to SLND + ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared with a median of only 2 SN removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.11) or regional recurrence (P = 0.45) between the 2 groups. Conclusions:Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND can offer excellent regional control and may be reasonable management for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.

Molecular Staging of Early Colon Cancer on the Basis of Sentinel Node Analysis: A Multicenter Phase II Trial

PURPOSE Approximately 30% of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I or II colorectal cancer (CRC) develop systemic disease. We hypothesized that multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) draining a primary CRC could detect micrometastases not detected by conventional histopathologic analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multi-institutional study, 40 patients with primary CRC underwent dye-directed lymphatic mapping at the time of colon resection. Each dye-stained SN was tagged, and the tumor and regional nodes were resected en bloc. All lymph nodes were examined by conventional hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. In addition, each SN was cut into multiple sections for cytokeratin immunohistochemical (CK-IHC) staining and for RT-PCR and electrochemiluminescent detection of three markers: beta-chain human chorionic gonadotropin, hepatocyte growth factor receptor, and universal melanoma-associated antigen. Whenever possible, RT-PCR assay was also performed on primary tumor tissue. The detection sensitivity of individual markers was 10(-3) to 10(-4) microg of RNA and one to five tumor cells in 10(7) lymphocytes of healthy donors. RESULTS One to three SNs were identified in each patient. An average of 15 nodes were removed from each CRC specimen. No nonsentinel (untagged) node contained evidence of tumor if all tagged (sentinel) nodes in the same specimen were histopathology tumor-negative. HE staining of SNs identified tumor in 10 patients (25%), and CK-IHC of SNs identified occult micrometastases in four patients (10%) whose SNs were negative by HE. Of the remaining 26 patients with no evidence of SN involvement by HE or CK-IHC, 12 (46%) had positive RT-PCR results. The number of markers expressed in each SN correlated (P <.04) with the T stage of the primary tumor. There was 79% concordance in marker expression for the respective pairs (n = 38) of primary tumor and histopathologically positive SNs, and 86% (12 of 14) concordance between RT-PCR positive and histopathologically positive SNs. CONCLUSION Identification and focused examination of the SN is a novel method of staging CRC. CK-IHC and RT-PCR identified occult micrometastases in 53% of patients whose SNs were negative by conventional staging techniques. These ultrasensitive assays of the SN can identify patients who may be at high risk for recurrence of CRC and therefore are more likely to benefit from systemic adjuvant therapy.

Prognostic impact of micrometastases in colon cancer: interim results of a prospective multicenter trial.

Objective:The 25% rate of recurrence after complete resection of stage II colon cancer (CC) suggests the presence of occult nodal metastases not identified by hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E). Interim data from our ongoing prospective multicenter trial of sentinel node (SN) biopsy indicate a 29.6% rate of micrometastases (MM) identified by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of H&E-negative SNs in CC. We hypothesized that these MM have prognostic importance. Methods:Between March 2001 and August 2006, 152 patients with resectable colorectal cancer were enrolled in the trial. IHC and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT) assay were performed on H&E-negative SNs. Results were correlated with disease-free survival. Results:The sensitivity of lymphatic mapping was significantly better in CC (75%) than rectal cancer (36%), P < 0.05. Of 92 node-negative CC patients 7 (8%) were upstaged to N1 and 18 (22%) had IHC MM. Four patients negative by H&E and IHC were positive by qRT. At a mean follow-up of 25 months, 15 patients had died from noncancer-related causes, 12 had developed recurrence, 5 had died of CC (2 with macrometastases, 3 with MM), and 7 were alive with disease. The 12 recurrences included 4 patients with SN macrometastases and 6 with SN MM (2 by IHC, 4 by qRT). One of the 2 SN-negative recurrences had other positive lymph nodes by H&E. All patients with CC recurrences had a positive SN by either H&E/IHC or qRT. No CC patient with a negative SN by H&E and qRT has recurred (P = 0.002). Conclusion:This is the first prospective evaluation of the prognostic impact of MM in colorectal cancer. These results indicate that the detection of MM may be clinically relevant in CC and may improve the selection of patients for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Patients with CC who are node negative by cumulative detection methods (H&E/IHC and qRT) are likely to be cured by surgery alone.

Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-term Follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial.

Background and Objective: The early results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated no difference in locoregional recurrence for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) randomized either to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone. We now report long-term locoregional recurrence results. Methods: ACOSOG Z0011 prospectively examined overall survival of patients with SLN metastases undergoing breast-conserving therapy randomized to undergo ALND after SLND or no further axillary specific treatment. Locoregional recurrence was prospectively evaluated and compared between the groups. Results: Four hundred forty-six patients were randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND and ALND. Both groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, Estrogen Receptor status, adjuvant systemic therapy, histology, and tumor size. Patients randomized to ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared with a median of only 2 SLNs removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND, as expected, also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 9.25 years, there was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (P = 0.13). The cumulative incidence of nodal recurrences at 10 years was 0.5% in the ALND arm and 1.5% in the SLND alone arm (P = 0.28). Ten-year cumulative locoregional recurrence was 6.2% with ALND and 5.3% with SLND alone (P = 0.36). Conclusion: Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND offers excellent regional control for selected patients with early metastatic breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.

Validation of lymphatic mapping in colorectal cancer: in vivo, ex vivo, and laparoscopic techniques.

Background:The use of lymphatic mapping (LM) is being investigated to improve the staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) and thereby identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. This study evaluated in vivo, laparoscopic, and ex vivo approaches for the ultrastaging of CRC.Methods:Seventy-five CRC patients were enrolled in a study of LM with peritumoral injection of isosulfan blue dye. LM was undertaken during open colon resection (OCR) in 64 patients, during laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) in 9 patients, and after specimen removal (ex vivo) in 2 patients. Ex vivo LM was also undertaken in 6 patients after unsuccessful in vivo LM. All nodes were examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining; in addition, sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) were multisectioned and examined by immunohistochemical staining with cytokeratin (CK-IHC).Results:At least one SN was identified in 72 patients (96%). In vivo LM identified SNs in 56 of 64 (88%) patients undergoing OCR and in 9 of 9 (100%) patients undergoing LCR. Ex vivo LM was undertaken as the initial mapping procedure in 2 cases of intraperitoneal colon cancer and after in vivo LM had failed in 6 cases of extraperitoneal rectal carcinoma; an SN was identified in 7 of the 8 cases. Focused examination of the SN correctly predicted nodal status in 53 of 56 OCR cases, 9 of 9 LCR cases, and 6 of 7 ex vivo cases. Multiple sections and CK-IHC identified occult micrometastases in 13 patients (17%), representing 10 OCR, 1 LCR, and 2 ex vivo cases.Conclusions:LM of drainage from a primary CRC can be accurately performed in vivo during OCR or LCR. Ex vivo LM can be applied when in vivo techniques are unsuccessful and may be useful for rectal tumors. During LCR, colonoscopic injection can be used to mark the primary tumor and define the lymphatic drainage so that adequate resection margins are obtained. These LM techniques improve staging accuracy in CRC.

Impact of Immediate Versus Delayed Axillary Node Dissection on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Sentinel Nodes: Results From American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trials Z0010 and Z0011

PURPOSE Patients with breast cancer metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) generally undergo completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND), either concurrently with SLN biopsy or at a second procedure. The impact of the timing of cALND on pathologic results and complications in these patients has not been examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS We examined outcomes from SLN-positive patients in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) trials Z0010 and Z0011. Pathologic data examined included primary tumor characteristics, total number of SLNs recovered, positive SLN(s) and non-SLN(s) identified. Complications assessed included axillary seroma, paresthesia, arm morbidity and range of motion, and lymphedema. RESULTS A total of 1,003 assessable patients with SLN metastasis had immediate (n = 425) or delayed (n = 578) cALND. The median number of SLNs and axillary LNs removed were the same between groups. Patients who had immediate cALND more often had larger tumors, SLN metastasis identified intraoperatively, two or more positive SLNs, and higher pathologic N stage. Axillary paresthesia, seroma, and impaired extremity range of motion were more common in the immediate group during the early postoperative period, but not at later time points. There was no difference in lymphedema at any time point. CONCLUSION In ACOSOG trials Z0010 and Z0011, LN recovery and long-term complications were similar after either delayed or immediate cALND for patients with metastasis to SLNs. Patients who undergo immediate cALND experience more short-term morbidity. With respect to staging and complications, there is no clear detriment for patients with a positive SLN who undergo a second procedure for cALND.

Prognostic Relevance of Occult Nodal Micrometastases and Circulating Tumor Cells in Colorectal Cancer in a Prospective Multicenter Trial

Purpose: Nodal micrometastasis and circulating tumor cells detected by multimarker quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) may have prognostic importance in patients with colorectal cancer. Experimental Design: Paraffin-embedded sentinel lymph nodes from 67 patients and blood from 34 of these patients were evaluated in a prospective multicenter trial of sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer. Sentinel lymph nodes were examined by H&E staining and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Sentinel lymph nodes and blood were examined by a four-marker qRT-PCR assay (c-MET, melanoma antigen gene-A3 family, β1→4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase, and cytokeratin-20); qRT-PCR results were correlated with disease stage and outcome. Results: In H&E-negative sentinel lymph node patients that recurred, cytokeratin immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR detected metastasis in 30% and 60% of patients, respectively. Disease-free survival differed significantly by multimarker qRT-PCR upstaged sentinel lymph node (P = 0.014). qRT-PCR analysis of blood for circulating tumor cells correlated with overall survival (P = 0.040). Conclusion: Molecular assessment for micrometastasis in sentinel lymph node and blood specimens may help identify patients at high risk for recurrent colorectal cancer, who could benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Novel Intraoperative Molecular Test for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE An accurate, intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) test could decrease delayed axillary dissections. Molecular tests may be more sensitive than current intraoperative tests but historically have not been rapid enough and have not been properly validated. We present the results from a large, prospective evaluation of the first rapid molecular SLN test, the Breast Lymph Node (BLN) Assay. METHODS A beta trial (n = 304) to determine the threshold levels of mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19 correlating with metastasis greater than 0.2 mm and a validation trial (n = 416) to validate the threshold cutoffs were conducted. Alternating portions from each SLN were processed for histology and the BLN Assay. RESULTS BLN Assay performance against extensive permanent-section histology verified by central pathology review was similar to that expected of standard permanent-section histology: sensitivity, 87.6%; specificity, 94.2%; positive predictive value, 86.2%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 94.9%. In 319 patients with both frozen-section hematoxylin and eosin results and BLN Assay results, the BLN Assay had higher sensitivity (95.6%) and NPV (98.2%) than frozen section (sensitivity, 85.6%; NPV, 94.5%). The assay can be performed in approximately 36 to 46 minutes for one to three nodes. CONCLUSION The BLN Assay allows a rapid evaluation of 50% of each SLN. Comparison with permanent-section histology on adjacent node pieces evaluated by expert pathologists indicated that the BLN Assay was more sensitive than current intraoperative techniques while maintaining high specificity. These data indicate that the assay may be clinically useful for intraoperative or postoperative axillary lymph node dissection decisions.

Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND The identification of lymph node metastases in colorectal resection specimens is necessary for accurate tumor staging. However, routine lymph node dissection by the pathologist yields only a subset of nodes removed surgically and may not include those nodes most directly in the path of lymphatic drainage from the tumor. Intraoperative mapping of such sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been reported in cases of melanoma and breast cancer. We applied a similar method to cases of colorectal carcinoma, with emphasis on the pathology of the SLNs. METHODS Eighty-three consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma were evaluated after intraoperative injection of 1 to 2 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye (Lymphazurin) into the peritumoral subserosa. Blue-stained lymph nodes were suture-tagged by the surgeon within minutes of the injection for identification by the pathologist, and a standard resection was performed. Designated SLNs were sectioned at 10 levels through the block; a cytokeratin immunostain (AE1) was also obtained. To evaluate the possibility that increased detection of metastases in the SLN might be solely due to increased histologic sampling, all initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 cases were sectioned also at 10 levels. RESULTS Sentinel lymph nodes were identified intraoperatively in 82 (99%) of 83 patients and accounted for 152 (11.9%) of 1275 lymph nodes recovered, with an average of 1.9 SLNs per patient. A total of 99 positive lymph nodes (38 positive SLNs and 61 positive non-SLNs) were identified in 34 node-positive patients. The SLNs were the only site of metastasis in 17 patients (50%), while 14 patients (41%) had both positive SLNs and non-SLNs. Three patients (9%) had positive non-SLNs with negative SLNs, representing skip metastases. In patients with positive SLNs, 91 (19%) of 474 total lymph nodes and 53 (12%) of 436 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. In patients with negative SLNs, 8 (1%) of 801 total lymph nodes and 8 (1.2%) of 687 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. Multilevel sections of 330 initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 patients yielded only 2 additional positive nodes (0. 6%). All patients with positive SLNs were correctly staged by a combination of 4 representative levels through the SLN(s) together with a single cytokeratin immunostain. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative mapping of SLNs in colorectal carcinoma identifies lymph nodes likely to contain metastases. Focused pathologic evaluation of the 1 to 4 SLNs so identified can improve the accuracy of pathologic staging.