Sylvia G. Simpson

Initial genome scan of the nimh genetics initiative bipolar pedigrees: Chromosomes 1, 6, 8, 10, and 12

A report on an initial genome screen on 540 individuals in 97 families was collected as part of the NIMH Genetics Initiative on Bipolar Disorder. Families were ascertained to be informative for genetic linkage and underwent a common ascertainment and assessment protocol at four clinical sites. The sample was genotyped for 65 highly polymorphic markers from chromosomes 1, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The average intermarker interval was 16 cM. Genotypic data was analyzed using affected sib pair, multipoint affected sib pair, and pedigree analysis methods. Multipoint methods gave lod scores of approximately two on chromosomes 1, 6, and 10. The peak lod score on chromosome 6 occurred at the end of the q-arm, at some distance from the 6p24-22 area previously implicated for schizophrenia. We are currently genotyping additional markers to reduce the intermarker interval around the signals. The interpretation of results from a genome screen of a complex disorder and the problem of achieving a balance between detecting false positive results and the ability to detect genes of modest effect are discussed.

Genome-wide scan of bipolar disorder in 65 pedigrees: Supportive evidence for linkage at 8q24, 18q22, 4q32, 2p12, and 13q12

The purpose of this study was to assess 65 pedigrees ascertained through a Bipolar I (BPI) proband for evidence of linkage, using nonparametric methods in a genome-wide scan and for possible parent of origin effect using several analytical methods. We identified 15 loci with nominally significant evidence for increased allele sharing among affected relative pairs. Eight of these regions, at 8q24, 18q22, 4q32, 13q12, 4q35, 10q26, 2p12, and 12q24, directly overlap with previously reported evidence of linkage to bipolar disorder. Five regions at 20p13, 2p22, 14q23, 9p13, and 1q41 are within several Mb of previously reported regions. We report our findings in rank order and the top five markers had an NPL>2.5. The peak finding in these regions were D8S256 at 8q24, NPL 3.13; D18S878 at 18q22, NPL 2.90; D4S1629 at 4q32, NPL 2.80; D2S99 at 2p12, NPL 2.54; and D13S1493 at 13q12, NPL 2.53. No locus produced statistically significant evidence for linkage at the genome-wide level. The parent of origin effect was studied and consistent with our previous findings, evidence for a locus on 18q22 was predominantly from families wherein the father or paternal lineage was affected. There was evidence consistent with paternal imprinting at the loci on 13q12 and 1q41.

Genomic Survey of Bipolar Illness in the NIMH Genetics Initiative Pedigrees: A Preliminary Report

NIMH Genetics Initiative Bipolar Group: John I. Nurnberger, Jr.* (Chair), J. Raymond DePaulo,Elliot S. Gershon, Theodore Reich, Mary C. Blehar, and collaborators from Indiana University(Howard J. Edenberg, Tatiana Foroud, Marvin Miller, Elizabeth Bowman, Aimee Mayeda, N. LeelaRau, Carrie Smiley, and P. Michael Conneally), Johns Hopkins University (Francis Mc-Mahon, Deborah Meyers, Sylvia Simpson, Melvin McInnis, and O. Colin Stine), NIMH IntramuralResearch Program (Sevilla Detera-Wadleigh, Lynn Goldin, Juliet Guroff, Elizabeth Max-well, Diane Kazuba, Pablo V. Gejman, Judith Badner, and Alan Sanders), and WashingtonUniversity of St. Louis (John Rice, Laura Bierut, and Alison Goate).Four sites collaborated with the NIMH todevelop a resource for the genetic study ofbipolar (BP) illness. Common methods of as-certainment and assessment were devel-oped in 1989. A series of families with a bi-polar I (BPI) proband and at least one BPIor schizoaffective, bipolar type (SA/BP)first-degree relative has been studied. Wenow report initial data from a genomic sur-vey with an average intermarker interval of10 cM on 540 subjects from 97 families. Thisis the largest commonly ascertained and as-sessed linkage sample for bipolar illness re-ported to date; it includes 232 subjects withBPI, 32 SA/BP, 72 bipolar II (BPII), and 88unipolar, recurrent (UPR). Nonparametricmethods of analysis were employed, with allsites using affected sib pair analysis. Thestrongest findings thus far appear to be onchromosomes 1, 6, 7, 10, 16, and 22. Supporthas also been found for some previously re-ported linkages, including 21q and possiblyXq26. All these areas (as well as others) willbe followed up with additional markers andfurther analyses. No locus tested thus farmeets stringent criteria for an initial find-ing of significant linkage. Am. J. Med. Genet.74:227–237, 1997.

Family-based association of FKBP5 in bipolar disorder.

The FKBP5 gene product forms part of a complex with the glucocorticoid receptor and can modulate cortisol-binding affinity. Variations in the gene have been associated with increased recurrence of depression and with rapid response to antidepressant treatment. We sought to determine whether common FKBP5 variants confer risk for bipolar disorder. We genotyped seven tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FKBP5, plus two SNPs previously associated with illness, in 317 families with 554 bipolar offspring, derived primarily from two studies. Single marker and haplotypic analyses were carried out with FBAT and EATDT employing the standard bipolar phenotype. Association analyses were also conducted using 11 disease-related variables as covariates. Under an additive genetic model, rs4713902 showed significant overtransmission of the major allele (P=0.0001), which was consistent across the two sample sets (P=0.004 and 0.006). rs7757037 showed evidence of association that was strongest under the dominant model (P=0.001). This result was consistent across the two datasets (P=0.017 and 0.019). The dominant model yielded modest evidence for association (P<0.05) for three additional markers. Covariate-based analyses suggested that genetic variation within FKBP5 may influence attempted suicide and number of depressive episodes in bipolar subjects. Our results are consistent with the well-established relationship between the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which mediates the stress response through regulation of cortisol, and mood disorders. Ongoing whole-genome association studies in bipolar disorder and major depression should further clarify the role of FKBP5 and other HPA genes in these illnesses.

Initial genome screen for bipolar disorder in the NIMH genetics initiative pedigrees: Chromosomes 2, 11, 13, 14, and X

We report on an initial genome screen of 540 individuals from 97 families collected as part of the NIMH Genetics Initiative Bipolar Group. Among the individuals studied, 232 were diagnosed with bipolar (BP) I, 72 with BPII, 88 with major depressive disorder-recurrent type (UPR), and 32 with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (SA/BP). A total of 53 markers on chromosomes 2, 11, 13, 14, and X (average spacing: 11.5 cM) were studied at Johns Hopkins University. Tests for linkage were performed using nonparametric affected sib-pair and whole pedigree methods with three definitions of affected status. Three regions of interest were identified (13q14-32, Xp22, and Xq26-28). On chromosomes 2, 11, and 14, a disease locus with relative risk lambda(i) = 1.5 could be excluded in <10% of the genetic distance studied, while a locus conferring lambda(i) = 3 or greater could be excluded across at least 96%. The autosomal region that could not be excluded even with lambda(i) = 5 was near 13q14-32. In this region, two-point affected sib-pair analyses revealed a pair of consecutive loci with excess sharing (P < 0.05) and a multipoint affected sib-pair LOD score of 1.12. On the X chromosome, nonparametric multipoint affected sib-pair analyses revealed peak total LOD scores of 0.94 on Xp22 and 1.34 on Xq26-28. A locus linked to the markers in Xp22 would have lambda(i) = 3.6 in affected brother-brother pairs, while a locus linked to the markers in Xq26-28 would have lambda(i) > 1.9 in affected sister-sister pairs. The results on 13q14-32, Xp22, and Xq26-28 suggest areas of interest for further studies.

Linkage of bipolar affective disorder to chromosome 18 markers in a new pedigree series.

Several groups have reported evidence suggesting linkage of bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) to chromosome 18. We have reported data from 28 pedigrees that showed linkage to marker loci on 18p and to loci 40 cM distant on 18q. Most of the linkage evidence derived from families with affected phenotypes in only the paternal lineage and from marker alleles transmitted on the paternal chromosome. We now report results from a series of 30 new pedigrees (259 individuals) genotyped for 13 polymorphic markers spanning chromosome 18. Subjects were interviewed by a psychiatrist and were diagnosed by highly reliable methods. Genotypes were generated with automated technology and were scored blind to phenotype. Affected sib pairs showed excess allele sharing at the 18q markers D18S541 and D18S38. A parent-of-origin effect was observed, but it was not consistently paternal. No robust evidence of linkage was detected for markers elsewhere on chromosome 18. Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis in the new sample combined with the original sample of families supports linkage on chromosome 18q, but the susceptibility gene is not well localized.

Genome-wide scan and conditional analysis in bipolar disorder: Evidence for genomic interaction in the National Institute of Mental Health genetics initiative bipolar pedigrees

BACKGROUND In 1989 the National Institute of Mental Health began a collaborative effort to identify genes for bipolar disorder. The first 97 pedigrees showed evidence of linkage to chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 10, 16, and 22 (Nurnberger et al 1997). An additional 56 bipolar families have been genotyped, and the combined sample of 153 pedigrees studied. METHODS Three hierarchical affection status models were analyzed with 513 simple sequence repeat markers; 298 were common across all pedigrees. The primary analysis was a nonparametric genome-wide scan. We performed conditional analyses based on epistasis or heterogeneity for five regions. RESULTS One region, on 16p13, was significant at the genome-wide p <.05 level. Four additional chromosomal regions (20p12, 11p15, 6q24, and 10p12) showed nominally significant linkage findings (p </=.01). Conditional analysis assuming epistasis identified a significant increase in linkage at four regions. Families linked to 6q24 showed a significant increase in nonparametric logarithms of the odds (NPL) scores at 5q11 and 7q21. Epistasis also was observed between 20p12 and 13q21, and 16p13 and 9q21. CONCLUSIONS The findings are presented in rank order of nominal significance. Several of these regions have been previously implicated in independent studies of either bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. The strongest finding is at 16p13 at D16S748 with an NPL of 3.3, there is evidence of epistasis between this locus and 9q21. Application of conditional analyses is potentially useful in larger sample collections to identify susceptibility genes of modest influence that may not be identified in a genome-wide scan aimed to identify single gene effects.

Suggestive evidence of a locus on chromosome 10p using the NIMH genetics initiative bipolar affective disorder pedigrees

As part of a four-center NIMH Genetics Initiative on Bipolar Disorder, a genome screen using 365 markers was performed on 540 DNAs from 97 families, enriched for affected relative pairs. This is the largest uniformly ascertained and assessed linkage sample for this disease, and includes 232 subjects diagnosed with bipolar I (BPI), 32 with schizo-affective, bipolar type (SABP), 72 with bipolar II (BPII), and 88 with unipolar recurrent depression (UPR). A hierarchical set of definitions of affected status was examined. Under Model I, affected individuals were those with a diagnosis of BPI or SABP, Model II included as affected those fitting Model I plus BPII, and Model III included those fitting Model II plus UPR. This data set was previously analyzed using primarily affected sib pair methods. We report the results of nonparametric linkage analyses of the extended pedigree structure using the program Genehunter Plus. The strongest finding was a lod score of 2.5 obtained on chromosome 10 near the marker D10S1423 with diagnosis as defined under Model II. This region has been previously implicated in genome-wide studies of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Other chromosomal regions with lod scores over 1.50 for at least one Model Included chromosomes 8 (Model III), 16 (Model III), and 20 (Model I). Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 96:18-23, 2000

Full-Genome Scan for Linkage in 50 Families Segregating the Bipolar Affective Disease Phenotype

A genome scan of approximately 12-cM initial resolution was done on 50 of a set of 51 carefully ascertained unilineal multiplex families segregating the bipolar affective disorder phenotype. In addition to standard multipoint linkage analysis methods, a simultaneous-search algorithm was applied in an attempt to surmount the problem of genetic heterogeneity. The results revealed no linkage across the genome. The results exclude monogenic models and make it unlikely that two genes account for the disease in this sample. These results support the conclusion that at least several hundred kindreds will be required in order to establish linkage of susceptibility loci to bipolar disorder in heterogeneous populations.

Familial Aggregation of Psychotic Symptoms in a Replication Set of 69 Bipolar Disorder Pedigrees

We found evidence previously of familial aggregation of psychotic symptoms in 65 bipolar disorder pedigrees. This finding, together with prior evidence from clinical, family, neurobiological, and linkage studies, suggested that psychotic bipolar disorder may delineate a valid subtype. We sought to replicate this finding in 69 new bipolar disorder pedigrees. The presence of psychotic symptoms, defined as hallucinations or delusions, during an affective episode was compared in families of 46 psychotic and 23 non‐psychotic bipolar I probands ascertained at Johns Hopkins for the NIMH Bipolar Disorder Genetics Initiative. There were 198 first‐degree relatives with major affective disorder including 90 with bipolar I disorder. Significantly more psychotic proband families than non‐psychotic proband families (76% vs. 48%) contained at least one affected relative with psychotic symptoms. Psychotic symptoms occurred in 35% of relatives of psychotic probands and in 22% of relatives of non‐psychotic probands (P = 0.10). Both psychotic affective disorder generally and psychotic bipolar I disorder clustered significantly in families. These results are consistent with our prior report although the magnitude of the predictive effect of a psychotic proband is less in the replication families. Our findings provide modest support for the validity of psychotic bipolar disorder as a subtype of bipolar disorder. This clinically defined subtype may prove more homogeneous than the disorder as a whole at the level of genetic etiology and of neuropathology/pathophysiology. Families with this subtype should be used to search for susceptibility genes common to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and for biological markers that may be shared with schizophrenia.