T. D. Creighton
University of Texas at Brownsville
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. D. Creighton.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2008
K. Wette; B. J. Owen; B. Allen; M. Ashley; J. Betzwieser; N. Christensen; T. D. Creighton; V. Dergachev; I. Gholami; E. Goetz; R. Gustafson; D. Hammer; D. I. Jones; Badri Krishnan; M. Landry; B. Machenschalk; D. E. McClelland; G. Mendell; C. Messenger; M. A. Papa; P. Patel; M. Pitkin; H. J. Pletsch; R. Prix; K. Riles; L. Sancho De La Jordana; S. M. Scott; A. M. Sintes; M. Trias; James Whelan
We describe a search underway for periodic gravitational waves from the central compact object in the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A. The object is the youngest likely neutron star in the Galaxy. Its position is well known, but the object does not pulse in any electromagnetic radiation band and thus presents a challenge in searching the parameter space of frequency and frequency derivatives. We estimate that a fully coherent search can, with a reasonable amount of time on a computing cluster, achieve a sensitivity at which it is theoretically possible (though not likely) to observe a signal even with the initial LIGO noise spectrum. Cassiopeia A is only the second object after the Crab pulsar for which this is true. The search method described here can also obtain interesting results for similar objects with current LIGO sensitivity.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2008
T. D. Creighton
The relative positions of the test masses in gravitational-wave detectors will be influenced not only by astrophysical gravitational waves, but also by the fluctuating Newtonian gravitational forces of moving masses in the ground and air around the detector. These effects are often referred to as gravity gradient noise. This paper considers the effects of gravity gradients from density perturbations in the atmosphere, and from massive airborne objects near the detector. These have been discussed previously by Saulson (1984 Phys. Rev. D 30 732), who considered the effects of background acoustic pressure waves and of massive objects moving smoothly past the interferometer; the gravity gradients he predicted would be too small to be of serious concern even for advanced interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. In this paper, I revisit these phenomena, considering transient atmospheric shocks, and estimating the effects of sound waves or objects colliding with the ground or buildings around the test masses. I also consider another source of atmospheric density fluctuations: temperature perturbations that are advected past the detector by the wind. I find that background acoustic noise and temperature fluctuations still produce gravity gradient noise that is below the noise floor even of advanced interferometric detectors, although temperature perturbations carried along non-laminar streamlines could produce noise that is within an order of magnitude of the projected noise floor at 10 Hz. A definitive study of this effect may require better models of the wind flow past a given instrument. I also find that transient shockwaves in the atmosphere could potentially produce large spurious signals, with signal-to-noise ratios in the hundreds in an advanced interferometric detector. These signals could be vetoed by means of acoustic sensors outside of the buildings. Massive wind-borne objects such as tumbleweeds could also produce gravity gradient signals with signal-to-noise ratios in the hundreds if they collide with the interferometer buildings, so it may be necessary to build fences preventing such objects from approaching within about 30 m of the test masses.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Sourabh Nampalliwar; Richard H. Price; T. D. Creighton; Fredrick A. Jenet
Some Galactic models predict a significant population of radio pulsars close to the Galactic center. Beams from these pulsars could be strongly deflected by the supermassive black hole (SMBH) believed to reside at the Galactic center and as a result reach Earth. Earlier work assuming a Schwarzschild SMBH gave marginal chances of observing this exotic phenomenon with current telescopes and good chances with future telescopes. Here we study whether those estimates are significantly affected by SMBH spin. We find that spin effects make a negligible difference in detectability, but the pattern of pulse arrival times is clearly affected. In particular, if strongly deflected beams are detected, the SMBH spin signature could be extracted from pulsar beam times of arrival.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
Kevin Stovall; T. D. Creighton; Richard H. Price; Fredrick A. Jenet
According to some models, there may be a significant population of radio pulsars in the Galactic center. In principle, a beam from one of these pulsars could pass close to the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center, be deflected, and be detected by Earth telescopes. Such a configuration would be an unprecedented probe of the properties of spacetime in the moderate- to strong-field regime of the SMBH. We present here background on the problem, and approximations for the probability of detection of such beams. We conclude that detection is marginally possible with current telescopes, but that telescopes that will be operating in the near future, with an appropriate multiyear observational program, will have a reasonable chance of detecting a beam deflected by the SMBH.
Physical Review D | 2008
B. Abbott; R. Abbott; R. Adhikari; J. Agresti; Stuart B. Anderson; M. Araya; H. Armandula; S. Ballmer; B. Barish; B. Bhawal; G. Billingsley; E. Black; K. Blackburn; Rolf Bork; V. Boschi; D. A. Brown; D. Busby; L. Cardenas; C. Cepeda; S. Chatterji; D. C. Coyne; T. D. Creighton; Erika D'Ambrosio; R. DeSalvo; R. W P Drever; R. J. Dupuis; P. Ehrens; E. Espinoza; T. Etzel; M. Evans
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2010
V. Predoi; J. Clark; T. D. Creighton; E. J. Daw; S. Fairhurst; I. S. Heng; J. Kanner; T. Regimbau; P. Shawhan; X. Siemens; P. J. Sutton; A. Vecchio; D. J. White; G. Woan
The Astrophysical Journal | 2009
Yan Wang; F. A. Jenet; T. D. Creighton; Richard H. Price
The Astrophysical Journal | 2009
Yan Wang; T. D. Creighton; Richard H. Price; F. A. Jenet
Archive | 2015
Fredrick A. Jenet; T. D. Creighton; Richard H. Price
Archive | 2011
Joseph Lazio; Katie Chynoweth; Fredrick A. Jenet; T. D. Creighton; Namir E. Kassim