Terrence R. Barrette
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Terrence R. Barrette.
Nature | 2002
Sooryanarayana Varambally; Saravana M. Dhanasekaran; Ming Zhou; Terrence R. Barrette; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Martin G. Sanda; Debashis Ghosh; Kenneth J. Pienta; Richard George Antonius Bernardus Sewalt; Arie P. Otte; Mark A. Rubin; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in males and is second only to lung cancer. Although effective surgical and radiation treatments exist for clinically localized prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer remains essentially incurable. Here we show, through gene expression profiling, that the polycomb group protein enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is overexpressed in hormone-refractory, metastatic prostate cancer. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes targeted against EZH2 reduce the amounts of EZH2 protein present in prostate cells and also inhibit cell proliferation in vitro. Ectopic expression of EZH2 in prostate cells induces transcriptional repression of a specific cohort of genes. Gene silencing mediated by EZH2 requires the SET domain and is attenuated by inhibiting histone deacetylase activity. Amounts of both EZH2 messenger RNA and EZH2 protein are increased in metastatic prostate cancer; in addition, clinically localized prostate cancers that express higher concentrations of EZH2 show a poorer prognosis. Thus, dysregulated expression of EZH2 may be involved in the progression of prostate cancer, as well as being a marker that distinguishes indolent prostate cancer from those at risk of lethal progression.
Neoplasia | 2004
Daniel R. Rhodes; Jianjun Yu; K. Shanker; Nandan Deshpande; Radhika Varambally; Debashis Ghosh; Terrence R. Barrette; Akhilesh Pandey; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
DNA microarray technology has led to an explosion of oncogenomic analyses, generating a wealth of data and uncovering the complex gene expression patterns of cancer. Unfortunately, due to the lack of a unifying bioinformatic resource, the majority of these data sit stagnant and disjointed following publication, massively underutilized by the cancer research community. Here, we present ONCOMINE, a cancer microarray database and web-based data-mining platform aimed at facilitating discovery from genome-wide expression analyses. To date, ONCOMINE contains 65 gene expression datasets comprising nearly 48 million gene expression measurements form over 4700 microarray experiments. Differential expression analyses comparing most major types of cancer with respective normal tissues as well as a variety of cancer subtypes and clinical-based and pathology-based analyses are available for exploration. Data can be queried and visualized for a selected gene across all analyses or for multiple genes in a selected analysis. Furthermore, gene sets can be limited to clinically important annotations including secreted, kinase, membrane, and known gene-drug target pairs to facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Nature | 2009
Christopher A. Maher; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Bo Han; Xiaojun Jing; Lee Sam; Terrence R. Barrette; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Recurrent gene fusions, typically associated with haematological malignancies and rare bone and soft-tissue tumours, have recently been described in common solid tumours. Here we use an integrative analysis of high-throughput long- and short-read transcriptome sequencing of cancer cells to discover novel gene fusions. As a proof of concept, we successfully used integrative transcriptome sequencing to ‘re-discover’ the BCR–ABL1 (ref. 10) gene fusion in a chronic myelogenous leukaemia cell line and the TMPRSS2–ERG gene fusion in a prostate cancer cell line and tissues. Additionally, we nominated, and experimentally validated, novel gene fusions resulting in chimaeric transcripts in cancer cell lines and tumours. Taken together, this study establishes a robust pipeline for the discovery of novel gene chimaeras using high-throughput sequencing, opening up an important class of cancer-related mutations for comprehensive characterization.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Matthew K. Iyer; Yashar S. Niknafs; Rohit Malik; Udit Singhal; Anirban Sahu; Yasuyuki Hosono; Terrence R. Barrette; John R. Prensner; Joseph R. Evans; Shuang Zhao; Anton Poliakov; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M. Dhanasekaran; Yi Mi Wu; Dan R. Robinson; David G. Beer; Felix Y. Feng; Hariharan K. Iyer; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as important regulators of tissue physiology and disease processes including cancer. To delineate genome-wide lncRNA expression, we curated 7,256 RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) libraries from tumors, normal tissues and cell lines comprising over 43 Tb of sequence from 25 independent studies. We applied ab initio assembly methodology to this data set, yielding a consensus human transcriptome of 91,013 expressed genes. Over 68% (58,648) of genes were classified as lncRNAs, of which 79% were previously unannotated. About 1% (597) of the lncRNAs harbored ultraconserved elements, and 7% (3,900) overlapped disease-associated SNPs. To prioritize lineage-specific, disease-associated lncRNA expression, we employed non-parametric differential expression testing and nominated 7,942 lineage- or cancer-associated lncRNA genes. The lncRNA landscape characterized here may shed light on normal biology and cancer pathogenesis and may be valuable for future biomarker development.
Cancer Cell | 2010
Jindan Yu; Jianjun Yu; Ram Shankar Mani; Qi Cao; Chad Brenner; Xuhong Cao; Xiaoju Wang; Longtao Wu; James Li; Ming Hu; Yusong Gong; Hong Cheng; Bharathi Laxman; Adaikkalam Vellaichamy; Sunita Shankar; Yong Li; Saravana M. Dhanasekaran; Roger Morey; Terrence R. Barrette; Robert J. Lonigro; Scott A. Tomlins; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Zhaohui S. Qin; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Chromosomal rearrangements fusing the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 to the oncogenic ETS transcription factor ERG occur in approximately 50% of prostate cancers, but how the fusion products regulate prostate cancer remains unclear. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with massively parallel sequencing, we found that ERG disrupts androgen receptor (AR) signaling by inhibiting AR expression, binding to and inhibiting AR activity at gene-specific loci, and inducing repressive epigenetic programs via direct activation of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2, a Polycomb group protein. These findings provide a working model in which TMPRSS2-ERG plays a critical role in cancer progression by disrupting lineage-specific differentiation of the prostate and potentiating the EZH2-mediated dedifferentiation program.
Science Translational Medicine | 2011
Sameek Roychowdhury; Matthew K. Iyer; Dan R. Robinson; Robert J. Lonigro; Yi Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Lee Sam; O. Alejandro Balbin; Michael J. Quist; Terrence R. Barrette; Jessica Everett; Javed Siddiqui; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Nora M. Navone; John C. Araujo; Patricia Troncoso; Christopher J. Logothetis; Jeffrey W. Innis; David C. Smith; Christopher D. Lao; Scott Y. H. Kim; J. Scott Roberts; Stephen B. Gruber; Kenneth J. Pienta; Moshe Talpaz; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
The mutations present in advanced cancers can be identified by integrative high-throughput sequencing to enable biomarker-driven clinical trials and, ultimately, treatment. First Steps to Personalized Cancer Treatment In an optimistic vision of personalized medicine, each cancer patient is treated with drugs tailored for their particular tumor. This sounds appealing, but is it even possible? Roychowdhury and his colleagues tested this approach by extensively characterizing cancers in several patients and then convening a Sequencing Tumor Board of experts to determine the appropriate treatment. With a combination of whole genome and exome sequencing plus sequencing of transcribed RNA, the authors were able to find informative mutations within 3 to 4 weeks, a short enough time to be useful clinically. To verify that their sequencing strategy would work before testing it on actual patients, they assessed two xenografts established from patients with metastatic prostate cancer. They found that one of these carried the common prostate cancer–specific gene fusion of TMPRSS2 and ERG and another, previously undescribed, gene fusion. Also, the androgen receptor gene was amplified and two tumor suppressors were inactivated. The Board concluded that this pattern of mutations could in theory be treated by combined block of the PI3K and androgen receptor signaling pathways. The authors then turned to an actual patient, a 46 year old with colorectal cancer, who had been unsuccessfully treated. Characterization of his metastatic tumor showed mutations in the oncogene NRAS, the tumor suppressor TP53, aurora kinase A, a myosin heavy chain and the FAS death receptor, plus amplification of CDK8. Of these, the Sequencing Tumor Board concluded that the NRAS and CDK8 aberrations could potentially be matched to clinical trials, although none were available at the time. Similar analysis of another patient with metastatic melanoma revealed a structural rearrangement in CDKN2C and HRas. Although the HRAS mutation has not been described before in melanoma, the Sequencing Tumor Board suggested that combined treatment with PI3K and MEK inhibitors would be suitable for this patient. The good news resulting from these studies was that the patients’ tumors were analyzed with in 24 days for ~
Nature Biotechnology | 2005
Daniel R. Rhodes; Scott A. Tomlins; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Vasudeva Mahavisno; Terrence R. Barrette; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Debashis Ghosh; Akhilesh Pandey; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
3600, well within the cost of routine clinical tests. But aspects need improvement: Additional testing for epigenetic and small RNA variants will allow more informative characterization. Sequencing at higher depth or enrichment methods will be needed for tumors of lower purity. And perhaps most important, we need a broader array of clinical trials, as highlighted by the fact that none was available for these two patients. Individual cancers harbor a set of genetic aberrations that can be informative for identifying rational therapies currently available or in clinical trials. We implemented a pilot study to explore the practical challenges of applying high-throughput sequencing in clinical oncology. We enrolled patients with advanced or refractory cancer who were eligible for clinical trials. For each patient, we performed whole-genome sequencing of the tumor, targeted whole-exome sequencing of tumor and normal DNA, and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the tumor to identify potentially informative mutations in a clinically relevant time frame of 3 to 4 weeks. With this approach, we detected several classes of cancer mutations including structural rearrangements, copy number alterations, point mutations, and gene expression alterations. A multidisciplinary Sequencing Tumor Board (STB) deliberated on the clinical interpretation of the sequencing results obtained. We tested our sequencing strategy on human prostate cancer xenografts. Next, we enrolled two patients into the clinical protocol and were able to review the results at our STB within 24 days of biopsy. The first patient had metastatic colorectal cancer in which we identified somatic point mutations in NRAS, TP53, AURKA, FAS, and MYH11, plus amplification and overexpression of cyclin-dependent kinase 8 (CDK8). The second patient had malignant melanoma, in which we identified a somatic point mutation in HRAS and a structural rearrangement affecting CDKN2C. The STB identified the CDK8 amplification and Ras mutation as providing a rationale for clinical trials with CDK inhibitors or MEK (mitogen-activated or extracellular signal–regulated protein kinase kinase) and PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) inhibitors, respectively. Integrative high-throughput sequencing of patients with advanced cancer generates a comprehensive, individual mutational landscape to facilitate biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009
Christopher A. Maher; Nallasivam Palanisamy; John C. Brenner; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Shujun Luo; Irina Khrebtukova; Terrence R. Barrette; Catherine S. Grasso; Jindan Yu; Robert J. Lonigro; Gary P. Schroth; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
A catalog of all human protein-protein interactions would provide scientists with a framework to study protein deregulation in complex diseases such as cancer. Here we demonstrate that a probabilistic analysis integrating model organism interactome data, protein domain data, genome-wide gene expression data and functional annotation data predicts nearly 40,000 protein-protein interactions in humans—a result comparable to those obtained with experimental and computational approaches in model organisms. We validated the accuracy of the predictive model on an independent test set of known interactions and also experimentally confirmed two predicted interactions relevant to human cancer, implicating uncharacterized proteins into definitive pathways. We also applied the human interactome network to cancer genomics data and identified several interaction subnetworks activated in cancer. This integrative analysis provides a comprehensive framework for exploring the human protein interaction network.
Nature Genetics | 2005
Daniel R. Rhodes; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Vasudeva Mahavisno; Terrence R. Barrette; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Recurrent gene fusions are a prevalent class of mutations arising from the juxtaposition of 2 distinct regions, which can generate novel functional transcripts that could serve as valuable therapeutic targets in cancer. Therefore, we aim to establish a sensitive, high-throughput methodology to comprehensively catalog functional gene fusions in cancer by evaluating a paired-end transcriptome sequencing strategy. Not only did a paired-end approach provide a greater dynamic range in comparison with single read based approaches, but it clearly distinguished the high-level “driving” gene fusions, such as BCR-ABL1 and TMPRSS2-ERG, from potential lower level “passenger” gene fusions. Also, the comprehensiveness of a paired-end approach enabled the discovery of 12 previously undescribed gene fusions in 4 commonly used cell lines that eluded previous approaches. Using the paired-end transcriptome sequencing approach, we observed read-through mRNA chimeras, tissue-type restricted chimeras, converging transcripts, diverging transcripts, and overlapping mRNA transcripts. Last, we successfully used paired-end transcriptome sequencing to detect previously undescribed ETS gene fusions in prostate tumors. Together, this study establishes a highly specific and sensitive approach for accurately and comprehensively cataloguing chimeras within a sample using paired-end transcriptome sequencing.
Genome Research | 2011
Dorothee Pflueger; Stéphane Terry; Andrea Sboner; Lukas Habegger; Raquel Esgueva; Pei-Chun Lin; Maria A. Svensson; Naoki Kitabayashi; Benjamin Moss; Theresa Y. MacDonald; Xuhong Cao; Terrence R. Barrette; Ashutosh Tewari; Mark S. Chee; Arul M. Chinnaiyan; David S. Rickman; Francesca Demichelis; Mark Gerstein; Mark A. Rubin
DNA microarrays have been widely applied to cancer transcriptome analysis. The Oncomine database contains a large collection of such data, as well as hundreds of derived gene-expression signatures. We studied the regulatory mechanisms responsible for gene deregulation in these cancer signatures by searching for the coordinate regulation of genes with common transcription factor binding sites. We found that genes with binding sites for the archetypal cancer transcription factor, E2F, were disproportionately overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers, whereas genes with binding sites for other transcription factors, such as Myc-Max, c-Rel and ATF, were disproportionately overexpressed in specific cancer types. These results suggest that alterations in pathways activating these transcription factors may be responsible for the observed gene deregulation and cancer pathogenesis.