Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas C. Kaufman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas C. Kaufman.


Nature | 2011

The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster

Brenton R. Graveley; Angela N. Brooks; Joseph W. Carlson; Michael O. Duff; Jane M. Landolin; Li Min Yang; Carlo G. Artieri; Marijke J. van Baren; Nathan Boley; Benjamin W. Booth; James B. Brown; Lucy Cherbas; Carrie A. Davis; Alexander Dobin; Renhua Li; Wei Lin; John H. Malone; Nicolas R Mattiuzzo; David S. Miller; David Sturgill; Brian B. Tuch; Chris Zaleski; Dayu Zhang; Marco Blanchette; Sandrine Dudoit; Brian D. Eads; Richard E. Green; Ann S. Hammonds; Lichun Jiang; Phil Kapranov

Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most well studied genetic model organisms, nonetheless its genome still contains unannotated coding and non-coding genes, transcripts, exons, and RNA editing sites. Full discovery and annotation are prerequisites for understanding how the regulation of transcription, splicing, and RNA editing directs development of this complex organism. We used RNA-Seq, tiling microarrays, and cDNA sequencing to explore the transcriptome in 30 distinct developmental stages. We identified 111,195 new elements, including thousands of genes, coding and non-coding transcripts, exons, splicing and editing events and inferred protein isoforms that previously eluded discovery using established experimental, prediction and conservation-based approaches. Together, these data substantially expand the number of known transcribed elements in the Drosophila genome and provide a high-resolution view of transcriptome dynamics throughout development.


Nature | 2014

Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species.

Mark Gerstein; Joel Rozowsky; Koon Kiu Yan; Daifeng Wang; Chao Cheng; James B. Brown; Carrie A. Davis; LaDeana W. Hillier; Cristina Sisu; Jingyi Jessica Li; Baikang Pei; Arif Harmanci; Michael O. Duff; Sarah Djebali; Roger P. Alexander; Burak H. Alver; Raymond K. Auerbach; Kimberly Bell; Peter J. Bickel; Max E. Boeck; Nathan Boley; Benjamin W. Booth; Lucy Cherbas; Peter Cherbas; Chao Di; Alexander Dobin; Jorg Drenkow; Brent Ewing; Gang Fang; Megan Fastuca

The transcriptome is the readout of the genome. Identifying common features in it across distant species can reveal fundamental principles. To this end, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have generated large amounts of matched RNA-sequencing data for human, worm and fly. Uniform processing and comprehensive annotation of these data allow comparison across metazoan phyla, extending beyond earlier within-phylum transcriptome comparisons and revealing ancient, conserved features. Specifically, we discover co-expression modules shared across animals, many of which are enriched in developmental genes. Moreover, we use expression patterns to align the stages in worm and fly development and find a novel pairing between worm embryo and fly pupae, in addition to the embryo-to-embryo and larvae-to-larvae pairings. Furthermore, we find that the extent of non-canonical, non-coding transcription is similar in each organism, per base pair. Finally, we find in all three organisms that the gene-expression levels, both coding and non-coding, can be quantitatively predicted from chromatin features at the promoter using a ‘universal model’ based on a single set of organism-independent parameters.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2005

Research resources for Drosophila: the expanding universe

Kathleen A. Matthews; Thomas C. Kaufman; William M. Gelbart

Drosophila melanogaster has been the subject of research into central questions about biological mechanisms for almost a century. The experimental tools and resources that are available or under development for D. melanogaster and its related species, particularly those for genomic analysis, are truly outstanding. Here we review three types of resource that have been developed for D. melanogaster research: databases and other sources of information, biological materials and experimental services. These resources are there to be exploited and we hope that this guide will encourage new uses for D. melanogaster information, materials and services, both by those new to flies and by experienced D. melanogaster researchers.


Archive | 1984

Homoeotic Genes and the Specification of Segmental Identity in the Embryo and Adult Thorax of Drosophila Melanogaster

Thomas C. Kaufman; Michael K. Abbott

The homoeotic loci Sex-Combs Reduced (Scr), Antennapedia (Antp), and Ultrabithorax (Ubx), are required early in development to specify the thoracic segmental identities of the embryo. However, each locus also has a later function(s): to maintain specific aspects of thoracic segmental identity through metamorphosis. Antp + primarily specifies mesothoracic (T2) identity while the embryonic prothoracic (T1) and metathoracic (T3) identities are dependent, respectively, upon Scr + and Ubx + and interactions between these loci and Antp +. Since the loss of Scr + and/or Ubx + in combination with the loss of Antp + function results in a transformation of one or more of the thoracic segments to a T1-gnathal identity, Antp + function is at least partially epistatic to that of either Scr + or Ubx + during the establishment of thoracic segmental identities. Somewhat later in development, Scr + and Ubx + are required to maintain the identity of specific regions of either the pro- or metathorax, respectively. By contrast, Antp + functions to maintain the identities of certain regions in all three segments. Loss of this function allows portions of the ventral region of each thoracic segment to become antenna-like. In addition, a loss of identity of a region of the anterior, dorsal-lateral mesothorax also occurs. Taken together, these results indicate that Antp is a complex locus with a central role in the establishment and maintenance of thoracic segmental identities. Differences among the thoracic segments arise through the interaction of Scr and Ubx with Antp.


Science | 2015

BIOSAFETY. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory.

Omar S. Akbari; Hugo J. Bellen; Ethan Bier; Simon L. Bullock; Austin Burt; George M. Church; Kevin R. Cook; Peter Duchek; Owain R. Edwards; Kevin M. Esvelt; Valentino M. Gantz; Kent G. Golic; Scott J. Gratz; Melissa M. Harrison; Keith R. Hayes; Anthony A. James; Thomas C. Kaufman; Jürgen A. Knoblich; Harmit S. Malik; Kathy A. Matthews; Kate M. O'Connor-Giles; Annette L. Parks; Norbert Perrimon; Fillip Port; Steven Russell; Ryu Ueda; Jill Wildonger

Multiple stringent confinement strategies should be used whenever possible Gene drive systems promote the spread of genetic elements through populations by assuring they are inherited more often than Mendelian segregation would predict (see the figure). Natural examples of gene drive from Drosophila include sex-ratio meiotic drive, segregation distortion, and replicative transposition. Synthetic drive systems based on selective embryonic lethality or homing endonucleases have been described previously in Drosophila melanogaster (1–3), but they are difficult to build or are limited to transgenic populations. In contrast, RNAguided gene drives based on the CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease can, in principle, be constructed by any laboratory capable of making transgenic organisms (4). They have tremendous potential to address global problems in health, agriculture, and conservation, but their capacity to alter wild populations outside the laboratory demands caution (4–7). Just as researchers working with self-propagating pathogens must ensure that these agents do not escape to the outside world, scientists working in the laboratory with gene drive constructs are responsible for keeping them confined (4, 6, 7).


Genetics | 2013

Probing the Boundaries of Orthology: The Unanticipated Rapid Evolution of Drosophila centrosomin

Robert Eisman; Thomas C. Kaufman

The rapid evolution of essential developmental genes and their protein products is both intriguing and problematic. The rapid evolution of gene products with simple protein folds and a lack of well-characterized functional domains typically result in a low discovery rate of orthologous genes. Additionally, in the absence of orthologs it is difficult to study the processes and mechanisms underlying rapid evolution. In this study, we have investigated the rapid evolution of centrosomin (cnn), an essential gene encoding centrosomal protein isoforms required during syncytial development in Drosophila melanogaster. Until recently the rapid divergence of cnn made identification of orthologs difficult and questionable because Cnn violates many of the assumptions underlying models for protein evolution. To overcome these limitations, we have identified a group of insect orthologs and present conserved features likely to be required for the functions attributed to cnn in D. melanogaster. We also show that the rapid divergence of Cnn isoforms is apparently due to frequent coding sequence indels and an accelerated rate of intronic additions and eliminations. These changes appear to be buffered by multi-exon and multi-reading frame maximum potential ORFs, simple protein folds, and the splicing machinery. These buffering features also occur in other genes in Drosophila and may help prevent potentially deleterious mutations due to indels in genes with large coding exons and exon-dense regions separated by small introns. This work promises to be useful for future investigations of cnn and potentially other rapidly evolving genes and proteins.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2018

FlyBase 2.0: the next generation

Jim Thurmond; Joshua L. Goodman; Victor B. Strelets; Helen Attrill; L. Sian Gramates; Steven J. Marygold; Beverley B. Matthews; Gillian Millburn; Giulia Antonazzo; Vítor Trovisco; Thomas C. Kaufman; Brian R. Calvi; Norbert Perrimon; Susan Russo Gelbart; Julie Agapite; Kris Broll; Lynn Crosby; Gilberto dos Santos; David B. Emmert; Kathleen Falls; Victoria Jenkins; Beverley Matthews; Carol Sutherland; Christopher J. Tabone; Pinglei Zhou; Mark Zytkovicz; Nicholas H. Brown; Phani Garapati; Alex Holmes; Aoife Larkin

Abstract FlyBase (flybase.org) is a knowledge base that supports the community of researchers that use the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a model organism. The FlyBase team curates and organizes a diverse array of genetic, molecular, genomic, and developmental information about Drosophila. At the beginning of 2018, ‘FlyBase 2.0’ was released with a significantly improved user interface and new tools. Among these important changes are a new organization of search results into interactive lists or tables (hitlists), enhanced reference lists, and new protein domain graphics. An important new data class called ‘experimental tools’ consolidates information on useful fly strains and other resources related to a specific gene, which significantly enhances the ability of the Drosophila researcher to design and carry out experiments. With the release of FlyBase 2.0, there has also been a restructuring of backend architecture and a continued development of application programming interfaces (APIs) for programmatic access to FlyBase data. In this review, we describe these major new features and functionalities of the FlyBase 2.0 site and how they support the use of Drosophila as a model organism for biological discovery and translational research.


bioRxiv | 2015

Genome-wide expression profiling Drosophila melanogaster deficiency heterozygotes reveals diverse genomic responses.

Hangnoh Lee; Dong-Yeon Cho; Cale Whitworth; Robert Eisman; Melissa Phelps; John Roote; Thomas C. Kaufman; Kevin R. Cook; Steven Russell; Teresa M. Przytycka; Brian Oliver

Deletions, commonly referred to as deficiencies by Drosophila geneticists, are valuable tools for mapping genes and for genetic pathway discovery via dose-dependent suppressor and enhancer screens. More recently, it has become clear that deviations from normal gene dosage are associated with multiple disorders in a range of species including humans. While we are beginning to understand some of the transcriptional effects brought about by gene dosage changes and the chromosome rearrangement breakpoints associated with them, much of this work relies on isolated examples. We have systematically examined deficiencies on the left arm of chromosome 2 and characterize gene-by-gene dosage responses that vary from collapsed expression through modest partial dosage compensation to full or even over compensation. We found negligible long-range effects of creating novel chromosome domains at deletion breakpoints, suggesting that cases of changes in gene regulation due to altered nuclear architecture are rare. These rare cases include trans de-repression when deficiencies delete chromatin characterized as repressive in other studies. Generally, effects of breakpoints on expression are promoter proximal (~100 bp) or within the gene body. Genome-wide effects of deficiencies are observed at genes with regulatory relationships to genes within the deleted segments, highlighting the subtle expression network defects in these sensitized genetic backgrounds. Author summary Deletions alter gene dose in heterozygotes and bring distant regions of the genome into juxtaposition. We find that the transcriptional dose response is generally varied, gene-specific, and coherently propagates into gene expression regulatory networks. Analysis of deletion heterozygote expression profiles indicates that distinct genetic pathways are weakened in adult flies bearing different deletions even though they show minimal or no overt phenotypes. While there are exceptions, breakpoints have a minimal effect on the expression of flanking genes, despite the fact that different regions of the genome are brought into contact and that important elements such as insulators are deleted. These data suggest that there is little effect of nuclear architecture and long-range enhancer and/or silencer promoter contact on gene expression in the compact Drosophila genome.


Genome Biology | 2007

The ribosomal protein genes and Minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster

Steven J. Marygold; John Roote; Gunter Reuter; Andrew Lambertsson; Michael Ashburner; Gillian Millburn; Paul M. Harrison; Zhan Yu; Naoya Kenmochi; Thomas C. Kaufman; Sally J. Leevers; Kevin R. Cook


Developmental Biology | 2005

Insect appendages and comparative ontogenetics

David R. Angelini; Thomas C. Kaufman

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas C. Kaufman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Dobin

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin W. Booth

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carrie A. Davis

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James B. Brown

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathy A. Matthews

Indiana University Bloomington

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge