Thomas R. Glass
Micron Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas R. Glass.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 1999
Joseph C. Pellegrini; Ziad R. Hatab; Jeffrey M. Bush; Thomas R. Glass
Traditionally, overlay metrology has ben primarily used for quality control of developed wafers. The secondary roles of overlay metrology, stepper modeling and feedback control, have become more prominent in recent years. In particular, the design of overlay sampling plans is usually strongly influenced by the requirements imposed by stepper modeling. Previous research has shown that intrafield sampling plans must be symmetric and repeating in order to support stable feedback control. These constraints impact the tradeoff between overlay tool throughput and quality control by imposing a higher than necessary cost on measuring additional exposure fields for irregular errors. In this paper we examine the concept of using super sparse overlays among plans along with innovative analysis methods and algorithms for stepper modeling. Super sparse sampling plans are defined as where the field by field intrafield sampling is irregular and asymmetric. When compared to typical sampling plans, super sparse plans allow the overlay tool to examine a 2 to 4 times the number of fields on a wafer with the same number of total measurements. In order to support super sparse sampling, it is necessary to employ innovative algorithms, which are capable of performing stepper modeling without losing result integrity. In this paper we report on the relative performance of regular versus super spares sampling plans for quality control, stepper modeling and overlay tool throughput.
23rd Annual International Symposium on Microlithography | 1998
Pary Baluswamy; Thomas R. Glass
Most deep ultraviolet (DUV) resist models available today utilize the Dill parameters to characterize resist exposure. These models assume that the thickness of the resist remains constant through exposure and post-exposure bake (PEB). The thickness is only affected by development in the models when resist is removed from the exposed or unexposed regions, depending on whether it is a positive or negative resist. It has been observed that a number of DUV resists change thickness upon exposure. This effect is expected to have an impact on the post-exposure acid profile calculated for modeling purposes. In this paper, we present data on the thickness changes for different resists and the effect of exposure to PEB delay on the change.
Archive | 2000
Ravi Iyer; Steven M. McDonald; Thomas R. Glass; Zhiping Yin
Archive | 1997
Thomas R. Glass
Archive | 2005
Mark Fischer; Zhiping Yin; Thomas R. Glass; Kunal R. Parekh; Gurtej S. Sandhu
Archive | 2003
Philip J. Ireland; Thomas R. Glass; Gurtej S. Sandhu
Archive | 1998
Ravi Iyer; Steven M. McDonald; Thomas R. Glass; Zhiping Yin
Archive | 2001
Zhiping Yin; Ravi Iyer; Thomas R. Glass; Richard D. Holscher; Ardavan Niroomand; Linda K. Somerville; Gurtej S. Sandhu
Archive | 2000
Zhiping Yin; Ravi Iyer; Thomas R. Glass; Richard D. Holscher; Ardavan Niroomand; Linda K. Somerville; Gurtej S. Sandhu
Archive | 2006
Mark Fischer; Zhiping Yin; Thomas R. Glass; Kunal R. Parekh; Gurtej S. Sandhu