Ulrike Schatz

Lipoprotein apheresis: an update

Abstract Since the 1980s, several lipoprotein apheresis methods that eliminate atherogenic lipoproteins (LDL and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]) have been developed. These methods are based on the following principles: precipitation, adsorption and filtration. In Dresden (Germany), we started to perform extracorporeal treatment in 1990; in the 1980s we were working as a lipidologic center and saw patients dying due to severe atherosclerotic diseases. At present, 80 patients are being treated with six different methods at the Apheresis center at the University Hospital Dresden. The effectiveness of these methods with respect to lowering of LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) is somewhat different. The number of patients with high Lp(a) levels and with severe atherosclerotic complications has increased steadily since 2008. Several studies have shown a high effectiveness for apheresis treatment in these patients. In the future, new drugs (e.g., lomitapide, mipomersen or PCSK9 inhibitors) will probably modify the position of apheresis in the therapeutic regimen.

Why an apheresis center should offer more than one lipoprotein apheresis method.

We describe our experience with the performance of six lipoprotein apheresis methods (HELP, TheraSorb LDL, DALI, lipidfiltration, Liposorber D, MONET) which have been used in 68 patients. Thirty‐four of them have been treated with more than one method. The calculations presented in this paper are based on laboratory data measured at the last three available apheresis sessions before the switch to another method and at the end of the observation period, respectively. With respect to the reduction of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, DALI and Liposorber D appeared to be the most effective lipoprotein apheresis methods, for reduction of lipoprotein(a), Liposorber D. Data on the influence of these lipoprotein apheresis methods on parameters of the coagulation system (prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen) are also reported. The histories of three patients who have been switched to several lipoprotein apheresis methods are given as examples. The major reason for switching was the low efficiency of a given lipoprotein apheresis method with respect to lowering of LDL cholesterol; the reason for this phenomenon was not clear in each case. In three patients who took an oral anticoagulant and were treated with HELP, the influence on the coagulation system is reported; they were submitted to another apheresis method. In two patients we observed an allergy to heparin—they were then treated with a heparin‐free apheresis method. In conclusion, we point out that there are several reasons why an apheresis center should offer more than one lipoprotein apheresis method.

Iron deficiency and its management in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis. Comparison of two parenteral iron formulations.

OBJECTIVES There is evidence of iron deficiency (ID) in patients treated with lipoprotein apheresis. Aim of this study was to assess ID in apheresis patients and to study its management comparing safety and efficacy of two approved intravenous (i.v.) iron formulations. METHODS Inclusion criteria were defined as a) serum ferritin < 300 μg/l and transferrin saturation < 20%, b) ferritin < 100 μg/l. Both iron deficient alone and ID anemic (IDA) patients were included. Other causes for anemia were ruled out by thorough history-taking and examination/blood tests. Patients were treated with six different lipoprotein apheresis methods: DALI, Liposorber D, TheraSorb LDL, HELP, MONET and Lipidfiltration. 50 patients were randomized to either ferric carboxymaltose (FCM, 500-1000 mg as single shot infusion over 20 min) or ferric gluconate (FG, 62.5 mg once weekly). RESULTS 50 of 67 patients of our Lipoprotein Apheresis Center showed iron deficiency. Both i.v. iron formulations studied were equally safe (no serious adverse events (SAEs), 6 patients/group showed adverse events (AEs)) and both effective (clinically and with respect to laboratory data) in lipoprotein apheresis patients, however FCM led to a more rapid and steeper rise of iron parameters. CONCLUSIONS ID and IDA are common findings in lipoprotein apheresis patients. The pathogenesis remains yet poorly understood and is probably multifactorial. Differential diagnosis of ID/IDA is as essential as differential therapy. Handled with care, older i.v. iron preparations like FG appear to be safe and effective in lipoprotein apheresis patients. However, novel formulations like FCM can be administered rapidly at higher doses due to high complex stability, allowing faster filling of iron stores. Newer laboratory parameters (Reticulocyte-He, low/medium/high fluorescence reticulocytes (LFR/MFR/HFR)) assessing iron status may be helpful in early detection of ID and in monitoring iron replacement therapy.

The anorexigenic peptide neurotensin relates to insulin sensitivity in obese patients after BPD or RYGB metabolic surgery

Neurotensin is a peptide with effects on appetite and intestinal lipid absorption. Experimental data suggest a role in glucose homeostasis, while human data is missing. Here, 20 morbidly obese subjects either underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD), or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in a randomized fashion. Before and 1 year after surgery, anthropometric data, body composition, clinical biochemistry, insulin sensitivity by means of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (HEC) and fasting plasma proneurotensin 1–117 were analyzed. Plasma proneurotensin increased significantly more 1 year after BDP than RYGB (P = 0.028), while weight loss was comparable. After metabolic surgery, proneurotensin correlated positively with insulin sensitivity (M-value) (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), while an inverse relationship with fasting glucose, HOMA-IR and HbA1c was observed (P < 0.05 for all components). After adjustment for age and gender, proneurotensin and BMI remained independently related with delta of M-value (β = 0.46 and β = 0.51, P < 0.05, resp.). From these data we conclude that proneurotensin positively correlates with insulin sensitivity uniquely after weight loss induced by metabolic surgery in humans. BDP leads to a stronger increase in the anorexigenic peptide compared to RYGB.

Lipid-modifying therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Germany: The CaReHigh Registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is amongst the most common genetic disorders encountered in primary care. Yet, only a minority of affected patients is diagnosed and treated. This interim analysis of the CaRe High Registry aims at examining the state of treatment and attainment of lipid goals in German FH patients. METHODS The CaRe High registry includes FH patients from lipid clinics and private practices. Data have been collected using questionnaires filled in by the recruiting physicians and by interviewing the participating patients. RESULTS We examined 512 F H patients diagnosed according to clinical criteria. Median age at the time of the first FH diagnosis was 39 (25th and 75th percentile: 27-50) years, median treatment naïve LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was 239.4 mg/dl (6.19 mmol/l), 25th to 75th percentile 191.8-342.5 mg/dl (4.96-8.86 mmol/l). 27% of the participants did not receive lipid-lowering drugs. Among the patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs, 19% received a PCSK9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) in combination with a statin, 9% were treated with a PCSK9i alone and 3% were treated with a combination of PCSK9i and a non-statin drug. Patients with pre-existing CVD were more likely to be treated with lipid-lowering drugs and more likely to receive a PCSK9i, but LDL-C targets were only achieved by a minority of patients (<20%). Gap to target LDL-C was lowest and the median achieved LDL-C reduction was 1.4 times higher with PCSK9i treatment than with (oral) lipid-lowering therapy without PCSK9i. CONCLUSIONS The Care High registry has included patients with the typical clinical features of familial hypercholesterolemia. PCSK9i treatment in addition to standard therapy allows attainment of target values in many patients with initially very high LDL-C.