Vaibhav Chaturvedi
Joint Global Change Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vaibhav Chaturvedi.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2015
Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Mohamad I. Hejazi; James A. Edmonds; Leon E. Clarke; G. Page Kyle; Evan Davies; Marshall A. Wise
Measures to limit greenhouse gas concentrations will result in dramatic changes to energy and land systems and in turn alter the character of human requirements for water. We employ the global change assessment model (GCAM), an integrated assessment model, to explore the interactions of energy, land, and water systems under combinations of three alternative radiative forcing stabilization levels and two carbon tax regimes. The paper analyzes two important research questions: i) how large may global irrigation water demands become over the next century, and ii) what are the potential impacts of emissions mitigation policies on global irrigation-water withdrawals. We find that increasing population and economic growth could more than double the demand for water for agricultural systems in the absence of climate policy, and policies to mitigate climate change further increase agricultural demands for water. The largest increases in agricultural irrigation water demand occur in scenarios where only fossil fuel emissions are priced (but not land use change emissions) and are primarily driven by rapid expansion in bio-energy production. Regions such as China, India, and other countries in South and East Asia are likely to experience the greatest increases in water demands. Finally, we test the sensitivity of water withdrawal demands to the share of bio-energy crops under irrigation and conclude that many regions have insufficient space for heavy bio-energy crop irrigation in the future—a result that calls into question the physical possibility of producing the associated biomass energy, especially under climate policy scenarios.
The Energy Journal | 2014
Leon E. Clarke; Allen A. Fawcett; John P. Weyant; James McFarland; Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Yuyu Zhou
This paper discusses Technology and U.S. Emissions Reductions Goals: Results of the EMF 24 Modeling Exercise
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2013
Mohamad I. Hejazi; James A. Edmonds; Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Evan Davies; Jiyong Eom
Abstract Three future projections of global municipal water use are established: business-as usual (BAU), low technological improvement (Low Tech), and high technological improvement (High Tech). A global municipal water demand model is constructed using global water-use statistics at the country scale, calibrated to the base year of 2005, and simulated to the end of the 21st century. Since the constructed water demand model hinges on socio-economic variables (population, income), water price, and end-use technology and efficiency improvement rates, projections of those input variables are adopted to characterize the uncertainty in future water demand estimates. The water demand model is linked to the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM), a global change integrated assessment model. Under the reference (BAU) scenario, the global total water withdrawal increases from 466 km3 year−1 in 2005 to 1098 km3 year−1 in 2100, while withdrawals in the High and Low Tech scenarios are 437 and 2000 km3 year−1, respectively. Editor Z.W. Kundzewicz; Associate editor D. Gerten Citation Hejazi, M., Edmonds, J., Chaturvedi, V., Davies, E., and Eom, J.Y., 2013. Scenarios of global municipal water use demand projections over the 21st century. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (3), 519–538
Climatic Change | 2014
Vaibhav Chaturvedi; P. R. Shukla
Addressing the challenges of global warming requires interventions on both the energy supply and demand side. With the supply side responses being thoroughly discussed in the literature, our paper focuses on analyzing the role of end use efficiency improvements for Indian climate change mitigation policy and the associated co-benefits, within the integrated assessment modeling framework of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM). Six scenarios are analyzed here in total- one no climate policy and two climate policy cases, and within each of these one scenario with reference end use energy technology assumptions and another with advance end use energy technology assumptions has been analyzed. The paper has some important insights. Final energy demand and emissions in India are significantly reduced with energy efficiency improvements, and the role of this policy is important especially for the building and transportation sector under both reference and climate policy scenarios. Though energy efficiency policy should be an integral part of climate policy, by itself it is not sufficient for achieving mitigation targets, and a climate policy is necessary for achieving mitigation goals. There are significant co-benefits of energy efficiency improvements. Energy security for India is improved with reduced oil, coal and gas imports. Significant reduction in local pollutant gases is found which is important for local health concerns. Capital investment requirement for Indian electricity generation is reduced, more so for the climate policy scenarios, and finally there are significant savings in terms of reduced abatement cost for meeting climate change mitigation goals.
Journal of international economic studies | 2008
Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Brajesh Kumar; Ravindra H. Dholakia
The present study examines the inter- relationship between economic growth, saving rate and inflation for south-east and south Asia in a simultaneous equation framework using two stage least squares with panel data. The relationship between saving rate and growth has been found to be bi-directional and positive. Inflation has a highly significant negative effect on growth but positive effect on saving rate. Inflation is not affected by growth but is largely determined by its past values, and saving rate is not affected by interest rate. These findings for countries in Asia with widely divergent values of aggregates are very relevant for development policies and strategies.
Archive | 2013
Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Mohamad Hejazi; James A. Edmonds; Leon E. Clarke; G. Page Kyle; Evan Davies; Marshall A. Wise; Katherine V. Calvin
Energy, water and land are scarce resources, critical to humans. Developments in each affect the availability and cost of the others, and consequently human prosperity. Measures to limit greenhouse gas concentrations will inevitably exact dramatic changes on energy and land systems and in turn alter the character, magnitude and geographic distribution of human claims on water resources. We employ the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM), an integrated assessment model to explore the interactions of energy, land and water systems in the context of alternative policies to limit climate change to three alternative levels: 2.5 Wm-2 (445 ppm CO2-e), 3.5 Wm-2 (535 ppm CO2-e) and 4.5 Wm-2 (645 ppm CO2-e). We explore the effects of two alternative land-use emissions mitigation policy options—one which taxes terrestrial carbon emissions equally with fossil fuel and industrial emissions, and an alternative which only taxes fossil fuel and industrial emissions but places no penalty on land-use change emissions. We find that increasing populations and economic growth could be anticipated to almost triple demand for water for agricultural systems across the century even in the absence of climate policy. In general policies to mitigate climate change increase agricultural demands for water still further, though the largest changes occur in the second half of the century, under both policy regimes. The two policies examined profoundly affected both the sources and magnitudes of the increase in irrigation water demands. The largest increases in agricultural irrigation water demand occurred in scenarios where only fossil fuel emissions were priced (but not land-use change emission) and were primarily driven by rapid expansion in bioenergy production. In these scenarios water demands were large relative to present-day total available water, calling into question whether it would be physically possible to produce the associated biomass energy. We explored the potential of improved water delivery and irrigation system efficiencies. These could potentially reduce demands substantially. However, overall demands remained high under our fossil-fuel-only tax policy. In contrast, when all carbon was priced, increases in agricultural water demands were smaller than under the fossil-fuel-only policy and were driven primarily by increased demands for water by non-biomass crops such as rice. Finally we estimate the geospatial pattern of water demands and find that regions such as China, India and other countries in south and east Asia might be expected to experience greatest increases in water demands.
Climatic Change | 2017
Mohit Sharma; Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Pallav Purohit
Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions is a critical research gap for space cooling and refrigeration applications in Indian commercial buildings. This is especially relevant as these services are expected to grow rapidly in future driven by economic growth and urbanisation. This paper focuses on these two applications which are highly energy and emission intensive, and quantifies their carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions through soft-linking a top-down model with a bottom-up approach. An integrated assessment modelling framework Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM)-IIM is used for modelling energy-related emissions under a business-as-usual scenario. In addition to CO2 emissions occurring from electricity use, cooling and refrigeration in commercial buildings emit another set of highly potent greenhouse gases, emanating from application of HFCs as coolant. HFCs substitute their ozone-depleting precursors in these applications. Countries across the world have agreed to phase down HFCs under the Montreal Protocol. Before we can analyse cost-effective options to bring down these emissions, it is important to quantify and assess the amount of emissions that could be avoided in the future. Our research sets up a baseline for carbon dioxide and HFC emissions from India for the commercial air-conditioning and refrigeration sectors and finds the potential HFC emission mitigation due to the Kigali Amendment. A detailed bottom-up modelling of these emissions is undertaken and it is found that, if unabated, the HFC emissions from commercial sector will surge from mere 1.8 million tonne (Mt) CO2e in 2015 to 211 Mt CO2e in 2050, whereas energy-related CO2 emissions from commercial air-conditioning and refrigeration will rise from 37 to 297 Mt CO2e in the same period. We also highlight the role of management practices and regulation for curbing HFC emissions which is especially relevant for the commercial building sector.
Archive | 2017
Vaibhav Chaturvedi; P. R. Shukla; Karthik Ganesan
The debate around nuclear energy is polarized with stakeholders taking moral positions on the merits of this technology. Keeping moral positions aside, we focus on the critical issue of the cost of nuclear energy and its implications for future penetration of nuclear energy. Conventionally, the cost of nuclear technology is reported as the overnight construction cost (OCC). We argue that the holistic perspective costs should include other external costs (including risks, co-benefits and co-costs) as well as macroeconomic costs such as those incurred for climate change mitigation. We first present the historical evolution of OCC of nuclear power plants across the world as well as selected Asian nations. We then discuss what it means for the cost of climate change mitigation if nuclear technology is removed from the mitigation portfolio. Our analysis seeks to inform the nuclear debate in Asia from an analytical viewpoint which also includes the implicit risks and costs that underlie the moral positions on this technology.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 2014
Mohamad I. Hejazi; James A. Edmonds; Leon E. Clarke; G. Page Kyle; Evan Davies; Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Marshall A. Wise; Pralit L. Patel; Jiyong Eom; Katherine Calvin; Richard H. Moss; Son H. Kim
Energy Economics | 2012
Volker Krey; Brian C. O'Neill; Bas J. van Ruijven; Vaibhav Chaturvedi; Vasileios Daioglou; Jiyong Eom; Leiwen Jiang; Yu Nagai; Shonali Pachauri; Xiaolin Ren