Venkat Krishnan
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Venkat Krishnan.
Archive | 2015
Patrick F. Sullivan; Wesley Cole; Nate Blair; Eric Lantz; Venkat Krishnan; Trieu Mai; David Mulcahy; Gian Porro
This report is one of several products resulting from an initial effort to provide a consistent set of technology cost and performance data and to define a conceptual and consistent scenario framework that can be used in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) future analyses. The long-term objective of this effort is to identify a range of possible futures of the U.S. electricity sector in which to consider specific energy system issues through (1) defining a set of prospective scenarios that bound ranges of key technology, market, and policy assumptions and (2) assessing these scenarios in NREL’s market models to understand the range of resulting outcomes, including energy technology deployment and production, energy prices, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
north american power symposium | 2016
Wesley Cole; Cara Marcy; Venkat Krishnan; Robert Margolis
This work presents U.S. utility-scale battery storage cost projections for use in capacity expansion models. We create battery cost projections based on a survey of literature cost projections of battery packs and balance of system costs, with a focus on lithium-ion batteries. Low, mid, and high cost trajectories are created for the overnight capital costs and the operating and maintenance costs. We then demonstrate the impact of these cost projections in the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) capacity expansion model. We find that under reference scenario conditions, lower battery costs can lead to increased penetration of variable renewable energy, with solar photovoltaics (PV) seeing the largest increase. We also find that additional storage can reduce renewable energy curtailment, although that comes at the expense of additional storage losses.
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid | 2017
Mingjian Cui; Jie Zhang; Qin Wang; Venkat Krishnan; Bri-Mathias Hodge
With increasing wind penetration, wind power ramps (WPRs) are currently drawing great attention to balancing authorities, since these wind ramps largely affect power system operations. To help better manage and dispatch the wind power, this paper develops a data-driven probabilistic WPR forecasting (p-WPRF) method based on a large number of simulated scenarios. A machine learning technique is first adopted to forecast the basic wind power forecasting scenario and produce the historical forecasting errors. To accurately model the distribution of wind power forecasting errors, a generalized Gaussian mixture model is developed and the cumulative distribution function (CDF) is also analytically deduced. The inverse transform method based on the CDF is used to generate a large number of forecasting error scenarios. An optimized swinging door algorithm is adopted to extract all the WPRs from the complete set of wind power forecasting scenarios. The p-WPRF is generated based on all generated scenarios under different weather and time conditions. Numerical simulations on publicly available wind power data show that the developed p-WPRF method can predict WPRs with a high level of reliability and accuracy.
power and energy society general meeting | 2016
Venkat Krishnan; Wesley Cole
Power sector capacity expansion models (CEMs) have a broad range of spatial resolutions. This paper uses the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model, a longterm national scale electric sector CEM, to evaluate the value of high spatial resolution for CEMs. ReEDS models the United States with 134 load balancing areas (BAs) and captures the variability in existing generation parameters, future technology costs, performance, and resource availability using very high spatial resolution data, especially for wind and solar modeled at 356 resource regions. In this paper we perform planning studies at three different spatial resolutions-native resolution (134 BAs), state-level, and NERC region level-and evaluate how results change under different levels of spatial aggregation in terms of renewable capacity deployment and location, associated transmission builds, and system costs. The results are used to ascertain the value of high geographically resolved models in terms of their impact on relative competitiveness among renewable energy resources.
Applied Energy | 2016
Eric Lantz; Trieu Mai; Ryan Wiser; Venkat Krishnan
Archive | 2016
Kelly Eurek; Wesley Cole; David A. Bielen; Nate Blair; Stuart Cohen; Bethany Frew; Jonathan Ho; Venkat Krishnan; Trieu Mai; Benjamin Sigrin; Daniel Steinberg
power and energy society general meeting | 2017
Mingjian Cui; Cong Feng; Zhenke Wang; Jie Zhang; Qin Wang; Anthony R. Florita; Venkat Krishnan; Bri-Mathias Hodge
Environmental Research Letters | 2017
Ryan Wiser; Trieu Mai; Dev Millstein; Galen Barbose; Lori Bird; Jenny Heeter; David Keyser; Venkat Krishnan; Jordan Macknick
Energies | 2018
Xin Fang; Venkat Krishnan; Bri-Mathias Hodge
Energies | 2017
Fernando E. Postigo Marcos; Carlos Mateo Domingo; Tomás Gómez San Román; Bryan Palmintier; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Venkat Krishnan; Fernando de Cuadra García; Barry Mather