Veronica Miyasike-daSilva

Standing still: Is there a role for the cortex?

In humans, standing still appears so automatic that high-level cortical processes seem unnecessary. However, by measuring cortical activity time-locked to reactive control events arising from naturally occurring instability while standing still, we detected cortical involvement in the form of an evoked N1 potential prior to the onset of balance reactions. Peak amplitude and spectral power of this event-related activity increased as postural challenges and demand for reactive control increased.

Electrophysiological correlates of changes in reaction time based on stimulus intensity

Background Although reaction time is commonly used as an indicator of central nervous system integrity, little is currently understood about the mechanisms that determine processing time. In the current study, we are interested in determining the differences in electrophysiological events associated with significant changes in reaction time that could be elicited by changes in stimulus intensity. The primary objective is to assess the effect of increasing stimulus intensity on the latency and amplitude of afferent inputs to the somatosensory cortex, and their relation to reaction time. Methods Median nerve stimulation was applied to the non-dominant hand of 12 healthy young adults at two different stimulus intensities (HIGH & LOW). Participants were asked to either press a button as fast as possible with their dominant hand or remain quiet following the stimulus. Electroencephalography was used to measure somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and event related potentials (ERPs). Electromyography from the flexor digitorum superficialis of the button-pressing hand was used to assess reaction time. Response time was the time of button press. Results Reaction time and response time were significantly shorter following the HIGH intensity stimulus compared to the LOW intensity stimulus. There were no differences in SEP (N20 & P24) peak latencies and peak-to-peak amplitude for the two stimulus intensities. ERPs, locked to response time, demonstrated a significantly larger pre-movement negativity to positivity following the HIGH intensity stimulus over the Cz electrode. Discussion This work demonstrates that rapid reaction times are not attributable to the latency of afferent processing from the stimulated site to the somatosensory cortex, and those latency reductions occur further along the sensorimotor transformation pathway. Evidence from ERPs indicates that frontal planning areas such as the supplementary motor area may play a role in transforming the elevated sensory volley from the somatosensory cortex into a more rapid motor response.

Does it really matter where you look when walking on stairs? Insights from a dual-task study.

Although the visual system is known to provide relevant information to guide stair locomotion, there is less understanding of the specific contributions of foveal and peripheral visual field information. The present study investigated the specific role of foveal vision during stair locomotion and ground-stairs transitions by using a dual-task paradigm to influence the ability to rely on foveal vision. Fifteen healthy adults (26.9±3.3 years; 8 females) ascended a 7-step staircase under four conditions: no secondary tasks (CONTROL); gaze fixation on a fixed target located at the end of the pathway (TARGET); visual reaction time task (VRT); and auditory reaction time task (ART). Gaze fixations towards stair features were significantly reduced in TARGET and VRT compared to CONTROL and ART. Despite the reduced fixations, participants were able to successfully ascend stairs and rarely used the handrail. Step time was increased during VRT compared to CONTROL in most stair steps. Navigating on the transition steps did not require more gaze fixations than the middle steps. However, reaction time tended to increase during locomotion on transitions suggesting additional executive demands during this phase. These findings suggest that foveal vision may not be an essential source of visual information regarding stair features to guide stair walking, despite the unique control challenges at transition phases as highlighted by phase-specific challenges in dual-tasking. Instead, the tendency to look at the steps in usual conditions likely provides a stable reference frame for extraction of visual information regarding step features from the entire visual field.

Does the movement matter?: determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions.

BACKGROUND Extremely rapid movements are frequently executed in response to novel, potentially threatening stimuli. The mechanism by which these sophisticated responses are generated is a topic of debate. The current study investigates: 1) the importance of stimulus-response congruence in rapid responses and 2) the relationship between the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and response time. METHODS Sixteen participants were seated in a chair that could tilt backwards 13°. Participants were instructed to react as fast as possible in response to either an auditory cue (AUD) or balance perturbation (chair tilt) (PERT) and completed one of three different tasks: reach-to-grasp a fixed handle (FIXED), reach-to-grasp a free moving handle (FREE) or plantar flex the left foot (FOOT). Electromyography and electrodermal activity were recorded. RESULTS For all tasks, muscle onset latency was shorter and muscle response amplitude was greater following the PERT cue compared to the AUD cue. In contrast, there were no differences in onset latency between motor response conditions. Electrodermal response amplitude was greater in the FIXED and FREE conditions than in the FOOT condition. DISCUSSION Even in situations where the stimulus was incongruent with the response, muscle onset latencies were evoked faster following the perturbation. The response latencies were determined by stimulus characteristics and the most rapid responses were not reliant on stimulus-response congruence. It remains unclear how it is possible to achieve such rapid response latencies to whole body perturbations but we speculate there may exist similar pathways that are uniquely facilitated by a stimulus dependent ANS response.

Use of mobility aids reduces attentional demand in challenging walking conditions

While mobility aids (e.g., four-wheeled walkers) are designed to facilitate walking and prevent falls in individuals with gait and balance impairments, there is evidence indicating that walkers may increase attentional demands during walking. We propose that walkers may reduce attentional demands under conditions that challenge balance control. This study investigated the effect of walker use on walking performance and attentional demand under a challenged walking condition. Young healthy subjects walked along a straight pathway, or a narrow beam. Attentional demand was assessed with a concurrent voice reaction time (RT) task. Slower RTs, reduced gait speed, and increased number of missteps (>92% of all missteps) were observed during beam-walking. However, walker use reduced attentional demand (faster RTs) and was linked to improved walking performance (increased gait speed, reduced missteps). Data from two healthy older adult cases reveal similar trends. In conclusion, mobility aids can be beneficial by reducing attentional demands and increasing gait stability when balance is challenged. This finding has implications on the potential benefit of mobility aids for persons who rely on walkers to address balance impairments.