Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Wietse P. Zuidema is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Wietse P. Zuidema.


Forensic Science International | 2015

Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims – A systematic review

Hamid Jalalzadeh; Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Ferco H. Berger; Judith Fronczek; Frank R.W. van de Goot; Udo J.L. Reijnders; Wietse P. Zuidema

BACKGROUND Post-mortem imaging or virtual autopsy is a rapidly advancing field of post-mortem investigations of trauma victims. In this review we evaluate the feasibility of complementation or replacement of conventional autopsy by post-mortem imaging in trauma victims. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies published between January 2008 and January 2014, in which post-mortem imaging was compared to conventional autopsy in trauma victims. Studies were included when two or more trauma victims were investigated. RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included, with a total number of 563 trauma victims. Post-mortem computer tomography (PMCT) was performed in 22 studies, post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMRI) in five studies and conventional radiography in two studies. PMCT and PMMRI both demonstrate moderate to high-grade injuries and cause of death accurately. PMCT is more sensitive than conventional autopsy or PMMRI in detecting skeletal injuries. For detecting minor organ and soft tissue injuries, autopsy remains superior to imaging. Aortic injuries are missed frequently by PMCT and PMMRI and form their main limitation. CONCLUSION PMCT should be considered as an essential supplement to conventional autopsy in trauma victims since it detects many additional injuries. Despite some major limitations, PMCT could be used as an alternative for conventional autopsy in situations where conventional autopsy is rejected or unavailable.


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2012

Criteria for cancelling helicopter emergency medical Services (HEMS) dispatches

Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Frank W. Bloemers; Wouter D. Lubbers; Herman M. T. Christiaans; Pieternel van Exter; Elly S.M. de Lange-de Klerk; Wietse P. Zuidema; J. Carel Goslings; Fred C. Bakker

Introduction In The Netherlands there is no consensus about criteria for cancelling helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) dispatches. This study assessed the ability of the primary HEMS dispatch criteria to identify major trauma patients. The predictive power of other early prehospital parameters was evaluated to design a safe triage model for HEMS dispatch cancellations. Methods All trauma-related dispatches of HEMS during a period of 6 months were included. Data concerning prehospital information and inhospital treatment were collected. Patients were divided into two groups (major and minor trauma) according to the following criteria: injury severity score 16 or greater, emergency intervention, intensive care unit admission, or inhospital death. Logistic regression analysis was used to design a prediction model for the early identification of major trauma patients. Results In total, 420 trauma-related dispatches were evaluated, of which 155 concerned major trauma patients. HEMS was more often cancelled for minor trauma patients than for major trauma patients (57.7% vs 20.6%). Overall, HEMS dispatch criteria had a sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 45.3% for identifying major trauma patients. Significant differences were found for vital sign abnormalities, anatomical components and several parameters of the mechanism of injury. A triage model designed for cancelling HEMS correctly identified major trauma patients (sensitivity 99.4%). Conclusion The accuracy of the current HEMS dispatch criteria is relatively low, resulting in high cancellation rates and low predictability for major trauma. The new HEMS cancellation triage model identified all major trauma patients with an acceptable overtriage and will probably reduce unjustified HEMS dispatches.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2014

Long-term results and treatment modalities of conservatively treated Broberg–Morrey type 1 radial head fractures

Arjen J. Smits; Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Wietse P. Zuidema

BACKGROUND AND AIM This study assessed the long-term outcome (>6 months, with a mean of 46 months after injury) of the conservatively treated radial head fracture type 1 of the Broberg-Morrey (B-M) modification of the Mason classification. The main aim of this study is to assess the limitations in ADL activities on long term following a conservative treatment for B-M 1 radial head fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS Out of a total patient group of 312 patients, 94 patients responded to our invitation for participation in the long-term follow-up study. These patients were included with a mean age of 42 years at time of injury and average of 46 months after injury. Most patients were treated with an upper arm cast or pressure bandage. These 94 patients were invited to fill out the validated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for elbow functioning as well as a demographic questionnaire. Basic patient and treatment data were collected from the hospital and trauma registration systems. RESULTS Forty-two percent of patients scored 0 (no disabilities) on the DASH questionnaire, 38% had a DASH score between 0.1 and 10.1, and 20% scored over 10.1. Correlations of the non-operative treatment modalities; immobilisation type, physiotherapy, smoking at time of injury, injury mechanism and immobilisation period with DASH outcome have not been found. CONCLUSION It appears that a B-M type 1 radial head fracture is not always accompanied with regaining full function on long term. To what extent these observed limitations influence patient behaviour and how treatment modalities influence these limitations should be the base of future prospective research.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2016

Splenic function after angioembolization for splenic trauma in children and adults: A systematic review

J.A.G. Schimmer; A.F.W. van der Steeg; Wietse P. Zuidema

PURPOSE Splenic artery embolization (SAE), proximal or distal, is becoming the standard of care for traumatic splenic injury. Theoretically the immunological function of the spleen may be preserved, but this has not yet been proven. A parameter for measuring the remaining splenic function must therefore be determined in order to decide whether or not vaccinations and/or antibiotic prophylaxis are necessary to prevent an overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed July 2015 by searching the Embase and Medline databases. Articles were eligible if they described at least two trauma patients and the subject was splenic function. Description of procedure and/or success rate of SAE was not necessary for inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. RESULTS Twelve studies were included, eleven with adult patients and one focusing on children. All studies used different parameters to assess splenic function. None of them reported a OPSI after splenic embolization. Eleven studies found a preserved splenic function after SAE, in both adults and children. CONCLUSION All but one studies on the long term effects of SAE indicate a preserved splenic function. However, there is still no single parameter or test available which can demonstrate that unequivocally.


European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2011

Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations

Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Teun Peter Saltzherr; Wouter D. Lubbers; Herman M. T. Christiaans; Pieternel van Exter; Elly S.M. de Lange-de Klerk; Frank W. Bloemers; Wietse P. Zuidema; J. Carel Goslings; Fred C. Bakker

Introduction The Revised Trauma Score is used worldwide in the prehospital setting and provides a snapshot of patients physiological state. Several studies have shown that the reliability of the RTS is high in trauma outcomes. In the Netherlands, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are mostly used for delivery of specialized trauma teams on-scene and occasionally for patient transportation. In our trauma system, the Emergency Medical Services crew performs triage after arrival on-scene and cancels the HEMS-dispatch if deemed unnecessary. In this study we assessed the ability of a maximum on-scene Revised Trauma Score (RTS=12) to be used as a triage tool for HEMS cancellation. Methods All patients with a maximum on-scene RTS after blunt trauma (with or without receiving HEMS care) who were presented in the trauma resuscitation room of two Level-1 trauma centers during a period of 6 months, were included. Information concerning prehospital and in-hospital vital parameters, severity and localization of the injuries, and the in-hospital course were analyzed. Major trauma patients were classified using the following parameters: Injury Severity Score of at least 16, emergency intervention, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital death. Results Four-hundred and forty blunt trauma patients having a maximum RTS were included between 1 July and 31 December 2006. Eighty patients received on-scene HEMS care. Almost 16% of the total population concerned major trauma patients, of which only 25 (36%) received HEMS care. In 17 patients (3.9%), the RTS deteriorated during transportation. Major trauma patients sustained more injuries to the chest, abdomen, and lower extremities. Conclusion The RTS alone is not a reliable triage tool for HEMS cancellations in our trauma system and will lead to a considerable rate of undertriage with one in every six cancellations being incorrect. Other criteria based on patients vital signs, combined with anatomical and mechanism of injury parameters should be developed to safely minimize triage errors.


European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2017

Incidence and etiology of mortality in polytrauma patients in a Dutch level I trauma center.

Zainab El Mestoui; Hamid Jalalzadeh; Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Wietse P. Zuidema

Background Earlier studies assessing mortality in polytrauma patients have focused on improving trauma care and reducing complications during hospital stay. The same studies have shown that the complication rate in these patients is high, often resulting in death. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and causes of mortality in polytrauma patients in our institute. Secondarily, we assessed the donation and autopsy rates and outcome in these patients. Patients and methods All polytrauma patients (injury severity score≥16) transported to and treated in our institute during a period of 6 years were retrospectively analyzed. We included all patients who died during hospital stay. Prehospital and in-hospital data were collected on patients’ condition, diagnostics, and treatment. The chance of survival was calculated according to the TRISS methodology. Patients were categorized according to the complications during treatment and causes of death. Logistic regression analysis was used to design a prediction model for mortality in major trauma. A statistical analysis was carried out. Results Of the 1073 polytrauma patients who were treated in our institute during the study period, 205 (19.1%) died during hospital stay. The median age of the deceased patients was 58.8 years and 125 patients were men. Their mean injury severity score was 30.4. The most common mechanism of injury involved fall from height, followed by bicycle accidents. Almost 50% of the patients underwent an emergency intervention. Almost 92% of the total population died because of the effects of the accident (primary trauma). Of these, 24% died during primary assessment in the emergency department. Most patients died because of the effects of severe head injury (63.4%), followed by exsanguination (17.6%). The most common type of complications causing death during treatment was respiratory failure (6.3%), followed by multiple organ failure (1.5%). Autopsy was performed in 10.4%. Organ donation procedure was performed in 14.5%. Permission for donation was not provided in almost 20% of the population. Conclusion The mortality rate in polytrauma patients in our institute is considerable and comparable with the international literature. Most patients die because of the effects of the accident (primary trauma). Autopsy and organ donation rates are low in our institution and leave room for substantial improvements in the future.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2017

Trauma surgery by general surgeons: Still an option for proximal femoral fractures?

Kaij Treskes; Stijn C. Voeten; Maria C.J.M. Tol; Wietse P. Zuidema; Jefrey Vermeulen; J. Carel Goslings; N.W.L. Schep; J.G.H. (Han) van den Brand; Romuald van Velde; Robert Haverlag; Jan M. Ultee; Victor Postma; Bas A. Twigt; Bart A. van Dijkman; Pieter Heres; Jasper Winkelhagen; Mariska Klooster; E.J. (Annelies) Toor

INTRODUCTION Surgery for proximal femoral fractures in the Netherlands is performed by trauma surgeons, general surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in outcome for patients with proximal femoral fractures operated by trauma surgeons versus general surgeons. Secondly, the relation between hospital and surgeon volume and postoperative complications was explored. METHODS Patients of 18 years and older were included if operated for a proximal femoral fracture by a trauma surgeon or a general surgeon in two academic, eight teaching and two non-teaching hospitals in the Netherlands from January 2010 until December 2013. The combined endpoint was defined as reoperation or surgical site infection. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for patient and fracture characteristics and hospital and surgeon volume. Categories for hospital volume were>170/year (high volume), 96-170/year (medium volume) and <96/year (low volume). RESULTS In 4552 included patients 2382 (52.3%) had surgery by a trauma surgeon. Postoperative complications occurred in 276 (11.6%) patients operated by a trauma surgeon and in 258 (11.9%) operated by a general surgeon (p=0.751). When considering confounders in a multivariate analysis, surgery by trauma surgeons was associated with less postoperative complications (OR 0.746; 95%CI 0.580-0.958; p=0.022). Surgery in high volume hospitals was also associated with less complications (OR 0.997; 95%CI 0.995-0.999; p=0.012). Surgeon volume was not associated with complications (OR 1.008; 95%CI 0.997-1.018; p=0.175). CONCLUSION Surgery by trauma surgeons and high hospital volume are associated with less reoperations and surgical site infections for patients with proximal femoral fractures.


Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery | 2018

Routine Follow-Up Radiographs for Ankle Fractures Seldom Add Value to Clinical Decision-Making : A Retrospective, Observational Study

Pieter van Gerven; Nikki Weil; Marco F. Termaat; Sidney M. Rubinstein; Mostafa El Moumni; Wietse P. Zuidema; Jochem Maarten Hoogendoorn; Hub G. W. M. van der Meulen; Maurits W. van Tulder; Inger B. Schipper

Abstract Currently, the routine use of radiographs for uncomplicated ankle fractures represents good clinical practice. However, radiographs are associated with waiting time, radiation exposure, and costs. Studies have suggested that radiographs seldom alter the treatment strategy if no clinical indication for the imaging study was present. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of routine radiographs on the treatment strategy during the follow‐up period of ankle fractures. All patients aged ≥18 years, who had visited 1 of the participating clinics with an eligible ankle fracture in 2012 and with complete follow‐up data were included. The data were retrospectively analyzed. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the number of, and indications for, the radiographs taken were collected from the medical records of the participating clinics. We assessed the changes in treatment strategy according to the radiographic findings. In 528 patients with an ankle fracture, 1174 radiographs were performed during the follow‐up period. Of these radiographs, 936 (79.7%) were considered routine. Of the routine radiographs taken during the follow‐up period, only 11 (1.2 %) resulted in changes to the treatment strategy. Although it is common practice to take radiographs routinely during the follow‐up period for ankle fractures, the results from the present study suggest that routine radiographs seldom alter the treatment strategy. This limited clinical relevance should be weighed against the health care costs and radiation exposure associated with the use of routine radiographs. For a definitive recommendation, however, the results of our study should be confirmed by a prospective trial, which we are currently conducting. &NA; Level of Clinical Evidence: 3


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2015

In response: Disability after nondisplaced and minimally displaced radial head fractures [Injury 45 (2014) 2110–2119]

Arjen J. Smits; Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; Wietse P. Zuidema

It is possible to estimate the number of fatalities in the Qatar migrant worker population by multiplying the fatal injury rate of 1.58/100,000 reported by Al-Thani, by 1.26 million, the estimated number of migrant workers in Qatar for the year 2012. This yields 20 deaths, and over a four or five year period the total number of deaths might be around 100. There has been considerable public concern about high injury rates for migrant workers in Qatar; one widely read newspaper report initially suggested that up to 1200 migrant workers may have died since 2010 [5]. Following a response from the Qatari government the newspaper updated the article to clarify that the Letter to the Editor


Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | 2015

Complications after laparotomy for trauma: a retrospective analysis in a level I trauma centre

Matthijs H. van Gool; Georgios F. Giannakopoulos; L.M.G. Geeraedts; Elly S. M. de Lange-de Klerk; Wietse P. Zuidema

Collaboration


Dive into the Wietse P. Zuidema's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Inger B. Schipper

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge