Computer Science

Answer selection is a task to choose the positive answers from a pool of candidate answers for a given question. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy for answer selection, called hierarchical ranking. We introduce three levels of ranking: point-level ranking, pair-level ranking, and list-level ranking. They formulate their optimization objectives by employing supervisory information from different perspectives to achieve the same goal of ranking candidate answers. Therefore, the three levels of ranking are related and they can promote each other. We take the well-performed compare-aggregate model as the backbone and explore three schemes to implement the idea of applying the hierarchical rankings jointly: the scheme under the Multi-Task Learning (MTL) strategy, the Ranking Integration (RI) scheme, and the Progressive Ranking Integration (PRI) scheme. Experimental results on two public datasets, WikiQA and TREC-QA, demonstrate that the proposed hierarchical ranking is effective. Our method achieves state-of-the-art (non-BERT) performance on both TREC-QA and WikiQA.

We present a novel large-context end-to-end automatic speech recognition (E2E-ASR) model and its effective training method based on knowledge distillation. Common E2E-ASR models have mainly focused on utterance-level processing in which each utterance is independently transcribed. On the other hand, large-context E2E-ASR models, which take into account long-range sequential contexts beyond utterance boundaries, well handle a sequence of utterances such as discourses and conversations. However, the transformer architecture, which has recently achieved state-of-the-art ASR performance among utterance-level ASR systems, has not yet been introduced into the large-context ASR systems. We can expect that the transformer architecture can be leveraged for effectively capturing not only input speech contexts but also long-range sequential contexts beyond utterance boundaries. Therefore, this paper proposes a hierarchical transformer-based large-context E2E-ASR model that combines the transformer architecture with hierarchical encoder-decoder based large-context modeling. In addition, in order to enable the proposed model to use long-range sequential contexts, we also propose a large-context knowledge distillation that distills the knowledge from a pre-trained large-context language model in the training phase. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model and proposed training method on Japanese discourse ASR tasks.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) models' current trend consists of using increasingly more extra-data to build the best models as possible. It implies more expensive computational costs and training time, difficulties for deployment, and worries about these models' carbon footprint reveal a critical problem in the future. Against this trend, our goal is to develop NLP models requiring no extra-data and minimizing training time. To do so, in this paper, we explore Markov chain models, Hidden Markov Chain (HMC) and Pairwise Markov Chain (PMC), for NLP segmentation tasks. We apply these models for three classic applications: POS Tagging, Named-Entity-Recognition, and Chunking. We develop an original method to adapt these models for text segmentation's specific challenges to obtain relevant performances with very short training and execution times. PMC achieves equivalent results to those obtained by Conditional Random Fields (CRF), one of the most applied models for these tasks when no extra-data are used. Moreover, PMC has training times 30 times shorter than the CRF ones, which validates this model given our objectives.

Homonym identification is important for WSD that require coarse-grained partitions of senses. The goal of this project is to determine whether contextual information is sufficient for identifying a homonymous word. To capture the context, BERT embeddings are used as opposed to Word2Vec, which conflates senses into one vector. SemCor is leveraged to retrieve the embeddings. Various clustering algorithms are applied to the embeddings. Finally, the embeddings are visualized in a lower-dimensional space to understand the feasibility of the clustering process.

This paper aims to describe the approach we used to detect hope speech in the HopeEDI dataset. We experimented with two approaches. In the first approach, we used contextual embeddings to train classifiers using logistic regression, random forest, SVM, and LSTM based models.The second approach involved using a majority voting ensemble of 11 models which were obtained by fine-tuning pre-trained transformer models (BERT, ALBERT, RoBERTa, IndicBERT) after adding an output layer. We found that the second approach was superior for English, Tamil and Malayalam. Our solution got a weighted F1 score of 0.93, 0.75 and 0.49 for English,Malayalam and Tamil respectively. Our solution ranked first in English, eighth in Malayalam and eleventh in Tamil.

Words are malleable objects, influenced by events that are reflected in written texts. Situated in the global outbreak of COVID-19, our research aims at detecting semantic shifts in social media language triggered by the health crisis. With COVID-19 related big data extracted from Twitter, we train separate word embedding models for different time periods after the outbreak. We employ an alignment-based approach to compare these embeddings with a general-purpose Twitter embedding unrelated to COVID-19. We also compare our trained embeddings among them to observe diachronic evolution. Carrying out case studies on a set of words chosen by topic detection, we verify that our alignment approach is valid. Finally, we quantify the size of global semantic shift by a stability measure based on back-and-forth rotational alignment.

The capabilities of natural language models trained on large-scale data have increased immensely over the past few years. Downstream applications are at risk of inheriting biases contained in these models, with potential negative consequences especially for marginalized groups. In this paper, we analyze the occupational biases of a popular generative language model, GPT-2, intersecting gender with five protected categories: religion, sexuality, ethnicity, political affiliation, and name origin. Using a novel data collection pipeline we collect 396k sentence completions of GPT-2 and find: (i) The machine-predicted jobs are less diverse and more stereotypical for women than for men, especially for intersections; (ii) Fitting 262 logistic models shows intersectional interactions to be highly relevant for occupational associations; (iii) For a given job, GPT-2 reflects the societal skew of gender and ethnicity in the US, and in some cases, pulls the distribution towards gender parity, raising the normative question of what language models _should_ learn.

Manual evaluation is essential to judge progress on automatic text summarization. However, we conduct a survey on recent summarization system papers that reveals little agreement on how to perform such evaluation studies. We conduct two evaluation experiments on two aspects of summaries' linguistic quality (coherence and repetitiveness) to compare Likert-type and ranking annotations and show that best choice of evaluation method can vary from one aspect to another. In our survey, we also find that study parameters such as the overall number of annotators and distribution of annotators to annotation items are often not fully reported and that subsequent statistical analysis ignores grouping factors arising from one annotator judging multiple summaries. Using our evaluation experiments, we show that the total number of annotators can have a strong impact on study power and that current statistical analysis methods can inflate type I error rates up to eight-fold. In addition, we highlight that for the purpose of system comparison the current practice of eliciting multiple judgements per summary leads to less powerful and reliable annotations given a fixed study budget.

Reading and writing research papers is one of the most privileged abilities that a qualified researcher should master. However, it is difficult for new researchers (\eg{students}) to fully {grasp} this ability. It would be fascinating if we could train an intelligent agent to help people read and summarize papers, and perhaps even discover and exploit the potential knowledge clues to write novel papers. Although there have been existing works focusing on summarizing (\emph{i.e.}, reading) the knowledge in a given text or generating (\emph{i.e.}, writing) a text based on the given knowledge, the ability of simultaneously reading and writing is still under development. Typically, this requires an agent to fully understand the knowledge from the given text materials and generate correct and fluent novel paragraphs, which is very challenging in practice. In this paper, we propose a Deep ReAder-Writer (DRAW) network, which consists of a \textit{Reader} that can extract knowledge graphs (KGs) from input paragraphs and discover potential knowledge, a graph-to-text \textit{Writer} that generates a novel paragraph, and a \textit{Reviewer} that reviews the generated paragraph from three different aspects. Extensive experiments show that our DRAW network outperforms considered baselines and several state-of-the-art methods on AGENDA and M-AGENDA datasets. Our code and supplementary are released at this https URL.

Disagreements are pervasive in human communication. In this paper we investigate what makes disagreement constructive. To this end, we construct WikiDisputes, a corpus of 7 425 Wikipedia Talk page conversations that contain content disputes, and define the task of predicting whether disagreements will be escalated to mediation by a moderator. We evaluate feature-based models with linguistic markers from previous work, and demonstrate that their performance is improved by using features that capture changes in linguistic markers throughout the conversations, as opposed to averaged values. We develop a variety of neural models and show that taking into account the structure of the conversation improves predictive accuracy, exceeding that of feature-based models. We assess our best neural model in terms of both predictive accuracy and uncertainty by evaluating its behaviour when it is only exposed to the beginning of the conversation, finding that model accuracy improves and uncertainty reduces as models are exposed to more information.