A. E. Delia
University of Colorado Boulder
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. E. Delia.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2004
William C. Conant; Timothy M. VanReken; Tracey A. Rissman; Varuntida Varutbangkul; Haflidi H. Jonsson; Athanasios Nenes; Jose L. Jimenez; A. E. Delia; Roya Bahreini; G. C. Roberts; John H. Seinfeld
Our understanding of the activation of aerosol particles into cloud drops during the formation of warm cumulus clouds presently has a limited observational foundation. Detailed observations of aerosol size and composition, cloud microphysics and dynamics, and atmospheric thermodynamic state were collected in a systematic study of 21 cumulus clouds by the Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Studies (CIRPAS) Twin Otter aircraft during NASAs Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers–Florida Area Cirrus Experiment (CRYSTAL-FACE). An “aerosol-cloud” closure study was carried out in which a detailed cloud activation parcel model, which predicts cloud drop concentration using observed aerosol concentration, size distribution, cloud updraft velocity, and thermodynamic state, is evaluated against observations. On average, measured droplet concentration in adiabatic cloud regions is within 15% of the predictions. This agreement is corroborated by independent measurements of aerosol activation carried out by two cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) counters on the aircraft. Variations in aerosol concentration, which ranged from 300 to 3300 cm^(−3), drives large microphysical differences (250–2300 cm^(−3)) observed among continental and maritime clouds in the South Florida region. This is the first known study in which a cloud parcel model is evaluated in a closure study using a constraining set of data collected from a single platform. Likewise, this is the first known study in which relationships among aerosol size distribution, CCN spectrum, and cloud droplet concentration are all found to be consistent with theory within experimental uncertainties much less than 50%. Vertical profiles of cloud microphysical properties (effective radius, droplet concentration, dispersion) clearly demonstrate the boundary layer aerosols effect on cloud microphysics throughout the lowest 1 km of cloud depth. Onboard measurements of aerosol hygroscopic growth and the organic to sulfate mass ratio are related to CCN properties. These chemical data are used to quantify the range of uncertainty associated with the simplified treatment of aerosol composition assumed in the closure study.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2007
Craig Stroud; Athanasios Nenes; Jose L. Jimenez; P. F. DeCarlo; J. Alex Huffman; Roelof T. Bruintjes; E. Nemitz; A. E. Delia; D. W. Toohey; Alex Guenther; Sreela Nandi
Measurements of aerosol size distribution, chemical composition, and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration were performed during the Chemical Emission, Loss, Transformation, and Interactions with Canopies (CELTIC) field program at Duke Forest in North Carolina. A kinetic model of the cloud activation of ambient aerosol in the chamber of the CCN instrument was used to perform an aerosol–CCN closure study. This study advances prior investigations by employing a novel fitting algorithm that was used to integrate scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) measurements of aerosol number size distribution and aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) measurements of the mass size distribution for sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and organics into a single, coherent description of the ambient aerosol in the size range critical to aerosol activation (around 100-nm diameter). Three lognormal aerosol size modes, each with a unique internally mixed composition, were used as input into the kinetic model. For the two smaller size modes, which control CCN number concentration, organic aerosol mass fractions for the defined cases were between 58% and 77%. This study is also unique in that the water vapor accommodation coefficient was estimated based on comparing the initial timing for CCN activation in the instrument chamber with the activation predicted by the kinetic model. The kinetic model overestimated measured CCN concentrations, especially under polluted conditions. Prior studies have attributed a positive model bias to an incomplete understanding of the aerosol composition, especially the role of organics in the activation process. This study shows that including measured organic mass fractions with an assumed organic aerosol speciation profile (pinic acid, fulvic acid, and levoglucosan) and an assumed organic aerosol solubility of 0.02 kg kg 1 still resulted in a significant model positive bias for polluted case study periods. The slope and y intercept for the CCN predicted versus CCN observed regression was found to be 1.9 and 180 cm 3 , respectively. The overprediction generally does not exceed uncertainty limits but is indicative that a bias exists in the measurements or application of model. From this study, uncertainties in the particle number and mass size distributions as the cause for the model bias can be ruled out. The authors are also confident that the model is including the effects of growth kinetics on predicted activated number. However, one cannot rule out uncertainties associated with poorly characterized CCN measurement biases, uncertainties in assumed organic solubility, and uncertainties in aerosol mixing state. Sensitivity simulations suggest that assuming either an insoluble organic fraction or external aerosol mixing were both sufficient to reconcile the model bias.
Mass Spectrometry Reviews | 2007
Manjula R. Canagaratna; John T. Jayne; Jose L. Jimenez; J. D. Allan; M. R. Alfarra; Qiu Zhang; Timothy B. Onasch; Frank Drewnick; Hugh Coe; Ann M. Middlebrook; A. E. Delia; Leah R. Williams; A. Trimborn; M. J. Northway; P. F. DeCarlo; Charles E. Kolb; P. Davidovits; D. R. Worsnop
Journal of Aerosol Science | 2004
J. D. Allan; A. E. Delia; Hugh Coe; Keith N. Bower; M. Rami Alfarra; Jose L. Jimenez; Ann M. Middlebrook; Frank Drewnick; Timothy B. Onasch; Manjula R. Canagaratna; John T. Jayne; Douglas R. Worsnop
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2007
D. Salcedo; Timothy B. Onasch; Manjula R. Canagaratna; Katja Dzepina; J. A. Huffman; John T. Jayne; D. R. Worsnop; Charles E. Kolb; Silke Weimer; Frank Drewnick; J. D. Allan; A. E. Delia; Jose L. Jimenez
Astrobiology | 2004
M. Trainer; Alexander Anatolevich Pavlov; Daniel B. Curtis; Christopher P. McKay; Douglas R. Worsnop; A. E. Delia; D. W. Toohey; Owen B. Toon; Margaret A. Tolbert
Archive | 2004
J. D. Allan; A. E. Delia; Hugh Coe; Keith N. Bower; M. Rami Alfarra; Jose L. Jimenez; Ann M. Middlebrook; Frank Drewnick; Timothy B. Onasch; Manjula R. Canagaratna; John T. Jayne; Douglas R. Worsnop
Archive | 2009
E. Nemitz; Alex Huffmann; Jose L. Jimenez; Brad Baker; John T. Walker; A. E. Delia; D. W. Toohey; Thomas R. Karl; Craig Stroud; Alex Guenther
Archive | 2004
M. Trainer; Alexander Anatolevich Pavlov; Daniel B. Curtis; C. P. McKay; Douglas R. Worsnop; A. E. Delia; D. W. Toohey; Owen Brian Toon; Margaret A. Tolbert
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2004
William C. Conant; Timothy M. VanReken; Tracey A. Rissman; Varuntida Varutbangkul; H. H. Jonsson; Athanasios Nenes; Jose L. Jimenez; A. E. Delia; Roya Bahreini; G. C. Roberts; John H. Seinfeld