A. Gobillion

Phase II randomized study of whole-brain radiation therapy with or without concurrent temozolomide for brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND To improve the therapeutic index of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer, we investigated the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II multicenter prospective randomized study included patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal BMs from breast cancer, unsuitable for surgery or radiosurgery. All patients received conformal WBRT (3Gy × 10-30Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m2/day during the irradiation period. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) 6 weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (modified WHO criteria). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), neurologic symptoms, and tolerability. RESULTS Between February 2008 and November 2010, 100 patients were enrolled in the study (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). Median age was 55 years (29-79). Median follow-up was 9.4 months [1.0-68.1]. ORRs at 6 weeks were 36% in the WBRT arm and 30% in the WBRT + TMZ arm (NS). In the WBRT arm, median PFS was 7.4 months and median OS was 11.1 months. In the WBRT + TMZ arm, median PFS was 6.9 months and median OS was 9.4 months. Treatment was well tolerated in this arm: the most common ≥grade 2 acute toxicity was reversible lymphopenia. CONCLUSION WBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00875355.BACKGROUND To improve the therapeutic index of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer, we investigated the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II multicenter prospective randomized study included patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal BMs from breast cancer, unsuitable for surgery or radiosurgery. All patients received conformal WBRT (3 Gy × 10-30 Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m(2)/day during the irradiation period. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) 6 weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (modified WHO criteria). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), neurologic symptoms, and tolerability. RESULTS Between February 2008 and November 2010, 100 patients were enrolled in the study (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). Median age was 55 years (29-79). Median follow-up was 9.4 months [1.0-68.1]. ORRs at 6 weeks were 36% in the WBRT arm and 30% in the WBRT + TMZ arm (NS). In the WBRT arm, median PFS was 7.4 months and median OS was 11.1 months. In the WBRT + TMZ arm, median PFS was 6.9 months and median OS was 9.4 months. Treatment was well tolerated in this arm: the most common ≥grade 2 acute toxicity was reversible lymphopenia. CONCLUSION WBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00875355.

Late toxicities and outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy combined with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative non-metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant radiotherapy (B-RT) in breast cancer (BC). METHODS Multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone or B-RT in patients with non-metastatic BC enrolled in randomized Phase 3 BEATRICE trial. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 during and 12 months after the completion of RT. RESULTS From 2007 to 2012, 39 females received adjuvant B-RT and 45 received adjuvant RT alone. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. All patients had triple-negative non-metastatic BC and received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by RT. 90% of the 39 females treated by concurrent B-RT received whole breast irradiation (WBI) with a boost and 4 (10%) received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 49% of the females with internal mammary chain irradiation. The mean duration of bevacizumab was 11.7 months. 38 (84%) females treated by RT alone received WBI with a boost and 16% of the females received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 47% of the females with internal mammary chain RT in 31%. Grade 3 acute dermatitis was observed in 9% of patients receiving B-RT and 5% of patients receiving RT alone with no significant difference. 1 year after the completion of RT, the most common late grade 1-2 toxicities in the B-RT group were pain (18%), fibrosis (8%) and telangiectasia (5%). CONCLUSION The concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional RT is associated with acceptable early and late 1-year toxicities in patients with BC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The largest series of this association.

Abstract P1-10-17: Radiotherapy associated with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer

Purpose/Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine early and late toxicities among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) receiving concurrent bevacizumab (BV) and radiation therapy (RT). Materials/Methods Multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of BV and RT in patients with non-metastatic BC enrolled in Phase 3 BEATRICE, BEVERLY and BETH trial. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 during RT, 12 months and 36 months after its completion. Results Sixty-four patients were included from october 2007 to august 2010. They all received adjuvant RT and BV concomitant treatment, plus neo-adjuvant BV for 24 patients. RT was adjuvant and normo-fractionated. Twelve months toxicity was available for 60 patients and 36 months toxicity was available for 43 patients. Median follow-up was 46 months (18-77). Median age was 51 years old (23-68). Among 63 evaluated patients during RT, acute radiation dermatitis was observed in 48 (76%) patients : Grade 1 for 27 (43%), grade 2 for 17 (27%), grade 3 for 4 patients (6%). Grade 2 acute oesophagitis was observed in 1 patient. At 3 years, few toxicities were observed : 6 patients (14%) had grade 1 pain, 4 (9%) had grade 1 fibrosis, one (2%) had grade 1 telangiectasis, one (2%) had grade 1 paresis, 3 (7%) had grade 1 lymphoedema and one grade 3 lymphoedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. At 12 months, only one evaluated patient had a LVEF Conclusions Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional RT is associated with acceptable early and late 3-years toxicities in patients with BC. Determination of late toxicity at 60 months is currently underway. Citation Format: Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, De La Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Levy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Ady Vago N, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Radiotherapy associated with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-17.

Abstract P5-14-11: Locoregional toxicities after adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer

Purpose/Objectives Few data are available regarding the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer, especially in terms of late toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine early and late loco-regional toxicities among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with this combination. Materials/Methods In our prospective and descriptive study, we analyzed loco-regional toxicities of adjuvant RT in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving either concurrent bevacizumab or not in the randomized trial BEATRICE. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v3.0). Evaluation was done during RT and 12 months after the end of RT. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze toxicity between the two groups. Results From September 2007 to July 2009, we included 84 patients from the randomized trial BEATRICE which evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of bevacizumab to standard adjuvant therapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer; 39 women received an adjuvant RT with concurrent bevacizumab and 45 women received an adjuvant RT alone. Evaluation at 12 months was available for all the patients. All patients had a triple negative non-metastatic breast cancer and had an adjuvant chemotherapy then RT. Among patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab with RT, a total of 35 patients (90%) achieved a whole breast irradiation (median dose: 50 Gy) with a boost in the surgical bed (median dose: 16 Gy) and 4 patients (10%) had a post mastectomy RT (median dose 50 Gy); lymph node RT was performed in 19 patients (49%) with internal mammary chain RT in 12 patients (31%). Mean time of bevacizumab treatment was 11.7 months [2.1-12.6] and mean total dose of bevacizumab was 15000 mg [3330-28080]. Among patients receiving RT alone, 38 patients (84%) achieved a whole breast irradiation (median dose: 50 Gy) with a boost in the surgical bed (median dose: 16 Gy) and 7 patients (16%) had a post mastectomy RT (median dose 50 Gy); lymph node RT was performed in 21 patients (47%) with internal mammary chain RT in 14 patients (31%). Radiation treatment parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Incidence of acute grade 3 dermatitis was 10% in patients receiving bevacizumab associated with RT and 6% in patients receiving RT alone without significant difference. One year after the end of RT, the most common late toxicities in the group receiving bevacizumab and RT were grade 1-2 pain (18%), grade 1-2 fibrosis (8%), grade 1-2 arm lymphedema (8%) and grade 1-2 telangiectasia (6%).There was no significant difference in pain, radiation fibrosis, telangiectasia, arm lymphedema and dyspnea between the two groups. No patient experienced grade 3-4 toxicity in the two groups. Conclusions Our results indicate that concurrent bevacizumab with loco-regional RT provide acceptable early and late toxicities after one year in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-14-11.

Abstract P6-11-01: A randomized phase II clinical trial of whole-brain radiation therapy plus concomitant temozolomide in treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer: Six-month follow-up results

Background : Despite of therapeutics progress in advanced breast cancer, brain metastases occurrence remain a frequent and delicate situation. The efficacy of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), still considered as the standard local treatment in case of multiple brain metastases, is limited. Recently, several phase II studies have shown some efficacy of the association of WBRT and temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating agent already known as a radiosensitizer, with improved brain control rate (44 to 96%). Patients with breast cancer were underrepresented and none of these trials have studied this combined treatment issue in this specific population. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide in the treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer. Materials and Methods : A prospective randomized multicenter phase II study was developed, using a modified two-stage Fleming design. Patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal brain metastases from breast cancer, not suitable for surgery nor radiosurgery, were included. All patients received conformational WBRT (3 Gy x 10 to 30 Gy). They were randomized to WBRT plus concomitant TMZ administered 75 mg/m 2 /day during radiation period versus WBRT alone. The primary endpoint was radiologic objective response at six weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (WHO modified criteria). We also evaluated neurologic symptoms, tolerance, safety, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. A longer clinical-brain MRI follow-up was planned, each three months during a two-year period. All of the patients gave their written informed consent to be part of the study, which was approved by the local committee. Results : One hundred patients were enrolled between February 2008 and December 2010 (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). The median age was 55 [29 -79]. Eighty (80) patients had brain metastases as single secondary localization. About one third of patients had a triple negative breast cancer subtype (38,3% in the association arm and 35,71% in the WBRT alone arm). There were 26,7% and 14,6% of HER2 positive subtype respectively. The median follow-up was 30 months [range 6-60]. At six months from brain metastases diagnosis (three months after the end of the treatment), objective response rate seems better in the WBRT + TMZ arm: 52% versus 40% in the arm WBRT alone but was not statistically significant ( p = 0,54). No complete response was observed. In the WBRT + TMZ group, median PFS and OS at six-months were respectively 55,6% [range 46-7 – 66,0] and 67,7% [range 59,1 – 77,6]. No improvement in neurologic symptoms was noticed. In multivariate analysis, initial TNM status was significantly correlated with PFS and OS. The concurrent use of TMZ with WBRT was well-tolerated. The most frequent upper grade II acute toxicity was reversible leucopenia in the association arm. Conclusion : The addition of temozolomide to WBRT in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer did not improve local control or survival at six months follow-up. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-11-01.