J. Jacob

Radiothérapie mammaire locorégionale et traitement concomitant par trastuzumab

The overexpression of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) is observed in 15% of breast cancers and associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival. Trastuzumab is an anti-HER2 targeted therapy, leading to a specific inhibition of the molecular mechanisms triggered by this receptor. In an adjuvant setting, trastuzumab and radiotherapy have each proved their oncologic efficacy in the management of the breast tumours presenting this molecular profile. However, both treatments expose to an increased risk of toxicities, particularly cardiovascular ones. Moreover, the radiosensitizing effect of trastuzumab has been proved in vitro and in vivo. Hence, in clinical practice, the benefit/risk ratio of a concurrent treatment remains to be defined. This literature review has for purposes to describe the rationale making conceivable the administration of trastuzumab concurrently with locoregional breast radiotherapy, and to remind the results of the clinical studies having assessed this therapeutic association.

Vers une approche intégrée des toxicités cardiovasculaires liées aux traitements du cancer du sein

There is an increasing number of therapeutic options in breast cancer management. While prognosis improves, the cardiac toxicity related to treatments remains a significant issue. This toxicity has several clinical presentations and can be explained by complex and diverse molecular mechanisms. Systemic treatments (anthracyclines, inhibitors of HER2 signaling pathway, hormone therapy, antiangiogenic agents) and radiotherapy have their own cardiac toxicity. However, the toxicities associated with these treatments may potentiate together and the existence of pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors should be taken into account. The assessment of cardiac hazard evolves toward a multifactorial approach. Several possibilities exist to minimize the incidence of cardiac complications. Those include pharmacological and technological innovations, but also a more accurate selection of patients and a growing involvement of practitioners in the field of cardiac toxicity, which is prerequisite for an early management of cardiac events.

Treatment of grade II–III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy

Meningiomas account for 30-35% of intracranial tumors. Grade I meningiomas are most common and carry the best prognosis. Grade II and III meningiomas are more aggressive and the outcomes after surgical resection alone remain unsatisfactory. The main objective of this retrospective, single-center study was to assess our results of treatment of grade II-III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy (HT). We retrospectively reviewed patients with histologically proven (WHO 2007) grade II-III meningioma irradiated with HT. Patients were treated one session a day, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 59.4 Gy and 68.4 Gy delivered in 33 and 38 fractions of 1.8 Gy each to the LR PTV and HR PTV, with or without simultaneous integrated boost. From May 2011 to January 2015, 19 patients (15 with grade II and 4 with grade III meningiomas) were treated. Median follow-up for patients with Grade II or Grade III meningiomas, was 29.2 months (range, 10.7-52.4) and 21.3 months (range, 2.4-51.3), respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 89.2%, 83.6% and 56.3% respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 94.7%, 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. No patient had neurological toxicity greater than grade 2 in the acute period. During follow-up, only one patient had neurological toxicity greater than or equal to grade 3. The management of grade II to III meningiomas using HT with doses exceeding 60 Gy is associated with good local control and acceptable survival results.

Can Helical Tomotherapy be used as a Safe Treatment Alternative for Breast Cancer Patients

Radiation therapy (RT) has demonstrated strong clinical benefits for patients who present a high relapse risk after breast conserving surgery or radical mastectomy. Unfortunately, the benefits of RT can be offset by its possible impacts on cardiac toxicity and increased risk of death from cardiac events. Additionally, recent radiological and radiotherapy techniques have allowed clinicians to better define target volumes and customize irradiation so that doses to the heart and left coronary artery can be accurately quantified. Alternative treatment positions, such as the lateral and prone positions are also being used. These positions can adapt to the patient’s anatomy and thus better protect the heart and lungs. This paper will report the outcomes for a patient who received breast cancer treatment after her treatment position and technique were optimized for ideal target volume coverage and minimum irradiation to organs at risk (OAR), particularly to the heart and lungs.