Alec W. Gross

Cellular Trafficking and Degradation of Erythropoietin and Novel Erythropoiesis Stimulating Protein (NESP)

Erythropoietin (Epo) is essential for the production of mature red blood cells, and recombinant Epo is commonly used to treat anemia, but how Epo is degraded and cleared from the body is not understood. Glycosylation of Epo is required for its in vivo bioactivity, although not for in vitro receptor binding or stimulation of Epo-dependent cell lines; Epo glycosylation actually reduces the affinity of Epo for the Epo receptor (EpoR). Interestingly, a hyperglycosylated analog of Epo, called novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP), has a lower affinity than Epo for the EpoR but has greater in vivo activity and a longer serum half-life than Epo. We hypothesize that a major mechanism for degradation of Epo in the body occurs in cells expressing the Epo receptor, through receptor-mediated endocytosis of Epo followed by degradation in lysosomes, and therefore investigated the trafficking and degradation of Epo and NESP by EpoR-expressing cells. We show that Epo and NESP are degraded only by cultured cells that express the EpoR, and their receptor binding, dissociation, and trafficking properties determine their rates of intracellular degradation. Epo binds surface EpoR faster than NESP (kon = 5.0 × 108 m–1 min–1 versus 1.1 × 108 m–1 min–1) but dissociates slower (koff = 0.029 min–1 versus 0.042 min–1). Surface-bound Epo and NESP are internalized at the same rate (kin = 0.06 min–1), and after internalization 60% of each ligand is resecreted intact and 40% degraded. Our kinetic model of Epo and NESP receptor binding, intracellular trafficking, and degradation explains why Epo is degraded faster than NESP at the cellular level.

The NH 2 -Terminal Coiled-Coil Domain and Tyrosine 177 Play Important Roles in Induction of a Myeloproliferative Disease in Mice by Bcr-Abl

ABSTRACT Bcr-Abl, a fusion protein generated by t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation, plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). It has been shown that Bcr-Abl contains multiple functional domains and motifs and can disrupt regulation of many signaling pathways and cellular functions. However, the role of specific domains and motifs of Bcr-Abl or of specific signaling pathways in the complex in vivo pathogenesis of CML is not completely known. We have previously shown that expression of Bcr-Abl in bone marrow cells by retroviral transduction efficiently induces a myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) in mice resembling human CML. We have also shown that the Abl kinase activity within Bcr-Abl is essential for Bcr-Abl leukemogenesis, yet activation of the Abl kinase without Bcr sequences is not sufficient to induce MPD in mice. In this study we investigated the role of Bcr sequences within Bcr-Abl in inducing MPD using this murine model for CML. We found that the NH2-terminal coiled-coil (CC) domain was both essential and sufficient, even though not efficient, to activate Abl to induce an MPD in mice. Interestingly, deletion of the Src homology 3 domain complemented the deficiencies of the CC-deleted Bcr-Abl in inducing MPD in mice. We further demonstrated that the Grb2 binding site at Y177 played an important role in efficient induction of MPD. These studies directly demonstrated the important roles of Bcr sequences in induction of MPD by Bcr-Abl.

Active conformation of the erythropoietin receptor: random and cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of the extracellular juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains.

In the absence of erythropoietin (Epo) cell surface Epo receptors (EpoR) are dimeric; dimerization is mediated mainly by the transmembrane domain. Binding of Epo changes the orientation of the two receptor subunits. This conformational change is transmitted through the juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains, leading to activation of JAK2 kinase and induction of proliferation and survival signals. To define the active EpoR conformation(s) we screened libraries of EpoRs with random mutations in the transmembrane domain and identified several point mutations that activate the EpoR in the absence of ligand, including changes of either of the first two transmembrane domain residues (Leu226 and Ile227) to cysteine. Following this discovery, we performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis in the EpoR juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains. Many mutants formed disulfide-linked receptor dimers, but only EpoR dimers linked by cysteines at positions 223, 226, or 227 activated EpoR signal transduction pathways and supported proliferation of Ba/F3 cells in the absence of cytokines. These data suggest that activation of dimeric EpoR by Epo binding is achieved by reorienting the EpoR transmembrane and the connected cytosolic domains and that certain disulfide-bonded dimers represent the activated dimeric conformation of the EpoR, constitutively activating downstream signaling. Based on our data and the previously determined structure of Epo bound to a dimer of the EpoR extracellular domain, we present a model of the active and inactive conformations of the Epo receptor.

Bcr-Abl with an SH3 deletion retains the ability To induce a myeloproliferative disease in mice, yet c-Abl activated by an SH3 deletion induces only lymphoid malignancy.

ABSTRACT The bcr-abl oncogene plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). The fusion of Bcr sequences to Abl constitutively activates the Abl protein tyrosine kinase. We have recently shown that expression of Bcr-Abl in bone marrow cells by retroviral transduction efficiently induces in mice a myeloproliferative disease resembling human CML and that Abl kinase activity is essential for Bcr-Abl to induce a CML-like myeloproliferative disease. However, it is not known if activation of the Abl kinase alone is sufficient to induce a myeloproliferative disease. In this study, we examined the role of the Abl SH3 domain of Bcr-Abl in induction of myeloproliferative disease and tested whether c-Abl activated by SH3 deletion can induce a CML-like disease. We found that Bcr-Abl with an Abl SH3 deletion still induced a CML-like disease in mice. In contrast, c-Abl activated by SH3 deletion induced only lymphoid malignancies in mice and did not stimulate the growth of myeloid colonies from 5-fluorouracil-treated bone marrow cells in vitro. These results indicate that Bcr sequences in Bcr-Abl play additional roles in inducing myeloproliferative disease beyond simply activating the Abl kinase domain and that functions of the Abl SH3 domain are either not required or redundant in Bcr-Abl-induced myeloproliferative disease. The results also suggest that the type of hematological neoplasm induced by an abl oncogene is influenced not only by what type of hematopoietic cells the oncogene is targeted into but also by the intrinsic oncogenic properties of the particular abl oncogene. In addition, we found that ΔSH3 c-Abl induced less activation of Akt and STAT5 than did Bcr-Abl, suggesting that activation of these pathways plays a critical role in inducing a CML-like disease.

The Membrane-proximal Region of the Thrombopoietin Receptor Confers Its High Surface Expression by JAK2-dependent and -independent Mechanisms

Janus tyrosine kinase 2 (JAK2) is essential for signaling by the thrombopoietin (TpoR) and erythropoietin (EpoR) receptors. In the absence of JAK2 most EpoR molecules are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum in an Endo H-sensitive form. In contrast, we show that in the absence of JAK2 a large fraction of the TpoR is processed to the mature Endo H-resistant form and reaches the cell surface. By studying chimeras of the TpoR and EpoR we show that high surface expression of the TpoR is entirely conferred by the membrane-proximal region of the intracellular domain that includes the juxtamembrane, Box 1, and Box 2 regions. The TpoR intracellular domain shows similar effects on receptor endocytosis rate as that of the EpoR, but does stabilize the mature receptor isoform from degradation. Co-expression of JAK2 further stabilizes mature TpoR and thus further increases its surface expression. This JAK2 effect depends on the Box 1 region, the only JAK2 interacting site in the TpoR. By contrast, EpoR requires Box 1 as well as the flanking 20 residues on the C-terminal side for JAK2 interaction and JAK2-dependent surface expression. Our study suggests that whereas cell surface expression of type I cytokine receptors requires their cognate JAKs, the mechanisms governing receptor-JAK interactions differ among receptors interacting with the same JAK protein.

Symmetric Signaling by an Asymmetric 1 Erythropoietin: 2 Erythropoietin Receptor Complex

Via sites 1 and 2, erythropoietin binds asymmetrically to two identical receptor monomers, although it is unclear how asymmetry affects receptor activation and signaling. Here we report the design and validation of two mutant erythropoietin receptors that probe the role of individual members of the receptor dimer by selectively binding either site 1 or site 2 on erythropoietin. Ba/F3 cells expressing either mutant receptor do not respond to erythropoietin, but cells co-expressing both receptors respond to erythropoietin by proliferation and activation of the JAK2-Stat5 pathway. A truncated receptor with only one cytosolic tyrosine (Y343) is sufficient for signaling in response to erythropoietin, regardless of the monomer on which it is located. Similarly, only one receptor in the dimer needs a juxtamembrane hydrophobic L253 or W258 residue, essential for JAK2 activation. We conclude that despite asymmetry in the ligand-receptor interaction, both sides are competent for signaling, and appear to signal equally.

c-CBL is not required for leukemia induction by Bcr-Abl in mice.

Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase activity is essential for the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A number of Bcr-Abl substrates have been identified, but it is not clear which of these substrates are required for Bcr-Abl to transform cells. The multifunctional protein c-Cbl is one of the most prominently tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in Bcr-Abl-expressing cells. Using cell lines and mice with homozygous disruption of the c-CBL locus, we investigated the role of this protein for Bcr-Abl-driven transformation. We find that although c-Cbl−/− fibroblast cell lines show a deficit in Bcr-Abl transformation compared to wild-type (Wt) cells, this deficit was less pronounced in c-Cbl−/− B cells derived from murine bone marrow. Most importantly, in a transplantation model of CML, Bcr-Abl was capable of inducing fatal leukemia in mice in the absence of c-Cbl protein. Our results indicate that c-Cbl is dispensable for Bcr-Abl-induced leukemogenesis in mice.

Bcr-Abl has a greater intrinsic capacity than v-Abl to induce the neoplastic expansion of myeloid cells

The Bcr-Abl/p210 fusion protein plays a primary role in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Abelson murine leukemia virus, which encodes v-Abl/p160, induces a pre-B cell leukemia/lymphoma in mice. It has been unclear whether the apparent specificity of these two abl oncogenes for myeloid versus lymphoid neoplasms is due to specific intrinsic properties of these Abl oncoproteins, or due to the properties of the target cells expressing them. We have recently shown that expression of Bcr-Abl in bone marrow cells by retroviral transduction efficiently induces a myeloproliferative disorder in mice resembling human CML. In this study, we compared Bcr-Abl/p210 and v-Abl/p160 in this mouse CML model. We found that early in the course of disease, both Bcr-Abl/p210 and v-Abl/p160 expanded early immature hematopoietic cells. Later Bcr-Abl/p210 selectively expanded myeloid cells while v-Abl/p160 primarily induced the rapid in vivo expansion of B lymphoblastic cells, along with a minor population of myeloid cells. In vitro, Bcr-Abl/p210 induced more growth of myeloid colonies from 5-fluorouracil treated bone marrow than v-Abl/p160. These results, obtained under equal bone marrow transduction/transplantation conditions, indicate that Bcr-Abl/p210 has a greater intrinsic capacity than v-Abl/p160 to induce the neoplastic growth of myeloid cells. In addition, we found that cultured cells expressing Bcr-Abl/p210 had more activated STAT5 than cells that expressed v-Abl/p160. This suggests that activation of STAT5 might be one part of the mechanism of abl oncogene disease specificity.