Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alexej Abyzov is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alexej Abyzov.


Nature | 2012

Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data

Mark Gerstein; Anshul Kundaje; Manoj Hariharan; Stephen G. Landt; Koon Kiu Yan; Chao Cheng; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Ekta Khurana; Joel Rozowsky; Roger P. Alexander; Renqiang Min; Pedro Alves; Alexej Abyzov; Nick Addleman; Nitin Bhardwaj; Alan P. Boyle; Philip Cayting; Alexandra Charos; David Chen; Yong Cheng; Declan Clarke; Catharine L. Eastman; Ghia Euskirchen; Seth Frietze; Yao Fu; Jason Gertz; Fabian Grubert; Arif Harmanci; Preti Jain; Maya Kasowski

Transcription factors bind in a combinatorial fashion to specify the on-and-off states of genes; the ensemble of these binding events forms a regulatory network, constituting the wiring diagram for a cell. To examine the principles of the human transcriptional regulatory network, we determined the genomic binding information of 119 transcription-related factors in over 450 distinct experiments. We found the combinatorial, co-association of transcription factors to be highly context specific: distinct combinations of factors bind at specific genomic locations. In particular, there are significant differences in the binding proximal and distal to genes. We organized all the transcription factor binding into a hierarchy and integrated it with other genomic information (for example, microRNA regulation), forming a dense meta-network. Factors at different levels have different properties; for instance, top-level transcription factors more strongly influence expression and middle-level ones co-regulate targets to mitigate information-flow bottlenecks. Moreover, these co-regulations give rise to many enriched network motifs (for example, noise-buffering feed-forward loops). Finally, more connected network components are under stronger selection and exhibit a greater degree of allele-specific activity (that is, differential binding to the two parental alleles). The regulatory information obtained in this study will be crucial for interpreting personal genome sequences and understanding basic principles of human biology and disease.


Nature | 2011

Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing

Ryan E. Mills; Klaudia Walter; Chip Stewart; Robert E. Handsaker; Ken Chen; Can Alkan; Alexej Abyzov; Seungtai Yoon; Kai Ye; R. Keira Cheetham; Asif T. Chinwalla; Donald F. Conrad; Yutao Fu; Fabian Grubert; Iman Hajirasouliha; Fereydoun Hormozdiari; Lilia M. Iakoucheva; Zamin Iqbal; Shuli Kang; Jeffrey M. Kidd; Miriam K. Konkel; Joshua M. Korn; Ekta Khurana; Deniz Kural; Hugo Y. K. Lam; Jing Leng; Ruiqiang Li; Yingrui Li; Chang-Yun Lin; Ruibang Luo

Genomic structural variants (SVs) are abundant in humans, differing from other forms of variation in extent, origin and functional impact. Despite progress in SV characterization, the nucleotide resolution architecture of most SVs remains unknown. We constructed a map of unbalanced SVs (that is, copy number variants) based on whole genome DNA sequencing data from 185 human genomes, integrating evidence from complementary SV discovery approaches with extensive experimental validations. Our map encompassed 22,025 deletions and 6,000 additional SVs, including insertions and tandem duplications. Most SVs (53%) were mapped to nucleotide resolution, which facilitated analysing their origin and functional impact. We examined numerous whole and partial gene deletions with a genotyping approach and observed a depletion of gene disruptions amongst high frequency deletions. Furthermore, we observed differences in the size spectra of SVs originating from distinct formation mechanisms, and constructed a map of SV hotspots formed by common mechanisms. Our analytical framework and SV map serves as a resource for sequencing-based association studies.


Genome Research | 2011

CNVnator: An approach to discover, genotype and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing

Alexej Abyzov; Alexander E. Urban; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein

Copy number variation (CNV) in the genome is a complex phenomenon, and not completely understood. We have developed a method, CNVnator, for CNV discovery and genotyping from read-depth (RD) analysis of personal genome sequencing. Our method is based on combining the established mean-shift approach with additional refinements (multiple-bandwidth partitioning and GC correction) to broaden the range of discovered CNVs. We calibrated CNVnator using the extensive validation performed by the 1000 Genomes Project. Because of this, we could use CNVnator for CNV discovery and genotyping in a population and characterization of atypical CNVs, such as de novo and multi-allelic events. Overall, for CNVs accessible by RD, CNVnator has high sensitivity (86%-96%), low false-discovery rate (3%-20%), high genotyping accuracy (93%-95%), and high resolution in breakpoint discovery (<200 bp in 90% of cases with high sequencing coverage). Furthermore, CNVnator is complementary in a straightforward way to split-read and read-pair approaches: It misses CNVs created by retrotransposable elements, but more than half of the validated CNVs that it identifies are not detected by split-read or read-pair. By genotyping CNVs in the CEPH, Yoruba, and Chinese-Japanese populations, we estimated that at least 11% of all CNV loci involve complex, multi-allelic events, a considerably higher estimate than reported earlier. Moreover, among these events, we observed cases with allele distribution strongly deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, possibly implying selection on certain complex loci. Finally, by combining discovery and genotyping, we identified six potential de novo CNVs in two family trios.


Nature | 2015

An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes

Peter H. Sudmant; Tobias Rausch; Eugene J. Gardner; Robert E. Handsaker; Alexej Abyzov; John Huddleston; Zhang Y; Kai Ye; Goo Jun; Markus His Yang Fritz; Miriam K. Konkel; Ankit Malhotra; Adrian M. Stütz; Xinghua Shi; Francesco Paolo Casale; Jieming Chen; Fereydoun Hormozdiari; Gargi Dayama; Ken Chen; Maika Malig; Mark Chaisson; Klaudia Walter; Sascha Meiers; Seva Kashin; Erik Garrison; Adam Auton; Hugo Y. K. Lam; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Can Alkan; Danny Antaki

Structural variants are implicated in numerous diseases and make up the majority of varying nucleotides among human genomes. Here we describe an integrated set of eight structural variant classes comprising both balanced and unbalanced variants, which we constructed using short-read DNA sequencing data and statistically phased onto haplotype blocks in 26 human populations. Analysing this set, we identify numerous gene-intersecting structural variants exhibiting population stratification and describe naturally occurring homozygous gene knockouts that suggest the dispensability of a variety of human genes. We demonstrate that structural variants are enriched on haplotypes identified by genome-wide association studies and exhibit enrichment for expression quantitative trait loci. Additionally, we uncover appreciable levels of structural variant complexity at different scales, including genic loci subject to clusters of repeated rearrangement and complex structural variants with multiple breakpoints likely to have formed through individual mutational events. Our catalogue will enhance future studies into structural variant demography, functional impact and disease association.


Nature | 2012

Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells

Alexej Abyzov; Jessica Mariani; Dean Palejev; Ying Zhang; Michael S. Haney; Livia Tomasini; Anthony F. Ferrandino; Lior A. Rosenberg Belmaker; Anna Szekely; Michael Wilson; Arif Kocabas; Nathaniel E. Calixto; Elena L. Grigorenko; Anita Huttner; Katarzyna Chawarska; Sherman M. Weissman; Alexander E. Urban; Mark Gerstein; Flora M. Vaccarino

Reprogramming somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has been suspected of causing de novo copy number variation. To explore this issue, here we perform a whole-genome and transcriptome analysis of 20 human iPSC lines derived from the primary skin fibroblasts of seven individuals using next-generation sequencing. We find that, on average, an iPSC line manifests two copy number variants (CNVs) not apparent in the fibroblasts from which the iPSC was derived. Using PCR and digital droplet PCR, we show that at least 50% of those CNVs are present as low-frequency somatic genomic variants in parental fibroblasts (that is, the fibroblasts from which each corresponding human iPSC line is derived), and are manifested in iPSC lines owing to their clonal origin. Hence, reprogramming does not necessarily lead to de novo CNVs in iPSCs, because most of the line-manifested CNVs reflect somatic mosaicism in the human skin. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that clonal expansion, and iPSC lines in particular, can be used as a discovery tool to reliably detect low-frequency CNVs in the tissue of origin. Overall, we estimate that approximately 30% of the fibroblast cells have somatic CNVs in their genomes, suggesting widespread somatic mosaicism in the human body. Our study paves the way to understanding the fundamental question of the extent to which cells of the human body normally acquire structural alterations in their DNA post-zygotically.


Cell | 2015

FOXG1-Dependent Dysregulation of GABA/Glutamate Neuron Differentiation in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Jessica Mariani; Gianfilippo Coppola; Ping Zhang; Alexej Abyzov; Lauren Provini; Livia Tomasini; Mariangela Amenduni; Anna Szekely; Dean Palejev; Michael Wilson; Mark Gerstein; Elena L. Grigorenko; Katarzyna Chawarska; Kevin A. Pelphrey; James R. Howe; Flora M. Vaccarino

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a disorder of brain development. Most cases lack a clear etiology or genetic basis, and the difficulty of re-enacting human brain development has precluded understanding of ASD pathophysiology. Here we use three-dimensional neural cultures (organoids) derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to investigate neurodevelopmental alterations in individuals with severe idiopathic ASD. While no known underlying genomic mutation could be identified, transcriptome and gene network analyses revealed upregulation of genes involved in cell proliferation, neuronal differentiation, and synaptic assembly. ASD-derived organoids exhibit an accelerated cell cycle and overproduction of GABAergic inhibitory neurons. Using RNA interference, we show that overexpression of the transcription factor FOXG1 is responsible for the overproduction of GABAergic neurons. Altered expression of gene network modules and FOXG1 are positively correlated with symptom severity. Our data suggest that a shift toward GABAergic neuron fate caused by FOXG1 is a developmental precursor of ASD.


Science | 2013

Integrative annotation of variants from 1092 humans: application to cancer genomics.

Ekta Khurana; Yao Fu; Vincenza Colonna; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Hyun Min Kang; Tuuli Lappalainen; Andrea Sboner; Lucas Lochovsky; Jieming Chen; Arif Harmanci; Jishnu Das; Alexej Abyzov; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Kathryn Beal; Dimple Chakravarty; Daniel Challis; Yuan Chen; Declan Clarke; Laura Clarke; Fiona Cunningham; Uday S. Evani; Paul Flicek; Robert Fragoza; Erik Garrison; Richard A. Gibbs; Zeynep H. Gümüş; Javier Herrero; Naoki Kitabayashi; Yong Kong; Kasper Lage

Introduction Plummeting sequencing costs have led to a great increase in the number of personal genomes. Interpreting the large number of variants in them, particularly in noncoding regions, is a current challenge. This is especially the case for somatic variants in cancer genomes, a large proportion of which are noncoding. Prioritization of candidate noncoding cancer drivers based on patterns of selection. (Step 1) Filter somatic variants to exclude 1000 Genomes polymorphisms; (2) retain variants in noncoding annotations; (3) retain those in “sensitive” regions; (4) prioritize those disrupting a transcription-factor binding motif and (5) residing near the center of a biological network; (6) prioritize ones in annotation blocks mutated in multiple cancer samples. Methods We investigated patterns of selection in DNA elements from the ENCODE project using the full spectrum of variants from 1092 individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 1), including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (indels), and structural variants (SVs). Although we analyzed broad functional annotations, such as all transcription-factor binding sites, we focused more on highly specific categories such as distal binding sites of factor ZNF274. The greater statistical power of the Phase 1 data set compared with earlier ones allowed us to differentiate the selective constraints on these categories. We also used connectivity information between elements from protein-protein-interaction and regulatory networks. We integrated all the information on selection to develop a workflow (FunSeq) to prioritize personal-genome variants on the basis of their deleterious impact. As a proof of principle, we experimentally validated and characterized a few candidate variants. Results We identified a specific subgroup of noncoding categories with almost as much selective constraint as coding genes: “ultrasensitive” regions. We also uncovered a number of clear patterns of selection. Elements more consistently active across tissues and both maternal and paternal alleles (in terms of allele-specific activity) are under stronger selection. Variants disruptive because of mechanistic effects on transcription-factor binding (i.e. “motif-breakers”) are selected against. Higher network connectivity (i.e. for hubs) is associated with higher constraint. Additionally, many hub promoters and regulatory elements show evidence of recent positive selection. Overall, indels and SVs follow the same pattern as SNVs; however, there are notable exceptions. For instance, enhancers are enriched for SVs formed by nonallelic homologous recombination. We integrated these patterns of selection into the FunSeq prioritization workflow and applied it to cancer variants, because they present a strong contrast to inherited polymorphisms. In particular, application to ~90 cancer genomes (breast, prostate and medulloblastoma) reveals nearly a hundred candidate noncoding drivers. Discussion Our approach can be readily used to prioritize variants in cancer and is immediately applicable in a precision-medicine context. It can be further improved by incorporation of larger-scale population sequencing, better annotations, and expression data from large cohorts. Identifying Important Identifiers Each of us has millions of sequence variations in our genomes. Signatures of purifying or negative selection should help identify which of those variations is functionally important. Khurana et al. (1235587) used sequence polymorphisms from 1092 humans across 14 populations to identify patterns of selection, especially in noncoding regulatory regions. Noncoding regions under very strong negative selection included binding sites of some chromatin and general transcription factors (TFs) and core motifs of some important TF families. Positive selection in TF binding sites tended to occur in network hub promoters. Many recurrent somatic cancer variants occurred in noncoding regulatory regions and thus might indicate mutations that drive cancer. Regions under strong selection in the human genome identify noncoding regulatory elements with possible roles in disease. Interpreting variants, especially noncoding ones, in the increasing number of personal genomes is challenging. We used patterns of polymorphisms in functionally annotated regions in 1092 humans to identify deleterious variants; then we experimentally validated candidates. We analyzed both coding and noncoding regions, with the former corroborating the latter. We found regions particularly sensitive to mutations (“ultrasensitive”) and variants that are disruptive because of mechanistic effects on transcription-factor binding (that is, “motif-breakers”). We also found variants in regions with higher network centrality tend to be deleterious. Insertions and deletions followed a similar pattern to single-nucleotide variants, with some notable exceptions (e.g., certain deletions and enhancers). On the basis of these patterns, we developed a computational tool (FunSeq), whose application to ~90 cancer genomes reveals nearly a hundred candidate noncoding drivers.


Genome Biology | 2009

PEMer: a computational framework with simulation-based error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data

Jan O. Korbel; Alexej Abyzov; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Nicholas Carriero; Philip Cayting; Zhengdong D. Zhang; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein

Personal-genomics endeavors, such as the 1000 Genomes project, are generating maps of genomic structural variants by analyzing ends of massively sequenced genome fragments. To process these we developed Paired-End Mapper (PEMer; http://sv.gersteinlab.org/pemer). This comprises an analysis pipeline, compatible with several next-generation sequencing platforms; simulation-based error models, yielding confidence-values for each structural variant; and a back-end database. The simulations demonstrated high structural variant reconstruction efficiency for PEMers coverage-adjusted multi-cutoff scoring-strategy and showed its relative insensitivity to base-calling errors.


Molecular Systems Biology | 2014

AlleleSeq: analysis of allele‐specific expression and binding in a network framework

Joel Rozowsky; Alexej Abyzov; Jing Wang; Pedro Alves; Debasish Raha; Arif Harmanci; Jing Leng; Robert D. Bjornson; Yong Kong; Naoki Kitabayashi; Nitin Bhardwaj; Mark A. Rubin; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein

To study allele‐specific expression (ASE) and binding (ASB), that is, differences between the maternally and paternally derived alleles, we have developed a computational pipeline (AlleleSeq). Our pipeline initially constructs a diploid personal genome sequence (and corresponding personalized gene annotation) using genomic sequence variants (SNPs, indels, and structural variants), and then identifies allele‐specific events with significant differences in the number of mapped reads between maternal and paternal alleles. There are many technical challenges in the construction and alignment of reads to a personal diploid genome sequence that we address, for example, bias of reads mapping to the reference allele. We have applied AlleleSeq to variation data for NA12878 from the 1000 Genomes Project as well as matched, deeply sequenced RNA‐Seq and ChIP‐Seq data sets generated for this purpose. In addition to observing fairly widespread allele‐specific behavior within individual functional genomic data sets (including results consistent with X‐chromosome inactivation), we can study the interaction between ASE and ASB. Furthermore, we investigate the coordination between ASE and ASB from multiple transcription factors events using a regulatory network framework. Correlation analyses and network motifs show mostly coordinated ASB and ASE.


Nature Neuroscience | 2015

The PsychENCODE project

Schahram Akbarian; Chunyu Liu; James A. Knowles; Flora M. Vaccarino; Peggy J. Farnham; Gregory E. Crawford; Andrew E. Jaffe; Dalila Pinto; Stella Dracheva; Daniel H. Geschwind; Jonathan Mill; Angus C. Nairn; Alexej Abyzov; Sirisha Pochareddy; Shyam Prabhakar; Sherman M. Weissman; Patrick F. Sullivan; Matthew W. State; Zhiping Weng; Mette A. Peters; Kevin P. White; Mark Gerstein; Anahita Amiri; Chris Armoskus; Allison E. Ashley-Koch; Taejeong Bae; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Benjamin P. Berman; Gerhard A. Coetzee; Gianfilippo Coppola

Recent research on disparate psychiatric disorders has implicated rare variants in genes involved in global gene regulation and chromatin modification, as well as many common variants located primarily in regulatory regions of the genome. Understanding precisely how these variants contribute to disease will require a deeper appreciation for the mechanisms of gene regulation in the developing and adult human brain. The PsychENCODE project aims to produce a public resource of multidimensional genomic data using tissue- and cell type–specific samples from approximately 1,000 phenotypically well-characterized, high-quality healthy and disease-affected human post-mortem brains, as well as functionally characterize disease-associated regulatory elements and variants in model systems. We are beginning with a focus on autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and expect that this knowledge will apply to a wide variety of psychiatric disorders. This paper outlines the motivation and design of PsychENCODE.

Collaboration


Dive into the Alexej Abyzov's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge