Andrew Dyck
University of British Columbia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andrew Dyck.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Ussif Rashid Sumaila; William W. L. Cheung; Andrew Dyck; Kamal Gueye; Ling Huang; Vicky W. Y. Lam; Daniel Pauly; Thara Srinivasan; Wilf Swartz; Reginald Watson; Dirk Zeller
Global marine fisheries are currently underperforming, largely due to overfishing. An analysis of global databases finds that resource rent net of subsidies from rebuilt world fisheries could increase from the current negative US
PLOS ONE | 2011
Johanna J. Heymans; Steven Mackinson; Ussif Rashid Sumaila; Andrew Dyck; Alyson Little
13 billion to positive US
Environment and Development Economics | 2013
U. Rashid Sumaila; Andrew Dyck; William W.L. Cheung
54 billion per year, resulting in a net gain of US
Journal of small business and entrepreneurship | 2011
Andrew Dyck; Tomi Ovaska
600 to US
Journal of Bioeconomics | 2010
U. Rashid Sumaila; Ahmed Khan; Andrew Dyck; Reg Watson; Gordon R. Munro; Peter Tydemers; Daniel Pauly
1,400 billion in present value over fifty years after rebuilding. To realize this gain, governments need to implement a rebuilding program at a cost of about US
Journal of Bioeconomics | 2010
Andrew Dyck; U. Rashid Sumaila
203 (US
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences | 2012
U. Rashid Sumaila; Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor; Andrew Dyck; Ling Huang; William W. L. Cheung; Jennifer Jacquet; Kristin M. Kleisner; Vicky W. Y. Lam; Wilf Swartz; Dirk Zeller; Daniel Pauly
130–US
Ices Journal of Marine Science | 2011
Vicky W. Y. Lam; Ussif Rashid Sumaila; Andrew Dyck; Daniel Pauly; Reg Watson
292) billion in present value. We estimate that it would take just 12 years after rebuilding begins for the benefits to surpass the cost. Even without accounting for the potential boost to recreational fisheries, and ignoring ancillary and non-market values that would likely increase, the potential benefits of rebuilding global fisheries far outweigh the costs.
Marine Policy | 2014
U. Rashid Sumaila; Andrew Dyck; Adam Baske
Background This study examines the impact of subsidies on the profitability and ecological stability of the North Sea fisheries over the past 20 years. It shows the negative impact that subsidies can have on both the biomass of important fish species and the possible profit from fisheries. The study includes subsidies in an ecosystem model of the North Sea and examines the possible effects of eliminating fishery subsidies. Methodology/Principal Findings Hindcast analysis between 1991 and 2003 indicates that subsidies reduced the profitability of the fishery even though gross revenue might have been high for specific fisheries sectors. Simulations seeking to maximise the total revenue between 2004 and 2010 suggest that this can be achieved by increasing the effort of Nephrops trawlers, beam trawlers, and the pelagic trawl-and-seine fleet, while reducing the effort of demersal trawlers. Simulations show that ecological stability can be realised by reducing the effort of the beam trawlers, Nephrops trawlers, pelagic- and demersal trawl-and-seine fleets. This analysis also shows that when subsidies are included, effort will always be higher for all fleets, because it effectively reduces the cost of fishing. Conclusions/Significance The study found that while removing subsidies might reduce the total catch and revenue, it increases the overall profitability of the fishery and the total biomass of commercially important species. For example, cod, haddock, herring and plaice biomass increased over the simulation when optimising for profit, and when optimising for ecological stability, the biomass for cod, plaice and sole also increased. When subsidies are eliminated, the study shows that rather than forcing those involved in the fishery into the red, fisheries become more profitable, despite a decrease in total revenue due to a loss of subsidies from the government.
Archive | 2011
Ussif Rashid Sumaila; Andrew Dyck; Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor; Reg Watson
We study the effects of providing subsidies to the fisheries in small island developing states (SIDS), where fisheries are important to both the food security and livelihoods of the populations. By analyzing data on current and potential catch and computing the potential catch losses from the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of SIDS, we find that, collectively, SIDS have currently overfished their waters to the extent that their current catch is just under 50 per cent of the maximum catch potential. This catch loss results in direct and indirect food security impacts in terms of losses in healthy, varied and nutrient-rich food, revenues, incomes and economic impacts in SIDS. Our results also demonstrate that capacity-enhancing subsidies contribute to overfishing while the effect of good subsidies is unclear and needs further analysis.