Anna Y. Lee
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna Y. Lee.
Nature Cell Biology | 2012
Johnny M. Tkach; Askar Yimit; Anna Y. Lee; Michael Riffle; Michael Costanzo; Daniel Jaschob; Jason A. Hendry; Jiongwen Ou; Jason Moffat; Charles Boone; Trisha N. Davis; Corey Nislow; Grant W. Brown
Relocalization of proteins is a hallmark of the DNA damage response. We use high-throughput microscopic screening of the yeast GFP fusion collection to develop a systems-level view of protein reorganization following drug-induced DNA replication stress. Changes in protein localization and abundance reveal drug-specific patterns of functional enrichments. Classification of proteins by subcellular destination enables the identification of pathways that respond to replication stress. We analysed pairwise combinations of GFP fusions and gene deletion mutants to define and order two previously unknown DNA damage responses. In the first, Cmr1 forms subnuclear foci that are regulated by the histone deacetylase Hos2 and are distinct from the typical Rad52 repair foci. In a second example, we find that the checkpoint kinases Mec1/Tel1 and the translation regulator Asc1 regulate P-body formation. This method identifies response pathways that were not detected in genetic and protein interaction screens, and can be readily applied to any form of chemical or genetic stress to reveal cellular response pathways.
Science | 2014
Anna Y. Lee; Robert P. St.Onge; Michael J. Proctor; Iain M. Wallace; Aaron H. Nile; Paul A. Spagnuolo; Yulia Jitkova; Marcela Gronda; Yan Wu; Moshe K. Kim; Kahlin Cheung-Ong; Nikko P. Torres; Eric D. Spear; Mitchell K.L. Han; Ulrich Schlecht; Sundari Suresh; Geoffrey Duby; Lawrence E. Heisler; Anuradha Surendra; Eula Fung; Malene L. Urbanus; Marinella Gebbia; Elena Lissina; Molly Miranda; Jennifer Chiang; Ana Aparicio; Mahel Zeghouf; Ronald W. Davis; Jacqueline Cherfils; Marc Boutry
Yeasty HIPHOP In order to identify how chemical compounds target genes and affect the physiology of the cell, tests of the perturbations that occur when treated with a range of pharmacological chemicals are required. By examining the haploinsufficiency profiling (HIP) and homozygous profiling (HOP) chemogenomic platforms, Lee et al. (p. 208) analyzed the response of yeast to thousands of different small molecules, with genetic, proteomic, and bioinformatic analyses. Over 300 compounds were identified that targeted 121 genes within 45 cellular response signature networks. These networks were used to extrapolate the likely effects of related chemicals, their impact upon genetic pathways, and to identify putative gene functions. Guilt by association helps identify the chemogenomic signatures of compounds targeting yeast genes. Genome-wide characterization of the in vivo cellular response to perturbation is fundamental to understanding how cells survive stress. Identifying the proteins and pathways perturbed by small molecules affects biology and medicine by revealing the mechanisms of drug action. We used a yeast chemogenomics platform that quantifies the requirement for each gene for resistance to a compound in vivo to profile 3250 small molecules in a systematic and unbiased manner. We identified 317 compounds that specifically perturb the function of 121 genes and characterized the mechanism of specific compounds. Global analysis revealed that the cellular response to small molecules is limited and described by a network of 45 major chemogenomic signatures. Our results provide a resource for the discovery of functional interactions among genes, chemicals, and biological processes.
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2013
Mahadeo A. Sukhai; Swayam Prabha; Rose Hurren; Angela Rutledge; Anna Y. Lee; Shrivani Sriskanthadevan; Hong Sun; Xiaoming Wang; Marko Skrtic; Ayesh Seneviratne; Maria Cusimano; Bozhena Jhas; Marcela Gronda; Neil MacLean; Eunice E. Cho; Paul A. Spagnuolo; Sumaiya Sharmeen; Marinella Gebbia; Malene L. Urbanus; Kolja Eppert; Dilan Dissanayake; Alexia Jonet; Alexandra Dassonville-Klimpt; Xiaoming Li; Alessandro Datti; Pamela S. Ohashi; Jeff Wrana; Ian Rogers; Pascal Sonnet; William Y. Ellis
Despite efforts to understand and treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there remains a need for more comprehensive therapies to prevent AML-associated relapses. To identify new therapeutic strategies for AML, we screened a library of on- and off-patent drugs and identified the antimalarial agent mefloquine as a compound that selectively kills AML cells and AML stem cells in a panel of leukemia cell lines and in mice. Using a yeast genome-wide functional screen for mefloquine sensitizers, we identified genes associated with the yeast vacuole, the homolog of the mammalian lysosome. Consistent with this, we determined that mefloquine disrupts lysosomes, directly permeabilizes the lysosome membrane, and releases cathepsins into the cytosol. Knockdown of the lysosomal membrane proteins LAMP1 and LAMP2 resulted in decreased cell viability, as did treatment of AML cells with known lysosome disrupters. Highlighting a potential therapeutic rationale for this strategy, leukemic cells had significantly larger lysosomes compared with normal cells, and leukemia-initiating cells overexpressed lysosomal biogenesis genes. These results demonstrate that lysosomal disruption preferentially targets AML cells and AML progenitor cells, providing a rationale for testing lysosomal disruption as a novel therapeutic strategy for AML.
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics | 2012
Alison C. Douglas; A. M. Smith; Sara Sharifpoor; Zhun Yan; Tanja Durbic; Lawrence E. Heisler; Anna Y. Lee; Owen Ryan; Hendrikje Göttert; Anu Surendra; Dewald van Dyk; Guri Giaever; Charles Boone; Corey Nislow; Brenda Andrews
Systematic analysis of gene overexpression phenotypes provides an insight into gene function, enzyme targets, and biological pathways. Here, we describe a novel functional genomics platform that enables a highly parallel and systematic assessment of overexpression phenotypes in pooled cultures. First, we constructed a genome-level collection of ~5100 yeast barcoder strains, each of which carries a unique barcode, enabling pooled fitness assays with a barcode microarray or sequencing readout. Second, we constructed a yeast open reading frame (ORF) galactose-induced overexpression array by generating a genome-wide set of yeast transformants, each of which carries an individual plasmid-born and sequence-verified ORF derived from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae full-length EXpression-ready (FLEX) collection. We combined these collections genetically using synthetic genetic array methodology, generating ~5100 strains, each of which is barcoded and overexpresses a specific ORF, a set we termed “barFLEX.” Additional synthetic genetic array allows the barFLEX collection to be moved into different genetic backgrounds. As a proof-of-principle, we describe the properties of the barFLEX overexpression collection and its application in synthetic dosage lethality studies under different environmental conditions.
ACS Chemical Biology | 2012
Kahlin Cheung-Ong; Kyung Tae Song; Zhidong Ma; Daniel Shabtai; Anna Y. Lee; David Gallo; Lawrence E. Heisler; Grant W. Brown; Ulrich Bierbach; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow
Platinum-based drugs have been used to successfully treat diverse cancers for several decades. Cisplatin, the original compound of this class, cross-links DNA, resulting in cell cycle arrest and cell death via apoptosis. Cisplatin is effective against several tumor types, yet it exhibits toxic side effects and tumors often develop resistance. To mitigate these liabilities while maintaining potency, we generated a library of non-classical platinum-acridine hybrid agents and assessed their mechanisms of action using a validated genome-wide screening approach in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in the distantly related yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Chemogenomic profiles from both S. cerevisiae and S. pombe demonstrate that several of the platinum-acridines damage DNA differently than cisplatin based on their requirement for distinct modules of DNA repair.
BMC Genomics | 2012
María De Los Ángeles Jaime; Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca; Ana Conesa; Anna Y. Lee; Mark R. Proctor; Lawrence E. Heisler; Marinella Gebbia; Guri Giaever; J. Timothy Westwood; Corey Nislow
BackgroundChitosan oligosaccharide (COS), a deacetylated derivative of chitin, is an abundant, and renewable natural polymer. COS has higher antimicrobial properties than chitosan and is presumed to act by disrupting/permeabilizing the cell membranes of bacteria, yeast and fungi. COS is relatively non-toxic to mammals. By identifying the molecular and genetic targets of COS, we hope to gain a better understanding of the antifungal mode of action of COS.ResultsThree different chemogenomic fitness assays, haploinsufficiency (HIP), homozygous deletion (HOP), and multicopy suppression (MSP) profiling were combined with a transcriptomic analysis to gain insight in to the mode of action and mechanisms of resistance to chitosan oligosaccharides. The fitness assays identified 39 yeast deletion strains sensitive to COS and 21 suppressors of COS sensitivity. The genes identified are involved in processes such as RNA biology (transcription, translation and regulatory mechanisms), membrane functions (e.g. signalling, transport and targeting), membrane structural components, cell division, and proteasome processes. The transcriptomes of control wild type and 5 suppressor strains overexpressing ARL1, BCK2, ERG24, MSG5, or RBA50, were analyzed in the presence and absence of COS. Some of the up-regulated transcripts in the suppressor overexpressing strains exposed to COS included genes involved in transcription, cell cycle, stress response and the Ras signal transduction pathway. Down-regulated transcripts included those encoding protein folding components and respiratory chain proteins. The COS-induced transcriptional response is distinct from previously described environmental stress responses (i.e. thermal, salt, osmotic and oxidative stress) and pre-treatment with these well characterized environmental stressors provided little or any resistance to COS.ConclusionsOverexpression of the ARL1 gene, a member of the Ras superfamily that regulates membrane trafficking, provides protection against COS-induced cell membrane permeability and damage. We found that the ARL1 COS-resistant over-expression strain was as sensitive to Amphotericin B, Fluconazole and Terbinafine as the wild type cells and that when COS and Fluconazole are used in combination they act in a synergistic fashion. The gene targets of COS identified in this study indicate that COS’s mechanism of action is different from other commonly studied fungicides that target membranes, suggesting that COS may be an effective fungicide for drug-resistant fungal pathogens.
Assay and Drug Development Technologies | 2013
Nikko P. Torres; Anna Y. Lee; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow; Grant W. Brown
Drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of a range of diseases such as cancer, AIDS, and bacterial infections. Such combinations are less likely to be thwarted by resistance, and they have the desirable potential to be synergistic. Synergistic combinations can have decreased toxicity if lower doses of the constituent agents can be used. Conversely, antagonistic combinations can lead to lower efficacy of a treatment. Unfortunately, practical limitations, including the large number of possible combinations to be tested and the importance of optimizing concentrations and order of addition, discourage systematic studies of compound combinations. To address these limitations, we present a platform to screen drug combinations at multiple concentrations with varying orders of addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, at high throughput. In a proof of principle, we screened all possible pairwise combinations of 11 DNA damaging agents and found that of the 66 combinations tested, six were synergistic and three were antagonistic. The strength of two-thirds of these combinations was dependent on the order in which the drugs were added to the cells. We further tested the synergistic and antagonistic combinations in two cancer cell lines and found the combination of mitomycin C and irinotecan to be synergistic in both cell lines. This pilot study demonstrates the utility of using yeast for screening large matrices of drug combinations, and it provides a means to prioritize drug combination tests in human cells. Finally, we underscore the importance of testing the order of addition for assessing drug combinations.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2013
Maciej Lis; Sanjay Bhatt; Nathan E. Schoenly; Anna Y. Lee; Corey Nislow; Libuse A. Bobek
ABSTRACT To compare the effects of four antimicrobial peptides (MUC7 12-mer, histatin 12-mer, cathelicidin KR20, and a peptide containing lactoferricin amino acids 1 to 11) on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we employed a genomewide fitness screen of combined collections of mutants with homozygous deletions of nonessential genes and heterozygous deletions of essential genes. When an arbitrary fitness score cutoffs of 1 (indicating a fitness defect, or hypersensitivity) and −1 (indicating a fitness gain, or resistance) was used, 425 of the 5,902 mutants tested exhibited altered fitness when treated with at least one peptide. Functional analysis of the 425 strains revealed enrichment among the identified deletions in gene groups associated with the Gene Ontology (GO) terms “ribosomal subunit,” “ribosome biogenesis,” “protein glycosylation,” “vacuolar transport,” “Golgi vesicle transport,” “negative regulation of transcription,” and others. Fitness profiles of all four tested peptides were highly similar, particularly among mutant strains exhibiting the greatest fitness defects. The latter group included deletions in several genes involved in induction of the RIM101 signaling pathway, including several components of the ESCRT sorting machinery. The RIM101 signaling regulates response of yeasts to alkaline and neutral pH and high salts, and our data indicate that this pathway also plays a prominent role in regulating protective measures against all four tested peptides. In summary, the results of the chemical genomic screens of S. cerevisiae mutant collection suggest that the four antimicrobial peptides, despite their differences in structure and physical properties, share many interactions with S. cerevisiae cells and consequently a high degree of similarity between their modes of action.
BioMed Research International | 2015
Corey Nislow; Anna Y. Lee; Patricia L. Allen; Guri Giaever; Andrew Paul Smith; Marinella Gebbia; Louis S. Stodieck; Jeffrey S. Hammond; Holly H. Birdsall; Timothy G. Hammond
Spaceflight is a unique environment with profound effects on biological systems including tissue redistribution and musculoskeletal stresses. However, the more subtle biological effects of spaceflight on cells and organisms are difficult to measure in a systematic, unbiased manner. Here we test the utility of the molecularly barcoded yeast deletion collection to provide a quantitative assessment of the effects of microgravity on a model organism. We developed robust hardware to screen, in parallel, the complete collection of ~4800 homozygous and ~5900 heterozygous (including ~1100 single-copy deletions of essential genes) yeast deletion strains, each carrying unique DNA that acts as strain identifiers. We compared strain fitness for the homozygous and heterozygous yeast deletion collections grown in spaceflight and ground, as well as plus and minus hyperosmolar sodium chloride, providing a second additive stressor. The genome-wide sensitivity profiles obtained from these treatments were then queried for their similarity to a compendium of drugs whose effects on the yeast collection have been previously reported. We found that the effects of spaceflight have high concordance with the effects of DNA-damaging agents and changes in redox state, suggesting mechanisms by which spaceflight may negatively affect cell fitness.
Handbook of Systems Biology | 2013
Anna Y. Lee; Gary D. Bader; Corey Nislow; Guri Giaever
The modern drug discovery (MDD) paradigm is based on the assumption that a small molecule with demonstrated ability to potently inhibit a target protein in vitro will translate into an efficacious low-dose therapy. This target-oriented paradigm has met little success, however, resulting in the lowest rate of new drug approvals in a generation. In contrast, the development of chemogenomics, allowing the cellular response to drug to be measured in vivo, has revealed that many drugs act instead through polypharmacology, that is, act to inhibit many proteins in the cell. This cellular behavior parallels our updated systems-level view of the cell as a highly interconnected system, one where the perturbation of a single protein will result in effects on its interacting protein partners. Chemogenomic profiling has revealed novel insights into the cellular response to chemical stress, and combined with advancements in systems biology, is creating the foundation for a new MDD polypharmacology-based paradigm.