Cassandra D. Salgado
Medical University of South Carolina
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cassandra D. Salgado.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2003
Cassandra D. Salgado; Barry M. Farr; David P. Calfee
Reports suggest that carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among persons without health care-associated risks has increased. A meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) among MRSA isolates from hospitalized patients or the prevalence of MRSA colonization among community members was conducted. The CA-MRSA prevalence among hospital MRSA was 30.2% in 27 retrospective studies and 37.3% in 5 prospective studies; 85% of all patients with CA-MRSA had > or =1 health care-associated risk. The pooled MRSA colonization rate among community members was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04%-1.53%), but there was significant heterogeneity among study populations. Community members from whom samples were obtained in health care facilities were more likely to be carrying MRSA than were community members from whom samples were obtained outside of the health care setting (relative risk, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56-3.53). Among studies that excluded persons with health care contacts, the MRSA prevalence was 0.2%. Moreover, most persons with CA-MRSA had > or =1 health care-associated risk, which suggests that the prevalence of MRSA among persons without risks remains low (< or =0.24%). Effective control of dissemination of MRSA throughout the community likely will require effective control of nosocomial MRSA transmission.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Deverick J. Anderson; Keith S. Kaye; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert R. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe
Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals to implement and prioritize their surgical site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion.1. Burden of SSIs as complications in acute care facilities.a. SSIs occur in 2%-5% of patients undergoing inpatient surgery in the United States.b. Approximately 500,000 SSIs occur each year.2. Outcomes associated with SSIa. Each SSI is associated with approximately 7-10 additional postoperative hospital days.b. Patients with an SSI have a 2-11 times higher risk of death, compared with operative patients without an SSI.i. Seventy-seven percent of deaths among patients with SSI are direcdy attributable to SSI.c. Attributable costs of SSI vary, depending on the type of operative procedure and the type of infecting pathogen; published estimates range from
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J. Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria J. Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Lindsay Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert A. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe
3,000 to
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Evelyn Lo; Lindsay E. Nicolle; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J. Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert J. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe
29,000.i. SSIs are believed to account for up to
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2002
Cassandra D. Salgado; Barry M. Farr; Keri K. Hall; Frederick G. Hayden
10 billion annually in healthcare expenditures.1. Definitionsa. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System and the National Healthcare Safety Network definitions for SSI are widely used.b. SSIs are classified as follows (Figure):i. Superficial incisional (involving only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision)ii. Deep incisional (involving fascia and/or muscular layers)iii. Organ/space
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Susan E. Coffin; Michael Klompas; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J. Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert J. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe
Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion.1. Patients at risk for CLABSIs in acute care facilitiesa. Intensive care unit (ICU) population: The risk of CLABSI in ICU patients is high. Reasons for this include the frequent insertion of multiple catheters, the use of specific types of catheters that are almost exclusively inserted in ICU patients and associated with substantial risk (eg, arterial catheters), and the fact that catheters are frequently placed in emergency circumstances, repeatedly accessed each day, and often needed for extended periods.b. Non-ICU population: Although the primary focus of attention over the past 2 decades has been the ICU setting, recent data suggest that the greatest numbers of patients with central lines are in hospital units outside the ICU, where there is a substantial risk of CLABSI.2. Outcomes associated with hospital-acquired CLABSIa. Increased length of hospital stayb. Increased cost; the non-inflation-adjusted attributable cost of CLABSIs has been found to vary from 29,000 per episode
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Deborah S. Yokoe; Leonard A. Mermel; Deverick J. Anderson; Kathleen M. Arias; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter L. Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Lindsay E. Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Kelly Podgorny; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert J. Wise; David C. Classen
Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion. 1. Burden of CAUTIs a. Urinary tract infection is the most common hospital-acquired infection; 80% of these infections are attributable to an indwelling urethral catheter. b. Twelve to sixteen percent of hospital inpatients will have a urinary catheter at some time during their hospital stay. c. The daily risk of acquisition of urinary infection varies from 3% to 7% when an indwelling urethral catheter remains in situ. 2. Outcomes associated with CAUTI a. Urinary tract infection is the most important adverse outcome of urinary catheter use. Bacteremia and sepsis may occur in a small proportion of infected patients. b. Morbidity attributable to any single episode of catheterization is limited, but the high frequency of catheter use in hospitalized patients means that the cumulative burden of CAUTI is substantial. c. Catheter use is also associated with negative outcomes other than infection, including nonbacterial urethral inflammation, urethral strictures, and mechanical trauma.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2004
Cassandra D. Salgado; Eve T. Giannetta; Frederick G. Hayden; Barry M. Farr
Influenza poses special hazards inside healthcare facilities and can cause explosive outbreaks of illness. Healthcare workers are at risk of acquiring influenza and thus serve as an important reservoir for patients under their care. Annual influenza immunisation of high-risk persons and their contacts, including healthcare workers, is the primary means of preventing nosocomial influenza. Despite influenza vaccine effectiveness, it is substantially underused by healthcare providers. Influenza can be diagnosed by culturing the virus from respiratory secretions and by rapid antigen detection kits; recognition of a nosocomial outbreak is important in order to employ infection-control efforts. Optimal control of influenza in the acute-care setting should focus upon reducing potential influenza reservoirs in the hospital, including: isolating patients with suspected or documented influenza, sending home healthcare providers or staff who exhibit typical symptoms of influenza, and discouraging persons with febrile respiratory illness from visiting the hospital during a known influenza outbreak in the community. (Note: influenza and other respiratory viruses can cause non-febrile illness but are still transmissible.) The antiviral M2 protein inhibitors (amantadine, rimantadine) and neuraminidase inhibitors (zanamivir, oseltamivir) have proven efficacy in treating and preventing influenza illness; however, their role in the prevention and control of influenza in the acute hospital setting remains to be more fully studied.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008
Erik R. Dubberke; Dale N. Gerding; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J. Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Victoria J. Fraser; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert A. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe
Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion.1. Occurrence of VAP in acute care facilities.a. VAP is one of the most common infections acquired by adults and children in intensive care units (ICUs).i. In early studies, it was reported that 10%-20% of patients undergoing ventilation developed VAP. More-recent publications report rates of VAP that range from 1 to 4 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days, but rates may exceed 10 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days in some neonatal and surgical patient populations. The results of recent quality improvement initiatives, however, suggest that many cases of VAP might be prevented by careful attention to the process of care.2. Outcomes associated with VAPa. VAP is a cause of significant patient morbidity and mortality, increased utilization of healthcare resources, and excess cost.i. The mortality attributable to VAP may exceed 10%.ii. Patients with VAP require prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation, extended hospitalizations, excess use of antimicrobial medications, and increased direct medical costs.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2007
Cassandra D. Salgado; Sangita Dash; J. Robert Cantey; Camelia E. Marculescu
Preventable healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) occur in US hospitals. Preventing these infections is a national priority, with initiatives led by healthcare organizations, professional associations, government and accrediting agencies, legislators, regulators, payers, and consumer advocacy groups. To assist acute care hospitals in focusing and prioritizing efforts to implement evidence-based practices for prevention of HAIs, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Standards and Practice Guidelines Committee appointed a task force to create a concise compendium of recommendations for the prevention of common HAIs. This compendium is implementation focused and differs from most previously published guidelines in that it highlights a set of basic HAI prevention strategies plus special approaches for use in locations and/or populations within the hospital when infections are not controlled by use of basic practices, recommends that accountability for implementing infection prevention practices be assigned to specific groups and individuals, and includes proposed performance measures for internal quality improvement efforts.