Catherine A. Ball
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Catherine A. Ball.
Nature Genetics | 2000
Michael Ashburner; Catherine A. Ball; Judith A. Blake; David Botstein; Heather L. Butler; J. Michael Cherry; Allan Peter Davis; Kara Dolinski; Selina S. Dwight; Janan T. Eppig; Midori A. Harris; David P. Hill; Laurie Issel-Tarver; Andrew Kasarskis; Suzanna E. Lewis; John C. Matese; Joel E. Richardson; Martin Ringwald; Gerald M. Rubin; Gavin Sherlock
Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.
Nature Genetics | 2001
Alvis Brazma; Pascal Hingamp; John Quackenbush; Gavin Sherlock; Paul T. Spellman; Stoeckert C; John Aach; Wilhelm Ansorge; Catherine A. Ball; Helen C. Causton; Terry Gaasterland; Patrick Glenisson; Irene F. Kim; John C. Matese; Helen Parkinson; Alan Robinson; Ugis Sarkans; Jason Stewart; Ronald C. Taylor; Jaak Vilo; Martin Vingron
Microarray analysis has become a widely used tool for the generation of gene expression data on a genomic scale. Although many significant results have been derived from microarray studies, one limitation has been the lack of standards for presenting and exchanging such data. Here we present a proposal, the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME), that describes the minimum information required to ensure that microarray data can be easily interpreted and that results derived from its analysis can be independently verified. The ultimate goal of this work is to establish a standard for recording and reporting microarray-based gene expression data, which will in turn facilitate the establishment of databases and public repositories and enable the development of data analysis tools. With respect to MIAME, we concentrate on defining the content and structure of the necessary information rather than the technical format for capturing it.
Nucleic Acids Research | 1998
J. Michael Cherry; Caroline Adler; Catherine A. Ball; Stephen A. Chervitz; Selina S. Dwight; Erich T. Hester; Yankai Jia; Gail Juvik; Taiyun Roe; Mark Schroeder; Shuai Weng; David Botstein
The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides Internet access to the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic sequence, its genes and their products, the phenotypes of its mutants, and the literature supporting these data. The amount of information and the number of features provided by SGD have increased greatly following the release of the S.cerevisiae genomic sequence, which is currently the only complete sequence of a eukaryotic genome. SGD aids researchers by providing not only basic information, but also tools such as sequence similarity searching that lead to detailed information about features of the genome and relationships between genes. SGD presents information using a variety of user-friendly, dynamically created graphical displays illustrating physical, genetic and sequence feature maps. SGD can be accessed via the World Wide Web at http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/
Methods in Enzymology | 2002
Laurie Issel-Tarver; Karen R. Christie; Kara Dolinski; Rey Andrada; Rama Balakrishnan; Catherine A. Ball; Gail Binkley; Stan Dong; Selina S. Dwight; Dianna G. Fisk; Midori A. Harris; Mark Schroeder; Anand Sethuraman; Kane Tse; Shuai Weng; David Botstein; J. Michael Cherry
Publisher Summary The goal of the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) is to provide information about the genome of this yeast, the genes it encodes, and their biological functions. The genome sequence of S. cerevisiae provides the structure around which information in SGD is organized; value is added to the sequence by careful biological annotation drawn from a number of sources. SGD curates and stores information about budding yeast DNA and protein sequences, genetics, cell biology, and the associated community of researchers. SGD also provides search and analysis tools designed to help researchers mine the data for pieces or patterns of biological information relevant to their interests. A continuing challenge for the staff of SGD is to present up-to-date information about yeast genes in a format that is intuitive and useful to biomedical researchers, while responding to the needs of this community by providing resources and tools for exploring the data in new ways. This chapter describes the organization of SGD, the sources of the data stored in SGD, some methods for retrieving information from the database, connections SGD has with outside databases and non-yeast research communities, and SGDs repository of yeast community information.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2001
Gavin Sherlock; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Andrew Kasarskis; Gail Binkley; John C. Matese; Selina S. Dwight; Shuai Weng; Heng Jin; Catherine A. Ball; Michael B. Eisen; Paul T. Spellman; Patrick O. Brown; David Botstein; J. Michael Cherry
The Stanford Microarray Database (SMD) stores raw and normalized data from microarray experiments, and provides web interfaces for researchers to retrieve, analyze and visualize their data. The two immediate goals for SMD are to serve as a storage site for microarray data from ongoing research at Stanford University, and to facilitate the public dissemination of that data once published, or released by the researcher. Of paramount importance is the connection of microarray data with the biological data that pertains to the DNA deposited on the microarray (genes, clones etc.). SMD makes use of many public resources to connect expression information to the relevant biology, including SGD [Ball,C.A., Dolinski,K., Dwight,S.S., Harris,M.A., Issel-Tarver,L., Kasarskis,A., Scafe,C.R., Sherlock,G., Binkley,G., Jin,H. et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 77-80], YPD and WormPD [Costanzo,M.C., Hogan,J.D., Cusick,M.E., Davis,B.P., Fancher,A.M., Hodges,P.E., Kondu,P., Lengieza,C., Lew-Smith,J.E., Lingner,C. et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 73-76], Unigene [Wheeler,D.L., Chappey,C., Lash,A.E., Leipe,D.D., Madden,T.L., Schuler,G.D., Tatusova,T.A. and Rapp,B.A. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 10-14], dbEST [Boguski,M.S., Lowe,T.M. and Tolstoshev,C.M. (1993) Nature Genet., 4, 332-333] and SWISS-PROT [Bairoch,A. and Apweiler,R. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 45-48] and can be accessed at http://genome-www.stanford.edu/microarray.
Nature | 1997
Cherry Jm; Catherine A. Ball; Weng S; Juvik G; Schmidt R; Adler C; Barbara Dunn; Dwight S; Riles L; Mortimer Rk; David Botstein
Structural features produced during the rifting of continents depend on the layered rheological properties of the crust and lithosphere and, in particular, on the presence of any transitions between brittle and ductile behaviour1. Here we use a wax model to explore the gross structural response of continental lithosphere under pure shear extension in the presence of a continuous brittle–ductile transition. The wax models were deformed under various boundary conditions to reflect a variety of different regions, most notably the Basin and Range province of North America. Our experiments show the development of listric normal faults, structures common to regions of continental extension. We also observe the formation of distributed and discrete rifting, and intrusion and occlusion of the upper brittle layer by the ductile lower layer. The factor controlling deformation style in each case appears to be the relative thickness of the brittle and ductile layers, although a relatively high rate of strain generally promotes discrete rifting.
American Journal of Pathology | 2004
Robert B. West; Christopher L. Corless; Xin Chen; Brian P. Rubin; Subbaya Subramanian; Kelli Montgomery; Shirley Zhu; Catherine A. Ball; Torsten O. Nielsen; Rajiv M. Patel; John R. Goldblum; Patrick O. Brown; Michael C. Heinrich; Matt van de Rijn
We recently characterized gene expression patterns in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) using cDNA microarrays, and found that the gene FLJ10261 (DOG1, discovered on GIST-1), encoding a hypothetical protein, was specifically expressed in GISTs. The immunoreactivity of a rabbit antiserum to synthetic DOG1 peptides was assessed on two soft tissue tumor microarrays. The tissue microarrays included 587 soft tissue tumors, with 149 GISTs, including 127 GIST cases for which the KIT and PDGFRA mutation status was known. Immunoreactivity for DOG1 was found in 136 of 139 (97.8%) of scorable GISTs. All seven GIST cases with a PDGFRA mutation were DOG1-positive, while most of these failed to react for KIT. The immunohistochemical findings were confirmed with in situ hybridization probes for DOG1, KIT, and PDGFRA. Other neoplasms in the differential diagnosis of GIST, including desmoid fibromatosis (0 of 17) and Schwannoma (0 of 3), were immunonegative for DOG1. Only 4 of 438 non-GIST cases were immunoreactive for DOG1. DOG1, a protein of unknown function, is expressed strongly on the cell surface of GISTs and is rarely expressed in other soft tissue tumors. Reactivity for DOG1 may aid in the diagnosis of GISTs, including PDGFRA mutants that fail to express KIT antigen, and lead to appropriate treatment with imatinib mesylate, an inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase.
Nature Biotechnology | 2008
Chris F. Taylor; Dawn Field; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Jan Aerts; Rolf Apweiler; Michael Ashburner; Catherine A. Ball; Pierre Alain Binz; Molly Bogue; Tim Booth; Alvis Brazma; Ryan R. Brinkman; Adam Clark; Eric W. Deutsch; Oliver Fiehn; Jennifer Fostel; Peter Ghazal; Frank Gibson; Tanya Gray; Graeme Grimes; John M. Hancock; Nigel Hardy; Henning Hermjakob; Randall K. Julian; Matthew Kane; Carsten Kettner; Christopher R. Kinsinger; Eugene Kolker; Martin Kuiper; Nicolas Le Novère
The Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations (MIBBI) project aims to foster the coordinated development of minimum-information checklists and provide a resource for those exploring the range of extant checklists.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2002
Selina S. Dwight; Midori A. Harris; Kara Dolinski; Catherine A. Ball; Gail Binkley; Karen R. Christie; Dianna G. Fisk; Laurie Issel-Tarver; Mark Schroeder; Gavin Sherlock; Anand Sethuraman; Shuai Weng; David Botstein; J. Michael Cherry
The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) resources, ranging from genetic and physical maps to genome-wide analysis tools, reflect the scientific progress in identifying genes and their functions over the last decade. As emphasis shifts from identification of the genes to identification of the role of their gene products in the cell, SGD seeks to provide its users with annotations that will allow relationships to be made between gene products, both within Saccharomyces cerevisiae and across species. To this end, SGD is annotating genes to the Gene Ontology (GO), a structured representation of biological knowledge that can be shared across species. The GO consists of three separate ontologies describing molecular function, biological process and cellular component. The goal is to use published information to associate each characterized S.cerevisiae gene product with one or more GO terms from each of the three ontologies. To be useful, this must be done in a manner that allows accurate associations based on experimental evidence, modifications to GO when necessary, and careful documentation of the annotations through evidence codes for given citations. Reaching this goal is an ongoing process at SGD. For information on the current progress of GO annotations at SGD and other participating databases, as well as a description of each of the three ontologies, please visit the GO Consortium page at http://www.geneontology.org. SGD gene associations to GO can be found by visiting our site at http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/.
Nature Genetics | 2009
John P. A. Ioannidis; David B. Allison; Catherine A. Ball; Issa Coulibaly; Xiangqin Cui; Aedín C. Culhane; Mario Falchi; Cesare Furlanello; Giuseppe Jurman; Jon Mangion; Tapan Mehta; Michael Nitzberg; Grier P. Page; Enrico Petretto; Vera van Noort
Given the complexity of microarray-based gene expression studies, guidelines encourage transparent design and public data availability. Several journals require public data deposition and several public databases exist. However, not all data are publicly available, and even when available, it is unknown whether the published results are reproducible by independent scientists. Here we evaluated the replication of data analyses in 18 articles on microarray-based gene expression profiling published in Nature Genetics in 2005–2006. One table or figure from each article was independently evaluated by two teams of analysts. We reproduced two analyses in principle and six partially or with some discrepancies; ten could not be reproduced. The main reason for failure to reproduce was data unavailability, and discrepancies were mostly due to incomplete data annotation or specification of data processing and analysis. Repeatability of published microarray studies is apparently limited. More strict publication rules enforcing public data availability and explicit description of data processing and analysis should be considered.