Charles N. Long
University of Colorado Boulder
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Charles N. Long.
Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXIII | 2018
Evgueni I. Kassianov; Erin Riley; Jessica Kleiss; Laura Riihimaki; Charles N. Long; Victor Morris; Larry K. Berg
Substantial difference between cloud amounts obtained from active and passive remote sensing has been documented by previous studies. The difference is typically attributed to two main factors: the different field-of-view (FOV) (first factor) and different sensitivity to cloud properties (second factor) of the active and passive ground-based instruments. The relative impact of these two main factors on shallow cumuli cloud amount is demonstrated in this study. The demonstration involves a new multi-year (2000-2017) product, which integrates both the active and passive remote sensing data collected at the mid-continental Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility. Cloud fraction (CF) obtained from the narrow-FOV lidar-radar observations and wide-FOV fractional sky cover (FSC) acquired from sky images are key components of the integrated product. Results of this study indicate that (1) CF tends to overestimate FSC and this overestimation can be large (~40% on average) even at extended temporal scales (several years) and (2) the observed overestimate is primarily due to different sensitivity of the active and passive remote sensing instruments to shallow cumuli, while the limited FOV of active remote sensing instruments plays a minor role in such overestimation.
Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXII | 2017
Evgueni I. Kassianov; Erin Riley; Jessica Kleiss; Charles N. Long; Laura Riihimaki; Donna M. Flynn; Connor Flynn; Larry K. Berg
Cloud amount is an essential and extensively used macrophysical parameter of cumulus clouds. It is commonly defined as a cloud fraction (CF) from zenith-pointing ground-based active and passive remote sensing. However, conventional retrievals of CF from the remote sensing data with very narrow field-of-view (FOV) may not be representative of the surrounding area. Here we assess its representativeness using an integrated dataset collected at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) programs Southern Great Plains (SGP) site in Oklahoma, USA. For our assessment with focus on selected days with single-layer cumulus clouds (2005-2016), we include the narrow-FOV ARM Active Remotely Sensed Clouds Locations (ARSCL) and large-FOV Total Sky Imager (TSI) cloud products, the 915-MHz Radar Wind Profiler (RWP) measurements of wind speed and direction, and also high-resolution satellite images from Landsat and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). We demonstrate that the root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between the 15-min averaged ARSCL cloud fraction (CF) and the 15-min averaged TSI fractional sky cover (FSC) is large (up to 0.3). We also discuss how the horizontal distribution of clouds can modify the obtained large RMSD using a new uniformity metric. The latter utilizes the spatial distribution of the FSC over the 100° FOV TSI images obtained with high temporal resolution (30 sec sampling). We demonstrate that cases with more uniform spatial distribution of FSC show better agreement between the narrow-FOV CF and large-FOV FSC, reducing the RMSD by up to a factor of 2.
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2016
Gijs de Boer; Scott E. Palo; Brian Argrow; Gabriel LoDolce; James Mack; Ru Shan Gao; Hagen Telg; Cameron Trussel; Joshua Fromm; Charles N. Long; Geoff Bland; James A. Maslanik; Beat Schmid; Terry Hock
Archive | 1994
Krista Gaustad; Laura Riihimaki; Charles N. Long
Archive | 2016
Sebastien Biraud; Fan Mei; Connor Flynn; John M. Hubbe; Charles N. Long; Alyssa A. Matthews; Mikhail S. Pekour; Arthur J. Sedlacek; Stephen R. Springston; Jason M. Tomlinson; D. Chand
Supplement to: Driemel, A et al. (2018): Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN): structure and data description (1992-2017). Earth System Science Data, 10(3), 1491-1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2018-8 | 2018
Amelie Driemel; John A. Augustine; Klaus Behrens; Sergio Colle; Christopher J. Cox; Emilio Cuevas-Agulló; Fred M. Denn; Thierry Duprat; Ellsworth G. Dutton; Masato Fukuda; Hannes Grobe; Martial Haeffelin; Gary Hodges; Nicole Hyett; Osamu Ijima; Ain Kallis; Wouter H. Knap; Vasilii Kustov; Christian Lanconelli; Charles N. Long; David Longenecker; Angelo Lupi; Marion Maturilli; Mohamed Mimouni; Lucky Ntsangwane; Hiroyuki Ogihara; Xabier Olano; Marc Olefs; Masao Omori; Lance Passamani
Archive | 2017
Gijs de Boer; Dale A. Lawrence; Scott E. Palo; Brian Argrow; Gabriel LoDolce; Nathan Curry; Douglas Weibel; William Finamore; Phillip D'Amore; Steven Borenstein; Tevis W. Nichols; Jack Elston; Mark D. Ivey; Albert Bendure; Beat Schmid; Charles N. Long; Hagen Telg; R. S. Gao; Terry Hock; Geoff Bland
EPIC3EGU General Assembly, Vienna, 2017-04-26European Geosciences Union | 2017
Amelie Driemel; Gert Koenig-Langlo; Rainer Sieger; Charles N. Long
EPIC3Bremerhaven, PANGAEA | 2017
Amelie Driemel; Gert Koenig-Langlo; Charles N. Long
Archive | 2016
Jerome D. Fast; Fan Mei; John M. Hubbe; Andrew Kalukin; Charles N. Long; Alyssa A. Matthews; Mikhail S. Pekour; Siegfried Schobesberger; John E. Shilling; Stephen R. Springston; Jason M. Tomlinson; Jian Wang; Alla Zelenyuk-Imre