D. Philipp
University of Arkansas
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Philipp.
Journal of Animal Science | 2013
J. D. Caldwell; K.P. Coffey; J. A. Jennings; D. Philipp; A.N. Young; J. D. Tucker; D. S. Hubbell; T. Hess; M.L. Looper; C. P. West; Mary C. Savin; Michael P. Popp; D. L. Kreider; D.M. Hallford; C.F. Rosenkrans
Replacing toxic, wild-type Neotyphodium coenophialum-infected tall fescue (E+) with nontoxic, N. coenophialum-infected tall fescue (NE+) has improved cow performance, but producer acceptance of NE+ has been slow. The objective was to compare performance by spring- and fall-calving cows grazing either E+ or NE+ at different percentages of the total pasture area. Gelbvieh×Angus crossbred cows (n=178) were stratified by BW and age within calving season and allocated randomly to 1 of 14 groups representing 5 treatments for a 3-yr study: i) Fall-calving on 100% E+ (F100); ii) Spring-calving on 100% E+ (S100); iii) Fall-calving on 75% E+ and 25% NE+ (F75); iv) Spring-calving on 75% E+ and 25% NE+ (S75); and v) Spring-calving on 100% NE+ (SNE100). Groups allocated to F75 and S75 grazed E+ until approximately 28 d before breeding and weaning, then were then moved to their respective NE+ pasture area for 4 to 6 wk; those allocated to F100, S100, and SNE100 grazed their pastures throughout the entire year. Samples of tall fescue were gathered from specific cells within each pasture at the time cows were moved into that particular cell (∼1 sample/mo). Blood samples were collected from the cows at the start and end of the breeding season. Stocking rate for each treatment was 1 cow/ha. Forage IVDMD, CP, and total ergot alkaloid concentrations were affected (P<0.05) by the treatment×sampling date interaction. Hay offered, cow BW, and BCS at breeding, end of breeding, and at weaning were greater (P<0.05) from fall-calving vs. spring-calving. Cow BW at weaning was greater (P<0.05) from F75 and S75 vs. F100 and S100. The calving season×NE+ % interaction affected (P<0.05) calving rates. Preweaning calf BW gain, actual and adjusted weaning BW, ADG, sale price, and calf value at weaning were greater (P<0.05) from fall-calving vs. spring-calving and from SNE100 vs. S75 except for sale price which was greater (P<0.05) from S75 vs. SNE100. Cow concentrations of serum prolactin at breeding and serum NEFA at the end of breeding were affected (P<0.05) by the calving season×NE+ % interaction. Serum Zn and Cu concentrations from cows were affected (P<0.05) by calving season. A fall-calving season may be more desirable for cows grazing E+, resulting in greater calving rates, cow performance, and calf BW at weaning, whereas limited access to NE+ may increase calving rates, serum prolactin, and NEFA concentrations during certain times in the production cycle, particularly in spring-calving cows.
Journal of Animal Science | 2018
J.K. Clark; K.P. Coffey; W.K. Coblentz; B. C. Shanks; J. D. Caldwell; R. E. Muck; D. Philipp; M A Borchardt; R. T. Rhein; W E Jokela; E A Backes; M.G. Bertram; W B Smith
Dairy slurry is used commonly as an animal-sourced fertilizer in agronomic production. However, residual effects of slurry application on intake and digestibility of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage from subsequent harvests are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine if moisture concentration of alfalfa silage and timing of dairy slurry application relative to subsequent harvest affected intake and digestibility by sheep. Katahdin crossbred ewes (n = 18; 48 ± 5.3 kg) in mid-gestation were stratified by BW and allocated randomly in each of two periods to one of six treatments arranged in a two × three factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of recommended (RM; 46.8%) or low (LM; 39.7%) moisture at baling after either no slurry application (NS), slurry application to stubble immediately after removal of the previous cutting (S0), or slurry application 14 d after removal of the previous cutting (S14). Silages were chopped through a commercial straw chopper, packed into plastic trash cans, and then offered to ewes within 4 d of chopping. Period 1 of the intake and digestion study consisted of a 14-d adaptation followed by a 7-d fecal collection period. Period 2 followed period 1 after a 4-d rest and consisted of an 11-d adaptation followed by 7 d of fecal collection. Ewes were housed individually in 1.4 × 4.3-m pens equipped with rubber mat flooring. Feces were swept from the floor twice daily, weighed, and dried at 50 °C. Ewes had ad libitum access to water and were offered chopped silage for a minimum of 10% refusal (DM). Blood samples were collected immediately prior to feeding, and 4 and 8 h after feeding on the day prior to the end of each period. Organic matter intake (g/kg BW) and OM digestibility tended (P < 0.10) to be, and digestible OM intake (g/kg BW) was reduced by slurry application. Lymphocytes (% of total white blood cells) were greater (P < 0.05) from LM vs. RM and from NS vs. S0 and S14. Red blood cell concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) from S14 vs. S0 and from S0 and S14 vs. NS. Serum urea N concentrations did not differ (P > 0.17) across treatments. Therefore, moisture concentration of alfalfa silage within the range used in this study may not affect voluntary intake or digestibility, but slurry application may have an effect on digestible OM intake. Also, moisture concentration of alfalfa silage and time of dairy slurry application may affect specific blood hemograms.
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
J.K. Clark; B. C. Shanks; K S Jogan; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; N.E. Jack; J. D. Caldwell; R. T. Rhein
Bermudagrass ( L.) is a familiar forage in the equine industry and teff () is gaining popularity as well. However, it is unclear if the application of poultry litter as a fertilizer affects palatability of these forages in horses. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if forage species and timing of litter application as a fertilizer has an effect on preference by horses. Hay treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement consisting of teff and bermudagrass harvested after no poultry litter application (NL), poultry litter applied to stubble immediately after removal of the previous cutting (L0), or poultry litter applied 14 d after the previous cutting (L14). Mature, stock-type geldings ( = 5; 480 ± 52.9 kg) were used in this study arranged as a balanced incomplete block design. Horses were offered different combinations of 4 of the 6 total forages daily for 3 d in each of 3 evaluation periods that immediately followed a 10-d adaptation period. Each forage was offered at half of the total daily DMI as measured during the last 5 d of the 10-d adaptation period to encourage selection among the 4 forages. Each hay offered was randomly allocated to a corner and suspended in hay nets over muck buckets in the corners of each stall. Horses were individually housed in 3.6- by 3.6-m indoor stalls with sand bedding and access to 3.6- by 7.6-m outdoor runs. Along with hay, horses were offered oats twice daily at 0.125% of BW at each feeding. Dry matter intake was greater ( < 0.01) for bermudagrass than for teff and for NL and L0 treatments compared with L14 treatments. Horses spent more ( < 0.01) time consuming bermudagrass compared with teff. However, there were no differences ( ≥ 0.25) in time spent consuming hay across litter treatments. Therefore, horses may prefer bermudagrass to teff and later application of poultry litter may affect voluntary intake by horses. However, all forages were mature, which may have impacted total intake and preference.
The Professional Animal Scientist | 2014
Juvenal Kanani; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; A.N. Young; R. T. Rhein; J.D. Caldwell
Seven hectares (ha) of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] were divided into 3 blocks with 3 whole plots each to evaluate the effects of moisture (165, 187, and 274 g/kg of DM) and sampling depth (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m) in round bales on chemical composition and in situ disappearance. Plots were assigned randomly to moisture treatments. Round bales (n = 3 per plot; 1.2 × 1.5 m, 568 kg) were obtained and sampled at 3 different depths within each bale (n = 81) before and after 71 d of storage. Duplicate in situ bags (10 × 20 cm) were incubated in 6 ruminally cannulated cows (BW = 585 ± 37.8 kg) up to 120 h. Residual DM for each sampling time was fit to a nonlinear model using PROC NLIN of SAS to determine DM degradation kinetics. Data were analyzed as a split-plot design using Proc Mixed procedures of SAS and tested for moisture, depth, and their interactions. Bale temperature and concentrations of ADL were greater (P 0.10) any of the digestion variables, but the water-soluble fraction, potentially degradable fraction, and effective ruminal disappearance as well as concentrations of OM, NDF, and acid-detergent insoluble nitrogen were affected (P < 0.05) by the moisture × sampling depth interaction. Therefore, a greater range in sampling depth should be used to accurately assess heat damage in large round bales.
The Professional Animal Scientist | 2011
M.S. Gadberry; D. Philipp; P. A. Beck; E.L. Brown; J.A. Hawkins
ABSTRACT The objective of this project was to examine the effect of grazing restriction, stage of maturity at harvest, and addition of glycerol to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) harvested as silage. The project design was a split-split plot, and the first treatment level was nongrazed wheat compared with wheat grazed just before first hollow stem. The secondary treatment structure was harvesting the wheat at anthesis versus soft dough maturity. The third treatment structure was applying glycerol to the wheat at 0, 5, 10, or 15% of DM before ensiling. Nongrazed wheat produced more yield than did grazed wheat (P = 0.04), and harvesting at soft dough produced more yield than did harvesting at anthesis (P
Crop Science | 2005
D. Philipp; V. G. Allen; Robert B. Mitchell; C. P. Brown; David B. Wester
Crop Science | 2007
D. Philipp; V. G. Allen; R. J. Lascano; C. P. Brown; D. B. Wester
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2007
D. Philipp; Kenneth J. Moore; Jeffrey F. Pedersen; Richard J. Grant; Daren D. Redfearn; Robert B. Mitchell
Journal of animal science and biotechnology | 2014
Juvenal Kanani; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; E. B. Kegley; Charles P. West; Shane Gadberry; John A. Jennings; A.N. Young; R. T. Rhein
Agronomía Mesoamericana | 2013
D. Philipp; William Gamboa