R. T. Rhein
University of Arkansas
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. T. Rhein.
Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2003
J. E. Turner; W. K. Coblentz; D. A. Scarbrough; R. T. Rhein; K.P. Coffey; Z.B. Johnson; C.F. Rosenkrans; D.W. Kellogg; J.V Skinner
Relatively little is known about the combined effects of rain damage and spontaneous heating on the storage characteristics and nutritive value of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) hay. Objectives were to assess effects of these variables in five management situations. ‘Kentucky 31’ tall fescue infested with the fungal endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum [Morgan-Jones & Glenn, Bacon, and Hamlin comb. nov.]) was packaged in conventional rectangular bales at 99 g/kg (low, L), 164 g/kg (ideal, I), and 225 g/kg (high, H) of moisture prior to rainfall, and at 246 g/kg of moisture after a 23 mm rainfall event (H–R) and at 93 g/kg of moisture after a total accumulation of 72 mm of rain (L–R). Concentrations of neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), and lignin immediately after baling increased (P≤0.017) with rain damage, but concentrations of total N and fiber-associated N components were little affected. Immediately after baling, the in situ dry matter (DM) disappearance for L–R hay was 32–44 g/kg lower (P=0.0001) than observed for hays baled without rain damage. After a 40–45-day storage period, L and I hays had a 31–36 g/kg advantage for in situ DM disappearance over hays damaged by spontaneous heating (H), rainfall (L–R), or both (H–R). Generally, the effects of a single 23 mm rainfall event on the nutritive value of tall fescue hay was relatively small, but damage increased substantially with multiple rainfall events.
Journal of Animal Science | 2018
J.K. Clark; K.P. Coffey; W.K. Coblentz; B. C. Shanks; J. D. Caldwell; R. E. Muck; D. Philipp; M A Borchardt; R. T. Rhein; W E Jokela; E A Backes; M.G. Bertram; W B Smith
Dairy slurry is used commonly as an animal-sourced fertilizer in agronomic production. However, residual effects of slurry application on intake and digestibility of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage from subsequent harvests are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine if moisture concentration of alfalfa silage and timing of dairy slurry application relative to subsequent harvest affected intake and digestibility by sheep. Katahdin crossbred ewes (n = 18; 48 ± 5.3 kg) in mid-gestation were stratified by BW and allocated randomly in each of two periods to one of six treatments arranged in a two × three factorial arrangement. Treatments consisted of recommended (RM; 46.8%) or low (LM; 39.7%) moisture at baling after either no slurry application (NS), slurry application to stubble immediately after removal of the previous cutting (S0), or slurry application 14 d after removal of the previous cutting (S14). Silages were chopped through a commercial straw chopper, packed into plastic trash cans, and then offered to ewes within 4 d of chopping. Period 1 of the intake and digestion study consisted of a 14-d adaptation followed by a 7-d fecal collection period. Period 2 followed period 1 after a 4-d rest and consisted of an 11-d adaptation followed by 7 d of fecal collection. Ewes were housed individually in 1.4 × 4.3-m pens equipped with rubber mat flooring. Feces were swept from the floor twice daily, weighed, and dried at 50 °C. Ewes had ad libitum access to water and were offered chopped silage for a minimum of 10% refusal (DM). Blood samples were collected immediately prior to feeding, and 4 and 8 h after feeding on the day prior to the end of each period. Organic matter intake (g/kg BW) and OM digestibility tended (P < 0.10) to be, and digestible OM intake (g/kg BW) was reduced by slurry application. Lymphocytes (% of total white blood cells) were greater (P < 0.05) from LM vs. RM and from NS vs. S0 and S14. Red blood cell concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) from S14 vs. S0 and from S0 and S14 vs. NS. Serum urea N concentrations did not differ (P > 0.17) across treatments. Therefore, moisture concentration of alfalfa silage within the range used in this study may not affect voluntary intake or digestibility, but slurry application may have an effect on digestible OM intake. Also, moisture concentration of alfalfa silage and time of dairy slurry application may affect specific blood hemograms.
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
J.K. Clark; B. C. Shanks; K S Jogan; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; N.E. Jack; J. D. Caldwell; R. T. Rhein
Bermudagrass ( L.) is a familiar forage in the equine industry and teff () is gaining popularity as well. However, it is unclear if the application of poultry litter as a fertilizer affects palatability of these forages in horses. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if forage species and timing of litter application as a fertilizer has an effect on preference by horses. Hay treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement consisting of teff and bermudagrass harvested after no poultry litter application (NL), poultry litter applied to stubble immediately after removal of the previous cutting (L0), or poultry litter applied 14 d after the previous cutting (L14). Mature, stock-type geldings ( = 5; 480 ± 52.9 kg) were used in this study arranged as a balanced incomplete block design. Horses were offered different combinations of 4 of the 6 total forages daily for 3 d in each of 3 evaluation periods that immediately followed a 10-d adaptation period. Each forage was offered at half of the total daily DMI as measured during the last 5 d of the 10-d adaptation period to encourage selection among the 4 forages. Each hay offered was randomly allocated to a corner and suspended in hay nets over muck buckets in the corners of each stall. Horses were individually housed in 3.6- by 3.6-m indoor stalls with sand bedding and access to 3.6- by 7.6-m outdoor runs. Along with hay, horses were offered oats twice daily at 0.125% of BW at each feeding. Dry matter intake was greater ( < 0.01) for bermudagrass than for teff and for NL and L0 treatments compared with L14 treatments. Horses spent more ( < 0.01) time consuming bermudagrass compared with teff. However, there were no differences ( ≥ 0.25) in time spent consuming hay across litter treatments. Therefore, horses may prefer bermudagrass to teff and later application of poultry litter may affect voluntary intake by horses. However, all forages were mature, which may have impacted total intake and preference.
The Professional Animal Scientist | 2014
Juvenal Kanani; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; A.N. Young; R. T. Rhein; J.D. Caldwell
Seven hectares (ha) of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] were divided into 3 blocks with 3 whole plots each to evaluate the effects of moisture (165, 187, and 274 g/kg of DM) and sampling depth (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m) in round bales on chemical composition and in situ disappearance. Plots were assigned randomly to moisture treatments. Round bales (n = 3 per plot; 1.2 × 1.5 m, 568 kg) were obtained and sampled at 3 different depths within each bale (n = 81) before and after 71 d of storage. Duplicate in situ bags (10 × 20 cm) were incubated in 6 ruminally cannulated cows (BW = 585 ± 37.8 kg) up to 120 h. Residual DM for each sampling time was fit to a nonlinear model using PROC NLIN of SAS to determine DM degradation kinetics. Data were analyzed as a split-plot design using Proc Mixed procedures of SAS and tested for moisture, depth, and their interactions. Bale temperature and concentrations of ADL were greater (P 0.10) any of the digestion variables, but the water-soluble fraction, potentially degradable fraction, and effective ruminal disappearance as well as concentrations of OM, NDF, and acid-detergent insoluble nitrogen were affected (P < 0.05) by the moisture × sampling depth interaction. Therefore, a greater range in sampling depth should be used to accurately assess heat damage in large round bales.
Agronomy Journal | 2002
J. E. Turner; W. K. Coblentz; D. A. Scarbrough; K.P. Coffey; D. Wayne Kellogg; Levi J. McBeth; R. T. Rhein
Journal of Dairy Science | 2005
R. T. Rhein; W. K. Coblentz; J. E. Turner; C.F. Rosenkrans; R.K. Ogden; D.W. Kellogg
Journal of animal science and biotechnology | 2014
Juvenal Kanani; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; E. B. Kegley; Charles P. West; Shane Gadberry; John A. Jennings; A.N. Young; R. T. Rhein
Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2004
J.E. Turner; W. K. Coblentz; K.P. Coffey; R. T. Rhein; B.C McGinley; N.W Galdámez-Cabrera; C.F. Rosenkrans; Z.B. Johnson; D.W. Kellogg; J.V Skinner
Crop Science | 2007
R. C. Norman; W. K. Coblentz; D. S. Hubbell; R. K. Ogden; K.P. Coffey; J. D. Caldwell; R. T. Rhein; C. P. West; C.F. Rosenkrans
Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2012
A.E. Bass; D. Philipp; K.P. Coffey; J. D. Caldwell; R. T. Rhein; A.N. Young; W.K. Coblentz