Dae-Hee Shin
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dae-Hee Shin.
Cytokine | 2016
Su Ui Lee; Min Hee Sung; Hyung Won Ryu; Jinhyuk Lee; Hui-Seong Kim; Hyun Ju In; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Hyun-Jun Lee; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Dae-Hee Shin; Yongnam Lee; Sung-Tae Hong; Sei-Ryang Oh
Airway mucus secretion is an essential innate immune response for host protection. However, overproduction and hypersecretion of mucus, mainly composed of MUC5AC, are significant risk factors in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Previously, we reported that verproside, a catalpol derivative iridoid glycoside isolated from Pseudolysimachion rotundum var. subintegrum, is a potent anti-asthmatic candidate drug in vivo. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the pharmacological actions of verproside remain unknown. Here, we found that verproside significantly reduces the expression levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)-induced MUC5AC mRNA and protein by inhibiting both nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) transcriptional activity and the phosphorylation of its upstream effectors such as IκB kinase (IKK)β, IκBα, and TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) in NCI-H292 cells. Moreover, verproside attenuated TNF-α-induced MUC5AC transcription more effectively when combined with an IKK (BAY11-7082) or a TAK1 (5z-7-oxozeaenol) inhibitor than when administered alone. Importantly, we demonstrated that verproside negatively modulates the formation of the TNF-α-receptor (TNFR) 1 signaling complex [TNF-RSC; TNFR1-recruited TNFR1-associated death domain protein (TRADD), TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIP1), and TAK1], the most upstream signaling factor of NF-κB signaling. In silico molecular docking studies show that verproside binds between TRADD and TRAF2 subunits. Altogether, these results suggest that verproside could be a good therapeutic candidate for treatment of inflammatory airway diseases such as asthma and COPD by blocking the TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway.
Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy | 2013
Ji-Young Jeon; Yong-Jin Im; Yunjeong Kim; Su-mi Han; Myeong-jin Jo; Dae-Hee Shin; Ji-Seok Yoo; Byung-Kwan Moon; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Hoon Lee; Yoonho Choi; Beom-Sik Cho; Han-Young Jang; Soo-Wan Chae; Min-Gul Kim
Candesartan is a long-acting and selective nonpeptide AT1 subtype angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and to evaluate the bioequivalence of two candesartan cilexetil 16u2009mg formulations. Forty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned into two groups. After a single dose of 16u2009mg candesartan cilexetil oral administration, blood samples were collected at specific time intervals from 0–36u2009h. The plasma concentrations of candesartan cilexetil were determined by LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax were calculated and the 90% confidence intervals of the ratio (test/reference) pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by analysis of variance on logarithmically transformed data. The mean for AUClast in the reference and the test drug were 1530.1u2009±u2009434.6 and 1315.7u2009±u2009368.6 ng·h/mL. The mean for AUCinf in the reference and the test drug were 1670.0u2009±u2009454.5 and 1441.2u2009±u2009397.8 ng·h/mL. The mean value for Cmax in the reference and the test drug was 142.6u2009±u200941.0 and 134.9u2009±u200941.4u2009ng/mL. The 90% confidence intervals for the AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax were in the range of log 0.81–log 0.91, log 0.81–log 0.91 and log 0.88–log1.01, respectively. No adverse events were reported by subjects or found on analysis of vital signs or laboratory tests. This single dose study found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these health volunteers. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated in 16u2009mg of candesartan cilexetil hydrochloride.
Clinical Therapeutics | 2015
Yong-Jin Im; Ji-Young Jeon; Eun Young Kim; Yunjeong Kim; Dong-Joon Oh; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Soo-Wan Chae; Min-Gul Kim
PURPOSEnTo provide consistent pain relief and improve convenient sustained release (SR), a fixed-dose combination tramadol/acetaminophen tablet was formulated. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of an SR 75-mg tramadol/650-mg acetaminophen formulation after a single dose compared with an immediate release (IR) 37.5-mg tramadol/325-mg acetaminophen formulation after 2 doses and at steady state and to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic SR formulation profile after a single dose.nnnMETHODSnTwo clinical trials were conducted: (1) an open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetic SR (one 75-mg tramadol/650-mg acetaminophen combination tablet) formulation profiles after a single dose and IR (one 37.5-mg tramadol/325-mg acetaminophen combination tablet q6h for 2 doses) formulation profiles after 2 doses and the effect of food intake on healthy male subjects and (2) an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-treatment multiple dose crossover study to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic SR and IR formulation profiles. Safety assessments were performed.nnnFINDINGSnForty-three subjects completed each study protocol. The SR combination tramadol/acetaminophen formulation was clinically and statistically equivalent to the IR combination formulation in the fasting state. When tramadol and acetaminophen tablets were administered with food, the time to peak plasma concentrations and the tramadol/acetaminophen absorption were unaffected. There was no serious adverse event reported.nnnIMPLICATIONSnThe SR combination tramadol/acetaminophen tablet exhibited similar exposure and absorption rates compared with those of the IR formulation of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and acetaminophen. The SR formulation may be more convenient for patients and has the potential to enhance compliance and pain control. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01880125.
Archive | 2011
Dong-Joon Oh; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Kwan Moon; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo
Archive | 2010
Dong-Joon Oh; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Kwan Moon; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo
Archive | 2013
Yongnam Lee; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Sei-Ryang Oh; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Ok-Kyoung Kwon; Doo-Young Kim; Jung-Hee Kim; Hyuk-Hwan Song
Archive | 2014
Yongnam Lee; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Kyung Seop Ahn; Sei Ryang Oh; Hyeong Kyu Lee; In Sik Shin; Doo-Young Kim; Ok-Kyoung Kwon; Hyuk Hwan Song; Seung Hyung Kim; SuUi Lee
Archive | 2015
김병기; Byoung Ki Kim; 유지석; Ji Seok Yoo; 신대희; Dae-Hee Shin; 류병환; Byung-Hwan Ryoo
Archive | 2017
Hyung Won Ryu; In-Sik Shin; Hyuk-Hwan Song; Su Ui Lee; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Sei-Ryang Oh; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Ji-Seok Yoo; Yongnam Lee
Archive | 2017
Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Doo-Young Kim; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Hyuk-Hwan Song; Ji-Seok Yoo; Jung-Hee Kim; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Ok-Kyoung Kwon; Sei-Ryang Oh; Yongnam Lee
Collaboration
Dive into the Dae-Hee Shin's collaboration.
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputs