Ji-Seok Yoo
Chonbuk National University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ji-Seok Yoo.
Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy | 2013
Ji-Young Jeon; Yong-Jin Im; Yunjeong Kim; Su-mi Han; Myeong-jin Jo; Dae-Hee Shin; Ji-Seok Yoo; Byung-Kwan Moon; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Hoon Lee; Yoonho Choi; Beom-Sik Cho; Han-Young Jang; Soo-Wan Chae; Min-Gul Kim
Candesartan is a long-acting and selective nonpeptide AT1 subtype angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and to evaluate the bioequivalence of two candesartan cilexetil 16 mg formulations. Forty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned into two groups. After a single dose of 16 mg candesartan cilexetil oral administration, blood samples were collected at specific time intervals from 0–36 h. The plasma concentrations of candesartan cilexetil were determined by LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax were calculated and the 90% confidence intervals of the ratio (test/reference) pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by analysis of variance on logarithmically transformed data. The mean for AUClast in the reference and the test drug were 1530.1 ± 434.6 and 1315.7 ± 368.6 ng·h/mL. The mean for AUCinf in the reference and the test drug were 1670.0 ± 454.5 and 1441.2 ± 397.8 ng·h/mL. The mean value for Cmax in the reference and the test drug was 142.6 ± 41.0 and 134.9 ± 41.4 ng/mL. The 90% confidence intervals for the AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax were in the range of log 0.81–log 0.91, log 0.81–log 0.91 and log 0.88–log1.01, respectively. No adverse events were reported by subjects or found on analysis of vital signs or laboratory tests. This single dose study found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these health volunteers. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated in 16 mg of candesartan cilexetil hydrochloride.
Clinical Therapeutics | 2015
Yong-Jin Im; Ji-Young Jeon; Eun Young Kim; Yunjeong Kim; Dong-Joon Oh; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Soo-Wan Chae; Min-Gul Kim
PURPOSE To provide consistent pain relief and improve convenient sustained release (SR), a fixed-dose combination tramadol/acetaminophen tablet was formulated. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of an SR 75-mg tramadol/650-mg acetaminophen formulation after a single dose compared with an immediate release (IR) 37.5-mg tramadol/325-mg acetaminophen formulation after 2 doses and at steady state and to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic SR formulation profile after a single dose. METHODS Two clinical trials were conducted: (1) an open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetic SR (one 75-mg tramadol/650-mg acetaminophen combination tablet) formulation profiles after a single dose and IR (one 37.5-mg tramadol/325-mg acetaminophen combination tablet q6h for 2 doses) formulation profiles after 2 doses and the effect of food intake on healthy male subjects and (2) an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-treatment multiple dose crossover study to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic SR and IR formulation profiles. Safety assessments were performed. FINDINGS Forty-three subjects completed each study protocol. The SR combination tramadol/acetaminophen formulation was clinically and statistically equivalent to the IR combination formulation in the fasting state. When tramadol and acetaminophen tablets were administered with food, the time to peak plasma concentrations and the tramadol/acetaminophen absorption were unaffected. There was no serious adverse event reported. IMPLICATIONS The SR combination tramadol/acetaminophen tablet exhibited similar exposure and absorption rates compared with those of the IR formulation of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and acetaminophen. The SR formulation may be more convenient for patients and has the potential to enhance compliance and pain control. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01880125.
Archive | 2011
Dong-Joon Oh; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Kwan Moon; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo
Archive | 2010
Dong-Joon Oh; Byoung-Ki Kim; Byung-Kwan Moon; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo
Archive | 2018
Duck Soo Lim; 임덕수; Byoung Ki Kim; 김병기; Dae Hyeon Kim; 김대현; Ji-Seok Yoo; 유지석; Young Joon Park; 박영준
Archive | 2017
Hyung Won Ryu; In-Sik Shin; Hyuk-Hwan Song; Su Ui Lee; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Sei-Ryang Oh; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Ji-Seok Yoo; Yongnam Lee
Archive | 2017
Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Doo-Young Kim; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Hyuk-Hwan Song; Ji-Seok Yoo; Jung-Hee Kim; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Ok-Kyoung Kwon; Sei-Ryang Oh; Yongnam Lee
Archive | 2017
Hyung Won Ryu; Hyuk-Hwan Song; Su Ui Lee; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Sei-Ryang Oh; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Ji-Seok Yoo; Yongnam Lee
Archive | 2016
ヨンナム イ; Yongnam Lee; Ji-Seok Yoo; テ−ヒ シン; Dae-Hee Shin; ビョンファン リュ; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; セイ−リャン オ; Sei Ryang Oh; キュン−ソプ アン; Kyung-Seop Ahn; ヒョンキュ イ; Hyeong Kyu Lee; オク−キョン クォン; Ok-Kyoung Kwon; ト−ヨン キム; Doo-Young Kim; ジョン−ヒ キム; Jung-Hee Kim; ヒョク−ファン ソン; Hyuk Hwan Song
Archive | 2016
Yongnam Lee; Ji-Seok Yoo; Dae-Hee Shin; Byung-Hwan Ryoo; Sei-Ryang Oh; Kyung-Seop Ahn; Hyeong-Kyu Lee; Su Ui Lee; Hyuk-Hwan Song; In-Sik Shin; Hyung Won Ryu
Collaboration
Dive into the Ji-Seok Yoo's collaboration.
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputsKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
View shared research outputs