Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dan Copsey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dan Copsey.


Journal of Climate | 2013

A New HadGEM3-A-Based System for Attribution of Weather- and Climate-Related Extreme Events

Nikolaos Christidis; Peter A. Stott; Adam A. Scaife; Alberto Arribas; Gareth S. Jones; Dan Copsey; Jeff R. Knight; Warren J. Tennant

AbstractA new system for attribution of weather and climate extreme events has been developed based on the atmospheric component of the latest Hadley Centre model. The model is run with either observational data of sea surface temperature and sea ice or estimates of what their values would be without the effect of anthropogenic climatic forcings. In that way, ensembles of simulations are produced that represent the climate with and without the effect of human influences. A comparison between the ensembles provides estimates of the change in the frequency of extremes due to anthropogenic forcings. To evaluate the new system, reliability diagrams are constructed, which compare the model-derived probability of extreme events with their observed frequency. The ability of the model to reproduce realistic distributions of relevant climatic variables is another key aspect of the system evaluation. Results are then presented from analyses of three recent high-impact events: the 2009/10 cold winter in the United K...


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Coupled versus uncoupled hindcast simulations of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation in the Year of Tropical Convection

Ann Shelly; Prince K. Xavier; Dan Copsey; T. C. Johns; José M. Rodríguez; S. F. Milton; Nicholas P. Klingaman

This study investigates the impact of a full interactive ocean on daily initialized 15 day hindcasts of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), measured against a Met Office Unified Model atmosphere control simulation (atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM)) during a 3 month period of the Year of Tropical Convection. Results indicate that the coupled configuration (coupled general circulation model (CGCM)) extends MJO predictability over that of the AGCM, by up to 3–5 days. Propagation is improved in the CGCM, which we partly attribute to a more realistic phase relationship between sea surface temperature (SST) and convection. In addition, the CGCM demonstrates skill in representing downwelling oceanic Kelvin and Rossby waves which warm SSTs along their trajectory, with the potential to feedback on the atmosphere. These results imply that an ocean model capable of simulating internal ocean waves may be required to capture the full effect of air-sea coupling for the MJO.


Journal of Climate | 2017

Atmospheric Response to Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice: The Importance of Ocean–Atmosphere Coupling and the Background State

Doug Smith; Nick Dunstone; Adam A. Scaife; Emma K. Fiedler; Dan Copsey; Steven C. Hardiman

AbstractThe atmospheric response to Arctic and Antarctic sea ice changes typical of the present day and coming decades is investigated using the Hadley Centre global climate model (HadGEM3). The response is diagnosed from ensemble simulations of the period 1979 to 2009 with observed and perturbed sea ice concentrations. The experimental design allows the impacts of ocean–atmosphere coupling and the background atmospheric state to be assessed. The modeled response can be very different to that inferred from statistical relationships, showing that the response cannot be easily diagnosed from observations. Reduced Arctic sea ice drives a local low pressure response in boreal summer and autumn. Increased Antarctic sea ice drives a poleward shift of the Southern Hemisphere midlatitude jet, especially in the cold season. Coupling enables surface temperature responses to spread to the ocean, amplifying the atmospheric response and revealing additional impacts including warming of the North Atlantic in response t...


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2017

The Met Office Global Coupled Model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) Configurations

Keith D. Williams; Dan Copsey; E. W. Blockley; A. Bodas‐Salcedo; D. Calvert; Ruth E. Comer; P. Davis; Tim Graham; H. T. Hewitt; R. Hill; Patrick Hyder; S. Ineson; T. C. Johns; A. B. Keen; Robert W. Lee; A.P. Megann; S. F. Milton; J. G. L. Rae; Malcolm J. Roberts; Adam A. Scaife; R. Schiemann; D. Storkey; L. Thorpe; I. G. Watterson; D. N. Walters; A. West; Richard A. Wood; Tim Woollings; P. Xavier

The Global Coupled 3 (GC3) configuration of the Met Office Unified Model is presented. Amongst other applications, GC3 is the basis of the United Kingdoms submission to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6). This paper documents the model components that make up the configuration (although the scientific description of these components are in companion papers), and details the coupling between them. The performance of GC3 is assessed in terms of mean biases and variability in long climate simulations using present-day forcing. The suitability of the configuration for predictabiity on shorter timescales (weather and seasonal forecasting) is also briefly discussed. The performance of GC3 is compared against GC2, the previous Met Office coupled model configuration, and against an older configuration (HadGEM2-AO) which was the submission to CMIP5. In many respects, the performance of GC3 is comparable with GC2, however there is a notable improvement in the Southern Ocean warm sea surface temperature bias which has been reduced by 75%, and there are improvements in cloud amount and some aspects of tropical variability. Relative to HadGEM2-AO, many aspects of the present-day climate are improved in GC3 including tropospheric and stratospheric temperature structure, most aspects of tropical and extra-tropical variability and top-of-atmosphere & surface fluxes. A number of outstanding errors are identified including a residual asymmetric sea surface temperature bias (cool northern hemisphere, warm Southern Ocean), an overly strong global hydrological cycle and insufficient European blocking.


Nature Communications | 2018

Critical Southern Ocean climate model biases traced to atmospheric model cloud errors

Patrick Hyder; John M. Edwards; Richard P. Allan; Helene T. Hewitt; Thomas J. Bracegirdle; Jonathan M. Gregory; Richard A. Wood; Andrew J. S. Meijers; J. Mulcahy; P. R. Field; Kalli Furtado; Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo; Keith D. Williams; Dan Copsey; Simon A. Josey; Chunlei Liu; C. D. Roberts; Claudio Sanchez; Jeff Ridley; Livia Thorpe; Steven C. Hardiman; Michael Mayer; David I. Berry; Stephen Belcher

The Southern Ocean is a pivotal component of the global climate system yet it is poorly represented in climate models, with significant biases in upper-ocean temperatures, clouds and winds. Combining Atmospheric and Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project (AMIP5/CMIP5) simulations, with observations and equilibrium heat budget theory, we show that across the CMIP5 ensemble variations in sea surface temperature biases in the 40–60°S Southern Ocean are primarily caused by AMIP5 atmospheric model net surface flux bias variations, linked to cloud-related short-wave errors. Equilibration of the biases involves local coupled sea surface temperature bias feedbacks onto the surface heat flux components. In combination with wind feedbacks, these biases adversely modify upper-ocean thermal structure. Most AMIP5 atmospheric models that exhibit small net heat flux biases appear to achieve this through compensating errors. We demonstrate that targeted developments to cloud-related parameterisations provide a route to better represent the Southern Ocean in climate models and projections.The Southern Ocean is critically important for global climate yet poorly represented by climate models. Here the authors trace sea surface temperature biases in this region to cloud-related errors in atmospheric-model simulated surface heat fluxes and provide a pathway to improve the models.


Geoscientific Model Development | 2010

Design and implementation of the infrastructure of HadGEM3: the next-generation Met Office climate modelling system

Helene T. Hewitt; Dan Copsey; I. D. Culverwell; Chris Harris; R. S. R. Hill; A. B. Keen; A. J. McLaren; Elizabeth C. Hunke


Geophysical Research Letters | 2011

Improved Atlantic winter blocking in a climate model

Adam A. Scaife; Dan Copsey; Chris Gordon; Chris Harris; Tim Hinton; Sarah Keeley; A. O'Neill; Malcolm J. Roberts; Keith D. Williams


Geoscientific Model Development | 2015

The Met Office Global Coupled model 2.0 (GC2) configuration

Keith D. Williams; Chris Harris; Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo; Joanne Camp; R. E. Comer; Dan Copsey; D. Fereday; Tim Graham; Richard Hill; Tim Hinton; Patrick Hyder; S. Ineson; Giacomo Masato; S. F. Milton; Malcolm J. Roberts; D. P. Rowell; C. Sanchez; Ann Shelly; Bablu Sinha; D. N. Walters; Alex West; Tim Woollings; P. K. Xavier


Geophysical Research Letters | 2006

Recent trends in sea level pressure in the Indian Ocean region

Dan Copsey; Rowan Sutton; Jeff R. Knight


Geoscientific Model Development | 2016

The impact of resolving the Rossby radius at mid-latitudes in the ocean: results from a high-resolution version of the Met Office GC2 coupled model

Helene T. Hewitt; Malcolm J. Roberts; Pat Hyder; Tim Graham; J. G. L. Rae; Stephen Belcher; Romain Bourdallé-Badie; Dan Copsey; Andrew C. Coward; Catherine Guiavarc'h; Chris Harris; Richard Hill; Joël J.-M. Hirschi; Gurvan Madec; Matthew S. Mizielinski; Erica Neininger; Adrian L. New; Jean-Christophe Rioual; Bablu Sinha; David Storkey; Ann Shelly; Livia Thorpe; Richard A. Wood

Collaboration


Dive into the Dan Copsey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge