Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David Rind is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David Rind.


Nature | 1998

Increased polar stratospheric ozone losses and delayed eventual recovery owing to increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations

Drew T. Shindell; David Rind; Patrick Lonergan

The chemical reactions responsible for stratospheric ozone depletion are extremely sensitive to temperature. Greenhouse gases warm the Earths surface but cool the stratosphere radiatively and therefore affect ozone depletion. Here we investigate the interplay between projected future emissions of greenhouse gases and levels of ozone-depleting halogen species using a global climate model that incorporates simplified ozone-depletion chemistry. Temperature and wind changes induced by the increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations alter planetary-wave propagation in our model, reducing the frequency of sudden stratospheric warmings in the Northern Hemisphere. This results in a more stable Arctic polar vortex, with significantly colder temperatures in the lower stratosphere and concomitantly increased ozone depletion. Increased concentrations of greenhouse gases might therefore be at least partly responsible for the very large Arctic ozone losses observed in recent winters. Arctic losses reach a maximum in the decade 2010 to 2019 in our model, roughly a decade after the maximum in stratospheric chlorine abundance. The mean losses are about the same as those over the Antarctic during the early 1990s, with geographically localized losses of up to two-thirds of the Arctic ozone column in the worst years. The severity and the duration of the Antarctic ozone hole are also predicted to increase because of greenhouse-gas-induced stratospheric cooling over the coming decades.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2014

Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive

Gavin A. Schmidt; Max Kelley; Larissa Nazarenko; Reto Ruedy; Gary L. Russell; Igor Aleinov; Mike Bauer; Susanne E. Bauer; Maharaj K. Bhat; Rainer Bleck; V. M. Canuto; Thomas L. Clune; Rosalinda de Fainchtein; Anthony D. Del Genio; Nancy Y. Kiang; A. Lacis; Allegra N. LeGrande; Elaine Matthews; Ron L. Miller; Amidu Oloso; William M. Putman; David Rind; Drew T. Shindell; Rahman A. Syed; Jinlun Zhang

We present a description of the ModelE2 version of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) General Circulation Model (GCM) and the configurations used in the simulations performed for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). We use six variations related to the treatment of the atmospheric composition, the calculation of aerosol indirect effects, and ocean model component. Specifically, we test the difference between atmospheric models that have noninteractive composition, where radiatively important aerosols and ozone are prescribed from precomputed decadal averages, and interactive versions where atmospheric chemistry and aerosols are calculated given decadally varying emissions. The impact of the first aerosol indirect effect on clouds is either specified using a simple tuning, or parameterized using a cloud microphysics scheme. We also use two dynamic ocean components: the Russell and HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) which differ significantly in their basic formulations and grid. Results are presented for the climatological means over the satellite era (1980–2004) taken from transient simulations starting from the preindustrial (1850) driven by estimates of appropriate forcings over the 20th Century. Differences in base climate and variability related to the choice of ocean model are large, indicating an important structural uncertainty. The impact of interactive atmospheric composition on the climatology is relatively small except in regions such as the lower stratosphere, where ozone plays an important role, and the tropics, where aerosol changes affect the hydrological cycle and cloud cover. While key improvements over previous versions of the model are evident, these are not uniform across all metrics.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2012

Regions of rapid sea ice change: An inter-hemispheric seasonal comparison

S Stammerjohn; Ra Massom; David Rind; Douglas G. Martinson

This bi-polar analysis resolves ice edge changes on nspace/time scales relevant for investigating seasonal iceocean nfeedbacks and focuses on spatio-temporal changes in nthe timing of annual sea ice retreat and advance over 1979/ n80 to 2010/11. Where Arctic sea ice decrease is fastest, the nsea ice retreat is now nearly 2 months earlier and subsequent nadvance more than 1 month later (compared to 1979/80), nresulting in a 3-month longer summer ice-free season. In nthe Antarctic Peninsula and Bellingshausen Sea region, sea nice retreat is more than 1 month earlier and advance 2 months nlater, resulting in a more than 3-month longer summer icefree nseason. In contrast, in the western Ross Sea (Antarctica) nregion, sea ice retreat and advance are more than 1 month nlater and earlier respectively, resulting in a more than n2 month shorter summer ice-free season. Regardless of trend nmagnitude or direction, and at latitudes mostly poleward of n70° (N/S), there is strong correspondence between anomalies nin the timings of sea ice retreat and subsequent advance, nbut little correspondence between advance and subsequent nretreat. These results support a strong ocean thermal feedback nin autumn in response to changes in spring sea ice nretreat. Further, model calculations suggest different net nocean heat changes in the Arctic versus Antarctic where nautumn sea ice advance is 1 versus 2 months later. Ocean-atmosphere nchanges, particularly in boreal spring and austral nautumn (i.e., during x03~March-May), are discussed and compared, nas well as possible inter-hemispheric climate connections.


Science | 1994

Glacial-Interglacial Changes in Moisture Sources for Greenland: Influences on the Ice Core Record of Climate

Christopher D. Charles; David Rind; Jean Jouzel; Randal D. Koster; Richard G. Fairbanks

Large, abrupt shifts in the l8O/16O ratio found in Greenland ice must reflect real features of the climate system variability. These isotopic shifts can be viewed as a result of air temperature fluctuations, but determination of the cause of the changes—the most crucial issue for future climate concerns—requires a detailed understanding of the controls on isotopes in precipitation. Results from general circulation model experiments suggest that the sources of Greenland precipitation varied with different climate states, allowing dynamic atmospheric mechanisms for influencing the ice core isotope shifts.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007

Why are there large differences between models in global budgets of tropospheric ozone

Shiliang Wu; Loretta J. Mickley; Daniel J. Jacob; Jennifer A. Logan; Robert M. Yantosca; David Rind

[1]xa0Global 3-D tropospheric chemistry models in the literature show large differences in global budget terms for tropospheric ozone. The ozone production rate in the troposphere, P(Ox), varies from 2300 to 5300 Tg yr−1 across models describing the present-day atmosphere. The ensemble mean of P(Ox) in models from the post-2000 literature is 35% higher than that compiled in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR). Simulations conducted with the GEOS-Chem model using two different assimilated meteorological data sets for 2001 (GEOS-3 and GEOS-4), as well as 3 years of GISS GCM meteorology, show P(Ox) values in the range 4250–4700 Tg yr−1; the differences appear mostly because of clouds. Examination of the evolution of P(Ox) over the GEOS-Chem model history shows major effects from changes in heterogeneous chemistry, the lightning NOx source, and the yield of organic nitrates from isoprene oxidation. Multivariate statistical analysis of model budgets in the literature indicates that 74% of the variance in P(Ox) across models can be explained by differences in NOx emissions, inclusion of nonmethane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs, mostly biogenic isoprene), and ozone influx from stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE). Higher NOx emissions, more widespread inclusion of NMVOC chemistry, and weaker STE in the more recent models increase ozone production; however, the effect of NMVOCs does not appear generally sensitive to the magnitude of emissions within the range typically used in models (500–900 Tg C yr−1). We find in GEOS-Chem that P(Ox) saturates when NMVOC emissions exceed 200 Tg C yr−1 because of formation of organic nitrates from isoprene oxidation, providing an important sink for NOx.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008

Effects of 2000-2050 Global Change on Ozone Air Quality in the United States

Shiliang Wu; Loretta J. Mickley; Eric M. Leibensperger; Daniel J. Jacob; David Rind; David G. Streets

[1] We investigate the effects on U.S. ozone air quality from 2000–2050 global changes in climate and anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursors by using a global chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) driven by meteorological fields from the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model (NASA/GISS GCM). We follow the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change A1B scenario and separate the effects from changes in climate and anthropogenic emissions through sensitivity simulations. The 2000–2050 changes in anthropogenic emissions reduce the U.S. summer daily maximum 8-hour ozone by 2–15 ppb, but climate change causes a 2–5 ppb positive offset over the Midwest and northeastern United States, partly driven by decreased ventilation from convection and frontal passages. Ozone pollution episodes are far more affected by climate change than mean values, with effects exceeding 10 ppb in the Midwest and northeast. We find that ozone air quality in the southeast is insensitive to climate change, reflecting compensating effects from changes in isoprene emission and air pollution meteorology. We define a ‘‘climate change penalty’’ as the additional emission controls necessary to meet a given ozone air quality target. We find that a 50% reduction in U.S. NOx emissions is needed in the 2050 climate to reach the same target in the Midwest as a 40% reduction in the 2000 climate. Emission controls reduce the magnitude of this climate change penalty and can even turn it into a climate benefit in some regions.


Geophysical Research Letters | 1993

What determines the cloud-to-ground lightning fraction in thunderstorms?

Colin Price; David Rind

The ratio of intracloud lightning (IC) to cloud-to-ground lightning (CG) in thunderstorms is observed to vary with latitude. The reason frequently given for this behaviour is that the height of the freezing level, and hence the negative charge center in thunderstorms, varies with latitude, resulting in higher ratios in the tropics compared with those in midlatitudes. This study shows that this hypothesis could well be incorrect. Analysis of cloud and lightning data indicates that the IC/CG ratio is linked to the thickness of the cold cloud region in thunderstorms (0°C to cloud top), rather than to the freezing level height.


Journal of Climate | 1995

Modeling the Effects of UV Variability and the QBO on the Troposphere–Stratosphere System. Part I:. The Middle Atmosphere

Nambath K. Balachandran; David Rind

Abstract Results of experiments with a GCM involving changes in UV input (±25%, ±10%, ±5% at wavelengths below 0.3 µm) and simulated equatorial QBO are presented, with emphasis on the middle atmosphere response. The UV forcing employed is larger than observed during the last solar cycle and does not vary with wavelength, hence the relationship of these results to those from actual solar UV forcing should be treated with caution. The QBO alters the location of the zero wind line and the horizontal shear of the zonal wind in the low to middle stratosphere, while the UV change alters the magnitude of the polar jet and the vertical shear of the zonal wind. Both mechanisms thus affect planetary wave propagation. The east phase of the QBO leads to tropical cooling and high-latitude warming in the lower stratosphere, with opposite effects in the upper stratosphere. This quadrupole pattern is also wen in the observations. The high-latitude responses are due to altered planetary wave effect, while the models trop...


Geological Society of America Bulletin | 1992

Pangaean climate during the Early Jurassic: GCM simulations and the sedimentary record of paleoclimate

Mark A. Chandler; David Rind; Reto Ruedy

Results from new simulations of the Early Jurassic climate show that increased ocean heat transport may have been the primary force generating warmer climates during the past 180 m.y. The simulations, conducted using the general circulation model (GCM) at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, include realistic representations of paleocontinental distribution, topography, epeiric seas, and vegetation, in order to facilitate comparisons between model results and paleoclimate data. Three major features of the simulated Early Jurassic climate include the following. (1) A global warming, compared to the present, of 5 °C to 10 °C, with temperature increases at high latitudes five times this global average. Average summer temperatures exceed 35 °C in low-latitude regions of western Pangaea where eolian sandstones testify to the presence of vast deserts. (2) Simulated precipitation and evaporation patterns agree closely with the moisture distribution interpreted from evaporites, and coal deposits. High rainfall rates are associated primarily with monsoons that originate over the warm Tethys Ocean. Unlike the megamonsoons proposed in previous studies, these systems are found to be associated with localized pressure cells whose positions are controlled by topography and coastal geography. (3)Decreases in planetary albedo, occurring because of reductions in sea ice, snow cover, and low clouds, and increases in atmospheric water vapor are the positive climate feed-backs that amplify the global warming.nnSimilar to other Mesozoic climate simulations, our model finds that large seasonal temperature fluctuations occurred over mid-and high-latitude continental interiors, refuting paleoclimate evidence that suggests more equable conditions. Sensitivity experiments suggest that some combination of ocean heat transport increase, high levels of CO2, and improved modeling of ground hydrological schemes may lead to a better match with the geologic record. We speculate, also, that the record itself is biased toward equable climatic conditions, a suggestion that may be tested by comparing GCM results with more detailed phytogeographic analyses.


Journal of Climate | 1992

Global patterns of cloud optical thickness variation with temperature

George Tselioudis; William B. Rossow; David Rind

Abstract The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) dataset is used to correlate variations of cloud optical thickness and cloud temperature in todays atmosphere. The analysis focuses on low clouds in order to limit the importance of changes in cloud vertical extent, particle size, and water phase. Coherent patterns of change are observed on several time and space scales. On the planetary scale, clouds in colder, higher latitudes are found to be optically thicker than clouds in warmer, lower latitudes. On the planetary scale, winter clouds are, for the most part, optically thicker than summer clouds. The logarithmic derivative of cloud optical thickness with temperature is used to describe the sign and magnitude of the optical thickness-temperature correlation. The seasonal, latitudinal, and day-to-day variations of this relation are examined for Northern Hemisphere clouds in 1984. The analysis is done separately for clouds over land and ocean. In cold continental clouds, optical thick...

Collaboration


Dive into the David Rind's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gavin A. Schmidt

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith Lean

United States Naval Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith Perlwitz

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Igor Aleinov

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa Nazarenko

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy Y. Kiang

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick Lonergan

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ron L. Miller

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge