Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gavin A. Schmidt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gavin A. Schmidt.


Journal of Climate | 2006

Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data

Gavin A. Schmidt; Reto Ruedy; James E. Hansen; Igor Aleinov; N. Bell; Mike Bauer; Susanne Bauer; Brian Cairns; V. M. Canuto; Y. Cheng; Anthony D. Del Genio; Greg Faluvegi; Andrew D. Friend; Timothy M. Hall; Yongyun Hu; Max Kelley; Nancy Y. Kiang; D. Koch; A. Lacis; Jean Lerner; Ken K. Lo; Ron L. Miller; Larissa Nazarenko; Valdar Oinas; Jan Perlwitz; Judith Perlwitz; David Rind; Anastasia Romanou; Gary L. Russell; Makiko Sato

Abstract A full description of the ModelE version of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) and results are presented for present-day climate simulations (ca. 1979). This version is a complete rewrite of previous models incorporating numerous improvements in basic physics, the stratospheric circulation, and forcing fields. Notable changes include the following: the model top is now above the stratopause, the number of vertical layers has increased, a new cloud microphysical scheme is used, vegetation biophysics now incorporates a sensitivity to humidity, atmospheric turbulence is calculated over the whole column, and new land snow and lake schemes are introduced. The performance of the model using three configurations with different horizontal and vertical resolutions is compared to quality-controlled in situ data, remotely sensed and reanalysis products. Overall, significant improvements over previous models are seen, particularly in upper-atmosphere te...


Science | 2009

Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions

Drew T. Shindell; Greg Faluvegi; D. Koch; Gavin A. Schmidt; Nadine Unger; Susanne Bauer

All Together Now Deciding how to change emissions of polluting gases that affect climate through their radiative forcing properties requires that the quantitative impact of these emissions be understood. Most past calculations of this type have considered only the radiative forcing of the specific emission and its atmospheric lifetime. Shindell et al. (p. 716; see the Perspectives by Arneth et al. and by Parrish and Zhu) use sophisticated atmospheric chemical and climate modeling to determine how gas-aerosol interactions affect the radiative properties of the atmosphere, finding significant departures from the standard method for emissions of methane, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides. These findings should help to optimize strategies for mitigating global warming by reducing anthropogenic emissions. Chemical interactions between atmospheric gases and aerosols modify the global warming impacts of emissions. Evaluating multicomponent climate change mitigation strategies requires knowledge of the diverse direct and indirect effects of emissions. Methane, ozone, and aerosols are linked through atmospheric chemistry so that emissions of a single pollutant can affect several species. We calculated atmospheric composition changes, historical radiative forcing, and forcing per unit of emission due to aerosol and tropospheric ozone precursor emissions in a coupled composition-climate model. We found that gas-aerosol interactions substantially alter the relative importance of the various emissions. In particular, methane emissions have a larger impact than that used in current carbon-trading schemes or in the Kyoto Protocol. Thus, assessments of multigas mitigation policies, as well as any separate efforts to mitigate warming from short-lived pollutants, should include gas-aerosol interactions.


Nature | 1999

Simulation of recent northern winter climate trends by greenhouse-gas forcing

Drew T. Shindell; Ron L. Miller; Gavin A. Schmidt; Lionel Pandolfo

The temperature of air at the Earths surface has risen during the past century, but the fraction of the warming that can be attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse gases remains controversial. The strongest warming trends have been over Northern Hemisphere land masses during winter, and are closely related to changes in atmospheric circulation. These circulation changes are manifested by a gradual reduction in high-latitude sea-level pressure, and an increase in mid-latitude sea-level pressure associated with one phase of the Arctic Oscillation (a hemisphere-scale version of the North Atlantic Oscillation). Here we use several different climate-model versions to demonstrate that the observed sea-level-pressure trends, including their magnitude, can be simulated by realistic increases in greenhouse-gas concentrations. Thus, although the warming appears through a naturally occurring mode of atmospheric variability, it may be anthropogenically induced and may continue to rise. The Arctic Oscillation trend is captured only in climate models that include a realistic representation of the stratosphere, while changes in ozone concentrations are not necessary to simulate the observed climate trends. The proper representation of stratospheric dynamics appears to be important to the attribution of climate change, at least on a broad regional scale.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2014

Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive

Gavin A. Schmidt; Max Kelley; Larissa Nazarenko; Reto Ruedy; Gary L. Russell; Igor Aleinov; Mike Bauer; Susanne E. Bauer; Maharaj K. Bhat; Rainer Bleck; V. M. Canuto; Thomas L. Clune; Rosalinda de Fainchtein; Anthony D. Del Genio; Nancy Y. Kiang; A. Lacis; Allegra N. LeGrande; Elaine Matthews; Ron L. Miller; Amidu Oloso; William M. Putman; David Rind; Drew T. Shindell; Rahman A. Syed; Jinlun Zhang

We present a description of the ModelE2 version of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) General Circulation Model (GCM) and the configurations used in the simulations performed for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). We use six variations related to the treatment of the atmospheric composition, the calculation of aerosol indirect effects, and ocean model component. Specifically, we test the difference between atmospheric models that have noninteractive composition, where radiatively important aerosols and ozone are prescribed from precomputed decadal averages, and interactive versions where atmospheric chemistry and aerosols are calculated given decadally varying emissions. The impact of the first aerosol indirect effect on clouds is either specified using a simple tuning, or parameterized using a cloud microphysics scheme. We also use two dynamic ocean components: the Russell and HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) which differ significantly in their basic formulations and grid. Results are presented for the climatological means over the satellite era (1980–2004) taken from transient simulations starting from the preindustrial (1850) driven by estimates of appropriate forcings over the 20th Century. Differences in base climate and variability related to the choice of ocean model are large, indicating an important structural uncertainty. The impact of interactive atmospheric composition on the climatology is relatively small except in regions such as the lower stratosphere, where ozone plays an important role, and the tropics, where aerosol changes affect the hydrological cycle and cloud cover. While key improvements over previous versions of the model are evident, these are not uniform across all metrics.


Journal of Climate | 2008

A Review of Antarctic Surface Snow Isotopic Composition: Observations, Atmospheric Circulation, and Isotopic Modeling*

Valerie Masson-Delmotte; Shugui Hou; Alexey Ekaykin; Jean Jouzel; Alberto J. Aristarain; Ronaldo T. Bernardo; David H. Bromwich; Olivier Cattani; Marc Delmotte; S. Falourd; Massimo Frezzotti; L. Genoni; Elisabeth Isaksson; Amaelle Landais; Michiel M. Helsen; Gundula Hoffmann; J. Lopez; Vin Morgan; Hideaki Motoyama; David Noone; H. Oerter; J. R. Petit; A. Royer; Ryu Uemura; Gavin A. Schmidt; Elisabeth Schlosser; Jefferson Cardia Simões; Eric J. Steig; Barbara Stenni; M. Stievenard

A database of surface Antarctic snow isotopic composition is constructed using available measurements, with an estimate of data quality and local variability. Although more than 1000 locations are documented, the spatial coverage remains uneven with a majority of sites located in specific areas of East Antarctica. The database is used to analyze the spatial variations in snow isotopic composition with respect to geographical characteristics (elevation, distance to the coast) and climatic features (temperature, accumulation) and with a focus on deuterium excess. The capacity of theoretical isotopic, regional, and general circulation atmospheric models (including “isotopic” models) to reproduce the observed features and assess the role of moisture advection in spatial deuterium excess fluctuations is analyzed.


Journal of Climate | 2003

Volcanic and Solar Forcing of Climate Change during the Preindustrial Era

Drew T. Shindell; Gavin A. Schmidt; Ron L. Miller; Michael E. Mann

The climate response to variability in volcanic aerosols and solar irradiance, the primary forcings during the preindustrial era, is examined in a stratosphere-resolving general circulation model. The best agreement with historical and proxy data is obtained using both forcings, each of which has a significant effect on global mean temperatures. However, their regional climate impacts in the Northern Hemisphere are quite different. While the short-term continental winter warming response to volcanism is well known, it is shown that due to opposing dynamical and radiative effects, the long-term (decadal mean) regional response is not significant compared to unforced variability for either the winter or the annual average. In contrast, the long-term regional response to solar forcing greatly exceeds unforced variability for both time averages, as the dynamical and radiative effects reinforce one another, and produces climate anomalies similar to those seen during the Little Ice Age. Thus, long-term regional changes during the preindustrial appear to have been dominated by solar forcing.


Climate Dynamics | 2007

Climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE

James E. Hansen; Makiko Sato; Reto Ruedy; Pushker A. Kharecha; Andrew A. Lacis; Ron L. Miller; Larissa Nazarenko; K. Lo; Gavin A. Schmidt; Gary L. Russell; Igor Aleinov; Susanne E. Bauer; E. Baum; Brian Cairns; V. M. Canuto; Mark A. Chandler; Y. Cheng; Armond Cohen; A. D. Del Genio; G. Faluvegi; Eric L. Fleming; Andrew D. Friend; Timothy M. Hall; Charles H. Jackman; Jeffrey Jonas; Maxwell Kelley; Nancy Y. Kiang; D. Koch; Gordon Labow; J. Lerner

We carry out climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members, and, if available, observed variability. Discrepancies between observations and simulations with all forcings are due to model deficiencies, inaccurate or incomplete forcings, and imperfect observations. Although there are notable discrepancies between model and observations, the fidelity is sufficient to encourage use of the model for simulations of future climate change. By using a fixed well-documented model and accurately defining the 1880–2003 forcings, we aim to provide a benchmark against which the effect of improvements in the model, climate forcings, and observations can be tested. Principal model deficiencies include unrealistically weak tropical El Nino-like variability and a poor distribution of sea ice, with too much sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere and too little in the Southern Hemisphere. Greatest uncertainties in the forcings are the temporal and spatial variations of anthropogenic aerosols and their indirect effects on clouds.


Science | 2010

Atmospheric CO2: principal control knob governing Earth's temperature.

Andrew A. Lacis; Gavin A. Schmidt; David Rind; Reto Ruedy

Turning Up the Heat The physical effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide on Earths energy budget—that is, its “greenhouse effect”—has been understood for more than 100 years, but its role in climate warming is still not universally accepted. Lacis et al. (p. 356) conducted a set of idealized climate model experiments in which various greenhouse gases were added to or subtracted from the atmosphere in order to illustrate their roles in controlling the temperature of the air. The findings clearly show that carbon dioxide exerts the most control on Earths climate, and that its abundance determines how much water vapor the atmosphere contains, even though the radiative effect of the water vapor is greater than that of carbon dioxide itself. Carbon dioxide is the atmospheric greenhouse gas that exerts the most control on Earth’s climate. Ample physical evidence shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single most important climate-relevant greenhouse gas in Earth’s atmosphere. This is because CO2, like ozone, N2O, CH4, and chlorofluorocarbons, does not condense and precipitate from the atmosphere at current climate temperatures, whereas water vapor can and does. Noncondensing greenhouse gases, which account for 25% of the total terrestrial greenhouse effect, thus serve to provide the stable temperature structure that sustains the current levels of atmospheric water vapor and clouds via feedback processes that account for the remaining 75% of the greenhouse effect. Without the radiative forcing supplied by CO2 and the other noncondensing greenhouse gases, the terrestrial greenhouse would collapse, plunging the global climate into an icebound Earth state.


Paleoceanography | 1999

Error analysis of paleosalinity calculations

Gavin A. Schmidt

A detailed error analysis is performed for the calculation of open-ocean salinity changes from carbonate oxygen-18 proxy data. Measurement errors are generally negligible, however, errors due to the “goodness of fit” of various regressions used in the calculation are significant. Depending on the method used and on the proxies available, error bars (1σ) for the salinity range from 0.6 to 1.8. In particular, expected errors for the midlatitude and tropical salinity differences at the Last Glacial Maximum are around 1.1 to 2.5. The largest errors occur because of the differences between temporal and spatial seawater oxygen-18:salinity relationships and through the use of nonconcurrent temperature measurements. Methods of improving paleosalinity estimates should focus on eliminating these large sources of uncertainty.


Paleoceanography | 1999

FORWARD MODELING OF CARBONATE PROXY DATA FROM PLANKTONIC FORAMINIFERA USING OXYGEN ISOTOPE TRACERS IN A GLOBAL OCEAN MODEL

Gavin A. Schmidt

The distribution and variation of oxygen isotopes in seawater are calculated using the Goddard Institute for Space Studies global ocean model. Simple ecological models are used to estimate the planktonic foraminiferal abundance as a function of depth, column temperature, season, light intensity, and density stratification. These models are combined to forward model isotopic signals recorded in calcareous ocean sediment. The sensitivity of the results to the changes in foraminiferal ecology, secondary calcification, and dissolution are also examined. Simulated present-day isotopic values for ecology relevant for multiple species compare well with core-top data. Hindcasts of sea surface temperature and salinity are made from time series of the modeled carbonate isotope values as the model climate changes. Paleoclimatic inferences from these carbonate isotope records are strongly affected by erroneous assumptions concerning the covariations of temperature, salinity, and δ18Ow. Habitat-imposed biases are less important, although errors due to temperature-dependent abundances can be significant.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gavin A. Schmidt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allegra N. LeGrande

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael E. Mann

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ron L. Miller

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Rind

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Reto Ruedy

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa Nazarenko

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary L. Russell

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greg Faluvegi

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge