Dong Gen Luo

The Function of Guanylate Cyclase 1 and Guanylate Cyclase 2 in Rod and Cone Photoreceptors

Retinal guanylate cyclases 1 and 2 (GC1 and GC2) are responsible for synthesis of cyclic GMP in rods and cones, but their individual contributions to phototransduction are unknown. We report here that the deletion of both GC1 and GC2 rendered rod and cone photoreceptors nonfunctional and unstable. In the rod outer segments of GC double knock-out mice, guanylate cyclase-activating proteins 1 and 2, and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase were undetectable, although rhodopsin and transducin α-subunit were mostly unaffected. Outer segment membranes of GC1–/– and GC double knock-out cones were destabilized and devoid of cone transducin (α- and γ-subunits), cone phosphodiesterase, and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1, whereas cone pigments were present at reduced levels. Real time reverse transcription-PCR analyses demonstrated normal RNA transcript levels for the down-regulated proteins, indicating that down-regulation is posttranslational. We interpret these results to demonstrate an intrinsic requirement of GCs for stability and/or transport of a set of membrane-associated phototransduction proteins.

How vision begins: An odyssey

Retinal rods and cones, which are the front-end light detectors in the eye, achieve wonders together by being able to signal single-photon absorption and yet also able to adjust their function to brightness changes spanning 109-fold. How these cells detect light is now quite well understood. Not surprising for almost any biological process, the intial step of seeing reveals a rich complexity as the probing goes deeper. The odyssey continues, but the knowledge gained so far is already nothing short of remarkable in qualitative and quantitative detail. It has also indirectly opened up the mystery of odorant sensing. Basic science aside, clinical ophthalmology has benefited tremendously from this endeavor as well. This article begins by recapitulating the key developments in this understanding from the mid-1960s to the late 1980s, during which period the advances were particularly rapid and fit for an intricate detective story. It then highlights some details discovered more recently, followed by a comparison between rods and cones.

Impaired Channel Targeting and Retinal Degeneration in Mice Lacking the Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel Subunit CNGB1

Cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels are important mediators in the transduction pathways of rod and cone photoreceptors. Native CNG channels are heterotetramers composed of homologous A and B subunits. In heterologous expression systems, B subunits alone cannot form functional CNG channels, but they confer a number of channel properties when coexpressed with A subunits. To investigate the importance of the CNGB subunits in vivo, we deleted the CNGB1 gene in mice. In the absence of CNGB1, only trace amounts of the CNGA1 subunit were found on the rod outer segment. As a consequence, the vast majority of isolated rod photoreceptors in mice lacking CNGB1 (CNGB1-/-) failed to respond to light. In electroretinograms (ERGs), CNGB1-/- mice showed no rod-mediated responses. The rods also showed a slow-progressing degeneration caused by apoptotic death and concurred by retinal gliosis. Cones were primarily unaffected and showed normal ERG responses up to 6 months, but they started to degenerate in later stages. At the age of ∼1 year, CNGB1-/- animals were devoid of both rods and cones. Our results show that CNGB1 is a crucial determinant of native CNG channel targeting. As a result of the lack of rod CNG channels, CNGB1-/- mice develop a retinal degeneration that resembles human retinitis pigmentosa.

Parietal-Eye Phototransduction Components and Their Potential Evolutionary Implications

The parietal-eye photoreceptor is unique because it has two antagonistic light signaling pathways in the same cell—a hyperpolarizing pathway maximally sensitive to blue light and a depolarizing pathway maximally sensitive to green light. Here, we report the molecular components of these two pathways. We found two opsins in the same cell: the blue-sensitive pinopsin and a previously unidentified green-sensitive opsin, which we name parietopsin. Signaling components included gustducin-α and Gαo, but not rod or cone transducin-α. Single-cell recordings demonstrated that Go mediates the depolarizing response. Gustducin-α resembles transducin-α functionally and likely mediates the hyperpolarizing response. The parietopsin-Go signaling pair provides clues about how rod and cone phototransduction might have evolved.

Activation of visual pigments by light and heat

Thermal activation of visual pigments involves the same chromophore-isomerization reaction as does light activation. Vision begins with photoisomerization of visual pigments. Thermal energy can complement photon energy to drive photoisomerization, but it also triggers spontaneous pigment activation as noise that interferes with light detection. For half a century, the mechanism underlying this dark noise has remained controversial. We report here a quantitative relation between a pigment’s photoactivation energy and its peak-absorption wavelength, λmax. Using this relation and assuming that pigment activations by light and heat go through the same ground-state isomerization energy barrier, we can predict the relative noise of diverse pigments with multi–vibrational-mode thermal statistics. The agreement between predictions and our measurements strongly suggests that pigment noise arises from canonical isomerization. The predicted high noise for pigments with λmax in the infrared presumably explains why they apparently do not exist in nature.

Quantal noise from human red cone pigment

The rod pigment, rhodopsin, shows spontaneous isomerization activity. This quantal noise produces a dark light of ∼0.01 photons s−1 rod−1 in human, setting the threshold for rod vision. The spontaneous isomerization activity of human cone pigments has long remained a mystery because the effect of a single isomerized pigment molecule in cones, unlike that in rods, is small and beyond measurement. We have now overcome this problem by expressing human red cone pigment transgenically in mouse rods in order to exploit their large single-photon response, especially after genetic removal of a key negative-feedback regulation. Extrapolating the measured quantal noise of transgenic cone pigment to native human red cones, we obtained a dark rate of ∼10 false events s−1 cone−1, almost 103-fold lower than the overall dark transduction noise previously reported in primate cones. Our measurements provide a rationale for why mammalian red, green and blue cones have comparable sensitivities, unlike their amphibian counterparts.

Distinct signaling of Drosophila chemoreceptors in olfactory sensory neurons

Significance Drosophila is a popular model system for the study of olfaction. However, the physiological properties of its olfactory sensory neurons, both intrinsic and responsive, remain unclear. We have succeeded, for the first time, in patch-clamp recording from targeted Drosophila OSNs, revealing the distinct signaling of odorant receptors (Ors) and ionotropic receptors (Irs). We found that Ir-driven receptor currents did not adapt, whereas Or responses strongly adapted. Surprisingly, although Or adaptation increased odor sensitivity at high odor backgrounds, it reduced odor sensitivity at low backgrounds. Adaptation permeates all senses, and the finding of dynamic gain control by adaptation in Drosophila Or-expressing OSNs sheds light on the understanding of adaptation in other sensory systems. In Drosophila, olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) rely primarily on two types of chemoreceptors, odorant receptors (Ors) and ionotropic receptors (Irs), to convert odor stimuli into neural activity. The cellular signaling of these receptors in their native OSNs remains unclear because of the difficulty of obtaining intracellular recordings from Drosophila OSNs. Here, we developed an antennal preparation that enabled the first recordings (to our knowledge) from targeted Drosophila OSNs through a patch-clamp technique. We found that brief odor pulses triggered graded inward receptor currents with distinct response kinetics and current–voltage relationships between Or- and Ir-driven responses. When stimulated with long-step odors, the receptor current of Ir-expressing OSNs did not adapt. In contrast, Or-expressing OSNs showed a strong Ca2+-dependent adaptation. The adaptation-induced changes in odor sensitivity obeyed the Weber–Fechner relation; however, surprisingly, the incremental sensitivity was reduced at low odor backgrounds but increased at high odor backgrounds. Our model for odor adaptation revealed two opposing effects of adaptation, desensitization and prevention of saturation, in dynamically adjusting odor sensitivity and extending the sensory operating range.

Light responses of primate and other mammalian cones.

Significance We aimed to solve a longstanding conundrum about the light response of primate cones. Unlike those of lower vertebrates, the primate cones’ response to light has long been reported as being biphasic. This surprise has also raised a yet-unanswered question about the requisite signal processing in the retina. More recently, human paired-flash electroretinographic data have challenged the biphasic waveform of the primate cone response. Our suction-pipette recordings from single primate cones now show directly that the light responses of primate and other mammalian cones are in fact very predominantly monophasic, much like those in invertebrates. Retinal cones are photoreceptors for daylight vision. For lower vertebrates, cones are known to give monophasic, hyperpolarizing responses to light flashes. For primate cones, however, they have been reported to give strongly biphasic flash responses, with an initial hyperpolarization followed by a depolarization beyond the dark level, now a textbook dogma. We have reexamined this primate-cone observation and, surprisingly, found predominantly monophasic cone responses. Correspondingly, we found that primate cones began to adapt to steady light at much lower intensities than previously reported, explainable by a larger steady response to background light for a monophasic than for a biphasic response. Similarly, we have found a monophasic cone response for several other mammalian species. Thus, a monophasic flash response may in fact be the norm for primate and other mammalian cones as for lower-vertebrate cones. This revised information is important for ultimately understanding human retinal signal processing and correlating with psychophysical data.

Phototransduction in Rods and Cones

Phototransduction is the first step in seeing, whereby photons absorbed by the retinal rods and cones trigger an electrical signal, which is then transmitted synaptically to higher-order retinal neurons for processing. The mechanism of phototransduction is now extremely well understood, especially that of rods, and is in fact the exemplary G-protein-mediated signaling pathway understood down to quantitative details. The molecular identifications of the various proteins involved in phototransduction and their mutations have also helped understand many hereditary diseases affecting vision.

AMPA receptor is involved in transmission of cone signal to ON bipolar cells in carp retina

The present work focuses on characterization of glutamate receptor subtypes mediating cone signal transmission to ON bipolar cells (BCs) in the carp retina, using intracellular recording techniques. Glutamate (5 mM) hyperpolarized cone-dominant ON BCs, which was associated with a suppression of light responses, whereas Co(2+) (1 mM) depolarized these cells and suppressed their light responses. On the other hand, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) of 20 microM caused a membrane depolarization and blocked depolarizing light responses, L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutryic acid (l-AP4) was without effect. The effects of AMPA were reversed by coapplication of GYKI 52466, an AMPA receptor selective non-competitive antagonist, but persisted in the presence of picrotoxin and strychnine. For rod-dominant ON BCs, both l-AP4 and AMPA reversibly blocked depolarizing light responses, but with membrane potential changes of opposite polarities (hyperpolarization for l-AP4 and depolarization for AMPA). In the inner retina, AMPA depolarized transient ON-OFF amacrine cells and blocked both ON and OFF cone-driven depolarizing responses, but l-AP4 did not. These results suggest that AMPA receptors, but not l-AP4 receptors, are involved in synaptic transmission of cone signal to ON bipolar cells in carp retina.