Eric J. Baxter
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eric J. Baxter.
The Astronomical Journal | 2009
Eric J. Baxter; Kevin R. Covey; August Albert Muench; Gábor Fűrész; Luisa Marie Rebull; Andrew Szentgyorgyi
We determine the distance to the open cluster NGC 2264 using a statistical analysis of cluster member inclinations. We derive distance-dependent values of sin i (where i is the inclination angle) for 97 stars in NGC 2264 from the rotation periods, luminosities, effective temperatures, and projected equatorial rotation velocities, v sin i, measured for these stars. We have measured 96 of the vsin i values in our sample by analyzing high-resolution spectra with a cross-correlation technique. We model the observed distribution of sin i for the cluster by assuming that member stars have random axial orientations and by adopting prescriptions for the measurement errors in our sample. By adjusting the distance assumed in the observed sin i distribution until it matches the modeled distribution, we obtain a best-fit distance for the cluster. We find the data to be consistent with a distance to NGC 2264 of 913 pc. Quantitative tests of our analysis reveal uncertainties of 40 and 110 pc due to sampling and systematic effects, respectively. This distance estimate suggests a revised age for the cluster of ~1.5 Myr, although more detailed investigations of the full cluster membership are required to draw strong conclusions.
Physical Review D | 2010
Eric J. Baxter; Scott Dodelson; Savvas M. Koushiappas; Louis E. Strigari
Detecting the dark matter annihilation signal from Galactic substructure, or subhalos, is an important challenge for high-energy gamma-ray experiments. In this paper we discuss detection prospects by combining two different aspects of the gamma-ray signal: the angular distribution and the photon counts probability distribution function (PDF). The true PDF from subhalos has been shown recently (by Lee et al.) to deviate from Poisson; we extend this analysis and derive the signal PDF from a detailed ΛCDM-based model for the properties of subhalos. We combine our PDF with a model for Galactic and extra-Galactic diffuse gamma-ray emission to obtain an estimator and projected error on dark matter particle properties (mass and annihilation cross section) using the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope. We compare the estimator obtained from the true PDF to that obtained from the simpler Poisson analysis. We find that, although both estimators are unbiased in the presence of backgrounds, the error on dark matter properties derived from the true PDF is ~50% smaller than when utilizing the Poisson-based analysis.
Physical Review D | 2012
Peter Adshead; Eric J. Baxter; Scott Dodelson; Adam Lidz
We study the impact of primordial non-Gaussianity generated during inflation on the bias of halos using excursion set theory. We recapture the familiar result that the bias scales as
Physical Review D | 2013
Adam Lidz; Eric J. Baxter; Peter Adshead; Scott Dodelson
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Eric J. Baxter; Eduardo Rozo
k^{-2}
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2018
J. Colin Hill; Eric J. Baxter
Physical Review D | 2011
Eric J. Baxter; Scott Dodelson
on large scales for local type non-Gaussianity but explicitly identify the approximations that go into this conclusion and the corrections to it. We solve the more complicated problem of non-spherical halos, for which the collapse threshold is scale dependent.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Michael D. Gladders; Jane R. Rigby; Keren Sharon; Eva Wuyts; Louis E. Abramson; H. Dahle; S. E. Persson; Andrew J. Monson; Daniel D. Kelson; Dominic J. Benford; David C. Murphy; Matthew B. Bayliss; Keely D. Finkelstein; Benjamin P. Koester; Alissa Bans; Eric J. Baxter; Jennifer Helsby
The statistical properties of the primordial perturbations contain clues about the origins of those fluctuations. Although the Planck collaboration has recently obtained tight constraints on primordial non-gaussianity from cosmic microwave background measurements, it is still worthwhile to mine upcoming data sets in effort to place independent or competitive limits. The ionized bubbles that formed at redshift z~6-20 during the Epoch of Reionization are seeded by primordial overdensities, and so the statistics of the ionization field at high redshift are related to the statistics of the primordial field. Here we model the effect of primordial non-gaussianity on the reionization field. The epoch and duration of reionization are affected as are the sizes of the ionized bubbles, but these changes are degenerate with variations in the properties of the ionizing sources and the surrounding intergalactic medium. A more promising signature is the power spectrum of the spatial fluctuations in the ionization field, which may be probed by upcoming 21 cm surveys. This has the expected 1/k^2 dependence on large scales, characteristic of a biased tracer of the matter field. We project how well upcoming 21 cm observations will be able to disentangle this signal from foreground contamination. Although foreground cleaning inevitably removes the large-scale modes most impacted by primordial non-gaussianity, we find that primordial non-gaussianity can be separated from foreground contamination for a narrow range of length scales. In principle, futuristic redshifted 21 cm surveys may allow constraints competitive with Planck.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2008
Eric J. Baxter; Lia R. Corrales; R. Yamada; A. A. Esin
We define a maximum likelihood (ML for short) estimator for the correlation function, ξ, that uses the same pair counting observables (D, R, DD, DR, RR) as the standard Landy & Szalay (LS for short) estimator. The ML estimator outperforms the LS estimator in that it results in smaller measurement errors at any fixed random point density. Put another way, the ML estimator can reach the same precision as the LS estimator with a significantly smaller random point catalog. Moreover, these gains are achieved without significantly increasing the computational requirements for estimating ξ. We quantify the relative improvement of the ML estimator over the LS estimator and discuss the regimes under which these improvements are most significant. We present a short guide on how to implement the ML estimator and emphasize that the code alterations required to switch from an LS to an ML estimator are minimal.
Physical Review D | 2018
J. Colin Hill; Eric J. Baxter; Adam Lidz; Johnny P. Greco; Bhuvnesh Jain