Eric Pasmant

ANRIL, a long, noncoding RNA, is an unexpected major hotspot in GWAS

A large noncoding RNA called ANRIL (for antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus) has been identified within the p15/CDKN2B‐p16/CDKN2A‐p14/ARF gene cluster. While the exact role of ANRIL awaited further elucidation, common disease genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have surprisingly identified the ANRIL gene as a genetic susceptibility locus shared associated by coronary disease, intracranial aneurysm and also type 2 diabetes. Expression studies have confirmed the coregulation of p15/CDKN2B, p16/CDKN2A’, p14/ARF, and ANRIL. Among the cluster, ANRIL expression showed the strongest association with the multiple phenotypes linked to the 9p21.3 region. More recent GWAS also identified ANRIL as a risk locus for gliomas and basal cell carcinomas in accordance with the princeps observation. Moreover’ a mouse model has confirmed the pivotal role of ANRIL in regulation of CDKN2A/B expression through a cis‐acting mechanism and its implication in proliferation and senescence. The implication of ANRIL in cellular aging has provided an attractive unifying hypothesis to explain its association with various susceptibility risk factors. ANRIL identification emphasizes the underestimated role of long noncoding RNAs. Many GWAS have identified trait‐associated SNPs that felt in non‐coding genomic regions. It is conceivable to anticipate that long’ noncoding RNAs will map to many of these “gene deserts.”—Pasmant, E., Sabbagh, A., Vidaud, M., Bieche, I. ANRIL, a long, noncoding RNA, is an unexpected major hotspot in GWAS. FASEB J. 25, 444–448 (2011). www.fasebj.org

Cardio-facio-cutaneous and Noonan syndromes due to mutations in the RAS/MAPK signalling pathway: genotype–phenotype relationships and overlap with Costello syndrome

Cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome, Noonan syndrome (NS), and Costello syndrome (CS) are clinically related developmental disorders that have been recently linked to mutations in the RAS/MEK/ERK signalling pathway. This study was a mutation analysis of the KRAS, BRAF, MEK1 and MEK2 genes in a total of 130 patients (40 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CFC, 20 patients without HRAS mutations from the French Costello family support group, and 70 patients with NS without PTPN11 or SOS1 mutations). BRAF mutations were found in 14/40 (35%) patients with CFC and 8/20 (40%) HRAS-negative patients with CS. KRAS mutations were found in 1/40 (2.5%) patients with CFC, 2/20 (10%) HRAS-negative patients with CS and 4/70 patients with NS (5.7%). MEK1 mutations were found in 4/40 patients with CFC (10%), 4/20 (20%) HRAS-negative patients with CS and 3/70 (4.3%) patients with NS, and MEK2 mutations in 4/40 (10%) patients with CFC. Analysis of the major phenotypic features suggests significant clinical overlap between CS and CFC. The phenotype associated with MEK mutations seems less severe, and is compatible with normal mental development. Features considered distinctive for CS were also found to be associated with BRAF or MEK mutations. Because of its particular cancer risk, the term “Costello syndrome” should only be used for patients with proven HRAS mutation. These results confirm that KRAS is a minor contributor to NS and show that MEK is involved in some cases of NS, demonstrating a phenotypic continuum between the clinical entities. Although some associated features appear to be characteristic of a specific gene, no simple rule exists to distinguish NS from CFC easily.

PRC2 loss amplifies Ras-driven transcription and confers sensitivity to BRD4-based therapies

The polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) exerts oncogenic effects in many tumour types. However, loss-of-function mutations in PRC2 components occur in a subset of haematopoietic malignancies, suggesting that this complex plays a dichotomous and poorly understood role in cancer. Here we provide genomic, cellular, and mouse modelling data demonstrating that the polycomb group gene SUZ12 functions as tumour suppressor in PNS tumours, high-grade gliomas and melanomas by cooperating with mutations in NF1. NF1 encodes a Ras GTPase-activating protein (RasGAP) and its loss drives cancer by activating Ras. We show that SUZ12 loss potentiates the effects of NF1 mutations by amplifying Ras-driven transcription through effects on chromatin. Importantly, however, SUZ12 inactivation also triggers an epigenetic switch that sensitizes these cancers to bromodomain inhibitors. Collectively, these studies not only reveal an unexpected connection between the PRC2 complex, NF1 and Ras, but also identify a promising epigenetic-based therapeutic strategy that may be exploited for a variety of cancers.

NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

In 5‐10% of patients, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) results from microdeletions that encompass the entire NF1 gene and a variable number of flanking genes. Two recurrent microdeletion types are found in most cases, with microdeletion breakpoints located in paralogous regions flanking NF1 (proximal NF1‐REP‐a and distal NF1‐REP–c for the 1.4 Mb type‐1 microdeletion, and SUZ12 and SUZ12P for the 1.2 Mb type‐2 microdeletion). A more severe phenotype is usually associated with NF1 microdeletion patients than in those with intragenic mutations. We characterized NF1 microdeletions in 70 unrelated NF1 microdeleted patients using a high‐resolution NF1 custom array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype‐phenotype correlations were studied in 58 of these microdeletion patients and compared to 389 patients with intragenic truncating NF1 mutations and phenotyped in the same standardized way. Our results confirmed in an unbiased manner the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome with a significantly higher incidence of learning disabilities and facial dysmorphism in microdeleted patients compared to patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Microdeleted NF1 patients also showed a trend toward significance for childhood overgrowth. High‐resolution array‐CGH identified a new recurrent ∼1.0 Mb microdeletion type, designated as type‐3, with breakpoints in the paralogous regions middle NF1‐REP‐b and distal NF1‐REP–c.

Somatic NF1 Inactivation is a Frequent Event in Sporadic Pheochromocytoma

Germline mutations in the RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, MAX, TMEM127, NF1 or VHL genes are identified in about 30% of patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and somatic mutations in RET, VHL or MAX genes are reported in 17% of sporadic tumors. In the present study, using mutation screening of the NF1 gene, mapping of chromosome aberrations by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, microarray-based expression profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC), we addressed the implication of NF1 somatic alterations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. We studied 53 sporadic tumors, selected because of their classification with RET/NF1/TMEM127-related tumors by genome wide expression studies, as well as a second set of 11 independent tumors selected on their low individual levels of NF1 expression evaluated by microarray. Direct sequencing of the NF1 gene in tumor DNA identified the presence of an inactivating NF1 somatic mutation in 41% (25/61) of analyzed sporadic tumors, associated with loss of the wild-type allele in 84% (21/25) of cases. Gene expression signature of NF1-related tumors highlighted the downregulation of NF1 and the major overexpression of SOX9. Among the second set of 11 tumors, two sporadic tumors carried somatic mutations in NF1 as well as in another susceptibility gene. These new findings suggest that NF1 loss of function is a frequent event in the tumorigenesis of sporadic pheochromocytoma and strengthen the new concept of molecular-based targeted therapy for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Unravelling the genetic basis of variable clinical expression in neurofibromatosis 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant disorder which displays considerable inter- and intra-familial variability in phenotypic expression. To evaluate the genetic component of variable expressivity in NF1, we examined the phenotypic correlations between affected relatives in 750 NF1 patients from 275 multiplex families collected through the NF-France Network. Twelve NF1-related clinical features, including five quantitative traits (number of café-au-lait spots of small size and of large size, and number of cutaneous, subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas) and seven binary ones, were scored. All clinical features studied, with the exception of neoplasms, showed significant familial aggregation after adjusting for age and sex. For most of them, patterns of familial correlations indicated a strong genetic component with no apparent influence of the constitutional NF1 mutation. Heritability estimates of the five quantitative traits ranged from 0.26 to 0.62. Moreover, we investigated for the first time the role of the normal NF1 allele in the variable expression of NF1 through a family-based association study. Nine tag SNPs in NF1 were genotyped in 1132 individuals from 313 NF1 families. No significant deviations of transmission of any of the NF1 variants to affected offspring was found for any of the 12 clinical features examined, based on single marker or haplotype analysis. Taken together, our results provided evidence that genetic modifiers, unlinked to the NF1 locus, contribute to the variable expressivity of the disease.

Neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

Although neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a common Mendelian disorder with autosomal-dominant inheritance, its expression is highly variable and unpredictable. Many NF1 patients have been genotyped but few allele-phenotype correlations have been identified. NF1 genotype-phenotype correlations are difficult to identify because of the complexity of the NF1 phenotype, its strong age dependency, the relatedness of many clinical features and the huge heterogeneity of pathogenic NF1 mutations. Some NF1 patients with a given NF1 mutation may develop very severe disease while others with the same mutation have only mild symptoms. This phenotypic variability may be due to both modifier genes and environmental factors. Recent targeted strategies have identified several interesting candidate modifier genes.

SPRED1 germline mutations caused a neurofibromatosis type 1 overlapping phenotype

Objective: Germline loss-of-function mutations in the SPRED1 gene have recently been identified in patients fulfilling the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) but with no NF1 (neurofibromin 1) mutation found, suggesting a neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome. Methods: 61 index cases with NF1 clinical diagnosis but no identifiable NF1 mutation were screened for SPRED1 mutation. Results: We describe one known SPRED1 mutation (c.190C>T leading to p.Arg64Stop) and four novel mutations (c.637C>T leading to p.Gln213Stop, c.2T>C leading to p.Met1Thr, c.46C>T leading to p.Arg16Stop, and c.1048_1060del leading to p.Gly350fs) in five French families. Their NF1-like phenotype was characterised by a high prevalence of café-au-lait spots, freckling, learning disability, and an absence of neurofibromas and Lisch nodules in agreement with the original description. However, we did not observe Noonan-like dysmorphy. It is noteworthy that one patient with the p.Arg16Stop mutation developed a monoblastic acute leukaemia. Conclusions: In our series, SPRED1 mutations occurred with a prevalence of 0.5% in NF1 patients and in 5% of NF1 patients displaying an NF1-like phenotype. SPRED1 mutated patients did not display any specific dermatologic features that were not present in NF1 patients, except for the absence of neurofibromas that seem to be a specific clinical feature of NF1. The exact phenotypic spectrum and the putative complications of this NF1 overlapping syndrome, in particular haematological malignancies, remain to be further characterised. NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 must be revised in view of this newly characterised Legius syndrome in order to establish a specific genetic counselling.

Role of Noncoding RNA ANRIL in Genesis of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a tumor predisposition syndrome with a worldwide birth incidence of one in 2500. Genetic factors unrelated to the NF1 locus are thought to influence the number of plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs) in patients with NF1, but no factors have been identified to date. METHODS We used high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of tissue from 22 PNFs obtained from 18 NF1 patients to identify modifier genes involved in PNF development. We used a family-based association test for five previously identified cancer-susceptibility tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1063192, rs2151280, rs2218220, rs10757257, and rs7023329) located in chromosomal region 9p21.3 in 1105 subjects (740 NF1 patients and 365 non-affected relatives) from 306 families. To confirm the functional role of rs2151280, we used real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to analyze the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), CDKN2B, alternate reading frame (ARF), and antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL) in the peripheral blood of 124 NF1 patients. Relationships between CDKN2A, CDKN2B, ARF, and ANRIL expression and the rs2151280 genotype were tested by the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS In NF1-associated PNFs, 9p21.3 deletions (including the CDKN2A/B-ANRIL locus) were found as the only recurrent somatic alterations. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2151280 (located in ANRIL) was statistically significantly associated with the number of PNFs (P < .001) in NF1 patients. In addition, allele T of rs2151280 was statistically significantly associated with reduced ANRIL transcript levels (P < .001), suggesting that modulation of ANRIL expression mediates PNF susceptibility. CONCLUSION Identification of ANRIL as a modifier gene in NF1 may offer clues to the molecular pathogenesis of PNFs, particularly neurofibroma formation, and emphasizes the unanticipated role of large noncoding RNA in activation of critical regulators of tumor development.

NF1 Molecular Characterization and Neurofibromatosis Type I Genotype–Phenotype Correlation: The French Experience

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affects about one in 3,500 people in all ethnic groups. Most NF1 patients have private loss‐of‐function mutations scattered along the NF1 gene. Here, we present an original NF1 investigation strategy and report a comprehensive mutation analysis of 565 unrelated patients from the NF‐France Network. A NF1 mutation was identified in 546 of the 565 patients, giving a mutation detection rate of 97%. The combined cDNA/DNA approach showed that a significant proportion of NF1 missense mutations (30%) were deleterious by affecting pre‐mRNA splicing. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification allowed the identification of restricted rearrangements that would have been missed if only sequencing or microsatellite analysis had been performed. In four unrelated families, we identified two distinct NF1 mutations within the same family. This fortuitous association points out the need to perform an exhaustive NF1 screening in the case of molecular discordant‐related patients. A genotype–phenotype study was performed in patients harboring a truncating (N = 368), in‐frame splicing (N = 36), or missense (N = 35) mutation. The association analysis of these mutation types with 12 common NF1 clinical features confirmed a weak contribution of the allelic heterogeneity of the NF1 mutation to the NF1 variable expressivity.