Béatrice Parfait

Cardio-facio-cutaneous and Noonan syndromes due to mutations in the RAS/MAPK signalling pathway: genotype–phenotype relationships and overlap with Costello syndrome

Cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome, Noonan syndrome (NS), and Costello syndrome (CS) are clinically related developmental disorders that have been recently linked to mutations in the RAS/MEK/ERK signalling pathway. This study was a mutation analysis of the KRAS, BRAF, MEK1 and MEK2 genes in a total of 130 patients (40 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CFC, 20 patients without HRAS mutations from the French Costello family support group, and 70 patients with NS without PTPN11 or SOS1 mutations). BRAF mutations were found in 14/40 (35%) patients with CFC and 8/20 (40%) HRAS-negative patients with CS. KRAS mutations were found in 1/40 (2.5%) patients with CFC, 2/20 (10%) HRAS-negative patients with CS and 4/70 patients with NS (5.7%). MEK1 mutations were found in 4/40 patients with CFC (10%), 4/20 (20%) HRAS-negative patients with CS and 3/70 (4.3%) patients with NS, and MEK2 mutations in 4/40 (10%) patients with CFC. Analysis of the major phenotypic features suggests significant clinical overlap between CS and CFC. The phenotype associated with MEK mutations seems less severe, and is compatible with normal mental development. Features considered distinctive for CS were also found to be associated with BRAF or MEK mutations. Because of its particular cancer risk, the term “Costello syndrome” should only be used for patients with proven HRAS mutation. These results confirm that KRAS is a minor contributor to NS and show that MEK is involved in some cases of NS, demonstrating a phenotypic continuum between the clinical entities. Although some associated features appear to be characteristic of a specific gene, no simple rule exists to distinguish NS from CFC easily.

Integrative Genomic Analysis Reveals Somatic Mutations in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors that occur in the context of inherited cancer syndromes in ∼30% of cases and are linked to germline mutations in the VHL, RET, NF1, SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2 and TMEM127 genes. Although genome-wide expression studies have revealed some of the mechanisms likely to be involved in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma tumorigenesis, the complete molecular distinction of all subtypes of hereditary tumors has not been solved and the genetic events involved in the generation of sporadic tumors are unknown. With these purposes in mind, we investigated 202 pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, including 75 hereditary tumors, using expression profiling, BAC array comparative genomic hybridization and somatic mutation screening. Gene expression signatures defined the hereditary tumors according to their genotype and notably, led to a complete subseparation between SDHx- and VHL-related tumors. In tumor tissues, the systematic characterization of somatic genetic events associated with germline mutations in tumor suppressor genes revealed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a majority of cases, but also detected point mutations and copy-neutral LOH. Finally, guided by transcriptome classifications and LOH profiles, somatic mutations in VHL or RET genes were identified in 14% of sporadic pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Overall, we found a germline or somatic genetic alteration in 45.5% (92/202) of the tumors in this large series of pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Regarding mutated genes, specific molecular pathways involved in tumorigenesis mechanisms are identified. Altogether, these new findings suggest that somatic mutation analysis is likely to yield important clues for personalizing molecular targeted therapies.

NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

In 5‐10% of patients, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) results from microdeletions that encompass the entire NF1 gene and a variable number of flanking genes. Two recurrent microdeletion types are found in most cases, with microdeletion breakpoints located in paralogous regions flanking NF1 (proximal NF1‐REP‐a and distal NF1‐REP–c for the 1.4 Mb type‐1 microdeletion, and SUZ12 and SUZ12P for the 1.2 Mb type‐2 microdeletion). A more severe phenotype is usually associated with NF1 microdeletion patients than in those with intragenic mutations. We characterized NF1 microdeletions in 70 unrelated NF1 microdeleted patients using a high‐resolution NF1 custom array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype‐phenotype correlations were studied in 58 of these microdeletion patients and compared to 389 patients with intragenic truncating NF1 mutations and phenotyped in the same standardized way. Our results confirmed in an unbiased manner the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome with a significantly higher incidence of learning disabilities and facial dysmorphism in microdeleted patients compared to patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Microdeleted NF1 patients also showed a trend toward significance for childhood overgrowth. High‐resolution array‐CGH identified a new recurrent ∼1.0 Mb microdeletion type, designated as type‐3, with breakpoints in the paralogous regions middle NF1‐REP‐b and distal NF1‐REP–c.

Somatic NF1 Inactivation is a Frequent Event in Sporadic Pheochromocytoma

Germline mutations in the RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, MAX, TMEM127, NF1 or VHL genes are identified in about 30% of patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and somatic mutations in RET, VHL or MAX genes are reported in 17% of sporadic tumors. In the present study, using mutation screening of the NF1 gene, mapping of chromosome aberrations by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, microarray-based expression profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC), we addressed the implication of NF1 somatic alterations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. We studied 53 sporadic tumors, selected because of their classification with RET/NF1/TMEM127-related tumors by genome wide expression studies, as well as a second set of 11 independent tumors selected on their low individual levels of NF1 expression evaluated by microarray. Direct sequencing of the NF1 gene in tumor DNA identified the presence of an inactivating NF1 somatic mutation in 41% (25/61) of analyzed sporadic tumors, associated with loss of the wild-type allele in 84% (21/25) of cases. Gene expression signature of NF1-related tumors highlighted the downregulation of NF1 and the major overexpression of SOX9. Among the second set of 11 tumors, two sporadic tumors carried somatic mutations in NF1 as well as in another susceptibility gene. These new findings suggest that NF1 loss of function is a frequent event in the tumorigenesis of sporadic pheochromocytoma and strengthen the new concept of molecular-based targeted therapy for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Unravelling the genetic basis of variable clinical expression in neurofibromatosis 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant disorder which displays considerable inter- and intra-familial variability in phenotypic expression. To evaluate the genetic component of variable expressivity in NF1, we examined the phenotypic correlations between affected relatives in 750 NF1 patients from 275 multiplex families collected through the NF-France Network. Twelve NF1-related clinical features, including five quantitative traits (number of café-au-lait spots of small size and of large size, and number of cutaneous, subcutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas) and seven binary ones, were scored. All clinical features studied, with the exception of neoplasms, showed significant familial aggregation after adjusting for age and sex. For most of them, patterns of familial correlations indicated a strong genetic component with no apparent influence of the constitutional NF1 mutation. Heritability estimates of the five quantitative traits ranged from 0.26 to 0.62. Moreover, we investigated for the first time the role of the normal NF1 allele in the variable expression of NF1 through a family-based association study. Nine tag SNPs in NF1 were genotyped in 1132 individuals from 313 NF1 families. No significant deviations of transmission of any of the NF1 variants to affected offspring was found for any of the 12 clinical features examined, based on single marker or haplotype analysis. Taken together, our results provided evidence that genetic modifiers, unlinked to the NF1 locus, contribute to the variable expressivity of the disease.

SPRED1 germline mutations caused a neurofibromatosis type 1 overlapping phenotype

Objective: Germline loss-of-function mutations in the SPRED1 gene have recently been identified in patients fulfilling the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) but with no NF1 (neurofibromin 1) mutation found, suggesting a neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome. Methods: 61 index cases with NF1 clinical diagnosis but no identifiable NF1 mutation were screened for SPRED1 mutation. Results: We describe one known SPRED1 mutation (c.190C>T leading to p.Arg64Stop) and four novel mutations (c.637C>T leading to p.Gln213Stop, c.2T>C leading to p.Met1Thr, c.46C>T leading to p.Arg16Stop, and c.1048_1060del leading to p.Gly350fs) in five French families. Their NF1-like phenotype was characterised by a high prevalence of café-au-lait spots, freckling, learning disability, and an absence of neurofibromas and Lisch nodules in agreement with the original description. However, we did not observe Noonan-like dysmorphy. It is noteworthy that one patient with the p.Arg16Stop mutation developed a monoblastic acute leukaemia. Conclusions: In our series, SPRED1 mutations occurred with a prevalence of 0.5% in NF1 patients and in 5% of NF1 patients displaying an NF1-like phenotype. SPRED1 mutated patients did not display any specific dermatologic features that were not present in NF1 patients, except for the absence of neurofibromas that seem to be a specific clinical feature of NF1. The exact phenotypic spectrum and the putative complications of this NF1 overlapping syndrome, in particular haematological malignancies, remain to be further characterised. NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 must be revised in view of this newly characterised Legius syndrome in order to establish a specific genetic counselling.

Role of Noncoding RNA ANRIL in Genesis of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a tumor predisposition syndrome with a worldwide birth incidence of one in 2500. Genetic factors unrelated to the NF1 locus are thought to influence the number of plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs) in patients with NF1, but no factors have been identified to date. METHODS We used high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of tissue from 22 PNFs obtained from 18 NF1 patients to identify modifier genes involved in PNF development. We used a family-based association test for five previously identified cancer-susceptibility tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1063192, rs2151280, rs2218220, rs10757257, and rs7023329) located in chromosomal region 9p21.3 in 1105 subjects (740 NF1 patients and 365 non-affected relatives) from 306 families. To confirm the functional role of rs2151280, we used real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to analyze the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), CDKN2B, alternate reading frame (ARF), and antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL) in the peripheral blood of 124 NF1 patients. Relationships between CDKN2A, CDKN2B, ARF, and ANRIL expression and the rs2151280 genotype were tested by the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS In NF1-associated PNFs, 9p21.3 deletions (including the CDKN2A/B-ANRIL locus) were found as the only recurrent somatic alterations. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2151280 (located in ANRIL) was statistically significantly associated with the number of PNFs (P < .001) in NF1 patients. In addition, allele T of rs2151280 was statistically significantly associated with reduced ANRIL transcript levels (P < .001), suggesting that modulation of ANRIL expression mediates PNF susceptibility. CONCLUSION Identification of ANRIL as a modifier gene in NF1 may offer clues to the molecular pathogenesis of PNFs, particularly neurofibroma formation, and emphasizes the unanticipated role of large noncoding RNA in activation of critical regulators of tumor development.

Functional Effects of PTPN11 (SHP2) Mutations Causing LEOPARD Syndrome on Epidermal Growth Factor-Induced Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/AKT/Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Signaling

ABSTRACT LEOPARD syndrome (LS), a disorder with multiple developmental abnormalities, is mainly due to mutations that impair the activity of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN11). How these alterations cause the disease remains unknown. We report here that fibroblasts isolated from LS patients displayed stronger epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced phosphorylation of both AKT and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) than fibroblasts from control patients. Similar results were obtained in HEK293 cells expressing LS mutants of SHP2. We found that the GAB1/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) complex was more abundant in fibroblasts from LS than control subjects and that both AKT and GSK-3β hyperphosphorylation were prevented by reducing GAB1 expression or by overexpressing a GAB1 mutant unable to bind to PI3K. Consistently, purified recombinant LS mutants failed to dephosphorylate GAB1 PI3K-binding sites. These mutants induced PI3K-dependent increase in cell size in a model of chicken embryo cardiac explants and in transcriptional activity of the atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) gene in neonate rat cardiomyocytes. In conclusion, SHP2 mutations causing LS facilitate EGF-induced PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β stimulation through impaired GAB1 dephosphorylation, resulting in deregulation of a novel signaling pathway that could be involved in LS pathology.

NF1 Molecular Characterization and Neurofibromatosis Type I Genotype–Phenotype Correlation: The French Experience

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affects about one in 3,500 people in all ethnic groups. Most NF1 patients have private loss‐of‐function mutations scattered along the NF1 gene. Here, we present an original NF1 investigation strategy and report a comprehensive mutation analysis of 565 unrelated patients from the NF‐France Network. A NF1 mutation was identified in 546 of the 565 patients, giving a mutation detection rate of 97%. The combined cDNA/DNA approach showed that a significant proportion of NF1 missense mutations (30%) were deleterious by affecting pre‐mRNA splicing. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification allowed the identification of restricted rearrangements that would have been missed if only sequencing or microsatellite analysis had been performed. In four unrelated families, we identified two distinct NF1 mutations within the same family. This fortuitous association points out the need to perform an exhaustive NF1 screening in the case of molecular discordant‐related patients. A genotype–phenotype study was performed in patients harboring a truncating (N = 368), in‐frame splicing (N = 36), or missense (N = 35) mutation. The association analysis of these mutation types with 12 common NF1 clinical features confirmed a weak contribution of the allelic heterogeneity of the NF1 mutation to the NF1 variable expressivity.

Microarray-Based Identification of Tenascin C and Tenascin XB, Genes Possibly Involved in Tumorigenesis Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Purpose: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder with a complex variety of clinical manifestations. The hallmark of NF1 is the onset of heterogeneous (dermal or plexiform) benign neurofibromas. Plexiform neurofibromas can give rise to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, which are resistant to conventional therapies. Experimental Design: To identify new signaling pathways involved in the malignant transformation of plexiform neurofibromas, we applied a 22,000-oligonucleotide microarray approach to a series of plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Changes in the expression of selected genes were then confirmed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Results: We identified two tenascin gene family members that were significantly deregulated in both human NF1-associated tumors and NF1-deficient primary cells: Tenascin C (TNC) was up-regulated whereas tenascin XB (TNXB) was down-regulated during tumor progression. TNC activation is mainly due to the up-regulation of large TNC splice variants. Immunohistochemical studies showed that TNC transcripts are translated into TNC protein in TNC-overexpressing tumors. Aberrant transcriptional activation of TNC seems to be principally mediated by activator protein transcription factor complexes. Conclusion:TNXB and TNC may be involved in the malignant transformation of plexiform neurofibromas. Anti-TNC antibodies, already used successfully in clinical trials to treat malignant human gliomas, may be an appropriate new therapeutic strategy for NF1.