Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fieke M. A. Wagemans is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fieke M. A. Wagemans.


Frontiers in Psychology | 2015

A theory of social thermoregulation in human primates

Hans IJzerman; James A. Coan; Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Marjolein Missler; Ilja van Beest; Siegwart Lindenberg; Mattie Tops

Beyond breathing, the regulation of body temperature—thermoregulation—is one of the most pressing concerns for many animals. A dysregulated body temperature has dire consequences for survival and development. Despite the high frequency of social thermoregulation occurring across many species, little is known about the role of social thermoregulation in human (social) psychological functioning. We outline a theory of social thermoregulation and reconsider earlier research on people’s expectations of their social world (i.e., attachment) and their prediction of the social world. We provide support and outline a research agenda that includes consequences for individual variation in self-regulatory strategies and capabilities. In our paper, we discuss physiological, neural, and social processes surrounding thermoregulation. Emphasizing social thermoregulation in particular, we appeal to the economy of action principle and the hierarchical organization of human thermoregulatory systems. We close with future directions of a crucial aspect of human functioning: the social regulation of body temperature.


Perception | 2018

Effects of facial skin smoothness and blemishes on trait impressions

Bastian Jaeger; Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Anthony M. Evans; Ilja van Beest

People make trait inferences based on facial appearance, and these inferences guide social approach and avoidance. Here, we investigate the effects of textural features on trait impressions from faces. In contrast to previous work, which exclusively manipulated skin smoothness, we manipulated smoothness and the presence of skin blemishes independently (Study 1) and orthogonally (Study 2). We hypothesized that people are particularly sensitive to skin blemishes because blemishes potentially indicate poor health and the presence of an infectious disease. We therefore predicted that the negative effect of blemished skin is stronger than the positive effect of smoothed skin. The results of both studies are in line with this reasoning. Across ratings of trustworthiness, competence, maturity, attractiveness, and health, the negative influence of skin blemishes was stronger and more consistent than the positive influence of skin smoothness (Study 1). Moreover, the presence of skin blemishes diminished the positive effect of skin smoothness on attractiveness ratings (Study 2). In sum, both facial skin blemishes and facial skin smoothness influence trait impression, but the negative effect of blemished skin is larger and more salient than the positive effect of smooth skin.


Cognition & Emotion | 2018

The social side of shame : approach versus withdrawal

Ilona E. de Hooge; Seger M. Breugelmans; Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Marcel Zeelenberg

ABSTRACT At present, the consequences and functions of experiences of shame are not yet well understood. Whereas psychology literature typically portrays shame as being bad for social relations, motivating social avoidance and withdrawal, there are recent indications that shame can be reinterpreted as having clear social tendencies in the form of motivating approach and social affiliation. Yet, until now, no research has ever put these alternative interpretations of shame-motivated behaviours directly to the test. The present paper presents such a test by studying the extent to which shame motivates a preference for social withdrawal versus a preference for social approach. Two studies (Nu2009=u2009148 and Nu2009=u2009133) using different shame inductions both showed people experiencing shame to prefer to be together with others (social approach) over being alone (social withdrawal). In addition, the preference for a social situation was found to be unique for shame; it was not found for the closely related emotion of guilt. Taken together, these findings provide direct empirical support for the idea that shame can have positive interpersonal consequences.


Translational Issues in Psychological Science | 2017

From the political here and now to generalizable knowledge

Mark Brandt; Fieke M. A. Wagemans

Political psychology is an exciting field because it is directly and immediately relevant to current events. This feature of the field is also a drawback because it can unintentionally limit the knowledge of the field to current events and prevent the development of generalizable knowledge. We discuss how using representative samples, representative political systems, and representative stimuli can help political psychology develop a more comprehensive political psychology with knowledge that is both generalizable and relevant.


Emotion | 2017

Disgust Sensitivity Is Primarily Associated With Purity-Based Moral Judgments

Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Mark Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg

Individual differences in disgust sensitivity are associated with a range of judgments and attitudes related to the moral domain. Some perspectives suggest that the association between disgust sensitivity and moral judgments will be equally strong across all moral domains (i.e., purity, authority, loyalty, care, fairness, and liberty). Other perspectives predict that disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with judgments of specific moral domains (e.g., primarily purity). However, no study has systematically tested if disgust sensitivity is associated with moral judgments of the purity domain specifically, more generally to moral judgments of the binding moral domains, or to moral judgments of all of the moral domains equally. Across 5 studies (total N = 1,104), we find consistent evidence for the notion that disgust sensitivity relates more strongly to moral condemnation of purity-based transgressions (meta-analytic r = .40) than to moral condemnation of transgressions of any of the other domains (range meta-analytic rs: .07–.27). Our findings are in line with predictions from Moral Foundations Theory, which predicts that personality characteristics like disgust sensitivity make people more sensitive to a certain set of moral issues.


Archive | 2016

Data analysis 2

Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Mark Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg


Archive | 2016

Data analysis 4

Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Mark Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg


Archive | 2016

Data analysis 1

Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Mark Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg


Personality and Individual Differences | 2018

Weirdness of disgust sensitivity items predicts their relationship to purity moral judgments.

Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Mark Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg


Archive | 2018

EASP Solid Science Training Workshop 2018 (Bordeaux)

Hans IJzerman; Richard A. Klein; Benedict C. Jones; Michèle B. Nuijten; Fieke M. A. Wagemans; Marco Perugini; Kai Jonas; Francois Ric; Frederik Aust

Collaboration


Dive into the Fieke M. A. Wagemans's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mattie Tops

VU University Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge