Frank Holsteyns
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Frank Holsteyns.
Applied Physics Letters | 2005
S Hens; Jan Vanhellemont; Dirk Poelman; Paul Clauws; Igor Romandic; Antoon Theuwis; Frank Holsteyns; J. Van Steenbergen
Optical inspection of polished Czochralski-grown Ge wafers typically reveals the presence of surface pits similar to the Crystal Originated Particles (COP’s) observed in silicon but in a wider variety of sizes and shapes. Computer simulation of vacancyclustering during the Cz germaniumcrystal growth suggests that the surface pits originate from large voids formed by the diffusion-limited clustering of an excess of vacancies.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Nandi Vrancken; Jiaqi Li; Stefanie Sergeant; G. Vereecke; Geert Doumen; Frank Holsteyns; Chang Chen; H. Terryn; Stefan De Gendt; XiuMei Xu
Superhydrophobic surfaces are highly promising for self-cleaning, anti-fouling and anti-corrosion applications. However, accurate assessment of the lifetime and sustainability of super-hydrophobic materials is hindered by the lack of large area characterization of superhydrophobic breakdown. In this work, attenuated total reflectance−Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) is explored for a dynamic study of wetting transitions on immersed superhydrophobic arrays of silicon nanopillars. Spontaneous breakdown of the superhydrophobic state is triggered by in-situ modulation of the liquid surface tension. The high surface sensitivity of ATR-FTIR allows for accurate detection of local liquid infiltration. Experimentally determined wetting transition criteria show significant deviations from predictions by classical wetting models. Breakdown kinetics is found to slow down dramatically when the liquid surface tension approaches the transition criterion, which clearly underlines the importance of more accurate wetting analysis on large-area surfaces. Precise actuation of the superhydrophobic breakdown process is demonstrated for the first time through careful modulation of the liquid surface tension around the transition criterion. The developed ATR-FTIR method can be a promising technique to study wetting transitions and associated dynamics on various types of superhydrophobic surfaces.
Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning#R##N#Fundamentals and Applied Aspects | 2008
Wim Fyen; Frank Holsteyns; Twan Bearda; S. Arnauts; Jan Van Steenbergen; Geert Doumen; K. Kenis; Paul Mertens
Publisher Summary In this chapter, the performance of several drying techniques commonly used in the semiconductor manufacturing industry is evaluated. This is done by measuring the residues on a wafer onto which a solution containing metal salts acting as tracer elements has been dispensed and dried. To correctly interpret the experimental data, the results are compared with predictions from a theoretical model. This model assumes two distinct mechanisms for deposition: adsorption and evaporative deposition. The first mechanism is a result of attractive interactions between the contaminant and the wafer surface, while the second mechanism is due to liquid evaporation during drying. For the latter case, the evaporated film thickness is introduced as a figure of merit for the drying process under study. In the tests, tests, spin drying was compared with two types of Marangoni based drying: on a vertically moving wafer and on a horizontally rotating wafer. The results show that for spin drying two consecutive phases occur: during the first seconds of spinning convective removal of liquid is the dominant mechanism, followed by a phase where evaporation takes over. This behavior is confirmed by models reported in the literature describing photo-resist coating. The amount of liquid evaporating during spin drying is inversely proportional to the square root of the rotation speed. This suggests that entrainment of liquid by the gas flow over the wafer surface is the dominant mechanism for evaporation. This finding is in agreement with fluid dynamics models describing the flow of gas entrained with a rotating substrate.
Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning (Second Edition)#R##N#Volume 1: Fundamentals and Applied Aspects | 2008
Wim Fyen; Frank Holsteyns; Twan Bearda; S. Arnauts; Jan Van Steenbergen; Geert Doumen; K. Kenis; Paul Mertens
In this chapter, the performance of several drying techniques commonly used in the semiconductor manufacturing industry is evaluated. This is done by measuring the residues on a wafer onto which a solution containing metal salts acting as tracer elements has been dispensed and dried. To correctly interpret the experimental data, the results are compared with predictions from a theoretical model. This model assumes two distinct mechanisms for deposition: adsorption and evaporative deposition. The first mechanism is a result of attractive interactions between the contaminant and the wafer surface, while the second mechanism is due to liquid evaporation during drying. For the latter case, the evaporated film thickness is introduced as a figure of merit for the drying process under study. In the tests, spin drying was compared with two types of Marangoni based drying: on a vertically moving wafer and on a horizontally rotating wafer. The results show that for spin drying two consecutive phases occur: during the first seconds of spinning convective removal of liquid is the dominant mechanism, followed by a phase where evaporation takes over. This behavior is confirmed by models reported in the literature describing photo-resist coating. The amount of liquid evaporating during spin drying is inversely proportional to the square root of the rotation speed. This suggests that entrainment of liquid by the gas flow over the wafer surface is the dominant mechanism for evaporation. This finding is in agreement with fluid dynamics models describing the flow of gas entrained with a rotating substrate.
international sige technology and device meeting | 2004
Roger Loo; Matty Caymax; Philippe Meunier-Beillard; Ivan Peytier; Frank Holsteyns; S. Kubicek; Peter Verheyen; Richard Lindsay; Olivier Richard
Archive | 2003
Frank Holsteyns; Francesca Iacopi; Karen Maex
Archive | 2003
Frank Holsteyns; Marc Heyns; Paul Mertens
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology | 2015
Dennis H. van Dorp; S. Arnauts; Frank Holsteyns; Stefan De Gendt
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology | 2014
G. Vereecke; XiuMei Xu; W. K. Tsai; Hui Yang; Silvia Armini; Tinne Delande; Geert Doumen; F. Kentie; Xiaoping Shi; I. Simms; K. Nafus; Frank Holsteyns; Herbert Struyf; S. De Gendt
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology | 2014
Jens Rip; Daniel Cuypers; S. Arnauts; Frank Holsteyns; D. H. van Dorp; S. De Gendt