Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Frédéric P. Lemaigre is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Frédéric P. Lemaigre.


Nucleic Acids Research | 1990

Nuclear factor-I and activator protein-2 bind in a mutually exclusive way to overlapping promoter sequences and trans-activate the human growth hormone gene

Stéphane J. Courtois; Dorninique A. Lafontaine; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Serge M. Durviaux; Guy G. Rousseau

Transcription of the human growth hormone (hGH) gene and its regulation are controlled by trans-acting factors that bind to hGH gene promoter sequences. Several DNase I footprints have been described within 500 bp of this promoter, one of which (-289 to -267) has not yet been ascribed to a defined factor. By DNase I footprinting, gel mobility shift, and methylation interference assays with extracts from HeLa cells and GH-producing pituitary tumor (GC) cells, we show that this factor belongs to the NF-I family. When NF-I was competed out of the cell extracts, the trans-acting factor AP-2 bound to the same site as NF-I. AP-2 was present not only in HeLa cells, but also in GC cells albeit at a much lower concentration. Consistent with the mutually exclusive binding of NF-I and AP-2, their methylation interference patterns included four guanine residues that were crucial for binding of both NF-I and AP-2. Cell-free transcription from the hGH gene promoter showed that these two factors can transactivate this gene.


Diabetologia | 2002

Liver glucokinase gene expression is controlled by the onecut transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor-6.

Vincent Lannoy; J F Decaux; Christophe E. Pierreux; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Guy G. Rousseau

HeadingAbstract Aims/hypothesis. Glucokinase plays a key role in glucose homeostasis and the expression of its gene is differentially regulated in pancreatic beta cells and in the liver through distinct promoters. The factors that determine the tissue-specific expression of the glucokinase gene are not known. Putative binding sites for hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-6, the prototype of the ONECUT family of transcription factors, are present in the hepatic promoter of the glucokinase gene and in diabetic hnf6 knockout mice. We hypothesized that HNF-6 controls the activity of the hepatic glucokinase promoter. Methods. We tested the binding of recombinant HNF-6 to DNA sequences from the mouse hepatic glucokinase promoter in vitro and the effect of HNF-6 on promoter activity in transfected cells. We investigated in vivo the role of HNF-6 in mice by examining the effect of inactivating the hnf6 gene on glucokinase gene-specific deoxyribonuclease I hypersensitive sites in liver chromatin and on liver glucokinase mRNA concentration. Results. HNF-6 bound to the hepatic promoter of the glucokinase gene and stimulated its activity. Inactivation of the hnf6 gene did not modify the pattern of deoxyribonuclease I hypersensitive sites but was associated with a decrease of liver glucokinase mRNA to half the control value. Conclusions/interpretation. Although HNF-6 is not required to open chromatin of the hepatic promoter of the glucokinase gene, it stimulates transcription of the glucokinase gene in the liver. This could partly explain the diabetes observed in hnf6 knockout mice.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2015

Hepatocellular carcinoma originates from hepatocytes and not from the progenitor/biliary compartment

Xueru Mu; Regina Español-Suñer; Ingmar Mederacke; Silvia Affò; Rita Manco; Christine Sempoux; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Arlind Adili; Detian Yuan; Achim Weber; Kristian Unger; Mathias Heikenwalder; Isabelle A. Leclercq; Robert F. Schwabe

In many organs, including the intestine and skin, cancers originate from cells of the stem or progenitor compartment. Despite its nomenclature, the cellular origin of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains elusive. In contrast to most organs, the liver lacks a defined stem cell population for organ maintenance. Previous studies suggest that both hepatocytes and facultative progenitor cells within the biliary compartment are capable of generating HCC. As HCCs with a progenitor signature carry a worse prognosis, understanding the origin of HCC is of clinical relevance. Here, we used complementary fate-tracing approaches to label the progenitor/biliary compartment and hepatocytes in murine hepatocarcinogenesis. In genotoxic and genetic models, HCCs arose exclusively from hepatocytes but never from the progenitor/biliary compartment. Cytokeratin 19-, A6- and α-fetoprotein-positive cells within tumors were hepatocyte derived. In summary, hepatocytes represent the cell of origin for HCC in mice, and a progenitor signature does not reflect progenitor origin, but dedifferentiation of hepatocyte-derived tumor cells.


Cell Cycle | 2006

Control of hepatic differentiation by activin/TGFbeta signaling.

Frédéric Clotman; Frédéric P. Lemaigre

During liver development, liver progenitors called hepatoblasts differentiate into hepatocytesor biliary cells. Recently, we showed that the segregation between hepatocytes and biliarycells is dependent on a gradient of Activin/TGFβ signaling, and that Activin/TGFβ signalingis controlled in fetal liver by transcription factors of the Onecut family. Here, we discusscandidate factors possibly involved in the formation of the Activin/TGFβ signaling gradient,how this gradient could integrate into a network of signaling pathways modulatinghepatoblast differentiation, and the implications for human liver disease and therapy.


Biochemical Journal | 2006

Increased protein glycation in fructosamine-3-kinase-deficient mice

Maria Veiga da-Cunha; Patrick Jacquemin; Ghislain Delpierre; Catherine Godfraind; Ivan Théate; Didier Vertommen; Frédéric Clotman; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Olivier Devuyst; Emile Van Schaftingen

Amines, including those present on proteins, spontaneously react with glucose to form fructosamines in a reaction known as glycation. In the present paper, we have explored, through a targeted gene inactivation approach, the role of FN3K (fructosamine 3-kinase), an intracellular enzyme that phosphorylates free and protein-bound fructose-epsilon-lysines and which is potentially involved in protein repair. Fn3k-/- mice looked healthy and had normal blood glucose and serum fructosamine levels. However, their level of haemoglobin-bound fructosamines was approx. 2.5-fold higher than that of control (Fn3k+/+) or Fn3k+/- mice. Other intracellular proteins were also significantly more glycated in Fn3k-/- mice in erythrocytes (1.8-2.2-fold) and in brain, kidney, liver and skeletal muscle (1.2-1.8-fold), indicating that FN3K removes fructosamines from intracellular proteins in vivo. The urinary excretion of free fructose-epsilon-lysine was 10-20-fold higher in fed mice compared with mice starved for 36 h, and did not differ between fed Fn3k+/+ and Fn3k-/- mice, indicating that food is the main source of urinary fructose-epsilon-lysine in these mice and that FN3K does not participate in the metabolism of food-derived fructose-epsilon-lysine. However, in starved animals, the urinary excretion of fructose-epsilon-lysine was 2.5-fold higher in Fn3k-/- mice compared with Fn3k+/+ or Fn3k+/- mice. Furthermore, a marked increase (5-13-fold) was observed in the concentration of free fructose-epsilon-lysine in tissues of fed Fn3k-/- mice compared with control mice, indicating that FN3K participates in the metabolism of endogenously produced fructose-epsilon-lysine. Taken together, these data indicate that FN3K serves as a protein repair enzyme and also in the metabolism of endogenously produced free fructose-epsilon-lysine.


Developmental Biology | 2010

Epithelial: Endothelial cross-talk regulates exocrine differentiation in developing pancreas

Christophe E. Pierreux; Sabine Cordi; Anne-Christine Hick; Younes Achouri; Carmen Ruiz de Almodovar; Pierre-Paul Prévot; Pierre J. Courtoy; Peter Carmeliet; Frédéric P. Lemaigre

Endothelial cells are required to initiate pancreas development from the endoderm. They also control the function of endocrine islets after birth. Here we investigate in developing pancreas how the endothelial cells become organized during branching morphogenesis and how their development affects pancreatic cell differentiation. We show that endothelial cells closely surround the epithelial bud at the onset of pancreas morphogenesis. During branching morphogenesis, the endothelial cells become preferentially located near the central (trunk) epithelial cells and remain at a distance from the branch tips where acinar cells differentiate. This correlates with predominant expression of the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) in trunk cells. In vivo ablation of VEGF-A expression by pancreas-specific inactivation of floxed Vegfa alleles results in reduced endothelial development and in excessive acinar differentiation. On the contrary, acinar differentiation is repressed when endothelial cells are recruited around tip cells that overexpress VEGF-A. Treatment of embryonic day 12.5 explants with VEGF-A or with VEGF receptor antagonists confirms that acinar development is tightly controlled by endothelial cells. We also provide evidence that endothelial cells repress the expression of Ptf1a, a transcription factor essential for acinar differentiation, and stimulate the expression of Hey-1 and Hey-2, two repressors of Ptf1a activity. In explants, we provide evidence that VEGF-A signaling is required, but not sufficient, to induce endocrine differentiation. In conclusion, our data suggest that, in developing pancreas, epithelial production of VEGF-A determines the spatial organization of endothelial cells which, in turn, limit acinar differentiation of the epithelium.


BMC Developmental Biology | 2009

Mechanism of primitive duct formation in the pancreas and submandibular glands: a role for SDF-1

Anne-Christine Hick; Jonathan van Eyll; Sabine Cordi; Céline Forez; Lara Passante; Hiroshi Kohara; Takashi Nagasawa; Pierre Vanderhaeghen; Pierre J. Courtoy; Guy G. Rousseau; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Christophe E. Pierreux

BackgroundThe exocrine pancreas is composed of a branched network of ducts connected to acini. They are lined by a monolayered epithelium that derives from the endoderm and is surrounded by mesoderm-derived mesenchyme. The morphogenic mechanisms by which the ductal network is established as well as the signaling pathways involved in this process are poorly understood.ResultsBy morphological analyzis of wild-type and mutant mouse embryos and using cultured embryonic explants we investigated how epithelial morphogenesis takes place and is regulated by chemokine signaling. Pancreas ontogenesis displayed a sequence of two opposite epithelial transitions. During the first transition, the monolayered and polarized endodermal cells give rise to tissue buds composed of a mass of non polarized epithelial cells. During the second transition the buds reorganize into branched and polarized epithelial monolayers that further differentiate into tubulo-acinar glands. We found that the second epithelial transition is controlled by the chemokine Stromal cell-Derived Factor (SDF)-1. The latter is expressed by the mesenchyme, whereas its receptor CXCR4 is expressed by the epithelium. Reorganization of cultured pancreatic buds into monolayered epithelia was blocked in the presence of AMD3100, a SDF-1 antagonist. Analyzis of sdf1 and cxcr4 knockout embryos at the stage of the second epithelial transition revealed transient defective morphogenesis of the ventral and dorsal pancreas. Reorganization of a globular mass of epithelial cells in polarized monolayers is also observed during submandibular glands development. We found that SDF-1 and CXCR4 are expressed in this organ and that AMD3100 treatment of submandibular gland explants blocks its branching morphogenesis.ConclusionIn conclusion, our data show that the primitive pancreatic ductal network, which is lined by a monolayered and polarized epithelium, forms by remodeling of a globular mass of non polarized epithelial cells. Our data also suggest that SDF-1 controls the branching morphogenesis of several exocrine tissues.


Hepatology | 2007

Epithelial expression of angiogenic growth factors modulate arterial vasculogenesis in human liver development

Luca Fabris; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Louis Libbrecht; Peggy Raynaud; Carlo Spirli; Romina Fiorotto; L. Okolicsanyi; Frédéric P. Lemaigre; Mario Strazzabosco; Tania Roskams

Intrahepatic bile ducts maintain a close anatomical relationship with hepatic arteries. During liver ontogenesis, the development of the hepatic artery appears to be modulated by unknown signals originating from the bile duct. Given the capability of cholangiocytes to produce angiogenic growth factors and influence peribiliary vascularization, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietin‐1, angiopoietin‐2, and their cognate receptors (VEGFR‐1, VEGFR‐2, Tie‐2) in fetal human livers at different gestational ages and in mice characterized by defective biliary morphogenesis (Hnf6−/−). The results showed that throughout the different developmental stages, VEGF was expressed by developing bile ducts and angiopoietin‐1 by hepatoblasts, whereas their cognate receptors were variably expressed by vascular cells according to the different maturational stages. Precursors of endothelial and mural cells expressed VEGFR‐2 and Tie‐2, respectively. In immature hepatic arteries, endothelial cells expressed VEGFR‐1, whereas mural cells expressed both Tie‐2 and Angiopoietin‐2. In mature hepatic arteries, endothelial cells expressed Tie‐2 along with VEGFR‐1. In early postnatal Hnf6−/− mice, VEGF‐expressing ductal plates failed to incorporate into the portal mesenchyma, resulting in severely altered arterial vasculogenesis. Conclusion: The reciprocal expression of angiogenic growth factors and receptors during development supports their involvement in the cross talk between liver epithelial cells and the portal vasculature. Cholangiocytes generate a VEGF gradient that is crucial during the migratory stage, when it determines arterial vasculogenesis in their vicinity, whereas angiopoietin‐1 signaling from hepatoblasts contributes to the remodeling of the hepatic artery necessary to meet the demands of the developing epithelium. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.)


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2006

Threshold levels of hepatocyte nuclear factor 6 (HNF-6) acting in synergy with HNF-4 and PGC-1alpha are required for time-specific gene expression during liver development.

Jean-Bernard Beaudry; Christophe E. Pierreux; Graham P. Hayhurst; Nicolas Plumb-Rudewiez; Mary C. Weiss; Guy G. Rousseau; Frédéric P. Lemaigre

ABSTRACT During liver development, hepatocytes undergo a maturation process that leads to the fully differentiated state. This relies at least in part on the coordinated action of liver-enriched transcription factors (LETFs), but little is known about the dynamics of this coordination. In this context we investigate here the role of the LETF hepatocyte nuclear factor 6 (HNF-6; also called Onecut-1) during hepatocyte differentiation. We show that HNF-6 knockout mouse fetuses have delayed expression of glucose-6-phosphatase (g6pc), which catalyzes the final step of gluconeogenesis and is a late marker of hepatocyte maturation. Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro gain- and loss-of-function approaches, we demonstrate that HNF-6 stimulates endogenous g6pc gene expression directly via a synergistic and interdependent action with HNF-4 and that it involves coordinate recruitment of the coactivator PGC-1α. The expression of HNF-6, HNF-4, and PGC-1α rises steadily during liver development and precedes that of g6pc. We provide evidence that threshold levels of HNF-6 are required to allow synergism between HNF-6, HNF-4, and PGC-1α to induce time-specific expression of g6pc. Our observations on the regulation of g6pc by HNF-6 provide a model whereby synergism, interdependency, and threshold concentrations of LETFs and coactivators determine time-specific expression of genes during liver development.


Hepatology | 2004

Transcription factor HNF-6/OC-1 inhibits the stimulation of the HNF-3α/Foxa1 gene by TGF-β in mouse liver

Nicolas Plumb-Rudewiez; Frédéric Clotman; Helene Strick-Marchand; Christophe E. Pierreux; Mary C. Weiss; Guy G. Rousseau; Frédéric P. Lemaigre

A network of liver‐enriched transcription factors controls differentiation and morphogenesis of the liver. These factors interact via direct, feedback, and autoregulatory loops. Previous work has suggested that hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)‐6/OC‐1 and HNF‐3α/FoxA1 participate coordinately in this hepatic network. We investigated how HNF‐6 controls the expression of Foxa1. We observed that Foxa1 expression was upregulated in the liver of Hnf6−/− mouse embryos and in bipotential mouse embryonic liver (BMEL) cell lines derived from embryonic Hnf6−/− liver, suggesting that HNF‐6 inhibits the expression of Foxa1. Because no evidence for a direct repression of Foxa1 by HNF‐6 was found, we postulated the existence of an indirect mechanism. We found that the expression of a mediator and targets of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF‐β) signaling was increased both in Hnf6−/− liver and in Hnf6−/− BMEL cell lines. Using these cell lines, we demonstrated that TGF‐β signaling was increased in the absence of HNF‐6, and that this resulted from upregulation of TGF‐β receptor II expression. We also found that TGF‐β can stimulate the expression of Foxa1 in Hnf6+/+ cells and that inhibition of TGF‐β signaling in Hnf6−/− cells down‐regulates the expression of Foxa1. In conclusion, we propose that Foxa1 upregulation in the absence of HNF‐6 results from increased TGF‐β signaling via increased expression of the TGF‐β receptor II. We further conclude that HNF‐6 inhibits Foxa1 by inhibiting the activity of the TGF‐β signaling pathway. This identifies a new mechanism of interaction between liver‐enriched transcription factors whereby one factor indirectly controls another by modulating the activity of a signaling pathway. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;40:1266–1274.)

Collaboration


Dive into the Frédéric P. Lemaigre's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guy G. Rousseau

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christophe E. Pierreux

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick Jacquemin

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frédéric Clotman

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cécile Augereau

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sabine Cordi

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre J. Courtoy

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolas Plumb-Rudewiez

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine Sempoux

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge