Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ghassan Taha.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006
T. Sugita; Hideaki Nakajima; Tatsuya Yokota; H. Kanzawa; Hartwig Gernandt; Andreas Herber; P. von der Gathen; Gert König-Langlo; Kaoru Sato; V. Dorokhov; V. Yushkov; Yasuhiro Murayama; Miho Yamamori; Sophie Godin-Beekmann; Florence Goutail; Howard K. Roscoe; Terry Deshler; M. Yela; Petteri Taalas; E. Kyrö; Samuel J. Oltmans; Bryan J. Johnson; M. Allaart; Z. Litynska; A. R. Klekociuk; S. B. Andersen; G. O. Braathen; H. De Backer; Cora E. Randall; Richard M. Bevilacqua
A solar occultation sensor, the Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer (ILAS)-II, measured 5890 vertical profiles of ozone concentrations in the stratosphere and lower mesosphere and of other species from January to October 2003. The measurement latitude coverage was 54–71°N and 64–88°S, which is similar to the coverage of ILAS (November 1996 to June 1997). One purpose of the ILAS-II measurements was to continue such high-latitude measurements of ozone and its related chemical species in order to help accurately determine their trends. The present paper assesses the quality of ozone data in the version 1.4 retrieval algorithm, through comparisons with results obtained from comprehensive ozonesonde measurements and four satellite-borne solar occultation sensors. In the Northern Hemisphere (NH), the ILAS-II ozone data agree with the other data within ±10% (in terms of the absolute difference divided by its mean value) at altitudes between 11 and 40 km, with the median coincident ILAS-II profiles being systematically up to 10% higher below 20 km and up to 10% lower between 21 and 40 km after screening possible suspicious retrievals. Above 41 km, the negative bias between the NH ILAS-II ozone data and the other data increases with increasing altitude and reaches 30% at 61–65 km. In the Southern Hemisphere, the ILAS-II ozone data agree with the other data within ±10% in the altitude range of 11–60 km, with the median coincident profiles being on average up to 10% higher below 20 km and up to 10% lower above 20 km. Considering the accuracy of the other data used for this comparative study, the version 1.4 ozone data are suitably used for quantitative analyses in the high-latitude stratosphere in both the Northern and Southern Hemisphere and in the lower mesosphere in the Southern Hemisphere.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2008
Didier F. G. Rault; Robert Paul Loughman; Ghassan Taha
Three candidate algorithms for the retrieval of ozone profile for the NPP OMPS Limb Profiler are described. The first one relies on the well established Doublet/Triplet method coupled with Optimal Estimation. The second one performs spectral fitting and uses Multiple Linear Regression. The last one is a direct application of the Optimal Estimation method on the actual CCD array measurements. The fundamentals of each technique are reviewed and their advantages/disadvantages are discussed. Sample results are given to illustrate the performance of each method.
Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XIII | 2009
Didier F. G. Rault; Jerry Lumpe; Thomas Eden; Ghassan Taha
An alternative algorithm is being analyzed to retrieve ozone and aerosol vertical distribution information from the OMPS/LP sensor which will be manifested on the upcoming NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) platform in early 2011. The algorithm relies on the optimal estimation method to infer ozone density and aerosol extinction directly from the radiance measurements made by the ensemble of CCD array pixels. The fundamentals of the technique are reviewed and the advantages of the method with respect to the mainstream retrieval algorithm are discussed. Sample results are given to illustrate the performance of the new method.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007
Samuel Brohede; C. S. Haley; C. A. McLinden; Christopher E. Sioris; Donal P. Murtagh; Svetlana V. Petelina; Edward J. Llewellyn; A. Bazureau; Florence Goutail; Cora E. Randall; Jerry Lumpe; Ghassan Taha; Larry W. Thomasson; Larry L. Gordley
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
Ghassan Taha; Glen Jaross; Didier Fussen; Filip Vanhellemont; E. Kyrölä; Richard D. McPeters
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007
Didier F. G. Rault; Ghassan Taha
Archive | 2004
E. J. Brinksma; Piters, A,J.; Ian Boyd; Alan Parrish; Astrid Bracher; von C. Savigny; Klaus Bramstedt; A.-M. Schmoltner; Ghassan Taha; E. Hilsenrath; Thomas Blumenstock; G. Kopp; S. Mikuteit; Andreas Fix; Y. J. Meijer; D. P. J. Swart; G.E. Bodeker; I. S. McDermid; T. Leblanc
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2016
Leslie Moy; Pawan K. Bhartia; Glen Jaross; Robert Paul Loughman; Natalya Kramarova; Zhong Chen; Ghassan Taha; Grace Chen; Philippe Xu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006
Naoko Saitoh; Sachiko Hayashida; T. Sugita; Hideaki Nakajima; Tatsuya Yokota; Masahiko Hayashi; Koichi Shiraishi; H. Kanzawa; Mitsumu K. Ejiri; Hitoshi Irie; T. Tanaka; Yukio Terao; Richard M. Bevilacqua; Cora E. Randall; Larry W. Thomason; Ghassan Taha; Hirokazu Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Sasano
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2017
Robert Paul Loughman; Pawan K. Bhartia; Zhong Chen; Philippe Xu; Ernest Nyaku; Ghassan Taha