Ian Wong
California Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ian Wong.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Ian Wong; Heather A. Knutson; Nikole K. Lewis; Tiffany Kataria; Adam Burrows; Jonathan J. Fortney; J. Schwartz; Eric Agol; Nicolas B. Cowan; Drake Deming; Jean-Michel Desert; Benjamin J. Fulton; Andrew W. Howard; Jonathan Langton; Gregory Laughlin; Kamen Todorov
We present full-orbit phase curve observations of the eccentric (e ~ 0.08) transiting hot Jupiter WASP-14b obtained in the 3.6 and 4.5 μm bands using the Spitzer Space Telescope. We use two different methods for removing the intrapixel sensitivity effect and compare their efficacy in decoupling the instrumental noise. Our measured secondary eclipse depths of 0.1882% ± 0.0048% and 0.2247% ± 0.0086% at 3.6 and 4.5 μm, respectively, are both consistent with a blackbody temperature of 2402 ± 35 K. We place a 2σ upper limit on the nightside flux at 3.6 μm and find it to be 9% ± 1% of the dayside flux, corresponding to a brightness temperature of 1079 K. At 4.5 μm, the minimum planet flux is 30% ± 5% of the maximum flux, corresponding to a brightness temperature of 1380 ± 65 K. We compare our measured phase curves to the predictions of one-dimensional radiative transfer and three-dimensional general circulation models. We find that WASP-14bs measured dayside emission is consistent with a model atmosphere with equilibrium chemistry and a moderate temperature inversion. These same models tend to overpredict the nightside emission at 3.6 μm, while underpredicting the nightside emission at 4.5 μm. We propose that this discrepancy might be explained by an enhanced global C/O ratio. In addition, we find that the phase curves of WASP-14b (7.8 M_(Jup)) are consistent with a much lower albedo than those of other Jovian mass planets with thermal phase curve measurements, suggesting that it may be emitting detectable heat from the deep atmosphere or interior processes.
The Astronomical Journal | 2016
James G. Ingalls; Jessica E. Krick; Sean J. Carey; John R. Stauffer; Patrick J. Lowrance; Carl J. Grillmair; Derek L. Buzasi; Drake Deming; Hannah Diamond-Lowe; T. Evans; G. Morello; Kevin B. Stevenson; Ian Wong; P. Capak; William Joseph Glaccum; Seppo Laine; Jason A. Surace; Lisa J. Storrie-Lombardi
We examine the repeatability, reliability, and accuracy of differential exoplanet eclipse depth measurements made using the InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope during the post-cryogenic mission. We have re-analyzed an existing 4.5 {\mu}m data set, consisting of 10 observations of the XO-3b system during secondary eclipse, using seven different techniques for removing correlated noise. We find that, on average, for a given technique, the eclipse depth estimate is repeatable from epoch to epoch to within 156 parts per million (ppm). Most techniques derive eclipse depths that do not vary by more than a factor 3 of the photon noise limit. All methods but one accurately assess their own errors: for these methods, the individual measurement uncertainties are comparable to the scatter in eclipse depths over the 10 epoch sample. To assess the accuracy of the techniques as well as to clarify the difference between instrumental and other sources of measurement error, we have also analyzed a simulated data set of 10 visits to XO-3b, for which the eclipse depth is known. We find that three of the methods (BLISS mapping, Pixel Level Decorrelation, and Independent Component Analysis) obtain results that are within three times the photon limit of the true eclipse depth. When averaged over the 10 epoch ensemble, 5 out of 7 techniques come within 60 ppm of the true value. Spitzer exoplanet data, if obtained following current best practices and reduced using methods such as those described here, can measure repeatable and accurate single eclipse depths, with close to photon-limited results.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Ian Wong; Heather A. Knutson; Tiffany Kataria; Nikole K. Lewis; Adam Burrows; Jonathan J. Fortney; J. Schwartz; Avi Shporer; Eric Agol; Nicholas Cowan; Drake Deming; Jean-Michel Desert; Benjamin J. Fulton; Andrew W. Howard; Jonathan Langton; Gregory Laughlin; Kamen Todorov
We analyze full-orbit phase curve observations of the transiting hot Jupiters WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b at 3.6 and 4.5 μm, obtained using the Spitzer Space Telescope. For WASP-19b, we measure secondary eclipse depths of 0.485% ± 0.024% and 0.584% ± 0.029% at 3.6 and 4.5 μm, which are consistent with a single blackbody with effective temperature 2372 ± 60 K. The measured 3.6 and 4.5 μm secondary eclipse depths for HAT-P-7b are 0.156% ± 0.009% and 0.190% ± 0.006%, which are well described by a single blackbody with effective temperature 2667 ± 57 K. Comparing the phase curves to the predictions of one-dimensional and three-dimensional atmospheric models, we find that WASP-19bs dayside emission is consistent with a model atmosphere with no dayside thermal inversion and moderately efficient day–night circulation. We also detect an eastward-shifted hotspot, which suggests the presence of a superrotating equatorial jet. In contrast, HAT-P-7bs dayside emission suggests a dayside thermal inversion and relatively inefficient day–night circulation; no hotspot shift is detected. For both planets, these same models do not agree with the measured nightside emission. The discrepancies in the model-data comparisons for WASP-19b might be explained by high-altitude silicate clouds on the nightside and/or high atmospheric metallicity, while the very low 3.6 μm nightside planetary brightness for HAT-P-7b may be indicative of an enhanced global C/O ratio. We compute Bond albedos of 0.38 ± 0.06 and 0 ( <0.08 at lσ) for WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b, respectively. In the context of other planets with thermal phase curve measurements, we show that WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b fit the general trend of decreasing day–night heat recirculation with increasing irradiation.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Ian Wong; Heather A. Knutson; Nicolas B. Cowan; Nikole K. Lewis; Eric Agol; Adam Burrows; Drake Deming; Jonathan J. Fortney; Benjamin J. Fulton; Jonathan Langton; Gregory Laughlin
We report secondary eclipse photometry of the hot Jupiter XO-3b in the 4.5 μm band taken with the Infrared Array Camera on the Spitzer Space Telescope. We measure individual eclipse depths and center of eclipse times for a total of 12 secondary eclipses. We fit these data simultaneously with two transits observed in the same band in order to obtain a global best-fit secondary eclipse depth of 0.1580% ± 0.0036% and a center of eclipse phase of 0.67004 ± 0.00013. We assess the relative magnitude of variations in the dayside brightness of the planet by measuring the size of the residuals during ingress and egress from fitting the combined eclipse light curve with a uniform disk model and place an upper limit of 0.05%. The new secondary eclipse observations extend the total baseline from one and a half years to nearly three years, allowing us to place an upper limit on the periastron precession rate of 2.9 × 10^(–3) deg day^(–1)— the tightest constraint to date on the periastron precession rate of a hot Jupiter. We use the new transit observations to calculate improved estimates for the system properties, including an updated orbital ephemeris. We also use the large number of secondary eclipses to obtain the most stringent limits to date on the orbit-to-orbit variability of an eccentric hot Jupiter and demonstrate the consistency of multiple-epoch Spitzer observations.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Charles A. Beichman; J. Livingston; M. Werner; Varoujan Gorjian; Jessica E. Krick; Katherine M. Deck; Heather A. Knutson; Ian Wong; Erik A. Petigura; Jessie L. Christiansen; David R. Ciardi; Thomas P. Greene; Joshua E. Schlieder; Mike Line; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Andrew W. Howard; Evan Sinukoff
We have used the Spitzer Space Telescope to observe two transiting planetary systems orbiting low-mass stars discovered in the Kepler K2 mission. The system K2-3 (EPIC 201367065) hosts three planets, while K2-26 (EPIC 202083828) hosts a single planet. Observations of all four objects in these two systems confirm and refine the orbital and physical parameters of the planets. The refined orbital information and more precise planet radii possible with Spitzer will be critical for future observations of these and other K2 targets. For K2-3b we find marginally significant evidence for a transit timing variation between the K2 and Spitzer epochs.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Peter B. Buhler; Heather A. Knutson; Konstantin Batygin; Benjamin J. Fulton; Jonathan J. Fortney; Adam Burrows; Ian Wong
HAT-P-13b is a Jupiter-mass transiting exoplanet that has settled onto a stable, short-period, and mildly eccentric orbit as a consequence of the action of tidal dissipation and perturbations from a second, highly eccentric, outer companion. Due to the special orbital configuration of the HAT-P-13 system, the magnitude of HAT-P-13bs eccentricity (
The Astronomical Journal | 2014
Ian Wong; Michael E. Brown; Joshua Patrick Emery
e_b
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Jessica E. Krick; James G. Ingalls; Sean J. Carey; K. von Braun; Stephen R. Kane; David R. Ciardi; Peter Plavchan; Ian Wong; Patrick J. Lowrance
) is in part dictated by its Love number (
The Astronomical Journal | 2016
Ian Wong; Michael E. Brown
k_{2_b}
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Ian Wong; Michael E. Brown
), which is in turn a proxy for the degree of central mass concentration in its interior. Thus, the measurement of