Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. E. Nielsen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. E. Nielsen.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006

Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

Veronika Eyring; Neal Butchart; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; G. E. Bodeker; B. A. Boville; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; Eugene C. Cordero; Martin Dameris; Makoto Deushi; Vitali E. Fioletov; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Volker Grewe; L. Jourdain; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Marion Marchand; Daniel R. Marsh; Tatsuya Nagashima; Paul A. Newman; J. E. Nielsen; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari

Simulations of the stratosphere from thirteen coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) are evaluated to provide guidance for the interpretation of ozone predictions made by the same CCMs. The focus of the evaluation is on how well the fields and processes that are important for determining the ozone distribution are represented in the simulations of the recent past. The core period of the evaluation is from 1980 to 1999 but long-term trends are compared for an extended period (1960–2004). Comparisons of polar high-latitude temperatures show that most CCMs have only small biases in the Northern Hemisphere in winter and spring, but still have cold biases in the Southern Hemisphere spring below 10 hPa. Most CCMs display the correct stratospheric response of polar temperatures to wave forcing in the Northern, but not in the Southern Hemisphere. Global long-term stratospheric temperature trends are in reasonable agreement with satellite and radiosonde observations. Comparisons of simulations of methane, mean age of air, and propagation of the annual cycle in water vapor show a wide spread in the results, indicating differences in transport. However, for around half the models there is reasonable agreement with observations. In these models the mean age of air and the water vapor tape recorder signal are generally better than reported in previous model intercomparisons. Comparisons of the water vapor and inorganic chlorine (Cly) fields also show a large intermodel spread. Differences in tropical water vapor mixing ratios in the lower stratosphere are primarily related to biases in the simulated tropical tropopause temperatures and not transport. The spread in Cly, which is largest in the polar lower stratosphere, appears to be primarily related to transport differences. In general the amplitude and phase of the annual cycle in total ozone is well simulated apart from the southern high latitudes. Most CCMs show reasonable agreement with observed total ozone trends and variability on a global scale, but a greater spread in the ozone trends in polar regions in spring, especially in the Arctic. In conclusion, despite the wide range of skills in representing different processes assessed here, there is sufficient agreement between the majority of the CCMs and the observations that some confidence can be placed in their predictions.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007

Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; G. E. Bodeker; Eugene C. Cordero; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; S. R. Beagley; B. A. Boville; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; Rudolf Deckert; Makoto Deushi; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Daniel R. Marsh; Sigrun Matthes; Tatsuya Nagashima; Paul A. Newman; J. E. Nielsen; S. Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer

[1] Simulations from eleven coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) employing nearly identical forcings have been used to project the evolution of stratospheric ozone throughout the 21st century. The model-to-model agreement in projected temperature trends is good, and all CCMs predict continued, global mean cooling of the stratosphere over the next 5 decades, increasing from around 0.25 K/decade at 50 hPa to around 1 K/ decade at 1 hPa under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario. In general, the simulated ozone evolution is mainly determined by decreases in halogen concentrations and continued cooling of the global stratosphere due to increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs). Column ozone is projected to increase as stratospheric halogen concentrations return to 1980s levels. Because of ozone increases in the middle and upper stratosphere due to GHGinduced cooling, total ozone averaged over midlatitudes, outside the polar regions, and globally, is projected to increase to 1980 values between 2035 and 2050 and before lowerstratospheric halogen amounts decrease to 1980 values. In the polar regions the CCMs simulate small temperature trends in the first and second half of the 21st century in midwinter. Differences in stratospheric inorganic chlorine (Cly) among the CCMs are key to diagnosing the intermodel differences in simulated ozone recovery, in particular in the Antarctic. It is found that there are substantial quantitative differences in the simulated Cly, with the October mean Antarctic Cly peak value varying from less than 2 ppb to over 3.5 ppb in the CCMs, and the date at which the Cly returns to 1980 values varying from before 2030 to after 2050. There is a similar variation in the timing of recovery of Antarctic springtime column ozone back to 1980 values. As most models underestimate peak Clynear 2000, ozone recovery in the Antarctic could occur even later, between 2060 and 2070. In the Arctic the column ozone increase in spring does not follow halogen decreases as closely as in the Antarctic, reaching 1980 values before Arctic halogen amounts decrease


Journal of Climate | 2017

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2)

Ronald Gelaro; Will McCarty; Max J. Suarez; Ricardo Todling; Andrea Molod; Lawrence L. Takacs; C. A. Randles; Anton Darmenov; Michael G. Bosilovich; Rolf H. Reichle; Krzysztof Wargan; L. Coy; Richard I. Cullather; C. Draper; Santha Akella; Virginie Buchard; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Gi-Kong Kim; Randal D. Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Dagmar Merkova; J. E. Nielsen; Gary Partyka; Steven Pawson; William M. Putman; Michele M. Rienecker; Siegfried D. Schubert; Meta Sienkiewicz

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) is the latest atmospheric reanalysis of the modern satellite era produced by NASAs Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). MERRA-2 assimilates observation types not available to its predecessor, MERRA, and includes updates to the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) model and analysis scheme so as to provide a viable ongoing climate analysis beyond MERRAs terminus. While addressing known limitations of MERRA, MERRA-2 is also intended to be a development milestone for a future integrated Earth system analysis (IESA) currently under development at GMAO. This paper provides an overview of the MERRA-2 system and various performance metrics. Among the advances in MERRA-2 relevant to IESA are the assimilation of aerosol observations, several improvements to the representation of the stratosphere including ozone, and improved representations of cryospheric processes. Other improvements in the quality of MERRA-2 compared with MERRA include the reduction of some spurious trends and jumps related to changes in the observing system, and reduced biases and imbalances in aspects of the water cycle. Remaining deficiencies are also identified. Production of MERRA-2 began in June 2014 in four processing streams, and converged to a single near-real time stream in mid 2015. MERRA-2 products are accessible online through the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data Information Services Center (GES DISC).


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Review of the formulation of present‐generation stratospheric chemistry‐climate models and associated external forcings

Olaf Morgenstern; Marco A. Giorgetta; Kiyotaka Shibata; Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; Theodore G. Shepherd; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; M. I. Hegglin; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura; J. E. Nielsen

The goal of the Chemistry-Climate Model Validation (CCMVal) activity is to improve understanding of chemistry-climate models (CCMs) through process-oriented evaluation and to provide reliable projections of stratospheric ozone and its impact on climate. An appreciation of the details of model formulations is essential for understanding how models respond to the changing external forcings of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances, and hence for understanding the ozone and climate forecasts produced by the models participating in this activity. Here we introduce and review the models used for the second round (CCMVal-2) of this intercomparison, regarding the implementation of chemical, transport, radiative, and dynamical processes in these models. In particular, we review the advantages and problems associated with approaches used to model processes of relevance to stratospheric dynamics and chemistry. Furthermore, we state the definitions of the reference simulations performed, and describe the forcing data used in these simulations. We identify some developments in chemistry-climate modeling that make models more physically based or more comprehensive, including the introduction of an interactive ocean, online photolysis, troposphere-stratosphere chemistry, and non-orographic gravity-wave deposition as linked to tropospheric convection. The relatively new developments indicate that stratospheric CCM modeling is becoming more consistent with our physically based understanding of the atmosphere.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2011

The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO

Luke D. Oman; J. R. Ziemke; Anne R. Douglass; Darryn W. Waugh; C. Lang; Jose M. Rodriguez; J. E. Nielsen

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 4Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD, USA The EI Nino-Southern Oscillation (EN SO) is the dominant mode of tropical variability on interannual time scales. ENSO appears to extend its influence into the chemical composition of the tropical troposphere, Recent results have revealed an ENSO induced wave-1 anomaly in observed tropical tropospheric column ozone, This results in a dipole over the western and eastern tropical Pacific, whereby differencing the two regions produces an ozone anomaly with an extremely high correlation to the Nino 3.4 Index. We have successfully reproduced this result using the Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) general circulation model coupled to a comprehensive stratospheric and tropospheric chemical mechanism forced with observed sea surface temperatures over the past 25 years, An examination of the modeled ozone field reveals the vertical contributions of tropospheric ozone to the column over the western and eastern Pacific region, We will show targeted comparisons with SHADOZ ozonesondes over these regions to provide insight into the vertical structure. Also, comparisons with NASAs Aura satellite Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and Tropospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES) instruments and other appropriate data sets will be shown, In addition, the water vapor response to ENSO will be compared to help illuminate its role relative to dynamics in impacting ozone concentrations. These results indicate that the tropospheric ozone response to ENSO is potentially a very useful chemistry-climate diagnostic and should be considered in future modeling assessments,


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Multimodel assessment of the factors driving stratospheric ozone evolution over the 21st century

Luke D. Oman; David A. Plummer; Darryn W. Waugh; John Austin; J. F. Scinocca; Anne R. Douglass; R. J. Salawitch; T. Canty; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; S. Dhomse; Veronika Eyring; S. M. Frith; Steven C. Hardiman; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Tetsu Nakamura; J. E. Nielsen; D. Olivie; G. Pitari; J. A. Pyle; E. Rozanov

The evolution of stratospheric ozone from 1960 to 2100 is examined in simulations from 14 chemistry-climate models, driven by prescribed levels of halogens and greenhouse gases. There is general agreement among the models that total column ozone reached a minimum around year 2000 at all latitudes, projected to be followed by an increase over the first half of the 21st century. In the second half of the 21st century, ozone is projected to continue increasing, level off, or even decrease depending on the latitude. Separation into partial columns above and below 20 hPa reveals that these latitudinal differences are almost completely caused by differences in the model projections of ozone in the lower stratosphere. At all latitudes, upper stratospheric ozone increases throughout the 21st century and is projected to return to 1960 levels well before the end of the century, although there is a spread among models in the dates that ozone returns to specific historical values. We find decreasing halogens and declining upper atmospheric temperatures, driven by increasing greenhouse gases, contribute almost equally to increases in upper stratospheric ozone. In the tropical lower stratosphere, an increase in upwelling causes a steady decrease in ozone through the 21st century, and total column ozone does not return to 1960 levels in most of the models. In contrast, lower stratospheric and total column ozone in middle and high latitudes increases during the 21st century, returning to 1960 levels well before the end of the century in most models.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Chemistry‐climate model simulations of spring Antarctic ozone

John Austin; Hamish Struthers; J. F. Scinocca; David A. Plummer; Hideharu Akiyoshi; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; G. E. Bodeker; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Anne Kubin; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Ulrike Langematz; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Tetsu Nakamura; J. E. Nielsen

Coupled chemistry-climate model simulations covering the recent past and continuing throughout the 21st century have been completed with a range of different models. Common forcings are used for the halogen amounts and greenhouse gas concentrations, as expected under the Montreal Protocol (with amendments) and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change A1b Scenario. The simulations of the Antarctic ozone hole are compared using commonly used diagnostics: the minimum ozone, the maximum area of ozone below 220 DU, and the ozone mass deficit below 220 DU. Despite the fact that the processes responsible for ozone depletion are reasonably well understood, a wide range of results is obtained. Comparisons with observations indicate that one of the reasons for the model underprediction in ozone hole area is the tendency for models to underpredict, by up to 35%, the area of low temperatures responsible for polar stratospheric cloud formation. Models also typically have species gradients that are too weak at the edge of the polar vortex, suggesting that there is too much mixing of air across the vortex edge. Other models show a high bias in total column ozone which restricts the size of the ozone hole (defined by a 220 DU threshold). The results of those models which agree best with observations are examined in more detail. For several models the ozone hole does not disappear this century but a small ozone hole of up to three million square kilometers continues to occur in most springs even after 2070.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1998

The CO2 seasonal cycle as a tracer of transport

S. E. Strahan; Anne R. Douglass; J. E. Nielsen; K. A. Boering

CO 2 time series in the lower stratosphere have been constructed as a function of latitude and altitude using ER-2 aircraft.observations. A seasonally varying signal derived from tropical surface CO 2 data was fit to these data in a manner similar to that of Boering et al. [1996]. This analysis shows how the tropospheric CO 2 seasonal cycle in air entering the tropical lower stratosphere ascends and gradually loses amplitude. The midlatitude results show that in the 370- to 400-K range the tropical signal is transported poleward rapidly with only a small loss in amplitude. The signal also reaches the midlatitudes rapidly at higher altitudes but with markedly less amplitude. Above ∼440 K the midlatitude CO 2 data best fit a line whose slope is the secular increase in CO 2 , This observational analysis is used as a basis for diagnosing transport in a CO 2 simulation produced using GEOS-1 Data Assimilation System (DAS) winds in an off-line chemistry and transport model. The model is forced at the lowest levels by a 5-year zonal mean CO 2 data set derived from surface observations. The analysis of model results as a function of height and latitude determines whether (1) the seasonally varying CO 2 cycle forced in the troposphere survives in the tropical lower stratosphere and whether (2) the CO 2 cycle in the tropical lower stratosphere propagates realistically to the midlatitudes. We find that the model transports a CO 2 seasonal cycle from the surface to the tropical upper troposphere that agrees with the phase and amplitude of tropospheric aircraft measurements. The cycle input into the model tropical lower stratosphere attenuates with height in a reasonable way compared with observations. The phase and amplitude of the cycle transported from the tropics to the midlatitudes agree well with the data up to about 440 K, but above that the model transports more of the tropical signal to the midlatitudes than is suggested by the ER-2 data. Overall, there is remarkable consistency between the model and observations in the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere, which supports the use of assimilated winds in assessments of the effects of aircraft exhaust.


Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2014

Development of a grid-independent GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (v9-02) as an atmospheric chemistry module for Earth system models

Michael Smither Long; Robert M. Yantosca; J. E. Nielsen; Christoph A. Keller; A. da Silva; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Steven Pawson; Daniel J. Jacob

The GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model (CTM), used by a large atmospheric chemistry research community, has been re-engineered to also serve as an atmospheric chemistry module for Earth system models (ESMs). This was done using an Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) interface that operates independently of the GEOSChem scientific code, permitting the exact same GEOSChem code to be used as an ESM module or as a standalone CTM. In this manner, the continual stream of updates contributed by the CTM user community is automatically passed on to the ESM module, which remains state of science and referenced to the latest version of the standard GEOS-Chem CTM. A major step in this re-engineering was to make GEOS-Chem grid independent, i.e., capable of using any geophysical grid specified at run time. GEOS-Chem data sockets were also created for communication between modules and with external ESM code. The grid-independent, ESMF-compatible GEOS-Chem is now the standard version of the GEOS-Chem CTM. It has been implemented as an atmospheric chemistry module into the NASA GEOS5 ESM. The coupled GEOS-5–GEOS-Chem system was tested for scalability and performance with a tropospheric oxidant-aerosol simulation (120 coupled species, 66 transported tracers) using 48–240 cores and message-passing interface (MPI) distributed-memory parallelization. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the GEOS-Chem chemistry module scales efficiently for the number of cores tested, with no degradation as the number of cores increases. Although inclusion of atmospheric chemistry in ESMs is computationally expensive, the excellent scalability of the chemistry module means that the relative cost goes down with increasing number of cores in a massively parallel environment.


Archive | 2008

The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System-Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0

Max J. Suarez; Michele M. Rienecker; Ricardo Todling; Julio T. Bacmeister; Lawrence L. Takacs; H. C. Liu; Wei Gu; Meta Sienkiewicz; Randy Koster; Ronald Gelaro; Ivanka Stajner; J. E. Nielsen

Collaboration


Dive into the J. E. Nielsen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne R. Douglass

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luke D. Oman

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul A. Newman

Universities Space Research Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jose M. Rodriguez

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. M. Frith

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. da Silva

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas E. Kinnison

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge