J. Welch
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Welch.
Nature Communications | 2014
C. Behrens; F.-J. Decker; Y. Ding; V. A. Dolgashev; J. Frisch; Zhirong Huang; P. Krejcik; H. Loos; Alberto Lutman; Timothy Maxwell; J. J. Turner; J. Wang; M.-H. Wang; J. Welch; J. Wu
X-ray free-electron lasers, with pulse durations ranging from a few to several hundred femtoseconds, are uniquely suited for studying atomic, molecular, chemical and biological systems. Characterizing the temporal profiles of these femtosecond X-ray pulses that vary from shot to shot is not only challenging but also important for data interpretation. Here we report the time-resolved measurements of X-ray free-electron lasers by using an X-band radiofrequency transverse deflector at the Linac Coherent Light Source. We demonstrate this method to be a simple, non-invasive technique with a large dynamic range for single-shot electron and X-ray temporal characterization. A resolution of less than 1 fs root mean square has been achieved for soft X-ray pulses. The lasing evolution along the undulator has been studied with the electron trapping being observed as the X-ray peak power approaches 100 GW.
Nature Communications | 2015
Agostino Marinelli; Daniel Ratner; Alberto Lutman; J. J. Turner; J. Welch; F.-J. Decker; H. Loos; C. Behrens; S. Gilevich; A. Miahnahri; Sharon Vetter; Timothy Maxwell; Y. Ding; Ryan Coffee; Soichi Wakatsuki; Zhirong Huang
The X-ray free-electron laser has opened a new era for photon science, improving the X-ray brightness by ten orders of magnitude over previously available sources. Similar to an optical laser, the spectral and temporal structure of the radiation pulses can be tailored to the specific needs of many experiments by accurately manipulating the lasing medium, that is, the electron beam. Here we report the generation of mJ-level two-colour hard X-ray pulses of few femtoseconds duration with an XFEL driven by twin electron bunches at the Linac Coherent Light Source. This performance represents an improvement of over an order of magnitude in peak power over state-of-the-art two-colour XFELs. The unprecedented intensity and temporal coherence of this new two-colour X-ray free-electron laser enable an entirely new set of scientific applications, ranging from X-ray pump/X-ray probe experiments to the imaging of complex biological samples with multiple wavelength anomalous dispersion.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2013
Daniele Cocco; Rafael Abela; John W. Amann; Ken Chow; P. Emma; Yiping Feng; Georg L. Gassner; Jerome Hastings; Philip A. Heimann; Z. Huang; Henrik Loos; Paul A. Montanez; Daniel S. Morton; H.-D. Nuhn; Daniel Ratner; Larry N. Rodes; Uwe Flechsig; J. Welch; J. Wu
After the successful demonstration of the hard X-ray self-seeding at LCLS, an effort to build a system for working in the soft X-ray region is ongoing. The idea for self-seeding in the soft X-ray region by using a grating monochromator was first proposed by Feldhauset. al. The concept places a grating monochromator in middle of the undulators and selects a narrow bandwidth “seed” from the SASE beam produced by the upstream section of undulators, which is then amplified to saturation in the downstream section of the undulators. The seeded FEL beam will have a narrower bandwidth approaching the transform limit. The challenge is to accommodate a monochromator and refocusing system as well as the electron beam magnetic chicane into a very limited space. The Soft X-raySelf Seeding system replaces only a single undulator section of ~ 4 m. Theoverall project and the expected FEL performances are described elsewhere. Here we present the detailed optical design solution, consisting of a fixed incidence angle toroidal blazed grating with variable groove density, a rotating plane mirror (the only required motion for tuning the energy) to redirect the selected monochromatic beam onto an exit slit, and two more mirrors, one sphere and one flat, to focus and overlap the ‘seed’ onto the electron beam in the downstream undulators.
Archive | 2010
Andrew Fisher; H.-D. Nuhn; J. Welch
The steel present in the construction of the undulator hall facility has the potential for changing the ambient fields present in the undulator hall. This note describes a measurement done to make a comparison between the fields in the hall and in the Magnetic Measurement Facility. In order for the undulators to have the proper tuning, the background magnetic field in the Undulator Hall should agree with the background field in the Magnetic Measurements Facility within .5 gauss. In order to verify that this was the case measurements were taken along the length of the undulator hall, and the point measurements were compared to the mean field which was measured on the MMF test bench.
Archive | 2010
Andrew Fisher; H.-D. Nuhn; J. Welch
The duct work and cable trays present in the undulator hall facility are made out of potentially magnetically active materials. This note describes a measurement done to make a comparison between the fields in the undulator hall with the duct work and cable trays present and in the Magnetic Measurement Facility. In order for the undulators to have the proper tuning, the background magnetic field in the Undulator Hall must agree with the background field in the Magnetic Measurements Facility within 0.5 gauss. To verify that this was the case, measurements were taken along the length of the undulator hall, and the point measurements were compared to the mean field which was measured on the MMF test bench. This set of measurements was conducted with most of the cable trays and duct work in place, but without any of the magnet stands in place.
Nature Photonics | 2010
Paul Emma; R. Akre; J. Arthur; R. Bionta; Christoph Bostedt; John D. Bozek; A. Brachmann; P. H. Bucksbaum; Ryan Coffee; F.-J. Decker; Y. Ding; D. Dowell; S. Edstrom; A. Fisher; J. Frisch; S. Gilevich; Jerome Hastings; G. Hays; Ph. Hering; Zhirong Huang; R. Iverson; H. Loos; Marc Messerschmidt; A. Miahnahri; Stefan Moeller; H.-D. Nuhn; G. Pile; Daniel Ratner; J. Rzepiela; D. Schultz
Nature Photonics | 2012
J. Amann; W. Berg; V. D. Blank; F.-J. Decker; Y. Ding; P. Emma; Yiping Feng; J. Frisch; D. Fritz; Jerome Hastings; Zhirong Huang; J. Krzywinski; R. R. Lindberg; H. Loos; Alberto Lutman; H.-D. Nuhn; Daniel Ratner; J. Rzepiela; Deming Shu; Yu. Shvyd'ko; S. Spampinati; Stanislav Stoupin; S. Terentyev; E. Trakhtenberg; D. Walz; J. Welch; J. Wu; A. Zholents; Diling Zhu
Physical Review Letters | 2009
Y. Ding; A. Brachmann; F.-J. Decker; D. Dowell; P. Emma; J. Frisch; S. Gilevich; G. Hays; Ph. Hering; Z. Huang; R. Iverson; H. Loos; A. Miahnahri; H.-D. Nuhn; Daniel Ratner; J. J. Turner; J. Welch; William E. White; J. Wu
Physical Review Letters | 2015
Daniel Ratner; R. Abela; J. Amann; C. Behrens; D.K.Bohler; G. Bouchard; Christoph Bostedt; M. Boyes; K. Chow; D. Cocco; F.-J. Decker; Y. Ding; C. Eckman; P. Emma; D. Fairley; Yiping Feng; C. Field; U. Flechsig; G. Gassner; J. B. Hastings; Philip A. Heimann; Zhirong Huang; N. Kelez; J. Krzywinski; H. Loos; Alberto Lutman; Agostino Marinelli; G. Marcus; Timothy Maxwell; P. Montanez
Physical Review Letters | 2012
Y. Ding; F.-J. Decker; P. Emma; C Feng; C. Field; J. Frisch; Z. Huang; J. Krzywinski; H. Loos; J. Welch; J. Wu; F Zhou