J. Williams

Correlation of ELISA-detected IgG and IgA anti-HLA antibodies in pretransplant sera with renal allograft rejection.

The present study compared the occurrence of rejection episodes during the first twelve posttransplant (Tx) months and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survivals among recipients stratified by the percent panel reactive antibody (% PRA) of pre-Tx sera as detected using either an antihuman globulin determined PRA (AHG-% PRA) or an ELISA methodology detecting IgG reactive against soluble HLA class I antigens (% PRA-STAT). There was a significant correlation between AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% and a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% (P<0.001). However, among 200 sera displaying an AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% (mean 57 +/- 2l%), only 69% (138/200) displayed a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10%. With further study the discrepant finding, of 62 sera that were AHG-PRA greater than or equal to 10% but PRA-STAT <10%, was due to the presence of IgM and/or IgG non-MHC reactivity. In contrast, among 293 sera displaying an AHG-PRA < 100% (mean 3 +/- 2%), 15% (43/293) displayed a PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10%. There was no correlation between AHG-% PRA and rejection episodes occurring during the first twelve post Tx months. In contrast, however, there was a highly significant correlation between PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% and the occurrence of rejection episodes during the first twelve post-Tx months (P < 0.001). Patients with PRA-STAT greater than of equal to 10% experienced a 70% rejection frequency compared with the 35% rejection frequency for patients with PRA-STAT sera < 10% (P<0.001). A significant correlation was observed between the presence of IgG-1 and rejection (P<0.01) but not IgG-subclasses 2, 3, or 4. Of particular interest was the observation in 11 patients that the presence of ELISA-detected IgA anti-HLA class I antigen (ELISA-IgA PRA greater than or equal to 10%) was associated with a significantly reduced rejection risk compared with sera where only PRA-STAT greater than or equal to 10% was present (27% vs. 70% incidence of rejection episodes, P<0.01). Finally, patients displaying pretransplant PRA-STAT results < 10% experienced significantly improved l-, 2-, and 3- year graft survivals of 85% vs. 74%, 82% vs. 70% and 81% vs. 67%, respectively (P<0.01 for each time point), compared with patients displaying PRA-STAT results greater than or equal to 10%. These data suggest that the use of the ELISA methodology to detect IgG reactivity against soluble HLA class I antigens (PRA-STAT) may allow for the determination of a more clinically informative % PRA than the AHG-% PRA. Moreover, the presence of ELISA-detected IgA anti-HLA may act to inhibit rejection mechanisms associated with ELISA-detected IgG anti-HLA greater than or equal to 10%.

Influence of HLA matching on rejections and short- and long-term primary cadaveric allograft survival

Distribution of cadaveric donor kidneys, based upon the donor-recipient HLA match grade, remains one of the major controversies in transplantation. To determine whether matching results in fewer rejection episodes and better graft survival, we retrospectively studied our single-center patient population of 683 cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. For 237 recipients of well-matched HLA A, B kidneys (< or = 2 HLA A, B mismatches [MM]) the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 76%, 66%, 62%, and 61%, respectively, were not significantly different from those of 71%, 65%, 63%, and 63%, respectively, for the 446 poorly matched HLA A, B (> 2 HLA A, B MM) recipients. Similarly, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals for the 307 recipients of well-matched HLA-DR kidneys (0 or 1 DR MM) of 74%, 65%, 63%, and 61%, respectively, were not significantly different from those of 72%, 65%, 63%, and 62%, respectively, for the 366 poorly matched (2 DR MM) recipients. Patient survivals were comparable at each time point for well- vs. poorly matched recipients. Similarly, donor-recipient HLA A, B, and DR matching was not beneficial in retransplant recipients who were transplanted following negative NIH and antiglobulin (AHG) crossmatches when testing both historical (high-PRA) and pretransplant sera. Since rejection episodes may be a more sensitive indicator of immune response than graft loss, we also analyzed the relationship between donor-recipient HLA match grade and posttransplant rejections. A total of 60% (n = 413) of recipients experienced no rejections and had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 82%, 78%, 74%, and 73%, respectively; 32% (n = 215) of patients who experienced 1 rejection had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 58%, 48%, 44%, and 43%, respectively (P < 0.001 for graft survival of 0 vs. 1 rejection). The remaining 8% (n = 55) of recipients experienced more than 1 (> 1) rejection and had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 62%, 38%, 36%, and 36%, respectively (P < 0.001 for graft survival of 0 vs. > 1 rejection and P < 0.01 for graft survival of 1 vs. > 1 rejection). The mean numbers of rejections/patient experienced by well-matched vs. poorly matched recipients were comparable and not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Retransplantation following AHG-negative crossmatches

Retransplant patients are an immunologically unique group since they have already experienced graft loss and have been exposed to a bolus of alloantigen. Having previously lost a transplant, these patients are often sensitized and have poorer early graft function resulting in patient management problems [1, 2]. Survival rates for cadaveric retransplantations have been consistently lower than those for primary grafts [3, 4, 5, 6]. Some of the risk factors associated. with poor retransplantation outcome include patient high PRA, recipient-donor HLA mismatches, positive flow cytometry crossmatches and, perhaps the most important, previous graft survival time less than 3–6 months [3, 4, [7, 8, 9]. Since the introduction of cyclosporine based immunosuppressive protocols in 1983, the one year regraft survival rate of second cadaver donor renal allografts has remained relatively constant, whereas that of first transplants has significantly improved [9]. However, since 1988 survival rates for retransplant cadaver-donor grafts have improved each year with the difference between first and second transplant one year survival rates decreasing from 8% in 1988 to 2% in 1991 [10]. These recent improvements may reflect the impact of more efficacious immunosuppression and more sensitive and informative crossmatching [6, 11]. However, data from the UNOS Registry suggests that a decreasing number of high-risk patients, especially reTx patients with short previous graft survival times, have been retransplanted in recent years and that selection of more low-risk reTx candidates may be an important contributing factor in explaining improved regraft survivals [8].