P. Kimball

Frequency, potential risk and therapeutic intervention in end-stage renal disease patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) is characterized by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) in association with thrombotic disorders of arterial and/or venus systems, spontaneous abortion(s) or thrombocytopenia. METHODS In this multicenter study, 502 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients awaiting renal transplants were screened to determine the frequency of APAS, the potential risk associated with APAS, and strategies for therapeutic intervention. Ninety-three patients (19%) had high titers of ACA. Twenty-three patients had documented evidence of one or more of the thrombotic disorders such as lupus, frequent abortions, frequent thrombosis of arteriovenous shunts, biopsy-proven microrenal angiopathy, or thrombocytopenia and thus were diagnosed with APAS. Of these 23 patients, 11 received kidney transplants either with (4 patients) or without (7 patients), concomitant anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS All seven of the patients with APAS not treated with anticoagulation therapy lost their allografts within 1 week as a result of renal thrombosis. In contrast, three out of four transplant patients with APAS treated with anticoagulation therapy maintained their allografts for over 2 years. The fourth patient lost his graft within a week because of thrombosis. Of the remaining 70 patients with high titers of ACA but no evidence of thrombotic disorders, 37 received kidney transplants. None lost their allografts as a result of thrombosis. Our data suggest that, although 19% of our ESRD patients exhibit high titer of ACA, only 5% of the patients have APAS. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our data suggest that the patients with APAS are at high risk of posttransplant renal thrombosis. Anticoagulation therapy could prevent patients from posttransplant thrombosis in patients with APAS.

Production of synergistic but nonidentical mechanisms of immunosuppression by rapamycin and cyclosporine.

We report that the mechanism of rapamycin (RAP) inhibition is synergistic, but nonidentical, to the mechanism of CsA inhibition. Like CsA, RAP inhibits T cell proliferation following mitogen (PHA) and/or alloantigen (MLR) stimulation. RAP levels of 100, 33, 11, 3.6, 1.2, and less than 1 ng/ml reduced PHA stimulation by 81%, 84%, 81%, 83%, 62%, and 33%, respectively, without cytotoxicity. The RAP concentration required to achieve 50% proliferative inhibition of either mitogen (PHA) or MLR assays revealed an interindividual variability of 5 pg/ml RAP (2 individuals), 1 ng/ml (3 individuals), and 100 ng/ml (2 individuals). Unlike CsA, RAP proliferative inhibition was not restricted to the G0 phase of the cell cycle. Addition of 100, 10, or 1 ng/ml RAP at the onset (G0), or 24 hr following cultivation (G1) similarly inhibited DNA synthesis by 42%, 42%, and 41% compared with 44%, 48%, and 47%, respectively. PWM-stimulated B cell proliferation was primarily RAP-sensitive during the G0 phase of the cell cycle. RAP at 100, 10, and 1 ng/ml inhibited B cell proliferation 46%, 51%, and 50% when added during G0 but only 15%, 20%, and 20% when added during G1. Generation of a cyclosporine-sensitive cytoplasmic activation signal, activator of DNA replication (ADR), was reduced by RAP. RAP reduction did not correlate directly with T cell proliferative inhibition (as does CsA). RAP-induced proliferative inhibition of 40% and 80% resulted in ADR inhibition of 16% and 33%. Proliferative inhibition was synergistically increased when CsA and RAP were used in combination, whereas ADR inhibition was only additively enhanced. Mechanistic disparity between RAP and CsA may potentiate clinical immunosuppression when RAP and CsA are used together.

Surveillance of alloantibodies after transplantation identifies the risk of chronic rejection

The monitoring of the levels of alloantibodies following transplantation might facilitate early diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR), the leading cause of renal allograft failure. Here, we used serial alloantibody surveillance to monitor patients with preoperative positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). Sixty-nine of 308 renal transplant patients in our center had preoperative positive FCXM. Blood was collected quarterly during the first postoperative year and tested by FCXM and single antigen bead luminometry, more sensitive techniques than complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatching. Distinct post-transplant profiles emerged and were associated with different clinical outcomes. Two-thirds of patients showed complete elimination of FCXM and solid-phase assay reactions within 1 year, had few adverse events, and a 95% 3-year graft survival. In contrast, the remaining third failed to eliminate flow FCXM or solid-phase reactions directed against HLA class I or II antibodies. The inferior graft survival (67%) with loss in this latter group was primarily due to CR. Thus, systematic assessment of longitudinal changes in alloantibody levels, either by FCXM or solid-phase assay, can help identify patients at greater risk of developing CR.

Positive pretransplant crossmatches predict early graft loss in liver allograft recipients

We evaluated the influence of donor-recipient HLA compatibility and recipient pretransplant antidonor sensitization on liver allograft recipient survival. The overall graft survival results for 67 cyclosporine-prednisone treated liver allograft recipients at 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant were 86%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. No significant differences were observed when comparing the one-year survivals of 81% vs. 85% for men and women or 80% vs. 85% for adult and pediatric patients. Similarly, no differences were observed when comparing one-year graft survivals for well vs. poorly matched recipients of 77% vs. 83% for recipients with < or = 2 HLA A, B vs. > 2 HLA A, B mismatches (MMs) and 82% vs. 82% for recipients with 0-1 HLA-DR MMs vs. 2 HLA-DR MMs, respectively. Pretransplant transfusion history and race also did not influence survival. Standard NIH (long-incubation) and anti-human globulin (AHG) crossmatches were performed. The 12% of recipients (8/67) displaying a positive NIH crossmatch experienced significantly poorer 3-, 6-, and 12-month survivals of 62% vs. 89%, 62% vs. 86%, and 62% vs. 86% (all P < 0.05), respectively, than the 59 NIH-crossmatch negative recipients. Similarly, the 16% (11/67) of recipients displaying a positive AHG crossmatch had significantly poorer 3-, 6-, and 12-month survivals of 63% vs. 91%, 54% vs. 89%, and 54% vs. 89% (all P < 0.05) respectively, than the 56 AHG crossmatch-negative recipients. NIH and AHG crossmatch-positive sera were treated with dithioerythritol (DTE) to establish whether reactivity was due to IgM or IgG immunoglobulin. One-year graft survivals of 65% vs. 30% (P < 0.05) were observed when the crossmatch-positive sera reactivities were due to IgM vs. IgG immunoglobulin. While graft survivals were improved when positive crossmatch serum reactivity was due to IgM, these survivals were still significantly poorer than when the crossmatches were completely negative (86% vs. 60%, P < 0.05 for NIH-negative vs. NIH-positive, but DTE-negative, and 88% vs. 77%, P < 0.05 for AHG-negative vs. AHG-positive, but DTE-negative). Therefore, an NIH- or AHG-positive crossmatch, due either to IgM or IgG reactivity, results in poor early (3- and 6-months) liver allograft survival. Crossmatch-positive recipients experienced significantly (P < 0.05) more rejections and more steroid-resistant rejections (P < 0.05) than crossmatch-negative recipients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The relationship among donor-recipient HLA mismatches, rejection, and death from coronary artery disease in cardiac transplant recipients

Review of 448 cyclosporine-treated heart transplant recipients was undertaken to examine the relationship of donor-recipient HLA compatibility to patient survival, rejection, and death from coronary artery disease (CAD). Pre-Tx crossmatching and panel-reactive antibody (PRA) were correlated to survival as well. Overall patient survivals were 78%, 70%, and 65% at 1, 3, and 5 years post-Tx, respectively. Matching of donor-recipient HLA did not improve outcome in that 1, 3, and 5 year survivals for well-matched (≤2 A, B, or 0–1DR mismatches [MMs]) vs. poorly matched (>2 A, B, or 2 DR MMs) recipients were comparable and not significantly different. Well-matched recipients, however, experienced significantly fewer rejections (1.06±1.2 vs. 1.96±1.0, P<0.01 for ≤2 A, B MMs vs. >2A, B MMs and 1.1±0.9 vs. 2.0±1.1 for 0–1 DR MMs vs. 2 DR MMs, P<0.01). Moreover, HLA-DR, but not HLA A, B, was a significant (P<0.01) predictor of early rejection (<30 days) in that 65% (165/254) of poorly matched vs. only 40% (95/194) of well-matched HLA-DR recipients experienced early rejections. Interestingly, an inverse relationship was found between HLA A and B MM, but not HLA-DR MM, and death from coronary artery disease in that 17% (19/111) of well-matched vs. 9% (32/327) of poorly matched patients died from CAD. Pre-Tx PRA did not impact patient survival or rejection. Donor-recipient crossmatching was performed utilizing the NIH and/or antiglobulin (AHG) procedures. No survival differences were observed at 1, 2, and 3 years post-Tx when comparing outcome for the 24 NIH cross-match (XM)-positive (+) with the 424 NIH-XM-nega-tive patients. Only 10 patients (10/125 AHG-tested recipients) displayed a positive AHG recipient antidonor reactivity. When these 10 AHG-XM (+) sera were treated with dithioerythritol (to inactivate IgM) all 10 converted to a negative reactivity, indicating that a positive crossmatch due to IgM reactivity should not be considered a contraindication to cardiac transplantation. These data also suggest that the reactivity of the 24 NLH-XM(+) sera were most likely due to IgM, and that poorly matched heart recipients may benefit from a more aggressive immunosuppressive regimen to prevent early rejections.

Influence of race on crossmatch outcome and recipient eligibility for transplantation.

Data from the Office of the Inspector General and the United Network for Organ Sharing suggested that black end-stage renal disease patients had unequal access to organ transplantation, in that they waited twice as long as white ESRD patients for a renal transplant. We hypothesized that preTx histocompatibility factors were more influential in determining how quickly an ESRD patient was transplanted than had been realized by either the Office of the Inspector General or UNOS. To test this hypothesis we compared the crossmatch reactivity of 378 white and 227 black ESRD patients awaiting a primary renal Tx against 100 consecutive cadaveric donors (80 white, 10 black, and 10 Mexican-American). A positive XM frequency of 16% (179 positive XM/1121 total XM) was observed when white ESRD patients were crossmatched against white donors. A comparable frequency of 21% (39/186) (+) XM was observed when white ESRD patients were crossmatched against black donors. Similarly, black ESRD patients crossmatched against black donors showed a 17% (20/115) (+) XM frequency. In contrast, a significantly higher (+) XM frequency of 43% (283/655) was observed when black ESRD patients were crossmatched against white donors (P less than 0.001). When black ESRD patients with a (+) preTx blood transfusion history were crossmatched against white donors, a 55% (241/438) (+) XM frequency was observed. This (+) XM frequency was 3.2 times greater than when black ESRD patients were matched against black donors (P less than 0.001). However, when untransfused black ESRD patients were matched against white donors only a 19% (42/217) (+) XM frequency was observed. Finally, preoperatively transfused black ESRD patients displayed a higher PRA of 47 +/- 12% vs. 27 +/- 10%, P less than 0.01, and a longer median waiting time to transplant of 329 vs. 181 days, P less than 0.01, than comparable white patients. The data suggest that presentization of blacks, following preTx blood transfusions from nonblack donors, predisposes black ESRD patients to present as immunologically inappropriate recipients for predominantly white donor allografts and results in their spending a longer time on renal transplant waiting lists.

Influence of HLA matching on rejections and short- and long-term primary cadaveric allograft survival

Distribution of cadaveric donor kidneys, based upon the donor-recipient HLA match grade, remains one of the major controversies in transplantation. To determine whether matching results in fewer rejection episodes and better graft survival, we retrospectively studied our single-center patient population of 683 cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. For 237 recipients of well-matched HLA A, B kidneys (< or = 2 HLA A, B mismatches [MM]) the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 76%, 66%, 62%, and 61%, respectively, were not significantly different from those of 71%, 65%, 63%, and 63%, respectively, for the 446 poorly matched HLA A, B (> 2 HLA A, B MM) recipients. Similarly, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals for the 307 recipients of well-matched HLA-DR kidneys (0 or 1 DR MM) of 74%, 65%, 63%, and 61%, respectively, were not significantly different from those of 72%, 65%, 63%, and 62%, respectively, for the 366 poorly matched (2 DR MM) recipients. Patient survivals were comparable at each time point for well- vs. poorly matched recipients. Similarly, donor-recipient HLA A, B, and DR matching was not beneficial in retransplant recipients who were transplanted following negative NIH and antiglobulin (AHG) crossmatches when testing both historical (high-PRA) and pretransplant sera. Since rejection episodes may be a more sensitive indicator of immune response than graft loss, we also analyzed the relationship between donor-recipient HLA match grade and posttransplant rejections. A total of 60% (n = 413) of recipients experienced no rejections and had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 82%, 78%, 74%, and 73%, respectively; 32% (n = 215) of patients who experienced 1 rejection had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 58%, 48%, 44%, and 43%, respectively (P < 0.001 for graft survival of 0 vs. 1 rejection). The remaining 8% (n = 55) of recipients experienced more than 1 (> 1) rejection and had 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survivals of 62%, 38%, 36%, and 36%, respectively (P < 0.001 for graft survival of 0 vs. > 1 rejection and P < 0.01 for graft survival of 1 vs. > 1 rejection). The mean numbers of rejections/patient experienced by well-matched vs. poorly matched recipients were comparable and not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Lethal graft-versus-host disease after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND This case report is the first documentation of the occurrence and potential source of lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. The patient was a 27-year-old African-American male who received an ABO-compatible, five HLA antigen-mismatched kidney-pancreas transplant from a 17-year-old African-American female donor, who died after childbirth. METHODS Preoperative crossmatches using lymphocytotoxicity and flow cytometry were negative. The patient received four blood transfusions within 10 days of transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of OKT3 induction, and then cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids. RESULTS On postoperative day (POD) 9, the patient became febrile, and leukocytopenia and pancytopenia developed. Immunosuppression was reduced and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was begun. Cultures were negative, interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 levels were elevated, and a cutaneous rash appeared on POD 18. A skin biopsy demonstrated dermatitis with focal epidermal necrosis consistent with GVHD. In an attempt to identify the source of GVHD, variable-number tandem repeat analysis fingerprinting was performed with DNA from donor splenocytes, from the skin biopsy, as well as from the patients buccal mucosa. The skin biopsy showed a mixed variable-number tandem repeat analysis type containing DNA fragments matching the recipient and donor. Blood donors were excluded as a source because they were serologically different from the organ donor. The patient developed liver abnormalities and died from multiorgan failure on POD 22. CONCLUSIONS We speculate that carryover of passenger donor lymphocytes within the transplanted organ were responsible for GVHD. Furthermore, donor traits such as sexual mismatching, African-American race, and alloimmune status may be important potential risk factors for GVHD.

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction.

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.03) at a mean follow‐up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.

Graft-versus-host disease after solid organ transplantation: a single center experience and review of literature.

BACKGROUND Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation that is most likely under-diagnosed. We describe our single center experience with three cases of GVHD diagnosed over a period of 15 years in a total of 2,271 solid organ transplant recipients. CASE REPORTS We describe three case reports: (1) a 3-week old neonate who developed GVHD 16 months after living-related liver transplant, (2) a 14-year old adolescent who developed GVHD 4 months following an unrelated cadaveric pancreas transplant and; (3) a 27-year old male who developed GVHD 18 days after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant from an unrelated donor. GVHD was confirmed through skin biopsies, engraftment profile from bone marrow biopsy and variable number tandem repeat analysis. Treatment strategies included use of corticosteroids and sirolimus monotherapy, corticosteroids and mesenchymal stromal cell therapy and reduction of immunosuppression. We observed that African-American race, sexual and HLA mismatching and cytomegalovirus infection may be high risk factors for development of GVHD following solid organ transplant. CONCLUSIONS GVHD continues to be a rare but fatal complication following solid organ transplantation that demands a high index of clinical suspicion for diagnosis and management. Future approaches may focus on early recognition of risk factors and improving treatment protocols using a combination of mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation with pharmacotherapy.