Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joel Cline is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joel Cline.


IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy | 2015

Recent Trends in Variable Generation Forecasting and Its Value to the Power System

Kirsten Orwig; Mark L. Ahlstrom; Venkat Banunarayanan; Justin Sharp; James M. Wilczak; Jeffrey Freedman; Sue Ellen Haupt; Joel Cline; Obadiah Bartholomy; Hendrik F. Hamann; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Catherine Finley; Dora Nakafuji; Jack L. Peterson; David Maggio; Melinda Marquis

The rapid deployment of wind and solar energy generation systems has resulted in a need to better understand, predict, and manage variable generation. The uncertainty around wind and solar power forecasts is still viewed by the power industry as being quite high, and many barriers to forecast adoption by power system operators still remain. In response, the U.S. Department of Energy has sponsored, in partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, public, private, and academic organizations, two projects to advance wind and solar power forecasts. Additionally, several utilities and grid operators have recognized the value of adopting variable generation forecasting and have taken great strides to enhance their usage of forecasting. In parallel, power system markets and operations are evolving to integrate greater amounts of variable generation. This paper will discuss the recent trends in wind and solar power forecasting technologies in the U.S., the role of forecasting in an evolving power system framework, and the benefits to intended forecast users.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2015

The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP): A Public–Private Partnership Addressing Wind Energy Forecast Needs

James M. Wilczak; Cathy Finley; Jeff Freedman; Joel Cline; Laura Bianco; Joseph B. Olson; Irina V. Djalalova; Lindsay Sheridan; Mark Ahlstrom; John Manobianco; John Zack; Jacob R. Carley; Stan Benjamin; Richard L. Coulter; Larry K. Berg; Jeffrey D. Mirocha; Kirk L. Clawson; Edward Natenberg; Melinda Marquis

AbstractThe Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP) is a public–private research program, the goal of which is to improve the accuracy of short-term (0–6 h) wind power forecasts for the wind energy industry. WFIP was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), with partners that included the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), private forecasting companies (WindLogics and AWS Truepower), DOE national laboratories, grid operators, and universities. WFIP employed two avenues for improving wind power forecasts: first, through the collection of special observations to be assimilated into forecast models and, second, by upgrading NWP forecast models and ensembles. The new observations were collected during concurrent year-long field campaigns in two high wind energy resource areas of the United States (the upper Great Plains and Texas) and included 12 wind profiling radars, 12 sodars, several lidars and surface flux stations, 184 instrumented tall towers, and over 400 nacelle anemome...


Weather and Forecasting | 2016

A Wind Energy Ramp Tool and Metric for Measuring the Skill of Numerical Weather Prediction Models

Laura Bianco; Irina V. Djalalova; James M. Wilczak; Joel Cline; Stan Calvert; Elena Konopleva-Akish; Cathy Finley; Jeffrey Freedman

AbstractA wind energy Ramp Tool and Metric (RT&M) has been developed out of recognition that during significant ramp events (large changes in wind power over short periods of time ) it is more difficult to balance the electric load with power production than during quiescent periods between ramp events. A ramp-specific metric is needed because standard metrics do not give special consideration to ramp events and hence may not provide an appropriate measure of model skill or skill improvement. This RT&M has three components. The first identifies ramp events in the power time series. The second matches in time forecast and observed ramps. The third determines a skill score of the forecast model. This is calculated from a utility operator’s perspective, incorporates phase and duration errors in time as well as power amplitude errors, and recognizes that up and down ramps have different impacts on grid operation. The RT&M integrates skill over a matrix of ramp events of varying amplitudes and durations.


Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2016

Wind power forecasting: IEA Wind Task 36 & future research issues

Gregor Giebel; Joel Cline; Helmut Frank; Will Shaw; Pierre Pinson; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Georges Kariniotakis; Jens Madsen; Corinna Möhrlen

This paper presents the new International Energy Agency Wind Task 36 on Forecasting, and invites to collaborate within the group. Wind power forecasts have been used operatively for over 20 years. Despite this fact, there are still several possibilities to improve the forecasts, both from the weather prediction side and from the usage of the forecasts. The new International Energy Agency (IEA) Task on Forecasting for Wind Energy tries to organise international collaboration, among national meteorological centres with an interest and/or large projects on wind forecast improvements (NOAA, DWD, MetOffice, met.no, DMI,...), operational forecaster and forecast users. The Task is divided in three work packages: Firstly, a collaboration on the improvement of the scientific basis for the wind predictions themselves. This includes numerical weather prediction model physics, but also widely distributed information on accessible datasets. Secondly, we will be aiming at an international pre-standard (an IEA Recommended Practice) on benchmarking and comparing wind power forecasts, including probabilistic forecasts. This WP will also organise benchmarks, in cooperation with the IEA Task WakeBench. Thirdly, we will be engaging end users aiming at dissemination of the best practice in the usage of wind power predictions. As first results, an overview of current issues for research in short-term forecasting of wind power is presented.


Weather and Forecasting | 2016

The POWER Experiment: Impact of Assimilation of a Network of Coastal Wind Profiling Radars on Simulating Offshore Winds in and above the Wind Turbine Layer

Irina V. Djalalova; Joseph B. Olson; Jacob R. Carley; Laura Bianco; James M. Wilczak; Yelena L. Pichugina; Robert M. Banta; Melinda Marquis; Joel Cline

AbstractDuring the summer of 2004 a network of 11 wind profiling radars (WPRs) was deployed in New England as part of the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS). Observations from this dataset are used to determine their impact on numerical weather prediction (NWP) model skill at simulating coastal and offshore winds through data-denial experiments. This study is a part of the Position of Offshore Wind Energy Resources (POWER) experiment, a Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored project that uses National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) models for two 1-week periods to measure the impact of the assimilation of observations from 11 inland WPRs. Model simulations with and without assimilation of the WPR data are compared at the locations of the inland WPRs, as well as against observations from an additional WPR and a high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) located on board the Research Vessel Ronald H. Brown (RHB), which cruised the Gulf of Maine during the NEAQS experiment. Model evaluation in the ...


Wind Energy Science Discussions | 2017

Large-eddy simulation sensitivities to variations of configuration and forcing parameters in canonical boundary-layer flows for wind energy applications

Jeffrey D. Mirocha; Matthew J. Churchfield; Domingo Muñoz-Esparza; Raj K. Rai; Yan Feng; Branko Kosovic; Sue Ellen Haupt; Barbara G. Brown; Brandon Lee Ennis; Caroline Draxl; Javier Sanz Rodrigo; William J. Shaw; Larry K. Berg; Patrick Moriarty; Rodman R. Linn; V. R. Kotamarthi; Ramesh Balakrishnan; Joel Cline; Michael C. Robinson; Shreyas Ananthan

The sensitivities of idealized large-eddy simulations (LESs) to variations of model configuration and forcing parameters on quantities of interest to wind power applications are examined. Simulated wind speed, turbulent fluxes, spectra and cospectra are assessed in relation to variations in two physical factors, geostrophic wind speed and surface roughness length, and several model configuration choices, including mesh size and grid aspect ratio, turbulence model, and numerical discretization schemes, in three different code bases. Two case studies representing nearly steady neutral and convective atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow conditions over nearly flat and homogeneous terrain were used to force and assess idealized LESs, using periodic lateral boundary conditions. Comparison with fast-response velocity measurements at 10 heights within the lowest 100 m indicates that most model configurations performed similarly overall, with differences between observed and predicted wind speed generally smaller than measurement variability. Simulations of convective conditions produced turbulence quantities and spectra that matched the observations well, while those of neutral simulations produced good predictions of stress, but smaller than observed magnitudes of turbulence kinetic energy, likely due to tower wakes influencing the measurements. While sensitivities to model configuration choices and variability in forcing can be considerable, idealized LESs are shown to reliably reproduce quantities of interest to wind energy applications within the lower ABL during quasi-ideal, nearly steady neutral and convective conditions over nearly flat and homogeneous terrain. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Academy of Wind Energy e.V. 590 J. D. Mirocha et al.: Large-eddy simulation sensitivities to variations of configuration


Optics and Photonics for Energy and the Environment | 2017

Monitoring Wind Flow in Complex Terrain for Improvement of Turbine Rotor-Layer Wind Forecasts

Yelena Pichugina; Alan Brewer; Robert M. Banta; Aditya Choukulkar; Timothy Bonin; Joel Cline; Jaymes S. Kenyon; Melinda Marquis; Joseph Olson

Wind energy encounters challenges due to variability in the wind resource. The paper presents the wind flow variability from Doppler lidar measurements and NWP models forecasts in the complex terrain of Columbia River Gorge.


Monthly Weather Review | 2017

Assessment of NWP Forecast Models in Simulating Offshore Winds through the Lower Boundary Layer by Measurements from a Ship-Based Scanning Doppler Lidar

Yelena L. Pichugina; Robert M. Banta; Joseph B. Olson; Jacob R. Carley; Melinda Marquis; W. Alan Brewer; James M. Wilczak; Irina V. Djalalova; Laura Bianco; Eric P. James; Stanley G. Benjamin; Joel Cline

AbstractEvaluation of model skill in predicting winds over the ocean was performed by comparing retrospective runs of numerical weather prediction (NWP) forecast models to shipborne Doppler lidar measurements in the Gulf of Maine, a potential region for U.S. coastal wind farm development. Deployed on board the NOAA R/V Ronald H. Brown during a 2004 field campaign, the high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) provided accurate motion-compensated wind measurements from the water surface up through several hundred meters of the marine atmospheric boundary layer (MABL). The quality and resolution of the HRDL data allow detailed analysis of wind flow at heights within the rotor layer of modern wind turbines and data on other critical variables to be obtained, such as wind speed and direction shear, turbulence, low-level jet properties, ramp events, and many other wind-energy-relevant aspects of the flow. This study will focus on the quantitative validation of NWP models’ wind forecasts within the lower MABL by com...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017

Evaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore Wind Energy Can Point the Way

Robert M. Banta; Yelena L. Pichugina; W. Alan Brewer; Eric P. James; Joseph B. Olson; Stanley G. Benjamin; Jacob R. Carley; Laura Bianco; Irina V. Djalalova; James M. Wilczak; R. Michael Hardesty; Joel Cline; Melinda Marquis

AbstractTo advance the understanding of meteorological processes in offshore coastal regions, the spatial variability of wind profiles must be characterized and uncertainties (errors) in NWP model wind forecasts quantified. These gaps are especially critical for the new offshore wind energy industry, where wind profile measurements in the marine atmospheric layer spanned by wind turbine rotor blades, generally 50–200 m above mean sea level (MSL), have been largely unavailable. Here, high-quality wind profile measurements were available every 15 min from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL)’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) during a monthlong research cruise in the Gulf of Maine for the 2004 New England Air Quality Study. These measurements were compared with retrospective NWP model wind forecasts over the area using two NOAA forecast-modeling systems [North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) and Rapid Refresh (RAP)]. HRDL profile measu...


European geosciences union general assembly | 2017

IEA Wind Task 36 Forecasting

Gregor Giebel; Joel Cline; Helmut Frank; Will Shaw; Bri-Mathias Hodge; Pierre Pinson; Georges Kariniotakis; Draxl Caroline; Corinna Möhrlen

Collaboration


Dive into the Joel Cline's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James M. Wilczak

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melinda Marquis

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bri-Mathias Hodge

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Irina V. Djalalova

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Bianco

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph B. Olson

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Will Shaw

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre Pinson

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge