Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John E. Krist is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John E. Krist.


Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 2010

Imaging Young Giant Planets From Ground and Space

Charles A. Beichman; John E. Krist; John T. Trauger; Thomas P. Greene; Ben R. Oppenheimer; Anand Sivaramakrishnan; René Doyon; Antony Boccaletti; Travis S. Barman; Marcia J. Rieke

ABSTRACT.High-contrast imaging can find and characterize gas giant planets around nearby young stars and the closest M stars, complementing radial velocity and astrometric searches by exploring orbital separations inaccessible to indirect methods. Ground-based coronagraphs are already probing within 25xa0AU of nearby young stars to find objects as small as ∼3xa0MJup∼3u2009MJup. This paper contrasts near-term and future ground-based capabilities with high-contrast imaging modes of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Monte Carlo modeling reveals that JWST can detect planets with masses as small as 0.2xa0MJup0.2u2009u2009MJup across a broad range of orbital separations. We present new calculations for planet brightness as a function of mass and age for specific JWST filters and extending to 0.1xa0MJup0.1u2009u2009MJup.


Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII | 2017

Wavefront control performance modeling with WFIRST shaped pupil coronagraph testbed

Hanying Zhou; Bijian Nemati; John E. Krist; Eric Cady; Brian Kern; Ilya Y. Poberezhskiy

NASA’s WFIRST mission includes a coronagraph instrument (CGI) for direct imaging of exoplanets. Significant improvement in CGI model fidelity has been made recently, alongside a testbed high contrast demonstration in a simulated dynamic environment at JPL. We present our modeling method and results of comparisons to testbed’s high order wavefront correction performance for the shaped pupil coronagraph. Agreement between model prediction and testbed result at better than a factor of 2 has been consistently achieved in raw contrast (contrast floor, chromaticity, and convergence), and with that comes good agreement in contrast sensitivity to wavefront perturbations and mask lateral shear.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Erratum: “A Resolved Debris Disk around the G2 V Star HD 107146” (ApJ, 617, L147 [2004])

D. R. Ardila; David A. Golimowski; John E. Krist; M. Clampin; J. P. Williams; John P. Blakeslee; Holland C. Ford; George F. Hartig; G. D. Illingworth

Due to a typo in the code used to calculate the optical depth, this quantity is incorrect in the original Letter. The error makes the scale of the optical depth too small by a factor of . This affects Figure 1 (bottom panels) and Figure 3 1600/4p p 127.324 (top panel). The shape of the optical depth and the color of the disk remain the same. The Letter’s conclusions remain the same. The correct figures are included below.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

Fast linearized coronagraph optimizer (FALCO) II: optical model validation and time savings over other methods

Dwight Moody; Erkin Sidick; A. J. Eldorado Riggs; Garreth Ruane; John E. Krist; Carl T. Coker

We have developed the Fast Linearized Coronagraph Optimizer (FALCO), a new software toolbox for high-contrast, coronagraphic wavefront sensing and control. FALCO rapidly calculates the linearized deformable mirror (DM) response matrices, also called control Jacobians, and can be used for the design, simulation, or testbed operation of several types of coronagraphs. In this paper, we demonstrate that the optical propagation used in FALCO is accurate and matches PROPER. In addition, we demonstrate the drastic reduction in runtime when using FALCO for DM Jacobian calculations instead of the conventional method used, for example with a model of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Coronagraph Instrument (CGI). We then compare the relative accuracy between optical models in FALCO and PROPER.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

WFIRST CGI integral field spectrograph performance and post-processing in the OS6 observing scenario

Maxime J. Rizzo; Neil Zimmerman; Tyler D. Groff; Avi M. Mandell; Qian Gong; Prabal Saxena; Michael W. McElwain; Aki Roberge; John E. Krist; A. J. Eldorado Riggs

The WFIRST coronagraph instrument (CGI) will have an integral field spectrograph (IFS) backend to disperse the entire field of view at once and obtain spatially-resolved, low-resolution spectra of the speckles and science scene. The IFS will be key to understanding the spectral nature of the speckles, obtain science spectra of planets and disks, and will be used for broadband wavefront control. In order to characterize, predict, and optimize the performance of the instrument, we present a detailed model of the IFS in the context of the new OS6 observing scenario. The simulation includes spatial, spectral, and temporal variations of the speckle field on the IFS detector plane, which allows us to explore several post-processing methods and assess what gains can be expected. The simulator includes the latest models of the detector behavior when operating in photon-counting mode.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

WFIRST coronagraph: digging dark-holes with partially corrected pupil phase

Erkin Sidick; John E. Krist; Ilya Y. Poberezhskiy

The WFIRST coronagraph employs two sequential deformable mirrors to compensate for phase and amplitude errors in the coronagraph optical system. In such a system the actuators of the deformable mirrors would be used for two purposes: To flatten the overall wavefront errors at a system pupil, and to create dark-holes. The actuators have limited stroke ranges. Therefore, if the pupil phase errors are relatively large, flattening them completely could use up a significant portion of the actuator stroke, sometimes leaving insufficient stroke for creating the dark-holes. We have investigated the impact of partially-corrected pupil phase errors on a Hybrid Lyot Coronagraph (HLC) broadband contrast performance. The predicted broadband contrast floor agrees well with those measured on the HLC testbed.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

Lessons for WFIRST CGI from ground-based high-contrast systems

Michael Bottom; Eric Cady; Faustine Cantalloube; Jozua de Boer; John E. Krist; A. Vigan; Elodie Choquet; Brian Kern; Anne-Marie Lagrange; Christian Marois; J. Milli; Mamadoue N'Diaye; Henry Ngo; Jason Rhodes; Vanessa P. Bailey; Jeffrey K. Chilcote; Robert J. De Rosa; J. H. Girard; Tyler D. Groff; Olivier Guyon; Bruce A. Macintosh; Jared Males; Tiffany Meshkat; Max Millar-Blanchaer; Eric L. Nielsen; Garreth Ruane; Rob van Holstein; Jason J. Wang; Wenhao Xuan

The Coronagraph Instrument (CGI) for NASAs Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will constitute a dramatic step forward for high-contrast imaging, integral field spectroscopy, and polarimetry of exoplanets and circumstellar disks, aiming to improve upon the sensitivity of current ground-based direct imaging facilities by 2-3 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, CGI will serve as a pathfinder for future exo-Earth imaging and characterization missions by demonstrating wavefront control, coronagraphy, and spectral retrieval in a new contrast regime, and by validating instrument and telescope models at unprecedented levels of precision. To achieve this jump in performance, it is critical to draw on the experience of ground-based high-contrast facilities. We discuss several areas of relevant commonalities, including: wavefront control, post-processing of integral field unit data, and calibration and observing strategies.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

WFIRST coronagraph flight performance modeling

Robert T. Effinger; Brian Kern; Milan Mandic; James McGuire; Dwight Moody; Patrick Francis Morrissey; Ilya Y. Poberezhskiy; A. J. Riggs; Navtej Saini; Erkin Sidick; Hong Tang; John T. Trauger; John E. Krist

As it has for the past few years, numerical modeling is being used to predict the on-orbit, high-contrast imaging performance of the WFIRST coronagraph, which was recently defined to be a technology demonstrator with science capabilities. A consequence has been a realignment of modeling priorities and revised applications of modeling uncertainty factors and margins, which apply to multiple factors such as pointing and wavefront jitter, thermally-induced deformations, polarization, and aberration sensitivities. At the same time, the models have increased in fidelity as additional parameters have been added, such as time-dependent pupil shear and mid-spatial-frequency deformations of the primary and secondary mirrors, detector effects, and reaction-wheel-speed-dependent pointing and wavefront jitter.


Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave | 2018

High accuracy coronagraph flight WFC model for WFIRST-CGI raw contrast sensitivity analysis

Hanying Zhou; John E. Krist; Eric Cady; Ilya Y. Poberezhskiy

A high-accuracy high-fidelity flight wavefront control (WFC) model is developed for detailed WFIRST-CGI raw contrast sensitivity analysis. Built upon features of recently testbed validated model, it is further refined to combine a full Fresnel propagation diffraction model for high accuracy contrast truth evaluation, and an economical compact model for WFC purposes. Extensive individual raw contrast error sensitivities are evaluated systematically, both as known imperfections and as unknown calibration errors, for two CGI modes: spectroscopy mode and wide field-of-view mode with shaped pupil coronagraph. More than 90 distinct error items were identified, including system aberrations, optical misalignment, component fabrication errors, telescope interface related errors, etc. The result forms the basis for raw contrast error budget flow down to a sub-system level, where detailed specifications needed to aid in component design and manufacturing, mechanical alignment and instrument integration, and verification and validation operations. Evaluations are automated, making it relatively easy for repeat runs of revised design or at new desired error quantity. Observations from the comprehensive analysis and top error sensitivities and contrast floor contributors are noted and discussed. Error budget flowdown process is also briefly described.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

The Morphology - dDnsity relation in z ~ 1 clusters

Marc Postman; Frank Bartko; R. J. Bouwens; Caryl Gronwall; E. S. Cheng; W. Zheng; Hien D. Tran; L. Bradley; N. Homeier; Garth D. Illingworth; George F. Hartig; Gerhardt R. Meurer; Robert A. Brown; V. Motta; Richard L. White; Simona Mei; N. Benítez; D. R. Ardila; Christopher J. Burrows; Felipe Menanteau; M. Sirianni; Marijn Franx; Michael P. Lesser; K.-V. Tran; Tomotsugu Goto; R. Demarco; Randy A. Kimble; P. D. Feldman; G. K. Miley; John P. Blakeslee

We measure the morphology-density relation (MDR) and morphology-radius relation (MRR) for galaxies in seven z ~ 1 clusters that have been observed with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) on board the Hubble Space Telescope. Simulations and independent comparisons of our visually derived morphologies indicate that ACS allows one to distinguish between E, S0, and spiral morphologies down to z850 = 24, corresponding to L/L* = 0.21 and 0.30 at z = 0.83 and 1.24, respectively. We adopt density and radius estimation methods that match those used at lower redshift in order to study the evolution of the MDR and MRR. We detect a change in the MDR between 0.8 < z < 1.2 and that observed at z ~ 0, consistent with recent work; specifically, the growth in the bulge-dominated galaxy fraction, fE+S0, with increasing density proceeds less rapidly at z ~ 1 than it does at z ~ 0. At z ~ 1 and Σ ≥ 500 galaxies Mpc-2, we find fE+S0 = 0.72 ± 0.10. At z ~ 0, an E+S0 population fraction of this magnitude occurs at densities about 5 times smaller. The evolution in the MDR is confined to densities Σ 40 galaxies Mpc-2 and appears to be primarily due to a deficit of S0 galaxies and an excess of Sp+Irr galaxies relative to the local galaxy population. The fE-density relation exhibits no significant evolution between z = 1 and 0. We find mild evidence to suggest that the MDR is dependent on the bolometric X-ray luminosity of the intracluster medium. Implications for the evolution of the disk galaxy population in dense regions are discussed in the context of these observations.

Collaboration


Dive into the John E. Krist's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Holland C. Ford

Space Telescope Science Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark C. Clampin

Space Telescope Science Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J. Burrows

Space Telescope Science Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. R. Ardila

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge