Josef Jiricny

The multifaceted mismatch-repair system

By removing biosynthetic errors from newly synthesized DNA, mismatch repair (MMR) improves the fidelity of DNA replication by several orders of magnitude. Loss of MMR brings about a mutator phenotype, which causes a predisposition to cancer. But MMR status also affects meiotic and mitotic recombination, DNA-damage signalling, apoptosis and cell-type-specific processes such as class-switch recombination, somatic hypermutation and triplet-repeat expansion. This article reviews our current understanding of this multifaceted DNA-repair system in human cells.

hMutSβ, a heterodimer of hMSH2 and hMSH3, binds to insertion/deletion loops in DNA

In human cells, mismatch recognition is mediated by a heterodimeric complex, hMutSalpha, comprised of two members of the MutS homolog (MSH) family of proteins, hMSH2 and GTBP [1,2]. Correspondingly, tumour-derived cell lines defective in hMSH2 and GTBP have a mutator phenotype [3,4], and extracts prepared from these cells lack mismatch-binding activity [1]. However, although hMSH2 mutant cell lines showed considerable microsatellite instability in tracts of mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats [4,5], only mononucleotide repeats were somewhat unstable in GTBP mutants [4,6]. These findings, together with data showing that extracts of cells lacking GTBP are partially proficient in the repair of two-nucleotide loops [2], suggested that loop repair can be GTBP-independent. We show here that hMSH2 can also heterodimerize with a third human MSH family member, hMSH3, and that this complex, hMutSbeta, binds loops of one to four extrahelical bases. Our data further suggest that hMSH3 and GTBP are redundant in loop repair, and help explain why only mutations in hMSH2, and not in GTBP or hMSH3, segregate with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) [7].

Modification of the human thymine‐DNA glycosylase by ubiquitin‐like proteins facilitates enzymatic turnover

DNA glycosylases initiate base excision repair (BER) through the generation of potentially harmful abasic sites (AP sites) in DNA. Human thymine‐DNA glycosylase (TDG) is a mismatch‐specific uracil/thymine‐DNA glycosylase with an implicated function in the restoration of G·C base pairs at sites of cytosine or 5‐methylcytosine deamination. The rate‐limiting step in the action of TDG in vitro is its dissociation from the product AP site, suggesting the existence of a specific enzyme release mechanism in vivo. We show here that TDG interacts with and is covalently modified by the ubiquitin‐like proteins SUMO‐1 and SUMO‐2/3. SUMO conjugation dramatically reduces the DNA substrate and AP site binding affinity of TDG, and this is associated with a significant increase in enzymatic turnover in reactions with a G·U substrate and the loss of G·T processing activity. Sumoylation also potentiates the stimulatory effect of APE1 on TDG. These observations implicate a function of sumoylation in the controlled dissociation of TDG from the AP site and open up novel perspectives for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms coordinating the early steps of BER.

Transcriptome Profile of Human Colorectal Adenomas

Colorectal cancers are believed to arise predominantly from adenomas. Although these precancerous lesions have been subjected to extensive clinical, pathologic, and molecular analyses, little is currently known about the global gene expression changes accompanying their formation. To characterize the molecular processes underlying the transformation of normal colonic epithelium, we compared the transcriptomes of 32 prospectively collected adenomas with those of normal mucosa from the same individuals. Important differences emerged not only between the expression profiles of normal and adenomatous tissues but also between those of small and large adenomas. A key feature of the transformation process was the remodeling of the Wnt pathway reflected in patent overexpression and underexpression of 78 known components of this signaling cascade. The expression of 19 Wnt targets was closely correlated with clear up-regulation of KIAA1199, whose function is currently unknown. In normal mucosa, KIAA1199 expression was confined to cells in the lower portion of intestinal crypts, where Wnt signaling is physiologically active, but it was markedly increased in all adenomas, where it was expressed in most of the epithelial cells, and in colon cancer cell lines, it was markedly reduced by inactivation of the β-catenin/T-cell factor(s) transcription complex, the pivotal mediator of Wnt signaling. Our transcriptomic profiles of normal colonic mucosa and colorectal adenomas shed new light on the early stages of colorectal tumorigenesis and identified KIAA1199 as a novel target of the Wnt signaling pathway and a putative marker of colorectal adenomatous transformation. (Mol Cancer Res 2007;5(12):1263–75)

Conversion of diploidy to haploidy.

Individuals susceptible to multigene disorders may now be spotted more easily.

Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability

Thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) is a member of the uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) superfamily of DNA repair enzymes. Owing to its ability to excise thymine when mispaired with guanine, it was proposed to act against the mutability of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) deamination in mammalian DNA. However, TDG was also found to interact with transcription factors, histone acetyltransferases and de novo DNA methyltransferases, and it has been associated with DNA demethylation in gene promoters following activation of transcription, altogether implicating an engagement in gene regulation rather than DNA repair. Here we use a mouse genetic approach to determine the biological function of this multifaceted DNA repair enzyme. We find that, unlike other DNA glycosylases, TDG is essential for embryonic development, and that this phenotype is associated with epigenetic aberrations affecting the expression of developmental genes. Fibroblasts derived from Tdg null embryos (mouse embryonic fibroblasts, MEFs) show impaired gene regulation, coincident with imbalanced histone modification and CpG methylation at promoters of affected genes. TDG associates with the promoters of such genes both in fibroblasts and in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), but epigenetic aberrations only appear upon cell lineage commitment. We show that TDG contributes to the maintenance of active and bivalent chromatin throughout cell differentiation, facilitating a proper assembly of chromatin-modifying complexes and initiating base excision repair to counter aberrant de novo methylation. We thus conclude that TDG-dependent DNA repair has evolved to provide epigenetic stability in lineage committed cells.

Crystal structure of a G:T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase: mismatch recognition by complementary-strand interactions.

G:U mismatches resulting from deamination of cytosine are the most common promutagenic lesions occurring in DNA. Uracil is removed in a base-excision repair pathway by uracil DNA-glycosylase (UDG), which excises uracil from both single- and double-stranded DNA. Recently, a biochemically distinct family of DNA repair enzymes has been identified, which excises both uracil and thymine, but only from mispairs with guanine. Crystal structures of the mismatch-specific uracil DNA-glycosylase (MUG) from E. coli, and of a DNA complex, reveal a remarkable structural and functional homology to UDGs despite low sequence identity. Details of the MUG structure explain its thymine DNA-glycosylase activity and the specificity for G:U/T mispairs, which derives from direct recognition of guanine on the complementary strand.

Recent progress in the biology, chemistry and structural biology of DNA glycosylases.

Since the discovery in 1974 of uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), the first member of the family of enzymes involved in base excision repair (BER), considerable progress has been made in the understanding of DNA glycosylases, the polypeptides that remove damaged or mispaired DNA bases from DNA. We also know the enzymes that act downstream of the glycosylases, in the processing of abasic sites, in gap filling and in DNA ligation. This article covers the most recent developments in our understanding of BER, with particular emphasis on the mechanistic aspects of this process, which have been made possible by the elucidation of the crystal structures of several glycosylases in complex with their respective substrates, substrate analogues and products. The biological importance of individual BER pathways is also being appreciated through the inactivation of key BER genes in knockout mouse models. BioEssays 23:270–281, 2001.

Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome

Since the discovery of a link between the malfunction of post‐replicative mismatch correction and hereditary non‐polyposis colon cancer, the study of this complex repair pathway has received a great deal of attention. Our understanding of the mammalian system was facilitated by conservation of the main protagonists of this process from microbes to humans. Thus, biochemical experiments carried out with Escherichia coli extracts helped us to identify functional human homologues of the bacterial mismatch repair proteins, while the genetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae aided our understanding of the phenotypes of human cells deficient in mismatch correction. Today, mismatch repair is no longer thought of solely as the mechanism responsible for the correction of replication errors, whose failure demonstrates itself in the form of a mutator phenotype and microsatellite instability. Malfunction of this process has been implicated also in mitotic and meiotic recombination, drug and ionizing radiation resistance, transcription‐coupled repair and apoptosis. Elucidation of the roles of mismatch repair proteins in these transduction pathways is key to our understanding of the role of mismatch correction in human cancer. However, in order to unravel all the complexities involved in post‐replicative mismatch correction, we need to know the cast and the roles of the individual players. This brief treatise provides an overview of our current knowledge of the biochemistry of this process.

Identification of hMutLbeta, a heterodimer of hMLH1 and hPMS1.

hMLH1 and hPMS2 function in postreplicative mismatch repair in the form of a heterodimer referred to as hMutLα. Tumors or cell lines lacking this factor display mutator phenotypes and microsatellite instability, and mutations in the hMLH1 andhPMS2 genes predispose to hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. A third MutL homologue, hPMS1, has also been reported to be mutated in one cancer-prone kindred, but the protein encoded by this locus has so far remained without function. We now show that hPMS1 is expressed in human cells and that it interacts with hMLH1 with high affinity to form the heterodimer hMutLβ. Recombinant hMutLα and hMutLβ, expressed in the baculovirus system, were tested for their activity in an in vitro mismatch repair assay. While hMutLα could fully complement extracts of mismatch repair-deficient cell lines lacking hMLH1 or hPMS2, hMutLβ failed to do so with any of the different substrates tested in this assay. The involvement of the latter factor in postreplicative mismatch repair thus remains to be demonstrated.