Lea Hirsch
University of California, Berkeley
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lea Hirsch.
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Benjamin J. Fulton; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Lauren M. Weiss; John Asher Johnson; Timothy D. Morton; Evan Sinukoff; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Lea Hirsch
The size of a planet is an observable property directly connected to the physics of its formation and evolution. We used precise radius measurements from the California-Kepler Survey to study the size distribution of 2025 Kepler planets in fine detail. We detect a factor of ≥2 deficit in the occurrence rate distribution at 1.5–2.0 R⊕. This gap splits the population of close-in (P < 100 days) small planets into two size regimes: R_p < 1.5 R⊕ and R_p = 2.0-3.0 R⊕, with few planets in between. Planets in these two regimes have nearly the same intrinsic frequency based on occurrence measurements that account for planet detection efficiencies. The paucity of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 R⊕ supports the emerging picture that close-in planets smaller than Neptune are composed of rocky cores measuring 1.5 R⊕ or smaller with varying amounts of low-density gas that determine their total sizes.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2016
Ian J. M. Crossfield; David R. Ciardi; Erik A. Petigura; Evan Sinukoff; Joshua E. Schlieder; Andrew W. Howard; Charles A. Beichman; Howard Isaacson; Courtney D. Dressing; Jessie L. Christiansen; Benjamin J. Fulton; Sebastien Lepine; Lauren M. Weiss; Lea Hirsch; J. Livingston; Christoph Baranec; Nicholas M. Law; Reed Riddle; Carl Ziegler; Steve B. Howell; Elliott P. Horch; Mark E. Everett; Johanna K. Teske; Arturo O. Martinez; Christian Obermeier; Björn Benneke; N. Scott; Niall R. Deacon; Kimberly M. Aller; Brad M. S. Hansen
NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program; NASA through a Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute; NASA [NAS 5-26555, NNH14CK55B]; National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [2014184874]; FONDECYT [1130857]; BASAL CATA [PFB-06]; Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourisms Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio [IC 120009]; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation [AST-0906060, AST-0960343, AST-1207891]; Mt. Cuba Astronomical Foundation; Max Planck Institute for Astronomy; Heidelberg; Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching; Johns Hopkins University; Durham University; University of Edinburgh; Queens University Belfast; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated; National Central University of Taiwan; Space Telescope Science Institute; National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]; University of Maryland; Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE)
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Geoffrey W. Marcy; John Asher Johnson; Howard Isaacson; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Benjamin J. Fulton; Lauren M. Weiss; Timothy D. Morton; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch; Ian J. M. Crossfield
The California-Kepler Survey (CKS) is an observational program to improve our knowledge of the properties of stars found to host transiting planets by NASAs Kepler Mission. The improvement stems from new high-resolution optical spectra obtained using HIRES at the W. M. Keck Observatory. The CKS stellar sample comprises 1305 stars classified as Kepler Objects of Interest, hosting a total of 2075 transiting planets. The primary sample is magnitude-limited (Kp < 14.2) and contains 960 stars with 1385 planets. The sample was extended to include some fainter stars that host multiple planets, ultra short period planets, or habitable zone planets. The spectroscopic parameters were determined with two different codes, one based on template matching and the other on direct spectral synthesis using radiative transfer. We demonstrate a precision of 60 K in effective temperature, 0.10 dex in surface gravity, 0.04 dex in [Fe/H], and 1.0 km/s in projected rotational velocity. In this paper we describe the CKS project and present a uniform catalog of spectroscopic parameters. Subsequent papers in this series present catalogs of derived stellar properties such as mass, radius and age; revised planet properties; and statistical explorations of the ensemble. CKS is the largest survey to determine the properties of Kepler stars using a uniform set of high-resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio spectra. The HIRES spectra are available to the community for independent analyses.
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
John Asher Johnson; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile; Timothy D. Morton; Lauren M. Weiss; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch
We present stellar and planetary properties for 1305 Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) hosting 2025 planet candidates observed as part of the California-Kepler Survey. We combine spectroscopic constraints, presented in Paper I, with stellar interior modeling to estimate stellar masses, radii, and ages. Stellar radii are typically constrained to 11%, compared to 40% when only photometric constraints are used. Stellar masses are constrained to 4%, and ages are constrained to 30%. We verify the integrity of the stellar parameters through comparisons with asteroseismic studies and Gaia parallaxes. We also recompute planetary radii for 2025 planet candidates. Because knowledge of planetary radii is often limited by uncertainties in stellar size, we improve the uncertainties in planet radii from typically 42% to 12%. We also leverage improved knowledge of stellar effective temperature to recompute incident stellar fluxes for the planets, now precise to 21%, compared to a factor of two when derived from photometry.
The Astronomical Journal | 2018
Lauren M. Weiss; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Andrew W. Howard; Joshua N. Winn; Howard Isaacson; Timothy D. Morton; Lea Hirsch; Evan Sinukoff; Andrew Cumming; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile
We have established precise planet radii, semimajor axes, incident stellar fluxes, and stellar masses for 909 planets in 355 multi-planet systems discovered by Kepler. In this sample, we find that planets within a single multi-planet system have correlated sizes: each planet is more likely to be the size of its neighbor than a size drawn at random from the distribution of observed planet sizes. In systems with three or more planets, the planets tend to have a regular spacing: the orbital period ratios of adjacent pairs of planets are correlated. Furthermore, the orbital period ratios are smaller in systems with smaller planets, suggesting that the patterns in planet sizes and spacing are linked through formation and/or subsequent orbital dynamics. Yet, we find that essentially no planets have orbital period ratios smaller than
The Astronomical Journal | 2016
Christian Obermeier; Thomas Henning; Joshua E. Schlieder; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Evan Sinukoff; Howard Isaacson; David R. Ciardi; Trevor J. David; Lynne A. Hillenbrand; Charles A. Beichman; Steve B. Howell; Elliott P. Horch; Mark E. Everett; Lea Hirsch; Johanna K. Teske; Jessie L. Christiansen; Sebastien Lepine; Kimberly M. Aller; Michael C. Liu; R. P. Saglia; J. Livingston; Matthias Kluge
1.2
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Jessie L. Christiansen; Andrew Vanderburg; Jennifer Burt; Benjamin J. Fulton; Konstantin Batygin; Björn Benneke; John M. Brewer; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Andrew Collier Cameron; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Courtney D. Dressing; Thomas P. Greene; Andrew W. Howard; David W. Latham; Emilio Molinari; A. Mortier; Fergal Mullally; F. Pepe; Ken Rice; Evan Sinukoff; A. Sozzetti; Susan E. Thompson; S. Udry; Steven S. Vogt; Travis Barman; Natasha E. Batalha; F. Bouchy; Lars A. Buchhave
, regardless of planet size. Using empirical mass-radius relationships, we estimate the mutual Hill separations of planet pairs. We find that
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Fei Dai; Joshua N. Winn; Davide Gandolfi; Sharon X. Wang; Johanna K. Teske; Jennifer Burt; S. Albrecht; O. Barragán; William D. Cochran; Michael Endl; Malcolm Fridlund; A. Hatzes; Teruyuki Hirano; Lea Hirsch; Marshall C. Johnson; A. B. Justesen; J. Livingston; Carina M. Persson; J. Prieto-Arranz; Andrew Vanderburg; R. Alonso; G. Antoniciello; Pamela Arriagada; R. P. Butler; J. Cabrera; Jeffrey D. Crane; F. Cusano; Szilard Csizmadia; H. J. Deeg; Sergio B. Dieterich
93\%
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
G. Zhou; G. Á. Bakos; J. D. Hartman; David W. Latham; Guillermo Torres; W. Bhatti; K. Penev; Lars A. Buchhave; G. Kovács; Allyson Bieryla; Samuel N. Quinn; Howard Isaacson; Benjamin J. Fulton; Emilio E. Falco; Z. Csubry; Mark E. Everett; T. Szklenár; Gilbert A. Esquerdo; Perry L. Berlind; M. Calkins; B. Béky; R. P. Knox; P. Hinz; Elliott P. Horch; Lea Hirsch; Steve B. Howell; Robert W. Noyes; G. W. Marcy; M. de Val-Borro; J. Lázár
of the planet pairs are at least 10 mutual Hill radii apart, and that a spacing of
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Ian J. M. Crossfield; David R. Ciardi; Howard Isaacson; Andrew W. Howard; Erik A. Petigura; Lauren M. Weiss; Benjamin J. Fulton; Evan Sinukoff; Joshua E. Schlieder; Dimitri Mawet; Garreth Ruane; Imke de Pater; Katherine de Kleer; Ashley Gerard Davies; Jessie L. Christiansen; Courtney D. Dressing; Lea Hirsch; Björn Benneke; Justin R. Crepp; Molly R. Kosiarek; J. Livingston; Erica J. Gonzales; Charles A. Beichman; Heather A. Knutson
\sim20