Lillian A. Orciari

Epidemiology of Human Rabies in the United States, 1980 to 1996

One of the oldest recognized zoonotic diseases, rabies continues to plague humankind and causes more than 35 000 deaths annually [1]. These potentially preventable deaths occur primarily in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where animal control, vaccination programs, and effective human postexposure prophylaxis are not widely available. In contrast, in the United States, deaths in humans caused by rabies totaled 99 in the 1950s, 15 in the 1960s, 23 in the 1970s, 10 in the 1980s, and 22 from 1990 through 1996 [2, 3]. The epidemiology of human rabies is ultimately linked to cycles of rabies virus transmission in animals. With the interruption of dog-to-dog transmission in most regions, the incidence of human rabies in the United States has reached a level that cannot be further reduced without targeting wildlife. An understanding of epidemiologic patterns of rabies virus maintenance in natural populations has emerged in the past 20 years, largely because of advances in immunology and molecular biology. Monoclonal antibody and genetic sequence analyses of rabies virus variants permit detailed descriptions of enzootic maintenance cycles of specific virus variants in the United States [4, 5]. These analyses have led to an understanding of how variants of rabies virus are maintained in natural reservoirs within geographic regions and have provided information on variability of the virus itself. Current epidemiologic patterns of rabies in the United States can be summarized as follows: The annual reports of rabies in wildlife exceed those of rabies in domestic animals [6]; rabies variants in bats are associated with a disproportionate number of infections in humans, although bats constitute only about 10% of all reported rabies cases in animals annually; most other cases of human rabies diagnosed in the United States can be attributed to infections acquired in areas of enzootic canine rabies outside of the United States; most persons with a case of rabies that originated in the United States have no history of an animal bite; and rabies is diagnosed after death in more than one third of the latter group. The last published summary of cases of human rabies in the United States covered the period from 1960 to 1979 [3]. This review discusses the clinical and epidemiologic features of cases of human rabies in the United States from 1980 to 1996. Methods Case Definition This report includes all laboratory-confirmed cases of human rabies in the United States or its territories from 1980 to 1996 [7-31]. All of the cases were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by health authorities as part of ongoing national surveillance. Variable Definitions Onset of illness was defined as either the first day of reported symptoms attributable to rabies or the date of initial presentation for medical care before confirmation of rabies. Clinical signs attributable to rabies included paresthesia, anxiety, agitation, confusion, disorientation, hydrophobia, aerophobia, hypersalivation, dysphagia, paresis, paralysis, and fluctuating levels of consciousness [32, 33]. The type of transmitting animal and the geographic location of exposure were listed if the case history included a definite animal bite. The reliability of information that linked rabies exposure to a human was assessed by subsequent laboratory typing of the rabies virus variant. All other exposures were defined as unknown. The diagnosis of rabies was considered antemortem if it was tentatively made and samples were obtained specifically for rabies testing before the patients death. Laboratory Tests The diagnosis of rabies was confirmed by using standard tests [34] conducted at the CDC or at a state laboratory. Serology Two tests were used to detect rabies antibody: the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test and the indirect immunofluorescence assay. The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test measures neutralizing antibody. An antibody titer of 1:5 or more, as defined by the reciprocal of the serum or cerebrospinal fluid dilution that reduces the challenge virus by 50%, was considered positive. An indirect immunofluorescence assay, using patient serum or cerebrospinal fluid diluted 1:4 or more, detects serum reactive with rabies antigen in infected cell cultures. The presence of antibody in serum was considered diagnostic if no vaccine or antirabies serum was given to the patient. Antibody in the cerebrospinal fluid, regardless of the rabies immunization history, was considered indicative of rabies virus infection. Virus Isolation Suspensions of brain or saliva specimens were added to mouse neuroblastoma cells and cultured for 24 and 48 hours. Culture slides were fixed and examined by direct immunofluorescence assay for antigen. Samples that were initially negative were maintained for an additional 3 to 4 days and retested. The negative result was considered definitive if it occurred both times. Antigen Detection Antigen detection was performed by direct immunofluorescence of assay serial frozen sections of nuchal skin biopsy specimens, touch impressions of corneal epithelial cells, or fresh brain matter. Paraffin-embedded fixed brain matter was sectioned and enzyme-digested before direct immunofluorescence. RNA Detection Standard extraction procedures and reagents were used to obtain nucleic acids from samples of undiluted saliva; from fresh or paraffin-embedded fixed samples of the brain; or, occasionally, from other tissues. Reverse transcription of RNA and complementary DNA amplification were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers derived from the sequence of the N protein gene. The nucleotide sequence of all PCR products was obtained by standard dideoxynucleotide sequencing methods. Rabies virus variants were identified by comparing samples of rabies virus obtained from all known reservoirs for rabies in the United States [5] with samples of rabies virus obtained from dogs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America [35]. Statistical Analysis Data analyses were performed by using EPI INFO 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia) or SPSS 6.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) [36, 37]. Specific tests are identified in the text. Some variables were dichotomized before statistical comparisons for determination of odds ratios and 95% CIs. All reported P values are for two-tailed tests of significance. Results Demographic Information Thirty-two persons died of rabies in the United States from 1980 through 1996. Patients ranged in age from 4 to 82 years (median, 27 years) and 20 (63%) were male (Table 1). Cases were reported from 20 states; 7 cases (22%) were reported in California and 6 in Texas. Eleven patients were exposed to rabies in eight foreign countries on the basis of variant typing. The onset of illness occurred in all months and had no apparent seasonal pattern. Dates of exposure, based on the history of an animal bite, were obtained for 7 patients (22%) (Table 1). Table 1. Human Rabies in the United States, 1980-1996 Exposure History A definite history of animal exposure was identified in 7 of the 32 patients (22%), and 25 remained unknown or indefinite (Table 1). Of the 7 cases of definite exposure, 6 resulted from a dog bite received in a foreign country and 1 was from a bat bite received in the United States. Although rabies was not diagnosed in any of the animals that inflicted bites, in each case the rabies virus variant identified in the human sample was consistent with that in the animal species implicated as the source of infection (Table 1). Contact with an animal, thereby suggesting the source for infection, was identified in 12 persons (8 with a bat, 2 with a dog, 1 with a cow, and 1 with a cat). This human-animal contact, however, could not be linked to a bite or mucous membrane contact with the saliva of an animal potentially infected with rabies virus. The remaining 13 patients did not report animal contact; thus, a potential source of exposure was not identified. Histories were obtained before death from friends or relatives in 9 cases and from 4 children aged 11 to 13 years. Prophylaxis None of the 32 patients received a complete series of rabies prophylaxis after exposure; patient 7 reported receiving a single injection of an unknown type after a dog bite in Guatemala, and patients 15, 29, and 30 received human rabies immune globulin during the course of their clinical illness. Clinical Presentation For the 7 patients in which a definite animal bite occurred, the median incubation period was 85 days (range, 53 to 150 days). The first signs and symptoms of rabies were often nonspecific, including fever, sore throat, chills, malaise, anorexia, headache, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, cough, and weakness. Specific symptoms, such as paresthesias at or near the presumed exposure site, were also reported early in the clinical course, and 19 of the 32 patients (59%) had three or more clinical findings suggestive of rabies during the course of their illness (Table 2). The 32 patients were seen by physicians on an outpatient basis a median of one time (range, 0 to 5 times) before hospitalization, and the median length of time from the onset of illness attributable to rabies to hospitalization was 4 days (range, 1 to 10 days). Table 2. Clinical Findings Suggestive of Rabies in 32 Patients* On admission, 21 of the 32 patients (66%) were febrile (oral temperature > 37.8C), including 12 patients with temperatures greater than 39.5C. Of the 11 patients who were afebrile on admission, 5 reported being febrile before admission, 2 became febrile within 2 days of admission, and 4 had no additional temperatures recorded. The antemortem diagnosis of rabies was first considered at the time of hospitalization in 5 patients, within 1 day of hospitalization in 5 patients, and after a median of 6 days of hospitalization (range, 2 to 12 days) in 10 patients. In 12 patients, rabies was diagnosed after death. Th

Bat lyssaviruses (Aravan and Khujand) from Central Asia: Phylogenetic relationships according to N, P and G gene sequences

Bat lyssaviruses Aravan and Khujand were isolated in southern Kyrgyzstan in 1991 and in northern Tajikistan in 2001, respectively. Preliminary studies with anti-nucleocapsid monoclonal antibodies suggested that the viruses were distinct from other lyssavirus serotypes. These data were supported by sequencing of the N gene of Aravan virus. In the present study, we sequenced the entire N, P and G genes of both Aravan and Khujand viruses and compared them with respective sequences of other lyssaviruses available from GenBank. The results suggested that each virus should be considered as a newly recognized genotype according to the current approaches for genotype definition (amount of nucleotide identity of the N gene and bootstrap support of joining to certain phylogenetic groups). Use of different phylogenetic methods and comparison of different parts of the genomes generally suggested that Khujand virus was mainly related to genotype 6, while Aravan virus, on the one hand, was related to Khujand virus, and, on the other hand, demonstrated moderate similarity to genotypes 4, 5 and 6. The potential significance of these new lyssaviruses for veterinary and public health should not be underestimated.

Molecular epidemiology of rabies in the United States

Abstract Changes in demographics, land use, recreation and hunting practices in the last 50 years dramatically increased the public health importance of reservoirs for rabies in wild species in the United States. This article focuses on attributes of host natural history to interpret the molecular phylogenies of the rabies variant transmitted within a particular animal population and the threat to human health presented by this reservoir.

MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TERRESTRIAL RABIES IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION

Fifty-five rabies virus isolates originating from different regions of the former Soviet Union (FSU) were compared with isolates originating from Eurasia, Africa, and North America according to complete or partial nucleoprotein (N) gene sequences. The FSU isolates formed five distinct groups. Group A represented viruses originating from the Arctic, which were similar to viruses from Alaska and Canada. Group B consisted of “Arctic-like” viruses, originating from the south of East Siberia and the Far East. Group C consisted of viruses circulating in the steppe and forest-steppe territories from the European part of Russia to Tuva and in Kazakhstan. These three phylogenetic groups were clearly different from the European cluster. Viruses of group D circulate near the western border of Russia. Their phylogenetic position is intermediate between group C and the European cluster. Group E consisted of viruses originating from the northwestern part of Russia and comprised a “northeastern Europe” group described earlier from the Baltic region. According to surveillance data, a specific host can be defined clearly only for group A (arctic fox; Alopex lagopus) and for the Far Eastern part of the group B distribution area (raccoon dog; Nyctereutes procyonoides). For other territories and rabies virus variants, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the main virus reservoir. However, the steppe fox (Vulpes corsac), wolf (Canis lupus), and raccoon dog are also involved in virus circulation, depending on host population density. These molecular data, joined with surveillance information, demonstrate that the current fox rabies epizootic in the territory of the FSU developed independently of central and western Europe. No evidence of positive selection was found in the N genes of the isolates. In the glycoprotein gene, evidence of positive selection was strongly suggested in codons 156, 160, and 183. At these sites, no link between amino acid substitutions and phylogenetic placement or specific host species was detected.

Enzootic rabies elimination from dogs and reemergence in wild terrestrial carnivores, United States.

Independent enzootics in wild terrestrial carnivores resulted from spillover events from long-term enzootics associated with dogs.

Rapid clearance of SAG-2 rabies virus from dogs after oral vaccination.

This study investigated the safety, efficacy, and clearance of SAG-2, an attentuated rabies virus, after oral vaccination in dogs. Nineteen dogs consumed baits containing lyophilized vaccine, but residual SAG-2 virus was recovered in only one of 57 oral swabs, collected one hour post-vaccination. Seven vaccinates were euthanized between 24 and 96 h after consuming a bait. Rabies virus RNA was detected in tonsils from all seven dogs by nested RT-PCR, with primers to the viral glycoprotein. Genomic, sense-transcripts, and m-RNAs were detected in five of seven tonsil samples using primers to the rabies virus nucleoprotein gene, as well as in four of seven samples from the buccal mucosa and one of seven from the tongue. Rabies virus antigen was detected in all tonsils by an immunohistochemistry test, confirming the RT-PCR results. In addition, virus was isolated from one tonsil sample collected at 96 h, providing supportive evidence of viral replication. Ten of 12 (83%) of the vaccinated dogs demonstrated an anamnestic response, with viral neutralizing antibody titers (> or =0.5 IU/ml), after rabies virus challenge. These ten dogs survived, whereas all control dogs succumbed to rabies. Attenuated rabies viruses, such as SAG-2, replicate in local tissues of the oral cavity and can be cleared relatively quickly, without viral excretion, leading to protective immunity against the disease.

Molecular Inferences Suggest Multiple Host Shifts of Rabies Viruses from Bats to Mesocarnivores in Arizona during 2001–2009

In nature, rabies virus (RABV; genus Lyssavirus, family Rhabdoviridae) represents an assemblage of phylogenetic lineages, associated with specific mammalian host species. Although it is generally accepted that RABV evolved originally in bats and further shifted to carnivores, mechanisms of such host shifts are poorly understood, and examples are rarely present in surveillance data. Outbreaks in carnivores caused by a RABV variant, associated with big brown bats, occurred repeatedly during 2001–2009 in the Flagstaff area of Arizona. After each outbreak, extensive control campaigns were undertaken, with no reports of further rabies cases in carnivores for the next several years. However, questions remained whether all outbreaks were caused by a single introduction and further perpetuation of bat RABV in carnivore populations, or each outbreak was caused by an independent introduction of a bat virus. Another question of concern was related to adaptive changes in the RABV genome associated with host shifts. To address these questions, we sequenced and analyzed 66 complete and 20 nearly complete RABV genomes, including those from the Flagstaff area and other similar outbreaks in carnivores, caused by bat RABVs, and representatives of the major RABV lineages circulating in North America and worldwide. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that each Flagstaff outbreak was caused by an independent introduction of bat RABV into populations of carnivores. Positive selection analysis confirmed the absence of post-shift changes in RABV genes. In contrast, convergent evolution analysis demonstrated several amino acids in the N, P, G and L proteins, which might be significant for pre-adaptation of bat viruses to cause effective infection in carnivores. The substitution S/T242 in the viral glycoprotein is of particular merit, as a similar substitution was suggested for pathogenicity of Nishigahara RABV strain. Roles of the amino acid changes, detected in our study, require additional investigations, using reverse genetics and other approaches.

Molecular Diversity of Rabies Viruses Associated with Bats in Mexico and Other Countries of the Americas

ABSTRACT Bat rabies and its transmission to humans and other species in Mexico were investigated. Eighty-nine samples obtained from rabid livestock, cats, dogs, and humans in Mexico were studied by antigenic typing and partial sequence analysis. Samples were further compared with enzootic rabies associated with different species of bats in the Americas. Patterns of nucleotide variation allowed the definition of at least 20 monophyletic clusters associated with 9 or more different bat species. Several lineages associated with distinctive antigenic patterns were found in rabies viruses related to rabies in vampire bats in Mexico. Vampire bat rabies virus lineages associated with antigenic variant 3 are widely spread from Mexico to South America, suggesting these lineages as the most likely ancestors of vampire bat rabies and the ones that have been moved by vampire bat populations throughout the Americas. Rabies viruses related to Lasiurus cinereus, Histiotus montanus, and some other not yet identified species of the genus Lasiurus were found circulating in Mexico. Long-range dissemination patterns of rabies are not necessarily associated with migratory bat species, as in the case of rabies in Desmodus rotundus and Histiotus montanus. Human rabies was associated with vampire bat transmission in most cases, and in one case, rabies transmission from free-tailed bats was inferred. The occurrence of rabies spillover from bats to domestic animals was also demonstrated. Genetic typing of rabies viruses allowed us to distinguish trends of disease dissemination and to address, in a preliminary fashion, aspects of the complex evolution of rabies viruses in different host-reservoir species.

Emerging Pattern of Rabies Deaths and Increased Viral Infectivity

Most human rabies deaths in the United States can be attributed to unrecognized exposures to rabies viruses associated with bats, particularly those associated with two infrequently encountered bat species (Lasionycteris noctivagans and Pipistrellus subflavus). These human rabies cases tend to cluster in the southeastern and northwestern United States. In these regions, most rabies deaths associated with bats in nonhuman terrestrial mammals are also associated with virus variants specific to these two bat species rather than more common bat species; outside of these regions, more common bat rabies viruses contribute to most transmissions. The preponderance of rabies deaths connected with the two uncommon L. noctivagans and P. subflavus bat rabies viruses is best explained by their evolution of increased viral infectivity.

Raccoon Rabies Virus Variant Transmission Through Solid Organ Transplantation

IMPORTANCE The rabies virus causes a fatal encephalitis and can be transmitted through tissue or organ transplantation. In February 2013, a kidney recipient with no reported exposures to potentially rabid animals died from rabies 18 months after transplantation. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether organ transplantation was the source of rabies virus exposure in the kidney recipient, and to evaluate for and prevent rabies in other transplant recipients from the same donor. DESIGN Organ donor and all transplant recipient medical records were reviewed. Laboratory tests to detect rabies virus-specific binding antibodies, rabies virus neutralizing antibodies, and rabies virus antigens were conducted on available specimens, including serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissues from the donor and the recipients. Viral ribonucleic acid was extracted from tissues and amplified for nucleoprotein gene sequencing for phylogenetic comparisons. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Determination of whether the donor died from undiagnosed rabies and whether other organ recipients developed rabies. RESULTS In retrospect, the donors clinical presentation (which began with vomiting and upper extremity paresthesias and progressed to fever, seizures, dysphagia, autonomic dysfunction, and brain death) was consistent with rabies. Rabies virus antigen was detected in archived autopsy brain tissue collected from the donor. The rabies viruses infecting the donor and the deceased kidney recipient were consistent with the raccoon rabies virus variant and were more than 99.9% identical across the entire N gene (1349/1350 nucleotides), thus confirming organ transplantation as the route of transmission. The 3 other organ recipients remained asymptomatic, with rabies virus neutralizing antibodies detected in their serum after completion of postexposure prophylaxis (range, 0.3-40.8 IU/mL). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Unlike the 2 previous clusters of rabies virus transmission through solid organ transplantation, there was a long incubation period in the recipient who developed rabies, and survival of 3 other recipients without pretransplant rabies vaccination. Rabies should be considered in patients with acute progressive encephalitis of unexplained etiology, especially for potential organ donors. A standard evaluation of potential donors who meet screening criteria for infectious encephalitis should be considered, and risks and benefits for recipients of organs from these donors should be evaluated.