Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marcel L. Dijkshoorn is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marcel L. Dijkshoorn.


Radiology | 2015

Fractional Flow Reserve Computed from Noninvasive CT Angiography Data: Diagnostic Performance of an On-Site Clinician-operated Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm

Adriaan Coenen; Marisa M. Lubbers; Akira Kurata; Atsushi Kono; Admir Dedic; Raluca G. Chelu; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Frank J. Gijsen; Mohamed Ouhlous; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Koen Nieman

PURPOSE To validate an on-site algorithm for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography data against invasively measured FFR and to test its diagnostic performance as compared with that of coronary CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board provided a waiver for this retrospective study. From coronary CT angiography data in 106 patients, FFR was computed at a local workstation by using a computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Invasive FFR measurement was performed in 189 vessels (80 of which had an FFR ≤ 0.80); these measurements were regarded as the reference standard. The diagnostic characteristics of coronary CT angiography-derived computational FFR, coronary CT angiography, and quantitative coronary angiography were evaluated against those of invasively measured FFR by using C statistics. Sensitivity and specificity were compared by using a two-sided McNemar test. RESULTS For computational FFR, sensitivity was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.2%, 93.8%), specificity was 65.1% (95% CI: 55.4%, 74.0%), and accuracy was 74.6% (95% CI: 68.4%, 80.8%), as compared with the finding of lumen stenosis of 50% or greater at coronary CT angiography, for which sensitivity was 81.3% (95% CI: 71.0%, 89.1%), specificity was 37.6% (95% CI: 28.5%, 47.4%), and accuracy was 56.1% (95% CI: 49.0%, 63.2%). C statistics revealed a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for computational FFR (AUC, 0.83) than for coronary CT angiography (AUC, 0.64). For vessels with intermediate (25%-69%) stenosis, the sensitivity of computational FFR was 87.3% (95% CI: 76.5%, 94.3%) and the specificity was 59.3% (95% CI: 47.8%, 70.1%). CONCLUSION With use of a reduced-order algorithm, computation of the FFR from coronary CT angiography data can be performed locally, at a regular workstation. The diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography-derived computational FFR for the detection of functionally important coronary artery disease (CAD) was good and was incremental to that of coronary CT angiography within a population with a high prevalence of CAD.


Radiology | 2009

Impact of Heart Rate Frequency and Variability on Radiation Exposure, Image Quality, and Diagnostic Performance in Dual-Source Spiral CT Coronary Angiography

Annick C. Weustink; Lisanne A. Neefjes; Stamatis Kyrzopoulos; Marcel van Straten; Rick Neoh Eu; Willem B. Meijboom; Carlos Van Mieghem; Ermanno Capuano; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Filippo Cademartiri; Eric Boersma; Pim J. de Feyter; Gabriel P. Krestin; Nico R. Mollet

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of heart rate frequency (HRF) and heart rate variability (HRV) on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance to help detect significant stenosis (> or =50% lumen diameter reduction) by using adaptive electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing at dual-source (DS) spiral computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. No prescan beta-blockers were applied. Unenhanced CT and CT coronary angiography with adaptive ECG pulsing were performed in 927 consecutive patients (600 men, 327 women; mean age, 60.3 years +/- 11.0 [standard deviation]) divided in three HRF groups: low, intermediate, and high (< or =65, 66-79, and > or =80 beats/min, respectively), and four HRV groups given mean interbeat difference (IBD) during CT coronary angiography: normal, minor, moderate, and severe (IBDs of 0-1, 2-3, 4-10, and >10, respectively). Radiation exposure and image quality were also evaluated. In 444 of these, diagnostic performance was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals by using quantitative coronary angiography as the reference standard. RESULTS CT coronary angiography yielded good image quality in 98% of patients and no significant differences in image quality were found among HRF and HRV groups. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients with low versus high HRF and in patients with severe versus normal HRV. No significant differences among HRF and HRV groups in image quality and diagnostic performance were found. A nonsignificant trend was found toward a lower specificity and PPV in patients with a high HRF or severe HRV when compared with low HRF or normal HRV in patients with a low calcium score (Agatston score <100). CONCLUSION DS spiral CT coronary angiography performed with adaptive ECG pulsing results in preserved diagnostic image quality and performance independent of HRF or HRV at the cost of limited dose reduction in arrhythmic patients.


Radiology | 2008

Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single-center experience.

Francesca Pugliese; Nico R. Mollet; M. G. Myriam Hunink; Filippo Cademartiri; Koen Nieman; Ron T. van Domburg; Willem B. Meijboom; Carlos Van Mieghem; Annick C. Weustink; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Pim J. de Feyter; Gabriel P. Krestin

PURPOSE To retrospectively compare sensitivity and specificity of four generations of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) scanners for diagnosing significant (>or=50%) coronary artery stenosis, with quantitative conventional coronary angiography as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this study. All patients consented to undergo CT studies prior to conventional coronary angiography, after they were informed of the additional radiation dose, and to the use of their data for future retrospective research. Two hundred four patients (157 men, 47 women; mean age, 58 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]), classified in four groups of 51 patients each, underwent coronary CT angiography with four-section, first- and second-generation 16-section, and 64-section CT scanners. Patients in sinus rhythm scheduled for conventional coronary angiography (stable angina, atypical chest pain) were included. Patients with bypass grafts and stents were excluded. Two readers unaware of results of conventional coronary angiography evaluated CT scans. Coronary artery segments of 2 mm or larger in diameter were included for comparative evaluation with quantitative coronary angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of significant stenoses (>or=50% luminal diameter reduction) were calculated. RESULTS Image quality was rated poor for the following percentages of coronary artery segments: 33.1% at four-section CT, 14.4% at first-generation 16-section CT, 6.3% at second-generation 16-section CT, and 2.6% at 64-section CT. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, respectively, were as follows: 57%, 91%, 60%, and 90% at four-section CT; 90%, 93%, 65%, and 99% at first-generation 16-section CT; 97%, 98%, 87%, and 100% at second-generation 16-section CT; and 99%, 96%, 80%, and 100% at 64-section CT. Diagnostic performance of four-section CT was significantly poorer than that of second-generation 16-section CT (odds ratio = 4.57) and 64-section CT (odds ratio = 2.89). CONCLUSION Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography varies among scanners of different generations. Earlier-generation scanners (four sections) had significantly poorer performance; performance of 16- compared with 64-section CT scanners showed progressive, although not significant, improvement.


Radiology | 2011

Image Quality and Radiation Exposure Using Different Low-Dose Scan Protocols in Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Randomized Study

Lisan A. Neefjes; Anoeshka S. Dharampal; Alexia Rossi; Koen Nieman; Annick C. Weustink; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Gert-Jan R. ten Kate; Admir Dedic; Stella L. Papadopoulou; Marcel van Straten; Filippo Cademartiri; Gabriel P. Krestin; Pim J. de Feyter; Nico R. Mollet

PURPOSE To compare image quality, radiation dose, and their relationship with heart rate of computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiographic scan protocols by using a 128-section dual-source CT scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approved the study; all patients gave informed consent. Two hundred seventy-two patients (175 men, 97 women; mean ages, 58 and 59 years, respectively) referred for CT coronary angiography were categorized according to heart rate: less than 65 beats per minute (group A) and 65 beats per minute or greater (group B). Patients were randomized to undergo prospective high-pitch spiral scanning and narrow-window prospective sequential scanning in group A (n = 160) or wide-window prospective sequential scanning and retrospective spiral scanning in group B (n = 112). Image quality was graded (1 = nondiagnostic; 2 = artifacts present, diagnostic; 3 = no artifacts) and compared (Mann-Whitney and Student t tests). RESULTS In group A, mean image quality grade was significantly lower with high-pitch spiral versus sequential scanning (2.67 ± 0.38 [standard deviation] vs 2.86 ± 0.21; P < .001). In a subpopulation (heart rate, <55 beats per minute), mean image quality grade was similar (2.81 ± 0.30 vs 2.94 ± 0.08; P = .35). In group B, image quality grade was comparable between sequential and retrospective spiral scanning (2.81 ± 0.28 vs 2.80 ± 0.38; P = .54). Mean estimated radiation dose was significantly lower (high-pitch spiral vs sequential scanning) in group A (for 100 kV, 0.81 mSv ± 0.30 vs 2.74 mSv ± 1.14 [P < .001]; for 120 kV, 1.65 mSv ± 0.69 vs 4.21 mSv ± 1.20 [P < .001]) and in group B (sequential vs retrospective spiral scanning) (for 100 kV, 4.07 mSv ± 1.07 vs 5.54 mSv ± 1.76 [P = .02]; for 120 kV, 7.50 mSv ± 1.79 vs 9.83 mSv ± 3.49 [P = .1]). CONCLUSION A high-pitch spiral CT coronary angiographic protocol should be applied in patients with regular and low (<55 beats per minute) heart rates; a sequential protocol is preferred in all others.


Radiology | 2010

Kidney and Urinary Tract Imaging: Triple-Bolus Multidetector CT Urography as a One-Stop Shop—Protocol Design, Opacification, and Image Quality Analysis

Maka Kekelidze; Roy S. Dwarkasing; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Karolina Sikorska; Paul C.M.S. Verhagen; Gabriel P. Krestin

PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate renal, vascular, and urinary tract visualization following a single postcontrast multidetector computed tomographic (CT) urographic sequence performed with three limited-volume bolus injections. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Patient informed consent was waived. Triple-bolus multidetector CT urography was performed in 110 patients. Triple-bolus protocol consisted of 30 mL of contrast material at 2 mL/sec at 0 seconds, 50 mL at 1.5 mL/sec at 435 seconds, 65 mL at 3 mL/sec at 488 seconds, with total abdominal scanning time of 510 seconds. Two independent readers rated urinary tract opacification and qualitatively and quantitatively assessed renal parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement. Upper urinary tract (UUT) distention was measured by one reader. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using kappa statistics. RESULTS Complete opacification of the intrarenal collecting system and proximal ureter was achieved in 91% (184 of 202) (kappa = 0.62) and 82% (166 of 202) (kappa = 0.94) of segments, respectively. The distal ureter was not opacified in 21% of the cases (kappa = 0.92), and the bladder was not opacified in 20% of the cases. Mean distention was higher for proximal (3.9 mm) than for distal (3.7 mm) segments. Image quality of renal parenchymal enhancement was excellent in 76% of cases. Arteries showed better contrast enhancement than veins (excellent rating in 89% vs 59% of the cases). Radiation dose calculated for triple-bolus acquisition was 9.8 mSv. CONCLUSION Triple-bolus multidetector CT urography is a dose-efficient protocol acquiring corticomedullary-nephrographic-excretory and vascular enhancement phases in a single acquisition and provides sufficient opacification and distention of the UUT. Simultaneously, adequate image quality of renal parenchyma and vascular anatomy is achieved.


European Journal of Echocardiography | 2013

Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve

Alexia Rossi; André Uitterdijk; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Ernst Klotz; Anoeshka S. Dharampal; Marcel van Straten; Wim J. van der Giessen; Nico R. Mollet; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Gabriel P. Krestin; Dirk J. Duncker; Pim J. de Feyter; Daphne Merkus

AIMS Only few preliminary experimental studies demonstrated the feasibility of adenosine stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging to calculate the absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), thereby providing information whether a coronary stenosis is flow limiting. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine whether adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging by Dual Source CT (DSCT) enables non-invasive quantification of regional MBF in an animal model with various degrees of coronary flow reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS In seven pigs, a coronary flow probe and an adjustable hydraulic occluder were placed around the left anterior descending coronary artery to monitor the distal coronary artery blood flow (CBF) while several degrees of coronary flow reduction were induced. CT perfusion (CT-MBF) was acquired during adenosine stress with no CBF reduction, an intermediate (15-39%) and a severe (40-95%) CBF reduction. Reference standards were CBF and fractional flow reserve measurements (FFR). FFR was simultaneously derived from distal coronary artery pressure and aortic pressure measurements. CT-MBF decreased progressively with increasing CBF reduction severity from 2.68 (2.31-2.81)mL/g/min (normal CBF) to 1.96 (1.83-2.33) mL/g/min (intermediate CBF-reduction) and to 1.55 (1.14-2.06)mL/g/min (severe CBF-reduction) (both P < 0.001). We observed very good correlations between CT-MBF and CBF (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) and CT-MBF and FFR (r = 0.85, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Adenosine stress DSCT myocardial perfusion imaging allows quantification of regional MBF under various degrees of CBF reduction.


European Radiology | 2007

Multi-detector row computed tomography angiography of peripheral arterial disease

Marc C. J. M. Kock; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Peter M. T. Pattynama; M. G. Myriam Hunink

With the introduction of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT), scan speed and image quality has improved considerably. Since the longitudinal coverage is no longer a limitation, multi-detector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) is increasingly used to depict the peripheral arterial runoff. Hence, it is important to know the advantages and limitations of this new non-invasive alternative for the reference test, digital subtraction angiography. Optimization of the acquisition parameters and the contrast delivery is important to achieve a reliable enhancement of the entire arterial runoff in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) using fast CT scanners. The purpose of this review is to discuss the different scanning and injection protocols using 4-, 16-, and 64-detector row CT scanners, to propose effective methods to evaluate and to present large data sets, to discuss its clinical value and major limitations, and to review the literature on the validity, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of multi-detector row CT in the evaluation of PAD.


Osteoarthritis and Cartilage | 2011

Clinically applied CT arthrography to measure the sulphated glycosaminoglycan content of cartilage

Michiel Siebelt; J. van Tiel; J.H. Waarsing; T.M. Piscaer; M. van Straten; Ronald Booij; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; G.J. Kleinrensink; J.A.N. Verhaar; Gabriel P. Krestin; Harrie Weinans; E.H. Oei

OBJECTIVE Similar to delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage, it might be possible to image cartilage quality using CT arthrography (CTa). This study assessed the potential of CTa as a clinically applicable tool to evaluate cartilage quality in terms of sulphated glycosaminoglycan content (sGAG) and structural composition of the extra-cellular matrix (ECM). METHODS Eleven human cadaveric knee joints were scanned on a clinical CT scanner. Of each knee joint, a regular non-contrast CT (ncCT) and an ioxaglate injected CTa scan were performed. Mean X-ray attenuation of both scans was compared to identify contrast influx in seven anatomical regions of interest (ROIs). All ROIs were rescanned with contrast-enhanced μCT, which served as the reference standard for sGAG content. Mean X-ray attenuation from both ncCT and CTa were correlated with μCT results and analyzed with linear regression. Additionally, residual values from the linear fit between ncCT and μCT were used as a covariate measure to identify the influence of structural composition of cartilage ECM on contrast diffusion into cartilage in CTa scans. RESULTS CTa resulted in higher X-ray attenuation in cartilage compared to ncCT scans for all anatomical regions. Furthermore, CTa correlated excellent with reference μCT values (sGAG) (R=0.86; R(2)=0.73; P<0.0001). When corrected for structural composition of cartilage ECM, this correlation improved substantially (R=0.95; R(2)=0.90; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Contrast diffusion into articular cartilage detected with CTa correlates with sGAG content and to a lesser extent with structural composition of cartilage ECM. CTa may be clinically applicable to quantitatively measure the quality of articular cartilage.


Investigative Radiology | 2014

Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow.

Atsushi Kono; Adriaan Coenen; Marisa M. Lubbers; Akira Kurata; Alexia Rossi; Anoeshka S. Dharampal; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Gabriel P. Krestin; Koen Nieman

ObjectivesQuantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by computed tomography (CT) was recently introduced to calculate myocardial blood flow (MBF). Because absolute MBF thresholds may be affected by technique, methodology, and the microvasculature, we investigated whether a relative measure of MBF improves accuracy to identify hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Materials and MethodsIn this prospective study, 42 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.3[8.7] years; 8 women) with suspected or known coronary disease underwent dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine vasodilation, before invasive angiography (coronary angiography) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). Within each myocardial territory MBF, the MBF relative to remote myocardium (MBFratio) was calculated and compared with coronary angiography and FFR. ResultsOf the 91 vessels interrogated by FFR (median, 0.81; interquartile range, 0.73–0.94), 45 vessels (49%) had an FFR value lower than 0.8 and were considered hemodynamically significant. Hyperemic MBF was lower in ischemic territories: 75.6 ± 22.5 mL per 100 mL/min versus 98.3 ± 23.1 mL per 100 mL/min (P < 0.0001). The MBFratio correlated better with FFR (P = 0.76) than the absolute MBF did (P = 0.52). Receiver operating curve analysis showed better discrimination by MBFratio: area under the curve of 0.85 versus 0.75 (P = 0.02). The MBF of remote myocardium varied between 60.7 and 167.2 mL per 100 mL/min and was lower in patients without heart rate acceleration (P = 0.0035). ConclusionsThe MBFratio seems to better identify hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease than does the absolute MBF determined by dynamic CT perfusion imaging. This may be caused by microvascular status or related to the methodology.


Journal of Neurology | 2008

Is a fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery a risk factor for TIA or ischemic stroke? : A study with 16-multidetector-row CT angiography

Cécile de Monyé; Diederik W.J. Dippel; Theodora A. M. Siepman; Marcel L. Dijkshoorn; Hervé L. J. Tanghe; Aad van der Lugt

Background and purposeFetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) is not uncommon. Whether patients with this anomaly have a higher risk of ischemic stroke in the territory of the PCA is not known. The clinical benefit of screening for a fetal origin in patients with TIA or stroke in the territory of the PCA and an ipsilateral atherosclerotic carotid stenosis is not clear. This study assessed the frequency of a fetal origin of the PCA in patients with a TIA or infarct in the territory of the PCA with 16-multidetector-row CT angiography (CTA).Methods82 patients (52 male; mean age = 64; range 19 to 90 years) with isolated homonymous hemianopia and/or a PCA infarct underwent CTA of the carotid artery and circle of Willis.ResultsA fetal origin of the PCA at the symptomatic side was present in 14 patients (17 %) and at the asymptomatic side in 18 patients (22%) (OR: 0.7; 95 % CI: 0.3 to 1.7). Severity of stenosis (NASCET criteria) of the ICA at the symptomatic side was < 30%, 30–49% and ≥ 50% in 72, 2 and 8 patients, respectively. Number and frequency of a fetal origin in these groups were 12 (17 %), 0 (0%) and 2 (25 %), respectively. There was no association between a severe carotid stenosis and a fetal origin of the PCA at the symptomatic side.ConclusionThis study does not provide arguments for an increased risk of ischemic stroke in the territory of the PCA in patients with a fetal origin of the PCA. A few patients with a TIA or infarct in the territory of the PCA have a fetal origin of the PCA in combination with a high-grade stenosis of the ipsilateral ICA, but not more often than one would expect from chance. Nevertheless, these patients may benefit from carotid endarterectomy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marcel L. Dijkshoorn's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriel P. Krestin

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Koen Nieman

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nico R. Mollet

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annick C. Weustink

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pim J. de Feyter

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexia Rossi

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Filippo Cademartiri

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcel van Straten

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adriaan Coenen

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marisa M. Lubbers

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge