Maryam Hajbabaei
University of California, Riverside
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maryam Hajbabaei.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2012
Maryam Hajbabaei; Kent Johnson; Robert A. Okamoto; Alexander Mitchell; Marcie Pullman; Thomas D. Durbin
The impact of biodiesel and second generation biofuels on nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) emissions from heavy-duty engines was investigated using a California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified diesel fuel. Two heavy-duty engines, a 2006 engine with no exhaust aftertreatment, and a 2007 engine with a diesel particle filter (DPF), were tested on an engine dynamometer over four different test cycles. Emissions from soy- and animal-based biodiesels, a hydrotreated renewable diesel, and a gas to liquid (GTL) fuel were evaluated at blend levels from 5 to 100%. NO(x) emissions consistently increased with increasing biodiesel blend level, while increasing renewable diesel and GTL blends showed NO(x) emissions reductions with blend level. NO(x) increases ranged from 1.5% to 6.9% for B20, 6.4% to 18.2% for B50, and 14.1% to 47.1% for B100. The soy-biodiesel showed higher NO(x) emissions increases compared to the animal-biodiesel. NO(x) emissions neutrality with the CARB diesel was achieved by blending GTL or renewable diesel fuels with various levels of biodiesel or by using di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP). It appears that the impact of biodiesel on NO(x) emissions might be a more important consideration when blended with CARB diesel or similar fuels, and that some form of NO(x) mitigation might be needed for biodiesel blends with such fuels.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2015
Georgios Karavalakis; Daniel Short; Diep Vu; R. Robert Russell; Maryam Hajbabaei; Akua Asa-Awuku; Thomas D. Durbin
We assessed the emissions response of a fleet of seven light-duty gasoline vehicles for gasoline fuel aromatic content while operating over the LA92 driving cycle. The test fleet consisted of model year 2012 vehicles equipped with spark-ignition (SI) and either port fuel injection (PFI) or direct injection (DI) technology. Three gasoline fuels were blended to meet a range of total aromatics targets (15%, 25%, and 35% by volume) while holding other fuel properties relatively constant within specified ranges, and a fourth fuel was formulated to meet a 35% by volume total aromatics target but with a higher octane number. Our results showed statistically significant increases in carbon monoxide, nonmethane hydrocarbon, particulate matter (PM) mass, particle number, and black carbon emissions with increasing aromatics content for all seven vehicles tested. Only one vehicle showed a statistically significant increase in total hydrocarbon emissions. The monoaromatic hydrocarbon species that were evaluated showed increases with increasing aromatic content in the fuel. Changes in fuel composition had no statistically significant effect on the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), formaldehyde, or acetaldehyde. A good correlation was also found between the PM index and PM mass and number emissions for all vehicle/fuel combinations with the total aromatics group being a significant contributor to the total PM index followed by naphthalenes and indenes.
International Journal of Engine Research | 2013
Maryam Hajbabaei; Kent C. Johnson; Jim Guthrie; Thomas D. Durbin
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has regulated the properties of diesel fuel sold in California since 1988 to lower emissions of particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Although many studies have shown that reduced levels of aromatics and higher cetane numbers can improve emissions, the actual impact of CARB fuels on in-use diesel emissions has not yet been extensively studied, especially as diesel engine and aftertreatment technology has evolved over the years. This study evaluates the differences between California and Federal diesel fuels with heavy-duty engine and chassis dynamometer tests. The engine dynamometer results showed that NOx emissions for the Federal fuels ranged from 4.7% to 9.5% higher than the CARB diesel. These NOx reductions are similar to the estimates being used in the latest regulations. The chassis dynamometer test results did not show as consistent trends for NOx as those seen for the engine dynamometer testing. For the chassis dynamometer testing, four out of ten vehicles showed consistent reductions in NOx, with emissions for the Federal fuels ranging from 3.3% to 9.9% higher than the CARB diesel, while the other six vehicles did not show consistent fuel impacts. On an absolute level, the NOx benefit for CARB diesel shows a decline with continuing advances in engine technology. The results showed that CARB diesel did not show strong benefits for PM. The results also showed that the introduction of aftertreatment systems for PM and NOx will, over time, largely eliminate any potential benefits that might be obtained through the use of CARB diesel, although NOx benefits will persist through to 2020.
Energy | 2013
Maryam Hajbabaei; Georgios Karavalakis; Kent C. Johnson; Linda Lee; Thomas D. Durbin
Fuel Processing Technology | 2014
Maryam Hajbabaei; Georgios Karavalakis; Kent C. Johnson; Jim Guthrie; Alexander Mitchell; Thomas D. Durbin
Fuel | 2013
Maryam Hajbabaei; Georgios Karavalakis; J. Wayne Miller; Mark Villela; Karen Huaying Xu; Thomas D. Durbin
SAE 2013 World Congress & Exhibition | 2013
George Karavalakis; Daniel Short; Maryam Hajbabaei; Diep Vu; Mark Villela; R. Robert Russell; Thomas D. Durbin; Akua Asa-Awuku
SAE 2013 World Congress & Exhibition | 2013
George Karavalakis; Nicholas Gysel; Maryam Hajbabaei; Thomas D. Durbin; Kent C. Johnson; Wayne Miller
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants | 2012
George Karavalakis; Maryam Hajbabaei; Thomas D. Durbin; Zhongqing Zheng; Kent C. Johnson
SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition | 2016
George Karavalakis; Yu Jiang; Jiacheng Yang; Maryam Hajbabaei; Kent C. Johnson; Thomas D. Durbin