Matthew Lassiter
Photronics, Inc.
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Matthew Lassiter.
20th European Conference on Mask Technology for Integrated Circuits and Microcomponents | 2004
Michael Cangemi; Darren Taylor; Matthew Lassiter
Alternating phase shift masks (alt. PSM) are emerging as an attractive resolution enhancement technique. Although alt. PSM is a technique that clearly improves resolution, there are some inherent disadvantages that are induced by the manufacturing process. Intensity imbalance, phase non-uniformity and quartz defects diminish the performance of an alternating PSM. Many of these disadvantages can be a result of imprecise quartz etching. By implementing a transparent etch stop layer, these deficiencies can be minimized. The etch stop layer ensures that all of the quartz is etched and that over-etching will not induce a phase-shift error. This produces improved phase uniformity and eliminates quartz defects. The etch stop layer also has the ability to improve the image intensity balancing by reducing the intensity through the zero degree region. This paper discusses the advantages and manufacturability of alt. PSM using a transparent etch stop layer.
23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology | 2003
Matthew Lassiter; Michael Cangemi; Darren Taylor
One of the major challenges in alternating aperture phase shift mask (AAPSM) production is the variability of the glass etch rate as a function of exposed area (pattern loading) on the mask. The lack of an endpoint system means that the etch is entirely based on time, and the result is increased variability in the mean etch depth as well as decreased yields against ever tightening phase specifications. If a transmissive etch stop layer were placed underneath an appropriate thickness of glass to obtain a 180-degree phase shift, the result is a forced endpoint at exactly 180 degrees every time. Such a film system also leads to many process advantages over conventional AAPSM processes. This paper discusses the film stack deposition and maskmaking at Photronics, Inc. and details the process advantages of using AAPSM blanks with etch stop layers.
23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology | 2003
Darren Taylor; Matthew Lassiter; Michael Cangemi
Current commercially available 193nm Embedded Attenuated Phase Shift Mask (EAPSM) blanks are MoSiON-based. In order to obtain the appropriate optical properties of 6% transmission and 180-degree phase shift at 193nm wavelength, these films are built very thin and subsequently have very high transmission at longer wavelengths. Current inspection tools use 364nm as the inspection wavelength; therefore the high transmission of the commercial blanks (>50% at 365nm) causes sensitivity problems in current high-end inspection tools. This problem is only fixed by costly upgrades to the current inspection tools, resulting in much higher mask costs. Photronics, Inc. has developed an alternative film stack that obtains the appropriate optical properties at 193nm (6%T and 180-degree phase shift). This film stack has a relatively low transmission (<15%) at the inspection tool wavelength in comparison to the commercial blanks enabling improved inspection performance with the current tool set. This paper outlines the development of new 193nm EAPSM blanks, the processing of these masks, and the resulting inspection performance in comparison to the commercial EAPSM blanks.
SPIE's 27th Annual International Symposium on Microlithography | 2002
Darren Taylor; Matthew Lassiter; Benjamin George Eynon; Douglas Van Den Broeke; J. Fung Chen
The Chromeless Phase Shift Mask (CLM) approach from ASML MaskTools has been developed as an approach to achieve sub-100nm lithography using currently available stepper technology. The technology uses sub-resolution gray-scaled regions of zero-phase and pi-phase quartz on the mask to produce effective feature widths well below 100nm at the wafer. The features on the mask consist entirely of etched and unetched quartz. No features consist of chrome on the mask. The integration of this type of phase shift mask technology into the photomask-manufacturing environment requires that the mask manufacturer be able to inspect the mask for defects in the quartz. The Defect Sensitivity Monitor (DSM) pattern was used to construct a CLM mask. The mask was inspected using commercially available inspection platforms, and the resulting inspection capability is reported.
Photomask and next-generation lithography mask technology. Conference | 2002
Matthew Lassiter; Benjamin George Eynon
There are several different methods for printing contact holes on wafers using optical lithography. A preferred resolution enhancement technique for improved contact hole lithography performance is the embedded attenuated phase shift mask (EAPSM). The EAPSM comes in many flavors and forms, but the current preferred form is a film transmission of 6 percent and a phase shift of 180 degrees relative to the clear fused silica areas. It is important to note that the phase shift and transmission values for the phase shift mask are at the actinic exposure wavelength of the wafer stepper/scanner. That is the mask is designed to have a transmission of 6 percent and phase shift of 180-degrees at 248nm or 193nm, depending on the wafer stepper. The resulting transmission of the phase shift mask at the inspection tool wavelength of 365nm is much higher, and the phase shift of the 365nm radiation is significantly less than at the shorter actinic wavelength. The gray-scaled aerial images that are collected by the mask inspection tool could vary significantly for the same size 2-D feature in the binary mask, the 248nm EAPSM, and the 193nm EAPSM. This is also compounded by the fact that the inspection tool calibrates the background transmission of the phase shift material as 0 percent transmission and calibrates the transmission of the fused silica as 100 percent transmission. When these gray-scaled images are used in an energy flux algorithm for contact area measurement, they can be potentially different for each of the three types of masks used to print contact holes. This paper explores the issues involved in using an off-actinic aerial image as the basis for the AVI method of contact sizing.
Archive | 2003
Patrick M. Martin; Matthew Lassiter; Darren Taylor; Michael Cangemi; Eric Poortinga
Archive | 2002
Matthew Lassiter; Michael Cangemi
Archive | 2003
Matthew Lassiter; Michael Cangemi
Optical Microlithography XVII | 2004
Neal Lafferty; Geert Vandenberghe; Bruce W. Smith; Matthew Lassiter; Patrick M. Martin
Archive | 2004
Michael Cangemi; Matthew Lassiter; Patrick M. Martin; Eric Poortinga; Darren Taylor